100percentfedup.com
My Theory About Trump and The Epstein Files CONFIRMED
Yesterday I brought you this report where I told you what I think is really going on with the Epstein Files.
Why President Trump campaigned hard on releasing them but has now completely flipped.
Why?
Is it because he’s in them?
No, I don’t believe that for one second.
Here’s what I think is actually happening:
Here’s What I Think Is Actually Happening With The “Epstein Files”
And Glenn Beck just confirmed it this morning in a new video. Or at least he confirmed his theory is exactly the same as mine.
Essentially, the destabilizing effects of releasing the true information would vastly outweigh whatever is gained.
I'm not saying I agree with that, but I am saying I think this is what the Intelligence Community has pushed on President Trump and I think he's deciding to take the path of least upheaval right now, prioritizing other things in his agenda vs. blowing up the world over this.
Here's Glenn Beck telling you essentially the same thing -- watch this short clip:
My Theory About Trump and The Epstein Files CONFIRMED pic.twitter.com/BY4jL5FWop
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) July 9, 2025
FULL TRANSCRIPT:
Okay.
Let's uh say hello to uh Stu and also to uh Jason Buttrill.
And let me start here.
Yesterday uh the president said something I thought a little shocking in the press conference. Uh while he was in a press conference with Pam Bondi—it was not a press conference, it was a uh a cabinet meeting.
Uh and by the way, this press conference lasted about 2 hours, which is longer than I believe all of the uh cabinet meetings uh that Joe Biden held over 4 years, all of them combined. I think just the press conference in that cabinet room was longer.
Um but uh he—he starts out and one of the first questions is about Epstein and goes to Pam Bondi.
And the president stops dead in her tracks and—do we have the audio please? Here's what he said:
[Unnamed Reporter]Named Jeffrey Epstein—yes, it left some lingering mysteries. One of the biggest ones is whether he ever worked for an American or foreign intelligence agency.
Um, the former labor secretary, who was uh Miami U.S. Attorney, um Alex Acosta, he a—allegedly said that he did work for an intelligence agency. So could you resolve whether or not he did?
And also, could you say why there is a minute missing from the jailhouse tape on the night of the Senate hearing?
[President Trump]Yeah sure, if I could—Hey Pam, could I just interrupt for one second? Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking—we have Texas, we have this, we have all of the things we—yeah.
And are people still talking about this guy? This creep? That is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time and do you feel like answering?
[Pam Bondi]I—I don't mind answering but—
[President Trump]I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this when we're having some of the greatest success and—and also tragedy with what happened in Texas. It just seems uh like a desecration.
[Commentator]Okay. That seemed odd to me because he ran on Jeffrey Epstein. He ran on "I'm gonna uh release everything."
So there's a couple of ways to look at this.
He feels he did release everything, there's nothing to see here. Um—and if that is true, then uh quite honestly, I stand by what I said yesterday: Pam Bondi should be fired for the way she rolled this out.
It was horrible. It's one of the worst uh rollouts of quote-unquote "the truth" I've ever seen.
Um you know just the—just just just the videotape alone.
Now she came out and she said, "Well there's that one minute." Okay, that's fine. That one minute I don't think is enough to show—you know—anything.
Uh it was edited, we thought yesterday, and she said it comes out and uh every year or every day there's a reset just before midnight.
I checked with uh you know security experts—that's absolutely true.
Um not all systems do that, but some systems do. There's a whole bunch of things we could go down that road on, but uh we don't need to.
But why wouldn't you say that? Why would you n—how did you miss that one minute?
Okay.
Uh second thing—it's not pointing at the door. It shows nothing. It shows nothing.
But we can nick—nitpick for every—you know—for everything.
I personally think we have seen a massive change in the White House and in the uh—the way this was being handled.
At first, "We're gonna release everything." Um—and then "I have it on my desk. Then I have it on my desk and I'm gonna release it by probably tomorrow."
And then when that didn't happen, then it was the FBI in New York. This is all Pam Bondi.
"The FBI in New York is thwarting our efforts and there are people in New York that are—that are trying to keep this information away from us."
And now there's nothing.
Nobody was arrested for trying to keep information away from her.
Wh—what is that?
It—it—that's mass incompetence. Mass incompetence.
So she should be fired. He's not gonna fire her.
Um because I think there's also something else going on.
I think—you know—and people are like, "Well that's that—you know—Donald Trump. It's 'cause he's—his name is in it."
No no no, it's not.
If you believe Donald Trump, the guy has models hanging off of every single finger uh that he has.
If he wants the models, he's got the models—and they're all over age.
And it doesn't seem to me that he's ever shown any—any—I mean just—that's stupid to believe that he would be with a 15-year-old girl. Stupid.
Um, are there people like that? Yeah. I don't think he's one of them.
Um and he had a falling out with Jeffrey Epstein and everything else, so I just don't believe that that is the deal.
And—and uh you know, I think you're wildly misguided if you do—to each his own, I guess.
Uh now, do I think possibly happened?
I personally believe that he was a—an operative. I think he was an intelligence operative.
And uh you know, you can say all you want but when you're president of the United States and the intelligence agencies come to you and sit you down and say, "Okay, here's what happens Mr. President when you release this."
You have—let's just say he—there wasn't 5,000 people involved. There was 4.
One of them was Prince Andrew.
Okay.
So um, all right, go ahead—release that.
You know what that says?
That says that he was an operative working for us and Prince Andrew was caught in this honey trap.
So now the United States of America just took one of their biggest, oldest allies and roped this guy into a honey trap.
For what?
For what, Mr. President?
"For what? I don't know for what."
Yeah well maybe we got nothing out of that, but this was a CIA oper—uh operation and it just happened to backfire on our biggest ally.
Do you think the world is gonna stand for that with everything else that we've done?
No, I don't.
Now I don't know—I don't know what decision I would make if I were president of the United States.
I would think—I would hope—that I would say, "Release it, 'cause we have to clean it up. Not my fault. Not my fault. Happened years ago. We're not doing it anymore and I'm making sure and the only way to make sure that we disinfect is to fire all the people that were involved."
Make sure that it doesn't happen again and make an example out of people.
That's what I would hope I would do.
That's what I would hope the president would do.
But I have a feeling that he's not afraid of him being exposed. He's not afraid of him being killed by the CIA.
I think he is making a decision that he believes is right for the country—but he's not gonna say that.
Now why would I s—why would I jump to this conclusion?
Because Donald Trump is a very, very, very smart guy.
And he knows how to handle the press and everything else.
Uh, what did he do?
Instead of saying, "Pam, you blew this rolling it out. Look America, there's nothing going on here. There's nothing going on. And I'm gonna get to work—you know—on other things. But I understand, 'cause we talked about it on the campaign trail. So I understand your interest in this, but there's nothing."
Instead what he said was:
"What a stupid question that is. Have you ever heard of a dumber question with all the stuff that's going on? Pam, do you even want to answer that dumb question?"
"Yeah, I'll take it Mr. President."
"I just"—I mean and then looking right at the reporter—"I can't believe you even asked that question. What a stupid question that is."
What did he just do?
He made sure in that room there was only one question about Epstein.
Had he not done that, there would've been follow-up questions.
What Donald Trump just did was single one reporter out and say:
"You're gonna be that stupid to ask that question?"
Now nobody wants to ask the follow-up question—and only a few people will.
Now I'm not a reporter.
We will continue to follow this story, but I have a feeling—
Until you have somebody like Shellenberger that are gonna dedicate their whole thing to uh exposing this—because I dothink there's stuff here—
Um but until you have Shellenberger or somebody like that going after it and—and uh and really doing—you know—24/7 kind of gumshoe work—
I don't think you're gonna find anything else.
Nothing else is coming from the government.
That was clear yesterday.
That's all you get.
That's it.
It's over.
Move on.
I don't suggest we move on,
Full video here:
Here was my original report from yesterday -- looks like we nailed it again!
See especially Option #2 below.
Here's What I Think Is Actually Happening With The "Epstein Files"
I've been giving the Jeffrey Epstein situation a ton of thought recently and especially today after President Trump lashed out at a reporter for daring to even ask about it.
Really bad look and it got my mind spinning even more about what could possibly be at play here.
President Trump Lashes Out: “I can’t believe you’re really asking me about Epstein!”
I see two possible options...
Let me lay these out and you can let me know in the Comments Section if you think a third option is more likely, but here are the only two I can think of.
Option 1: Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino have been compromised. Most likely threats to their families. That's about the only thing that explains how all three of these people could do such a radical 180, which is contradictory to everything they've said in the past and contradictory to their character. I don't think President Trump can be compromised so I have to assume he's simply not aware, hasn't been read in, and he's so focused on everything else he is doing that quite frankly he's pissed off that Epstein is overshadowing all of his accomplishments.
I think all of that fits together pretty well as a cohesive idea.
Option 2: I had previously been in the Option 1 camp up until today, but seeing how President Trump responded today when asked about Epstein, it is very clear he wants to drop this like a hot potato and never come back to it. Why? The only conclusion I can come to is that the Epstein Files entrapped so many high-ranking officials that if the truth came out that we are truly being "governed by pedophiles" (as the meme says) -- if that truly came out as real and confirmed -- and it was something like 95% of Washington, D.C. it would destabilize the nation to a point where President Trump is not willing to take that risk.
Option 3: I suppose Option 3 is just that all of them, including Trump and/or his buddies, are in the Epstein Files and this is simply a cover-up of epic proportions. This contradicts everything I know about President Trump, so I don't consider this likely or even plausible.
Let's go back to Option 2 for a minute, because I'm starting to move into this camp. It's just about the only thing that explains everything.
I can already hear you saying "But Noah, that's what we want! Do it! That sounds great!"
And I'm with you. I agree with you.
But President Trump has to make decisions based on what he thinks is best for the Nation, not what he personally wants.
He's demonstrated in the past that's what he will do.
He could very easily have locked up Hillary Clinton in 2016, but he has stated publicly he didn't think that was best for the Nation. It would have been best for him, but not best for the Nation.
I can only assume that not only is President Trump fully read in, and fully in control, but that he war-gamed this out with his officials and likely with AI tools far powerful than anything you or I have access to, and the conclusion has resounded come back that fully unveiling the depths of depravity and scope of the Epstein Files would destabilize this Nation and cause too great a risk to take.
In other words, the red-pilling would be too much, too fast.
You and I would be fine. We'd stand up and cheer.
But too big a chunk of this country is still asleep.
Their cognitive dissonance would be off the charts and many simply wouldn't be able to cope.
Others would respond with lynch mobs and "they won't be able to walk the streets" will become reality.
As great as that might sound from a justice perspective, President Trump doesn't want mass instability.
He has an agenda to implement, and this would completely derail his second term.
That's my take.
That's my read on this.
That's the only way I can square everything I am seeing with my eyes.
Your thoughts?
New Posts (Home)
ChatBox
Popular Posts 
Game Zone
Top PodCasts
Rumble
