100percentfedup.com
DEEP DIVE: Did We All See An EXIT Wound Or An ENTRANCE Wound? — It’s JFK All Over Again!
Ok folks, I have sat on this story for 3 days now because I have been digging into it and researching and did not want to publish this prematurely.
I still have more questions than answers, but I think we have to at least ask this question now: Was Charlie Kirk’s neck wound we all saw and the gushing blood an entrance wound or an exit wound?
Seems crazy to even ask right?
Yes, at least until you start digging in and then you realize there seems to be perhaps more evidence for it being an exit wound than for the narrative we have all been fed.
I’ll show you and then I’ll let YOU decide what you think…and we can all keep researching this together.
I’ll start with my friend Mike Adams, the HealthRanger who asks this very respectful question, pointing out that a 30-06 rifle would leave a huge exit wound and almost certainly blood all over the back white wall. And yet…we don’t have either of those things:
I don’t mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn’t we be asking why there doesn’t appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from…
— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) September 14, 2025
I don’t mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn’t we be asking why there doesn’t appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from the roof with a front-facing shot, there would be unmistakable blood splatter directly behind Charlie. A 30-06 rifle round would have traveled all the way through the flesh and would have made a very large exit path, carrying blood and tissue with it. Again, apologies for being graphic, but I don’t know any other way to ask this question. It’s just that this is one more thing that isn’t adding up. And like you, I just want answers. I want to know who did this.
More here:
Are they concealing the camera footage from behind Charlie because it shows either no exit wound or damage inconsistent with a .30-06 caliber round?
Where’s the exit wound blood splatter?
It reeks of a cover-up!
This guy showed up and removed the camera right after Charlie… pic.twitter.com/6b9wAIhMsS
— Red Pill USA (@Red_Pill_US) September 16, 2025
No blood of any kind on the back white wall.
Within 15 minutes the rear camera is dismounted and taken away, not by authorities.
This is the heart of the crime scene and it’s almost immediately cleaned up and no blood found at all.
THIS IS THE BLOOD WALL.
Workers are pressed up against the very spot where their boss’s blood would have splattered during the assassination.
They’re not looking at it. Not cautious. Not even wary.
This is literally the crime scene immediately after a political assassination.… pic.twitter.com/AYPTA96QMX
— HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) September 15, 2025
I want to be very clear I am not accusing anyone specifically in the crowd, just trying to get angles and trajectories and asking questions about things that don’t make sense.
The more you study the videos and the more angles you look at, it sure does seem like Charlie was shot close up, from his right:
This is by far the most convincing video I have seen.
-It seems we likely saw the exit wound in the front left side of the neck.
-It makes far more sense Charlie was shot from his right side slightly behind near the outside staircase.
-Even the sound/reaction & was… pic.twitter.com/1K6mSXTeGl
— cat (@iamacat9000) September 15, 2025
More here:
They bullet is in the ground they are concreting as we speak. The neck wound was the exit. Charlie was shot from the right rear pic.twitter.com/TuZL0GxMmo
— Tribulation Times (@trib_times) September 15, 2025
I apologize for the graphic nature of this video, but this shows it pretty well:
The more I watch this the more I see the bullet entering from above his right ear, our left as we look on it, the exit wound is through his neck.
The shooter was not on the roof, that guy was jsut a distraction. pic.twitter.com/UXoiyrtbYP
— ᒍᥱꙆɩᥒᥲ (@jelinaangelll) September 17, 2025
Why has no one shown us the footage from this camera?
Mark it down folks, you will NEVER see what this camera recorded:
I am 99% certain this is an exit wound.
This camera, which was the first taken down and footage we haven’t seen, is probably the most important video evidence that we know of. pic.twitter.com/vWt6baYIKI
— Owen Shroyer (@OwenShroyer1776) September 17, 2025
WE NEED TO SEE THIS CAMERA:
THIS is why they are hiding the “Tent Camera” in the Charlie Kirk assassination!
That camera has the PROOF and all info needed to know what really happened here.
Disregard the circle and jut look at the VIEW! pic.twitter.com/QpRSrqRUOP
— In2ThinAir (@In2ThinAir) September 15, 2025
This video breaks it down REALLY well…
Watch this:
For a longer breakdown, this is really good too.
Watch here:
I swear to God almighty, the FBI is lying.
The government is lying to us.
That is an exit wound on the front of his neck.
Before you get mad, or angry, because I am questioning the narrative, watch the video.
Please share. pic.twitter.com/xi6rOyFMw8
— Jason Coursey (@JasonCoursey) September 16, 2025
Make it make sense…
MJTruth is spot on here:
UPDATE: Charlie Kirk
5 Minutes after Charlie was Shot, a Man is Spotted removing the overhead Video Camera, Directly over Charlie Kirk’s Head
This is an active crime scene… blood everywhere… and he’s standing in it? Why is he removing anything? Was he standing on top of the… https://t.co/58Njh4kZrz pic.twitter.com/VAvScODSyW
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 15, 2025
And meanwhile, they’ve already paved over the crime scene?
Is that normal?
Why would you do that?
Update: Charlie Kirk
Construction work underway where Charlie Kirk was assassinated
My Thoughts… Not really sure what to feel about it… I personally feel like enough time has passed for them to do their investigation, but the construction just feels awfully soon.
This… https://t.co/EJ9PJU0YTj pic.twitter.com/NoalPz06yq
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 15, 2025
Then you have this…
Have you seen this?
This kid was giving an eye-witness testimony about what he saw and he was almost immediately cut off and manhandled:
Charlie Kirk’s security made hand signals the exact moment he got shot.
Charlie kirk’s employees silenced eye witnesses.
This stinks. pic.twitter.com/psloB82QxY
— ADAM (@AdameMedia) September 15, 2025
Why not let him speak?
That is REALLY weird!
Many are saying it was a palm pistol and I want to make clear I am not accusing anyone of anything:
It was a palm pistol: https://t.co/bMNUdYThCg pic.twitter.com/VF9xakztL1
— Val Venis (The Big Valbowski) (@ValVenisEnt) September 15, 2025
Folks, my head is spinning but I can no longer ignore all of this.
Help me out, what do you think?