The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) resumed their policy of deporting illegal aliens to poverty-stricken nations willing to take in the worst of the worst -- sending at least five “criminal illegal aliens” to Eswatini in Southern Africa.

The real reason the West keeps saving the Islamic Republic. The post Glazov Gang: Throwing the Mullahs a Lifeline Yet Again appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

If you’re an originalist or a conservative, there’s a basic rule of thumb when it comes to judicial appointees: If you don’t have a track record as an originalist or a conservative, when you enter the bench, there’s a good shot that very, very soon you will swivel to the Left. This is also true in the world of universities. It’s also true in the world of Hollywood.  If you go to Hollywood and you don’t have an abundantly clear, long-standing track record as a religious conservative who stood stalwart in the face of left-wing aggression, there’s a good shot that pretty quickly you are going to cave because the pressure to be eaten up by the social values of the Left in Hollywood is so extreme.  That is apparently what has happened with the Chip and Joanna Gaines show, “Back to the Frontier.” They present themselves as devout Christians, and a lot of their fans are Christian and faith-based. But the new series features a gay couple with adopted children, and a lot of people are upset with Chip and Joanna Gaines because of this. They’re saying, “Hold up a second. You purport to be religious Christians, and this is a show that I would normally watch with my family. But now here you are normalizing what is — by any sort of traditional Christian theology — sinful behavior.” If you’re a secular person and you’re not a Christian, none of this may matter to you, but the reality is that people who are traditionally faithful to Scripture believe that one man, one woman, and their children should be the basic standard for how families form. So, for Christians who have made their money on being Christians, to actually now start infusing their shows with left-wing social values is a problem.  The idea of the show is that they’re going to replicate the conditions of homesteading back on the range in the late 19th century.  The gay couple on the show is Joe Riggs and Jason Hannah. Riggs told the Dallas Morning News that the show was an “opportunity to put ourselves out there and help normalize families like ours.” That, of course, is the goal whenever Hollywood does something like this: to say that all forms of family are morally the same. This goes all the way back to the early 1990s, when in “Mrs. Doubtfire,” you had Robin Williams lecturing the American public that all forms of families were essentially morally equivalent.  Hannah opined, “When families like ours are visible, it opens doors for others to feel safe, loved, and validated. Visibility isn’t just about being seen; it’s about making sure no one feels alone.” Chip Gaines was inundated with complaints from his fan base because the Chip and Joanna Gaines fan base is Biblically loyal.  The complaints pointed out, “Listen, obviously this phenomenon exists in life. Gay marriage is legal in the United States, but that doesn’t mean that you as a creator, a person that we trust with our time and the fact that our kids watch your shows, should be mainlining left-wing social values into your shows.” Chip Gaines then called all those people intolerant, saying in a post to X, “Talk, ask [questions], listen.. maybe even learn. Too much to ask of modern American Christian culture. Judge 1st, understand later/never … It’s a sad sunday when ‘non believers’ have never been confronted with hate or vitriol until they are introduced to a modern American Christian.” The reality star ended the post with an emoji of a broken heart. Okay, dude. That is about the worst approach that you can take to your fan base.  Put aside the morality of what he’s saying, which is insipid. It turns out that traditional morality does draw lines between certain behaviors and other behaviors. It doesn’t mean you have to treat people badly. It doesn’t mean that you have to be insulting or awful to them.  But — if you are a traditional, religious person and you believe that traditional marriage is the way that God intended for the world to work and Nature designed the world to work — if that is what you believe, then you should stand by that, even when it is politically unpopular.  That doesn’t even mean that you can’t have friends who are violating your faith standards. All Judeo-Christian teaching teaches that everyone sins; that’s the normal way the world works.  But that does not mean that the sin itself becomes normalized, which is exactly what the show intends to do. Many of the followers of Chip and Joanna Gaines are not only upset with the fact that the show is featuring this sort of stuff, they’re upset with the fact that Chip is now sneering at them, looking down his nose at them, and suggesting that the real problem here is not that he has violated his own faith standards by promulgating a set of values that is unChristian, but that he believes that Christians themselves, by objecting to that promulgation, are thus demonstrating that they’re intolerant and vicious and mean by objecting to the normalization of what Christians consider to be sinful.  That is not mean or intolerant. That is simply saying there is a standard, and if you purport to be an upholder of that standard, you should abide by it. If Chip and Joanna Gaines were a secular couple who had never purported to be Christian, and they were making a show like this in Hollywood, no one would care. No one would bat an eye because the expectation would be different.  When you say that you are an adherent to a particular philosophy or a particular ideology — and this is true politically as well — and then you are disloyal to that idea, you should be called out. Chip and Joanna Gaines have made their money off American Christians who believe that Chip and Joanna Gaines are like them. They have been under fire for a long time. They were accused of being anti-LGBTQ. That’s because if you are a traditional Christian, Hollywood calls you a bigot and a homophobe. If we’re to be honest with each other as a civilization and as human beings, we should be able to be honest about what we perceive to be the actual moral standards that are being violated. And just because you have friends who violate the moral standard, that doesn’t mean that the moral standard ought to be obliterated, because then there’s no moral standard at all. Niceness and civility are not moral standards. They are good things, but they aren’t moral standards. They are not weight-bearing moral concepts. They are standards of behavior. And you need more than standards of behavior to build a civilization.  If you are tasked with upholding a standard, you should uphold that standard. If you betray the standard, you should be called out for that.  That is true politically. It is true with regard to religion. It’s true with regard to life more generally.  So I think Chip and Joanna Gaines owe their fans a major apology.  I talk about this cultural issue because it undergirds so much of politics and our social life together. That’s because two things can be true at once. One: You can hold a strong moral standard, a standard that matters. Two: You should be tolerant toward people in terms of how you treat them.  You can treat people nicely who don’t abide by your moral standards as long as they’re not actively hurting anybody else.  But that does not mean the moral standard itself should change.

An effort to mandate background checks for congressional staffers is facing bipartisan pushback, according to Congresswoman Kat Cammack. The Florida Republican, who is serving her third term in the House, discussed her resolution that aims to require background checks conducted by the U.S. Capitol Police with The Daily Wire’s Mary Margaret Olohan on Tuesday. “I think the American people deserve to know who’s working on their behalf,” Cammack said. “It’s pretty simple, but you would not believe the resistance that we’re getting.” Cammack, who introduced the measure last month, said the opposition is coming from both Republicans and Democrats. “I think that … speaks to all the more reason why we need to have these background checks in place. Why would you not want to know who is working in your office?” the congresswoman added. The resolution stipulates that background checks must be conducted within 30 days of employment or a new Congress, with the results disclosed only to office heads. Additionally, the measure requires employees to publicly report any foreign government payments or contracts from the past three years and their foreign citizenship status within 30 days of starting, effective from the current 119th Congress. Cammack asserted that it is “known” that Chinese spies and people with links to the Muslim Brotherhood, which Republican senators are pushing to designate as a terrorist organization, have infiltrated the offices of lawmakers. “It is absolutely remarkable the amount of foreign interference and influence that is in the halls of Congress today,” said the congresswoman. As it stands, House staffers are only required to have background checks when they go through the process of obtaining a security clearance, Cammack said when she first announced the resolution in June. In her conversation with The Daily Wire, Cammack emphasized that she is trying to set an example for her colleagues, noting that she already conducts background checks on her staff. “If someone wants to have someone in their team that had maybe a previous record, that’s entirely their prerogative,” Cammack said. She added, “When it comes to foreign interference, when it comes to dual citizenship, when it comes to having ties to organizations that have terrorist funding, you should know, and the American people should know.”

A top aide to former First Lady Jill Biden pleaded the Fifth Amendment at his deposition on Wednesday, opting not to answer any questions regarding former President Joe Biden’s health and cognitive state during his term in the White House. House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-KY) said that he’d only asked Anthony Bernal — Jill Biden’s chief of staff — two questions about the former president, and revealed that Bernal had pleaded the Fifth instead of offering an answer to either. ??? Anthony Bernal — Jill Biden’s Chief of Staff — just invoked the Fifth Amendment during his congressional deposition. This week new reporting confirms President Biden’s aides took unauthorized executive actions during his presidency amid his cognitive decline. It’s no… — Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) July 16, 2025 “Anthony Bernal — Jill Biden’s Chief of Staff — just invoked the Fifth Amendment during his congressional deposition,” Comer said, referencing a New York Times report that revealed just how many of the pardons and sentence commutations allegedly signed off by then-President Biden had actually been signed using the autopen — and questions had been raised as to who had given the final approval for the autopen to be used. “This week new reporting confirms President Biden’s aides took unauthorized executive actions during his presidency amid his cognitive decline.” “It’s no surprise that Anthony Bernal is pleading the Fifth Amendment to shield himself from criminal liability. During his deposition today, Mr. Bernal pleaded the Fifth when asked if any unelected official or family members executed the duties of the President and if Joe Biden ever instructed him to lie about his health,” he continued. “This is a historic scandal and Americans demand transparency and accountability. We will continue to pursue the truth on their behalf and examine options to get the answers we need.” Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) took his assessment a step further, noting that in addition to not answering any questions, Bernal would not even read his own statement before the committee. “This morning, I attended the deposition of Anthony Bernal – Jill Biden’s ‘work husband.’ These are my takeaways,” Donalds said. “He couldn’t answer A SINGLE QUESTION; He refused to read his own statement; This is corruption at the highest level; Joe was not in charge of his own admin; Every order, bill, & memo is NULL & VOID; The Democrats can’t hide from this; We must subpoena ALL BIDEN STAFF; @DrBiden must be called to testify; @KamalaHarris must be called to testify.” This morning, I attended the deposition of Anthony Bernal–Jill Biden’s “work husband.” These are my takeaways: ?He couldn’t answer A SINGLE QUESTION ?He refused to read his own statement ?This is corruption at the highest-level ?Joe was not in charge of his own admin ?Every… pic.twitter.com/moix6gOcVu — Congressman Byron Donalds (@RepDonaldsPress) July 16, 2025 Just days earlier, the former president’s doctor, Kevin O’Connor, also pleaded the Fifth Amendment, answering no questions about Biden’s health or cognitive abilities while in the White House.

In every single criminal trial in this country, whether the crime is petty theft or murder or anything in between, there are very clear standards that deal with video evidence. In particular, if the government wants to introduce video evidence, they have to provide all of the available footage that they have. It’s a pretty intuitive concept. So if someone robs a convenience store, and the police recover surveillance tapes from the store, then they need to turn those tapes over to the defense. The prosecution can’t modify the tapes in any way. They can’t splice different tapes together. They certainly can’t delete anything. They have to provide the raw, unedited footage to the defense team. And on top of that, they have to verify that the tapes are authentic, and that they haven’t been tampered with, by establishing a sworn chain of custody. This is about as basic as it gets. Every judge in the country  — even Ketanji Brown Jackson — can grasp this very straightforward concept. You can easily get a case thrown out of traffic court if they won’t give you all of the relevant footage they have. On the other hand, when it comes to the single most-watched sex trafficking case in the history of the United States, this rule apparently does not apply. You can forget about “chain of custody.” And you can forget about obtaining raw footage as well. Instead, in the case of Jeffrey Epstein, the DOJ produced a video that was clearly manipulated. As we’ve discussed previously, WIRED Magazine found that the footage from outside Epstein’s jail cell — which the DOJ claimed was “raw” footage — had actually been edited and saved multiple times back in May of this year. Specifically, “the file was assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website.” Additionally, viewers noticed that there was a glitch when the timer in the footage moved from 11:58 to 11:59 p.m.; it seemed to jump ahead to midnight. None of this was initially explained or disclosed by the DOJ, which again, referred to the footage as “raw.” Of course, the reason that the DOJ claimed the footage was “raw” is that they understand, as most people do, that any edits — for any reason — would immediately raise a lot of questions. There should be no need to save the file multiple times, or to combine clips. They could’ve just posted everything they had, and let the public sort it out. But the DOJ didn’t do that. It’s possible they were hoping that no one would look at the metadata, or study the videos closely. WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show If that was the plan, it didn’t last very long. After the footage was posted, and Wired Magazine noticed the problem, Pam Bondi had to come up with a justification for all of the discrepancies. What she said, ultimately, is that the security system in the jail resets every night for around a minute. Therefore, we were told, there was nothing nefarious about the missing footage. It’s just a fact of life that, in one of the most secure prisons in the country, we can’t design a camera system that stays online 24/7. That’s beyond our capacity. We can land a man on the moon, but we can’t prevent the cameras from shutting down every night, just long enough to maybe allow someone to get murdered. We also can’t make sure there’s more than one functioning camera in the vicinity of this cell block. Already, this was an unsatisfactory explanation. The DOJ didn’t actually provide proof that the system needs to go offline for a minute every night. Bondi just claimed it was normal, and we were all supposed to accept it. She also didn’t say anything whatsoever about why the footage needed to be edited in the first place. Again, this wouldn’t fly in traffic court. And it definitely doesn’t pass muster when we’re talking about Jeffrey Epstein, who had the potential to implicate the most powerful people in the world. And yet — somehow — the story just got much, much worse for Bondi and the DOJ. It turns out that, even after they were exposed for hiding relevant information from the public about this tape, they still haven’t come forward with the full story. So it falls on WIRED Magazine, a small internet publication, to fill in even more details. Here’s what they reported the other day: “Newly uncovered metadata reveals that nearly three minutes of footage were cut from what the US Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation described as ‘full raw’ surveillance video from the only functioning camera near Jeffrey Epstein’s prison cell the night before he was found dead. … Further analysis shows that one of the source clips was approximately 2 minutes and 53 seconds longer than the segment included in the final video, indicating that footage appears to have been trimmed before release. It’s unclear what, if anything, the minutes cut from the first clip showed.” Before we read on further in the article, there’s simply no way to justify this. It doesn’t matter if the extra 2 minutes and 53 seconds were irrelevant. It doesn’t matter if those extra 2 minutes and 53 seconds were duplicated in another video file. In this case, and in every other case, the duty of the government is to be transparent. It’s not to save people a very small amount of time when they’re watching an hour’s worth of video footage. Any government that’s functioning properly would understand this calculation immediately. Just give people all of the information you have. The article continues: “The nearly three-minute discrepancy may be related to the widely reported one-minute gap—between 11:58:58 pm and 12:00:00 am—that attorney general Pam Bondi has attributed to a nightly system reset. The metadata confirms that the first video file, which showed footage from August 9, 2019, continued for several minutes beyond what appears in the final version of the video and was trimmed to the 11:58:58 pm mark, right before the jump to midnight. The cut to the first clip doesn’t necessarily mean that there is additional time unaccounted for—the second clip picks up at midnight, which suggests the two would overlap—nor does it prove that the missing minute was cut from the video.” Close quote. In other words, we can’t say definitively what’s in the three minutes of footage that were cut. It’s possible there’s nothing of interest. But there’s one way that the government could provide some more clarity. They could simply dump all of the files on the DOJ’s website, without any editing whatsoever. At the moment, no one in the Trump administration can come up with a coherent justification for why this hasn’t been done. They also can’t explain why they haven’t released “Phase 2” of the Epstein files — or the “truckload” of “documents” that Pam Bondi said the DOJ had recovered in the last few months from the Southern District of New York. She says there are graphic depictions of children on the videos that she can’t release, but she hasn’t said anything at all about any of the “documents,” beyond telling us that they’re not important. Nor has she unsealed the search warrants or financial disclosures in the case. Instead of getting any transparency here, the Trump administration is continuing to tell us that these materials are “boring” and that we shouldn’t care about them. Here’s how the president put it yesterday: ?TRUMP: "I don't understand why my supporters are so interested in Epstein. He's been dead for a long time. He was never a big factor. I don't understand the fascination…it's pretty boring stuff. I think only pretty bad people want to keep that going."pic.twitter.com/Ca4gWS80Cs — Autism Capital ? (@AutismCapital) July 16, 2025 Look, I know some people are annoyed at me for harping on this and criticizing the president, who in many other ways is doing a fantastic job. But I happen to believe that bringing sex predators to justice is extremely important. And I just can’t accept being blatantly gaslit by people in power, even if they’re people I otherwise support. In fact, ESPECIALLY if they’re people I otherwise support. So I must say that this answer from Trump is just simply awful. First, there’s the personal attack on anyone who asks questions, saying they’re “bad people.” That’s always a winning argument. If you want to convince millions of skeptical people that their leaders are lying to them about their behavior, then the best approach is to mock them. Works every time. Then there’s the implication that the Epstein files are “boring.” Well, in that case, release everything. Bore us to death. Then the story’s over, and everyone can go on with their lives. The 9/11 report was something like 600 pages. Parts of that document were boring. Almost no one actually read the entire thing. But it was still very important that the 9/11 report was written. It’s extremely confusing, to put it mildly, to see the president of the United States take the opposite position. He says he doesn’t understand why people care about Jeffrey Epstein, as if it’s some kind of moral failing on our part. Yes, why would anyone care about some of the most powerful people on the planet spending time on a sex trafficker’s private island? Who could possibly be concerned about the possibility that a cabal of pedophiles and perverts is running entire countries and major corporations? This is where the comparison to RussiaGate comes in, and it’s probably the worst part of the answer you just heard. RussiaGate was a disaster for this country precisely because we didn’t get the whole story. RussiaGate was premised on lies and distortions, at every stage. If Donald Trump made a joke at a rally, the media interpreted it as a coded message to Putin. They pretended he had a secret computer in Trump Tower that was communicating with Moscow. They said there was a “pee tape.” They claimed Russian hackers were being housed at a non-existent Russian consulate in Miami. They claimed Trump had weakened the GOP’s platform on Russia, even though the opposite was true. When Hunter Biden dropped his laptop off at a repair store, full of incriminating evidence about Joe Biden’s influence peddling operation, the media blamed that on Russia too. And on and on. RussiaGate was an utter fraud. And to the extent it was successful, it worked because the media (and the Obama administration) repeatedly lied to us. They didn’t give us information. Instead, they lied to our faces for the better part of a decade. With Epstein, we want the opposite response from the media and the government. We want total transparency. At the end of his answer, Trump talks about filtering the documents so that we only obtain “credible” information. But that’s not the job of the government. Their job is to give us whatever information they can. Once they start assessing “credibility,” they give themselves a license to hide incriminating information. And there’s no reason to grant the government that license — no matter which political party is in charge. That’s what makes the Democrats’ sudden interest in the Epstein files so galling and intolerable. They’re obviously turning this into a dumb partisan issue, when it isn’t one. We talked about this a bit yesterday. All of a sudden, after years of complete disinterest in the entire topic, Democrats are suddenly clamoring for the release of the Epstein files — or at least, they’re publicly pretending to want the Epstein files to be released. Here’s Adam Kinzinger, for example. He’s essentially a Democrat at this point: “EVERY, and i mean EVERY Republican incumbent or candidate or even anyone THINKING about running as a Republican for even dog catcher needs asked over and over and over about Epstein.” This is a guy who spent his only significant time in Congress — the only time people knew who he was — screeching hysterically about elderly women and a “Q Shaman” walking around the Capitol Building on January 6th. That was the issue he claimed to care about. But no one actually cared about January 6th, so the whole plan backfired. So now that he’s out of office, he’s demanding that everyone talk about Epstein — an issue he didn’t seem to care about until this week. It’s not hard to see what’s going on here. Neither party — Democrat or Republican — wants to see the full, unredacted release of the Epstein files. At a minimum, we can assume that top donors of both parties are implicated in some way. So they both want to neutralize this whole issue as quickly as they can. For Democrats, that means turning the Epstein files into yet another partisan football. They’re going to make performative efforts to get the files released, even though they know it’ll never work. For example, here’s Axios’ reporting from yesterday: “House Republicans on Tuesday voted down another Democratic procedural maneuver aimed at forcing the Justice Department to release documents related to Jeffrey Epstein. … Democrats’ procedural motion would have scuttled the GOP’s legislative agenda for the day in favor of the bill, making it difficult for Republicans to vote for it. … It came after Republicans on the House Rules Committee voted Monday night against attaching the Epstein language to a broader cryptocurrency and defense funding vote.” Specifically, that “broader cryptocurrency vote” involved legislation that could’ve paved the way for a “central bank digital currency,” as well as restrictions on cryptocurrency ownership. Whatever you think of this bill — although it seems to be a pretty terrible idea — the fact remains that it has nothing whatsoever to do with Jeffrey Epstein. So Democrats are using this whole issue to play very transparent political games. That’s how seriously they take child sex trafficking. But ultimately, if we’re being honest, the problem here goes back to the White House. They’ve given the Democrats this opening by bungling the situation so badly. The Trump administration seems mystified (or is acting that way) by the anger from the base. But the Epstein scandal isn’t happening in a vacuum. We haven’t seen any high profile or powerful people held accountable for their crimes. No one’s even been fired, let alone arrested, for allowing an assassin to almost kill Trump last year. Trump was elected in 2016 on a promise to “lock her up.” So when do we start locking people up? Trump himself has spent 10 years calling out many different crimes and scandals. Just this past weekend, he was talking again about the rigged election in 2020. Why hasn’t anyone been arrested or charged for any of this? What about the people who lied about the COVID shot? What about the people who funded the BLM riots in 2020? What about the cabal of unelected bureaucrats who were using Joe Biden’s autopen to sign pardons and executive orders, effectively seizing control of the federal government? The New York Times just uncovered emails from Biden officials in which they made executive decisions to sign certain documents: “Mr. Zients hit ‘reply all’ and wrote, ‘I approve the use of the autopen for the execution of all of the following pardons.'” That’s a reference to Jeff Zients, the White House chief of staff. That’s a sentence that no government official — other than the president — should ever write. The chief of staff does not have the authority to use the president’s signature to pardon people. But that’s exactly what happened. That’s not to say that digital signatures shouldn’t be allowed. Various outlets, including NBC News, have tried to claim that conservatives are attacking the idea of digital signatures. But that’s not the case. If Joe Biden had said, “Use my autopen to approve these pardons,” there would be no story. But that’s not what happened. Instead, a bunch of aides got together, said they “heard” Joe Biden authorize certain things. And then, solely based on their claims about what Joe Biden wanted, they used his signature. Republicans are saying this is a major scandal. I agree that it is. So then who will be held responsible? Who will be punished? Republicans are constantly “investigating” things. But nobody is ever punished at the end of it. Meanwhile, Democrats spent the last four years prosecuting Trump and throwing conservative activists and political advisers in prison. And now, even after the majority of Americans voted for transparency and justice, we’re not anywhere close to getting it. That’s not going to work. It’s not what any Republican voted for in the last election. We want to see accountability. We want to know that even the rich and powerful will pay for their crimes. It hasn’t happened. And for a lot of people, understandably so, this Epstein stuff is the last straw. Give us the information you’ve been promising. Give us the information we’re entitled to. If you refuse to do that — if you insist on insulting us instead — then we’re facing a much worse outcome than Democrat control of Congress in less than two years. We’re also facing a total collapse of legitimacy in our country. You can only deny reality for so long before people decide they’ve had enough. And whatever donors or intelligence assets are being protected here, they’re not that important. They’re not worth risking a revolt. So give us the “boring” Epstein files. Publish all of the “uninteresting” footage you clipped out of those videos from Epstein’s cell block, for reasons that no one has bothered to explain. Otherwise, in the absence of transparency, people will come to their own conclusions. And when they do, whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, you won’t like what happens next.

WASHINGTON – Representative Mark Harris (R-NC) in the House and Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) in the Senate plan to introduce legislation to strip the National Education Association (NEA) of its federal charter Wednesday after backlash over its leaked partisan and antisemitic resolutions. In a press conference with other co-sponsors and supporters, Harris said, “The NEA was created to champion America’s teachers and serve our schools, but it has spiraled into a partisan machine that’s more about radical ideology than education.” Announcing the bill alongside Harris were the measure’s cosponsors, Reps. Mary Miller (R-IL) and Ralph Norman (R-SC) and supporters Corey DeAngelis – a senior fellow at the American Culture Project and online advocate for school choice – and Tina Deschovich – a founder of Moms for Liberty. The legislation aims at stripping the NEA of its federal charter, which is an outline of its mission and activities at the time of its founding in 1906. Representative Harris argued that the new bill is necessary because the NEA breached its original charter. Harris cited Corey DeAngelis, who revealed that the NEA adopted many liberal resolutions in their annual meeting at the start of July. This includes supporting students organizing “against ICE raids and deportations” and continuing to “advocate for LGBTQ+ students” following the recent Supreme Court ruling against LGBT propaganda in classrooms. The NEA also passed a resolution “to defend against Trump’s embrace of fascism by using the term facism [sic] in NEA materials to correctly characterize Donald Trump’s program and actions.” In the resolution itself, the teachers’ union misspelled fascism. DeAngelis also reported that the NEA planned to “not use, endorse, or publicize any materials from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL),” an organization founded on stopping “the defamation of the Jewish people.” On top of alleged antisemitism and calling President Trump’s actions fascist, the NEA is also under fire for their political donations to the Democratic party. Harris noted that the NEA spent nearly $2 million on political donations to Democratic candidates during the 2024 election cycle, as reported by The Daily Caller.  “98% of their political contributions every single election cycle are funneled to their buddies and Democrat campaign coffers,” DeAngelis said at the press conference. “It’s a money laundering operation. It should be illegal.” The Free Press also reported that a NEA delegate retorted to a member asking about the best ways to teach reading and writing that “We (the NEA) don’t have time for that. We’ve got to fight Trump.” Harris said, “The NEA has morphed into a mouthpiece for left wing extremism. They call themselves the teachers union, but their true mission is clear, indoctrinating our children with toxic propaganda.” In a statement to the Daily Wire, Harris said, “The messaging that [the NEA needs] to do is get back to teaching students …  reading, writing and arithmetic, not brainwashing. … That’s wrong, and so we’re just calling that out.” The Daily Wire reached out to the NEA for comment but received no response as of the time of publication.

Jason and Brittany Aldean had a heartbreaking scare after their son, Memphis, ended up in the ER. In an Instagram story on July 15, Brittany shared that the seven-year-old had spent a “long night” in the emergency room after fracturing his collarbone. She didn’t say how Memphis injured himself, but she noted that he “will be in a sling for a couple of weeks” and “just needs rest and extra lovin’.” “He’ll be healed before we know it,” Brittany concluded. Instagram Along with the message, she also added a video that showed Jason comforting Memphis in the hospital bed. “How you feeling, buddy? Do you feel better?” the country singer asked. “I hope it’s not broken. But I think maybe you’re probably gonna have to get a little sling.” Jason Aldean Imagines Wild Stories For Memphis’ Friends To bring a smile to his son’s face, Jason Aldean also made up a few wild stories for Memphis’ friends to explain what happened. “Tell them you were wrestling alligators,” he joked. Instagram Jason also suggested that Memphis tell people he got jumped and beat his attackers up.  “I’m not going to tell them that,” Memphis responded. “They’re definitely not going to believe me.”  Memphis is the oldest of the couple’s two children. Jason and Brittany Aldean also share a six-year-old daughter, Navy. Jason has two daughters from his previous marriage, as well: Kendyl, 17, and Keeley, 22. This story’s featured image is by Terry Wyatt/WireImage via Getty. The post Jason Aldean’s Son Is Doing Well After A “Long Night” In The ER appeared first on InspireMore.