Don’t Join a 1% Club If You’re a Family Guy ??‍?‍?‍??️

A new video showing a different camera angle of the Charlie Kirk shooting has now emerged. Quite frankly, I am still surprised we have not seen HUNDREDS of different videos from different angles, given that everyone has phones and most people in that crowd had their phones out. So I’m most surprised at the complete LACK of videos we have seen so far, but here’s a new one from the angle that is most interesting to me. Was Charlie shot by someone slightly behind him and to his right? I don’t know for sure, but I know there’s a lot of evidence saying that makes much more sense. Watch this new video here, where I believe you can see Frank Turek in the foreground: https://x.com/_therealbee_/status/1965900423442977279?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg More here: https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1965866604094423531 One more here: https://x.com/Uncensorednewsw/status/1965887474917642636 And if those are now working (I’m noticing some extreme censorship of that video on X) try this instead: One more here, with a third view…. Does this video show the bullet entering from the (video) left and then exiting out (video) right? https://x.com/block1capital/status/1967986063114375338?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg And one more backup here in case that link isn’t working either: So there you go folks… What do you think? For more on why I think it’s very possible Charlie Kirk was shot from the back and to his right, read this DEEP DIVE I put together: DEEP DIVE: Did We All See An EXIT Wound Or An ENTRANCE Wound? — It’s JFK All Over Again! Ok folks, I have sat on this story for 3 days now because I have been digging into it and researching and did not want to publish this prematurely. I still have more questions than answers, but I think we have to at least ask this question now:  Was Charlie Kirk's neck wound we all saw and the gushing blood an entrance wound or an exit wound? Seems crazy to even ask right? Yes, at least until you start digging in and then you realize there seems to be perhaps more evidence for it being an exit wound than for the narrative we have all been fed. I'll show you and then I'll let YOU decide what you think...and we can all keep researching this together. I'll start with my friend Mike Adams, the HealthRanger who asks this very respectful question, pointing out that a 30-06 rifle would leave a huge exit wound and almost certainly blood all over the back white wall.  And yet...we don't have either of those things: I don't mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn't we be asking why there doesn't appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from… — HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) September 14, 2025 I don't mean to be graphic, and I mean no disrespect to Charlie Kirk and his tragic assassination, but shouldn't we be asking why there doesn't appear to be an exit wound and blood splatter on the large white banner directly behind Charlie when he was shot? If the shot came from the roof with a front-facing shot, there would be unmistakable blood splatter directly behind Charlie. A 30-06 rifle round would have traveled all the way through the flesh and would have made a very large exit path, carrying blood and tissue with it. Again, apologies for being graphic, but I don't know any other way to ask this question. It's just that this is one more thing that isn't adding up. And like you, I just want answers. I want to know who did this. More here: Are they concealing the camera footage from behind Charlie because it shows either no exit wound or damage inconsistent with a .30-06 caliber round? Where's the exit wound blood splatter? It reeks of a cover-up! This guy showed up and removed the camera right after Charlie… pic.twitter.com/6b9wAIhMsS — Red Pill USA (@Red_Pill_US) September 16, 2025 No blood of any kind on the back white wall. Within 15 minutes the rear camera is dismounted and taken away, not by authorities. This is the heart of the crime scene and it's almost immediately cleaned up and no blood found at all. THIS IS THE BLOOD WALL. Workers are pressed up against the very spot where their boss's blood would have splattered during the assassination. They're not looking at it. Not cautious. Not even wary. This is literally the crime scene immediately after a political assassination.… pic.twitter.com/AYPTA96QMX — HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) September 15, 2025 I want to be very clear I am not accusing anyone specifically in the crowd, just trying to get angles and trajectories and asking questions about things that don't make sense. The more you study the videos and the more angles you look at, it sure does seem like Charlie was shot close up, from his right: This is by far the most convincing video I have seen. -It seems we likely saw the exit wound in the front left side of the neck. -It makes far more sense Charlie was shot from his right side slightly behind near the outside staircase. -Even the sound/reaction & was… pic.twitter.com/1K6mSXTeGl — cat (@iamacat9000) September 15, 2025 More here: They bullet is in the ground they are concreting as we speak. The neck wound was the exit. Charlie was shot from the right rear pic.twitter.com/TuZL0GxMmo — The Hammer (@hammerthetruth7) September 15, 2025 I apologize for the graphic nature of this video, but this shows it pretty well: The more I watch this the more I see the bullet entering from above his right ear, our left as we look on it, the exit wound is through his neck. The shooter was not on the roof, that guy was jsut a distraction. pic.twitter.com/UXoiyrtbYP — ᒍᥱꙆɩᥒᥲ (@jelinaangelll) September 17, 2025 Why has no one shown us the footage from this camera? Mark it down folks, you will NEVER see what this camera recorded: https://x.com/OwenShroyer1776/status/1968307396633137488 WE NEED TO SEE THIS CAMERA: THIS is why they are hiding the "Tent Camera" in the Charlie Kirk assassination! That camera has the PROOF and all info needed to know what really happened here. Disregard the circle and jut look at the VIEW! pic.twitter.com/QpRSrqRUOP — In2ThinAir (@In2ThinAir) September 15, 2025 This video breaks it down REALLY well... Watch this: For a longer breakdown, this is really good too. Watch here: I swear to God almighty, the FBI is lying. The government is lying to us. That is an exit wound on the front of his neck. Before you get mad, or angry, because I am questioning the narrative, watch the video. Please share. pic.twitter.com/xi6rOyFMw8 — Jason Coursey (@JasonCoursey) September 16, 2025 Make it make sense... MJTruth is spot on here: UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 5 Minutes after Charlie was Shot, a Man is Spotted removing the overhead Video Camera, Directly over Charlie Kirk’s Head This is an active crime scene… blood everywhere… and he’s standing in it? Why is he removing anything? Was he standing on top of the… https://t.co/58Njh4kZrz pic.twitter.com/VAvScODSyW — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 15, 2025 And meanwhile, they've already paved over the crime scene? Is that normal? Why would you do that? Update: Charlie Kirk Construction work underway where Charlie Kirk was assassinated My Thoughts… Not really sure what to feel about it… I personally feel like enough time has passed for them to do their investigation, but the construction just feels awfully soon. This… https://t.co/EJ9PJU0YTj pic.twitter.com/NoalPz06yq — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 15, 2025 Then you have this... Have you seen this? This kid was giving an eye-witness testimony about what he saw and he was almost immediately cut off and manhandled: Charlie Kirk’s security made hand signals the exact moment he got shot. Charlie kirk’s employees silenced eye witnesses. This stinks. pic.twitter.com/psloB82QxY — ADAM (@AdameMedia) September 15, 2025 Why not let him speak? That is REALLY weird! Many are saying it was a palm pistol and I want to make clear I am not accusing anyone of anything: It was a palm pistol: https://t.co/bMNUdYThCg pic.twitter.com/VF9xakztL1 — Val Venis (The Big Valbowski) (@ValVenisEnt) September 15, 2025 Folks, my head is spinning but I can no longer ignore all of this. Help me out, what do you think?

I sure do miss when Late Night TV hosts were actually funny… Like Letterman back in his prime, before he went all woke publicly. Back when the most important thing was just being funny, not pushing a narrative. And part of just being funny means nothing is off limits. Joking about the President has been a hallmark of Late Night TV going back to Carson, but it was always done because the JOKE was the thing that mattered at the end of the day.  Something actually funny. After Leno and Letterman left Late Night, that all shifted. The joke became secondary, and pushing a political ideology was primary. And that’s when comedy died. Like this painful moment: He really thought he was on to something pic.twitter.com/V3kDB9Z5KU — (news) DOGE (@DOGE__news) September 28, 2024 CRINGE! Heck, sometimes it wasn’t even pushing an ideology, it was blatantly pushing propaganda… Remember this? That time when Stephen Colbert dances on Late Night to “get the jab” with his dancing syringes! pic.twitter.com/MpUUCBtRGe — KC (@KCPayTreeIt) November 28, 2023 It should have been immediately obvious at this point that any semblance of a Comedy Show had died and it was now pure propaganda. But now let’s advance the narrative, because I am seeing a glimmer of hope that comedy is returning. Of the three (Kimmel, Colbert and Fallon), Jimmy Fallon has always been lightyears funnier and more talented than the other two. He’s also always been much less political than the other two. Don’t forget it was Fallon who had Donald Trump on in 2016 and humanized him by asking if he could rub his hair! That was a key moment in that race, and Fallon handled it well — much to the chagrin of his Far-Left fans. But now we go to Jimmy Fallon last night reacting to ABC pulling Jimmy Kimmel and of course he makes a few comments about Kimmel being a good man and very funny (he is neither of those things), but then he moves on to say he’s going to cover President Trump’s trip to the UK just like he always would with no censorship….and then the bit that followed actually made me laugh out loud. THIS is actually funny folks! No one is saying you can’t joke about President Trump — we’re just saying be funny when you do! Heck, even Charlie Kirk thought it was funny when South Park did their episode on him. We have to have a sense of humor about these things and admit when they’re funny — it’s just that they haven’t been very funny for a very long time. So I am happy to admit when they finally are. No one wants President Trump to be off limits, we simply want the blatant LIES and blatant propaganda masquerading (badly) as comedy to stop. See the difference? Ok, now enjoy this actually funny bit: Jimmy Fallon reacts to ABC suspending Jimmy Kimmel’s show: “A lot of people are worried that we won’t keep saying what we want to say, or that we’ll be censored, but I’m going to cover the President’s trip to the UK, just like I normally would” pic.twitter.com/FTQa1L3iA5 — DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) September 19, 2025 Backup here if needed: Jimmy Fallon actually being funny! pic.twitter.com/Kcct948Vfd — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 19, 2025

The drummer is behind the mixing desk on three new songs from the punk-pop veterans

Caught By Drone ‎#chills #scary #horror #mystery‎ #creepy #haunted #paranormal

War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength The left has decided if we don’t use the proper words, it’s violence. Our words are now violent. If we don’t use their insane pronouns, we are violent. On the other hand, if they are screaming hatefully, lying, inciting violence, it’s their First Amendment right. They […] The post The Upside Down World of the Radical Left appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.