YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #nightsky #newyork #physics #moon #astrophysics #fullmoon #supermoon #planet #zenith #wolfmoon #moonafteryule #coldmoon #privacy #supermoon2026
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The First - News Feed
The First - News Feed
7 hrs ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Trump Reignites the Greenland Hysteria
Like
Comment
Share
One America News Network Feed
One America News Network Feed
7 hrs

Greenland and Denmark envoys launch ‘Not for Sale’ defense on Capitol Hill
Favicon 
www.oann.com

Greenland and Denmark envoys launch ‘Not for Sale’ defense on Capitol Hill

Greenlandic and Danish officials stood firm on Capitol Hill this Thursday, delivering a flat "not for sale" message to U.S. lawmakers. The delegation aimed to shut down any further discussion regarding President Donald Trump’s repeated suggestions that the United States should purchase the Arctic territory.
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
7 hrs ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Rob Finnerty slams Mamdani admin’s housing solution
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
7 hrs ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Minnesota Star Tribune, CEO ‘covered the Somalian fraud story by covering it up’: Rob Finnerty
Like
Comment
Share
Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed
7 hrs

Bolsheviks in Manhattan Chant Kill ICE, Hang Kristi Noem
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Bolsheviks in Manhattan Chant Kill ICE, Hang Kristi Noem

The Bolsheviks in Foley Square in Manhattan are calling for the Killing of ICE officers and hanging Secretary Kristi Noem. They are using the F word for the IDF and Charlie Kirk. You can watch the video here. Thousands are using the legal shooting of Renee Good to further their hardcore leftist cause. This is […] The post Bolsheviks in Manhattan Chant Kill ICE, Hang Kristi Noem appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
7 hrs

Minneapolis Teachers Union President Says District Will Offer Virtual Learning For Next Five Weeks
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

Minneapolis Teachers Union President Says District Will Offer Virtual Learning For Next Five Weeks

'Let’s stay strong together'
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
7 hrs

The View Claims Trump 'Dictatorship' Can and Will KILL Their Audience
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

The View Claims Trump 'Dictatorship' Can and Will KILL Their Audience

After spending a lot of time in 2025 using inciting rhetoric to turn up the temperature and radicalize their audience against President Trump and his administration, The View’s rhetoric grew even more dangerous on Thursday as they took advantage on the ICE-involved shooting in Minnesota to ratchet up tensions. The leftist extremists of the ABC News program openly claimed we were living in “fascist America” where the Trump “dictatorship” can and would kill their audience members on a whim. “So, my question for the panel: are we in the middle of fascist America?” proclaimed deranged co-host Joy Behar. After reading a list of events from the week, including falsely claiming “[Secretary of War] Pete Hegseth started an illegal war for oil in Venezuela” and the shooting, Behar did some View math suggested it “adds up, to me, like a dictatorship in the making. That we are now in it.” Behar, who’s a multimillionaire, then attacked ICE agents for presumably being poor. “And these ICE agent, by the way, they get a $50,000 bonus when they sign up. They're highly motivated people who probably don't have much going on,” she sneered.   Inciting violence. Joy Behar claims we're now living in "fascist America" and wants Americans to "wake up" and realize there's a dictatorship. She claims the events of this week "adds up to me like a dictatorship in the making. That we are now in it. We are in it now." She… pic.twitter.com/KRW2bVqOBM — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 8, 2026   Ignoring the fact that the woman who killed was there to obstruct ICE’s lawful duties and tried to use her car as a weapon against an agent, ABC News moderator Whoopi Goldberg whined that people thought the show was a “waste [of] air” and claimed that anyone in their audience could and would be killed by ICE: That young lady could have been anybody in this audience. It doesn't matter what -- forget color. Forget everything. It could have been anybody and if they can do this to her, they can do it to you too.   Inciting violence. The View claims the Trump administration can and will kill their audience. Whoopi whines that most people think The View is a "waste of air," then claims the woman killed "could have been anybody in this audience." "If they can do this to her, they can do it to… pic.twitter.com/hQXRm3BO1r — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 8, 2026   The third instance of inciting rhetoric from the show came from pretend independent Sara Haines who warned protesters that they were in danger of being slaughtered in the streets by law enforcement: And Whoopi, when you say you are reassured because people are hearing it; people are hitting the street and we’re watching the temperature rise even further. So, I would say it's also really important to be careful. Although we have the right to protest, the right to stand up, you might be against people that aren't trained properly. So, be careful because it's not worth the win if you lose a life.   Inciting violence. Sara Haines warns protesters they may be killed by law enforcement at gatherings. "Although we have the right to protest, the right to stand up, you might be against people that aren't trained properly so be careful because it's not worth the win if you lose a… pic.twitter.com/0pzi63FjEE — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 8, 2026   Haines also spoke out of her rear, suggesting –without evidence – that the agent didn’t have the proper training. It had since come out that the agent had 10 years of experience. But that fact likely wouldn’t matter to Haines since she asserted that the recruitment campaign by the Department of Homeland Security was attracting “the wrong type of people to come and be undertrained to do this job,” because they were fans of videogames. Co-host Sunny Hostin also had her own braindead takes. She insisted that if you saw what happened as anything other than an “unlawful killing” as she did, it was “propaganda” and “Orwellian.” “You must believe what your eyes see,” she demanded – you listen to what she was telling you.   Sunny Hostin asserts that calling the Minnesota shooting anything other than an "unlawful killing" is "propaganda" and "Orwellian." "You must believe what your eyes see," she demanded. pic.twitter.com/IK6EiSdyB6 — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 8, 2026   Unironically, Behar demanded those who disagreed with them to “stop gaslighting us,” as Hostin claimed viewers that ICE was using vehicles as an excuse to “target” and shoot at people: Just one last thing. In the last four months alone, ICE officers have fired on at least nine people in five state and D.C., and in all of those individuals targeted in those shootings were in vehicles and they have claimed seven defense. No one has been charged. So, when you are out there peacefully protesting, which is your right under the Constitution, even if you're in a vehicle, please, please be careful because this is what's happening in this country right now. “Know that anything can happen now,” Goldberg gravely warned.   Behar had the nerve to demand "stop gas lighting us" as Hostin warned people that ICE was using vehicles as an excuse to shoot at people. Whoopi also warns that "anything can happen." pic.twitter.com/kch4c6CSWD — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) January 8, 2026   If you thought the token “Republican” on the panel offered any pushback, Alyssa Farah Griffin was as useless as ever as she claimed the agent took the law into this own hands. “In America the punishment for evading law enforcement in a vehicle or on foot is not death. It simply is not. That's not how our system works,” she bloviated. As NewsBusters noted in our roundup of The View’s worst moments of inciting rhetoric in 2025, their technique at the time was: erroneously claim that Trump was a dictator, the country had no future, and that people didn’t have access to the ability to effect change via the ballot box, thus leaving impressionable extremists only one option: violence. In 2026, they’ve added the threat of death into their toxic cocktail. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View January 8, 2026 11:04:13 a.m. Eastern (…) SARA HAINES: She [Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem] said this law enforcement agent was following training. It is basic law enforcement training to not step in front of a vehicle that can move, because it creates an opportunity for that vehicle to become a death threat and therefore unnecessary shootings like this. So, although we don't know who this agent is or many details about him, we do know there was an increased goal last year to double the amount of ICE agents. And to hit that number, what they did was they removed all age requirements and cut the training program to less than half of what it had been, while also recruiting people using visuals. I think we have a couple here. That are warlike images like with Uncle Sam and also references to Halo which is a single shooter war game that talks about “destroy the flood” which is kind of presuming that all of these immigrants are parasitic alien enemies. So, it is also recruiting, potentially the wrong type of people to come and be undertrained to do this job. (…) 11:05:32 a.m. Eastern ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: In America the punishment for evading law enforcement in a vehicle or on foot is not death. It simply is not. That's not how our system works. (…) JOY BEHAR: So, my question for the panel: are we in the middle of fascist America? Because in this - WHOOPI GOLDBERG: I told you that yesterday. BEHAR: Just this last week I'm just going to give you a summary of what we've been through. One work. Pete Hegseth started an illegal war for oil in Venezuela, Stephen Miller threatened a military takeover of Greenland, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. slashed childhood vaccine recommendations, and ICE shot and killed a United States citizen in Minneapolis. That sort of adds up, to me, like a dictatorship in the making. That we are now in it. GOLDBERG: Yes! BEHAR: We are in it now and American people, I think, have to wake up to this a little bit more than we are. We try very hard to give you what we know. But people have to start reading and watching and paying attention a little bit more than we have. Because we can lose it, you know. And these ICE agent, by the way, they get a $50,000 bonus when they sign up. They're highly motivated people who probably don't have much going on. (…) 11:08:29 a.m. Eastern SUNNY HOSTIN: When I looked at the video from several different angles, which is what lawyers are trained to do, I saw an unlawful killing. I think that's very clear. And I think we need to be at the point in this country that we call a thing a thing and stop listening to propaganda and being Orwellian in terms of not believing what your eyes are seeing. You must believe what your eyes see. Right? GOLDBERG: People are taking to the -- this is what -- HOSTIN: They are believing now. GOLDBERG: This is what is really gives me great hope. People are starting to recognize from whatever -- wherever they voted from that something is terribly wrong. And it makes me - BEHAR: Feel better? GOLDBERG: -- feel like I can take a breath. Because for a long time-  it felt like people just thought we were, you know, just talking to waste air, but people are seeing things because everyone is affected by this. That young lady could have been anybody in this audience. HOSTIN: Well, that's -- GOLDBERG: It doesn't matter what -- forget color. Forget everything. It could have been anybody and if they can do this to her, they can do it to you too. (…) 11:11:00 a.m. Eastern HAINES: And Whoopi, when you say you are reassured because people are hearing it; people are hitting the street and we’re watching the temperature rise even further. So, I would say it's also really important to be careful. Although we have the right to protest, the right to stand up, you might be against people that aren't trained properly. So, be careful because it's not worth the win if you lose a life. (…) 11:11:34 a.m. Eastern BEHAR: And stop gaslighting us! We can see that happened! Cut the crap! HOSTIN: Just one last thing. In the last four months alone, ICE officers have fired on at least nine people in five state and D.C., and in all of those individuals targeted in those shootings were in vehicles and they have claimed seven defense. No one has been charged. So, when you are out there peacefully protesting, which is your right under the Constitution, even if you're in a vehicle, please, please be careful because this is what's happening in this country right now. GOLDBERG: Its what we tell you all the time. Follow -- know that anything can happen now. And be smart about what you're doing. We'll be right back.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
7 hrs

PBS Invites Paranoid Professor to Mark January 6 As 'Phase of Fascism' Under Trump
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

PBS Invites Paranoid Professor to Mark January 6 As 'Phase of Fascism' Under Trump

The subject line to the promo email for Tuesday’s Amanpour & Co. on PBS marked the one riot the left didn’t get behind: “Fascism Expert Jason Stanley on the 5th Anniversary of Jan. 6 Capitol Attack.” Stanley is a favored guest on PBS, NPR and the left-wing MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) -- which gives an unsubtle hint where PBS lies on the ideological spectrum -- and Bianna Golodryga, filling in for regular host Christiane Amanpour, and reporter Hari Sreenivasan treated his left-wing paranoia with reverence regarding the so-called "insurrection," a decidedly loaded term. HOST BIANNA GOLODRYGA: Well, a lot can change in five years and many people watching the January 6th insurrection on this day and 2021 might not have predicted Donald Trump's re-election. When he returned to office last January, Trump pardoned groups of supporters who stormed the Capitol after he lost the 2020 election. While the president has made no official mention of the anniversary today, some protesters marched to the U.S. Capitol to commemorate Ashli Babbitt and four others who died in the rioting. Pardoning the insurrectionists is just one of many actions Trump has taken since returning to office that critics call an attempt to reduce January 6th to an afterthought in American history.... "Fascism expert" Stanley talked to correspondent Hari Sreenivasan. HARI SREENIVASAN, CORRESPONDENT: ….You are joining us on January 6th. It's the fifth anniversary and -- of the January 6th insurrection. You served on -- as an expert advisor to the January 6th Committee. And about a year after, you wrote that America was entering, quote, a legal phase of fascism, mourning that the insurrection was being followed by legal and legislative mechanisms, like rewriting election laws and restricting voting rights. Here we are now, five years later, has your opinion changed? JASON STANLEY, PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO: No. And I think the Supreme Court ruling that has given the president essentially carte -- well, carte blanche over so-called official acts makes the situation we face even more dire as we've seen in this past year. CBS's chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford called that anti-Supreme Court narrative “over-reported,” “patently false,” “profoundly irresponsible,” and “dangerous” for the country in a report late last year. SREENIVASAN: I want to get to the legality of the Supreme Court in a second, but let's talk about Venezuela. Right now, does the -- you know, does the end justify the means? Because there are people that are rejoicing in Venezuela and outside who even the Nobel Prize winner, Maria Corina Machado, she celebrated this operation… Stanley responded defensively, that Trump and Maduro are quite similar authoritarians:  STANLEY: Well, what would you think if another country kidnapped President Trump saying that he has done all these illegal things? He's not very popular. He's despotic. Obviously, that would be a violation of international law.... Prodded by his sympathetic interviewer, Stanley expressed his warped view of America, from his supposed safe space in Toronto. STANLEY: ….When I go to the United States now, what I see is this very crazy situation being normalized. And people are like, see, you could have stayed. And I think I could have stayed without a doubt at this point. But, you know, this situation where you constantly have, you're like, wow, legally, they could target this huge swath of people. And that might include me or definitely could include me because I'm definitely calling the Trump administration fascists…. Sreenivasan asked about the “dismantling of certain agencies” and the renaming of the Kennedy Center as suggesting “we might be at a point of no return.” STANLEY: I don't -- we are at a point of no return. There is no return from -- and right, the merging of state and corporate interests is, of course, a signature sign of fascism. But we are at a point of no return…. Naturally, Stanley is a fan of New York City’s new hard-left mayor Zohran Mamdani and suggested Mamdani or someone else could "sketch a new vision for America and really some kind of new country." Or so says the transplant Canadian….
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
7 hrs

Sabrina Harman, The Army Reservist Who Became Infamous During The Abu Ghraib Scandal
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

Sabrina Harman, The Army Reservist Who Became Infamous During The Abu Ghraib Scandal

Sabrina HarmanSabrina Harman was one of a handful of American soldiers who served time for abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib. In April 2004, graphic photographs showing prisoner torture at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq shocked the world. The images chronicled sexual humiliation, psychological torture, and physical abuse. Worst of all, many of the photos showed U.S. military members grinning nearby, including a 26-year-old Army reservist from Virginia named Sabrina Harman. Harman is featured prominently in some of the most damning photos from Abu Ghraib, including one in which she grins and gives a thumbs up while posing behind a pile of naked, hooded men. She faced five years in prison for her actions, though she was ultimately sentenced to just six months. So who was Sabrina Harman, and how did she make her way to Abu Ghraib? Sabrina Harman, The Army Reservist Who Enlisted After 9/11 Harman FamilySabrina Harman in Al Hillah with an Iraqi boy in an undated photo. Born on Jan. 5, 1978, Sabrina D. Harman grew up in Virginia. Her father was a homicide detective, and her mother was a “forensics buff,” according to NBC News. As such, Harman grew up around talk of violence and murder, though her fellow soldiers later remembered her to be exceptionally gentle. They told the New Yorker that she would even go out of her way to save bugs. After the September 11 attacks, Harman left her job as an assistant manager at a Papa John’s Pizza in Fairfax County and enlisted as a reservist in the U.S. Army. She was assigned to the 372nd Military Police Company which, in the spring of 2003, was sent to Al Hillah, Iraq, to support the Iraqi police force. There, Harman and her fellow soldiers acted like peacekeepers. They patrolled the town, socialized with its residents, and helped train policemen. According to the New Yorker, they expected that the Iraq War would soon be over and that they would be sent home. As such, the mood was light. Instead, the 372nd was next assigned to Abu Ghraib, a notorious Iraqi prison where Saddam Hussein imprisoned and tortured dissidents. Fdy3k/Wikimedia CommonsExterior of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. Though Sabrina Harman and her colleagues had no training in interrogation — and had not even been trained in the Geneva convention — they were tasked with helping “break down” prisoners. On her first night at the Abu Ghraib prison, Harman had a foreboding feeling. She wrote to her roommate back in the United States, saying: “I have a bad feeling about this place. I want to leave as soon as possible!” The Abuse Of Detainees At Abu Ghraib As Sabrina Harman told NBC in 2004, she and her colleagues were brought Iraqi detainees by Army intelligence officers, CIA operatives, or by contractors. Though the soldiers of the 372nd had been trained for combat, not as prison guards, their job was to get the men talking. “They would bring in one to several prisoners at a time already hooded and cuffed,” Harman explained. “The job of the [military police] was to keep them awake, make it hell so they would talk.” Public DomainSabrina Harman with the body of a detainee named Manadel al-Jamadi. Though smiling, Harman was disturbed that al-Jamadi’s death had been described as a “heart attack,” and took photos of his other injuries. Upon their arrival, Harman and her colleagues were bewildered by what they saw. The detainees at Abu Ghraib were stripped naked, put in stress positions, forced to exercise or stand on boxes, and placed in humiliating situations, like with women’s underwear their heads. Prisoners who cooperated were allowed things like cigarettes or hot food. Uncooperative prisoners were deprived of food, sleep, clothing, and even their mattresses. “In the beginning,” Sabrina Harman recalled to the New Yorker, “you see somebody naked and you see underwear on their head and you’re like, ‘Oh, that’s pretty bad — I can’t believe I just saw that.’ And then you go to bed and you come back the next day and you see something worse. Well, it seems like the day before wasn’t so bad.” Harman and her colleagues did not invent the abuse at Abu Ghraib, but they did participate in it. And they photographed it. When Harman was told about a prisoner who’d died of a “heart attack,” she went to see the body, and noticed injuries which suggested that the prisoner had been beaten. “There was no way he died of a heart attack because of all the cuts and blood coming out of his nose,” Harman later stated in the documentary Standard Operating Procedure (2008). She took photos, Harman continued, “to prove to anybody who looked at this guy… This guy did not die of a heart attack. Look at all these other existing injuries that they tried to cover up.” But while Harman expressed horror about the death of the detainee, she also participated in the abuse of other prisoners. Ultimately, she would be accused of photographing a corpse and posing for a picture with it, jumping on prisoners as they lay in a pile, writing “rapeist” on a prisoner’s leg, and with attaching wires to a prisoner’s hands while he stood on a box with his head covered. Harman told him he would be electrocuted if he fell off the box, and a photograph of the hooded prisoner, nicknamed “Gilligan,” by the soldiers, became one of the most infamous from Abu Ghraib. Public DomainThe prisoner nicknamed “Gilligan,” who Harman and others perched on a box. They told him he would be electrocuted if he fell off. Indeed, Harman appeared in a number of photographs from Abu Ghraib. In one of the most infamous images, she smiles and gives a thumbs up while posing behind a pile of naked prisoners with hoods over their heads. In another, she gives a thumbs-up in front of a detainee who had been seemingly bitten by a dog. But while Harman looks jovial in the pictures, she had begun to realize that what she and the others was doing was wrong. “At first I thought it was funny, but these people are going too far,” Harman wrote to her roommate. “I can’t handle whats going on. I cant get it out of my head… [I]t’s awful. I thought I could handle anything, but I was wrong.” Then, in 2004, photos that Harman and others had taken at Abu Ghraib came to light. Sabrina Harman’s Punishment For What Happened At Abu Ghraib Public DomainSabrina Harman giving the thumbs up while treating a prisoner, who was seemingly bitten by a dog. Rumors of what was happening at Abu Ghraib swirled throughout 2003, and in January 2004, the Army assigned Major General Antonio M. Taguba to investigate. Taguba found that “numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted on several detainees” and that “this systemic and illegal abuse of detainees was intentionally perpetrated by several members of the military police guard force.” Then, that, April, the CBS program 60 Minutes II revealed the abuse at Abu Ghraib. The network published photos which showed the abuse of detainees, as well as the grinning faces of U.S. service members — including Sabrina Harman. The scandal outraged the world, especially since the photos showed clear violations of the Geneva Convention. Though the Abu Ghraib prison scandal was indicative of the larger U.S. policy of “enhanced interrogation,” U.S. president George W. Bush claimed that the abuse had been perpetrated by just a few individuals. And in the end, just seven reservists who had worked at Abu Ghraib — including Harman — faced charges for the abuse of detainees at the prison. Harman faced charges of conspiracy, dereliction of duty, and maltreatment of subordinates, for which she could have spent five years in prison. In the end, Harman was found guilty of one count of conspiracy to maltreat detainees, four counts of maltreating detainees, and one count of dereliction of duty, and sentenced to six months in military prison. “As a soldier and military police officer, I failed my duties and failed my mission to protect and defend,” Harman stated after her sentencing, according to The New York Times. “I not only let down the people in Iraq, but I let down every single soldier that serves today.” She continued: “My actions potentially caused an increased hatred and insurgency toward the United States, putting soldiers and civilians at greater risk. I take full responsibility for my actions… The decisions I made were mine and mine alone.” Sabrina Harman was one of a handful of soldiers who served time for abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Next, read about William Calley, the only soldier charged for the My Lai massacre in Vietnam. And then learn about the capture of Saddam Hussein. The post Sabrina Harman, The Army Reservist Who Became Infamous During The Abu Ghraib Scandal appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
7 hrs

The Curious Story Of Kim Ung-Yong, The South Korean Child Prodigy Who Became Known As A ‘Failed Genius’
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

The Curious Story Of Kim Ung-Yong, The South Korean Child Prodigy Who Became Known As A ‘Failed Genius’

Wikimedia CommonsSome consider Kim Ung-yong to have one of the highest IQs on the planet. Kim Ung-yong is primarily known for being a genius. A child prodigy from South Korea who allegedly became a researcher at NASA by the age of 10, it would be hard to describe him any other way. But being one of the smartest people in the world came with a cost. After becoming famous as a young boy for his ability to speak multiple languages and solve complex equations, most expected that Kim would go on to have an exceptional, world-changing career. But that isn’t what happened. Instead, he chose a quiet life in his native South Korea. Because of this, Kim was branded a “failed genius.” But to him, happiness was always paramount to success and fame. And, in any case, some parts of his story were seemingly exaggerated or outright false. A Child Prodigy With An IQ Of 210 Kim Ung-yongKim Ung-yong at the age of three. Born on March 8, 1962, Kim Ung-yong seemed destined for greatness. His parents were each professors — his father taught physics, while his mother taught medicine — so it was little surprise their son would be intelligent as well. Nobody, however, expected just how intelligent he would truly be. By the time he was just one year old, he had mastered both the Korean alphabet and one thousand Chinese characters from studying the Thousand Character Classic, a sixth-century Chinese poem. By age three, he was reportedly solving calculus problems and even published a collection of essays, calligraphy, and illustrations written in English and German — a feat that would challenge most adults, let alone a toddler. Naturally, it became a bestseller. At four years old, he allegedly scored above 210 on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, a test designed for seven-year-olds, allegedly gaining him recognition from the Guinness Book of World Records for the highest IQ ever recorded. By the age of five, he could also fluently speak five languages: Korean, Japanese, English, German, and French. That same year, Korean media reports that the five-year-old also began studying physics at Hanyang University. But that wasn’t all he was up to. Kim also made his television debut on a Japanese show called Fuji TV, on which he solved complex differential and integral calculus problems, demonstrated his polyglot abilities, and recited poetry before a live audience. He quickly became a worldwide phenomenon — but Kim reportedly next decided to use his genius for a different purpose. Wikimedia CommonsKim Ung-yong at age seven. At the age of eight, Kim Ung-yong seemingly left South Korea for the United States, where he purportedly completed his masters and doctorate in nuclear and thermal physics at the University of Colorado — and attracted the attention of researchers at NASA. A NASA Researcher Without A Childhood Although he was just a child, Kim was undoubtedly impressive. He was so impressive, in fact, that NASA reportedly recruited him as a researcher. Extraordinary would have been an understatement — Kim Ung-yong seemed to belong to the exlusive group of the smartest people in the world. For roughly the next decade, Kim reportedly worked in the United States, contributing to projects at one of the world’s most advanced scientific institutions. On paper, it was the culmination of every parent’s dream for a gifted child — a chance to change the world with an unparalleled mind. NASAA NASA facility in the late 1960s. The reality wasn’t quite so glamorous, though. Kim was a genius, but he was also just a young boy. He didn’t have any real peers. His work colleagues were decades his senior, and children his age didn’t work with such complex subjects as aerospace engineering. “It was really lonely,” Kim later reflected. “No one had ever been friends with me. After work, I could exercise and enjoy my hobbies, but there was no one to join me. I came from another country, and I was young, and everyone was an adult, and there was no place for a child to be present.” So, in the summer of 1978, Kim claims he quit working for NASA and made the decision to return to South Korea. However, he wasn’t able to simply continue his career. Although he had reportedly earned his master’s and doctorate in the United States at a young age, Korean companies believed many of the claims they had heard about him were sensationalized news. To make matters worse, he didn’t have a diploma from his elementary, middle, or high school — and Korean college entrance exams were notoriously intense. That’s when people began to label Kim a “failed genius.” Was Kim Ung-Yong Really A “Failed Genius”? After years of being labeled a genius, many people assumed that Kim would excel at anything he put his mind to. For him to return to Korea, seemingly unable to find work or even enter university, it certainly seemed as if he had “failed” — but, what exactly did he fail at? Kim hadn’t chosen to work at NASA; NASA had supposedly reached out to him. Certainly, his parents would have recognized his potential and influenced the course of his life, but he was, at the end of the day, still a child who had not really been given the opportunity to define his dreams for himself. No one had ever asked Kim what he wanted to achieve. In the end, he seems to have found the answer for himself. After leaving Seoul, Kim enrolled in Chungbuk University. There, Kim began to find normality — and happiness. “I have no past. I don’t think there’s a time when I was a kid,” he reflected. “I have no memories of elementary school or high school. So in college, I learned a lot of things I didn’t know, and I was happy with that. How did I fail when I was happy? I did not fail.” The Korea HeraldToday, Kim is a professor at Chungbuk University. After graduating from the university, Kim began giving lectures and published more than a hundred international papers. He met a woman and they married. They had two children together. He lived a quiet, normal life and became a teacher. “I am very excited to teach at a university, which had long been my dream,” Kim told Korean media. “I will devote myself to teaching the next generation.” In the end, it seems he was successful in achieving his own goal — happiness. But his story still raises many questions. What if people had been right to be skeptical of Kim Ung-yong’s story? Is Kim Ung-Yong’s Story True? Inside The Murky Truth Of The Child Prodigy Kim had a tough time when he first returned to Korea, and it is perhaps understandable that companies and institutions were skeptical of his claims. After all, Kim’s own father had cast doubt on the whole story. As users on Namuwiki, a Korean-language wiki similar to Wikipedia, pointed out, there are a number of holes in Kim’s story. For starters, his father once told the Korean press that Kim had only left the country once, for his television appearance in Japan, and was actually a shut-in for about a decade who “went on field trips to the outside world once a week.” There is no record that Kim ever attended Colorado State University, either. In fact, the university seemingly outright denied that he had attended. NamuwikiAn email seemingly from John Harton of Colorado State University. Looking further into Kim’s claims about working at NASA yields more skepticism as well, especially considering that the first child labor laws in the United States were passed in the 1930s. NASA, as a government agency, would have clearly violated the law by putting Kim to work. He also most certainly would not have been a senior researcher, as is claimed. What most likely happened, based on various interviews and claims from both of Kim’s parents, is a much sadder, more grounded story. Kim Ung-yong had shown some remarkable intelligence in his early years, which then created a media firestorm. Reporters constantly tried to interview and photograph him. Eventually, it got to be too much. “I couldn’t go outside… During the day, I was so harassed by the media that I couldn’t do anything, so I had to paint and study at night,” Kim recalled in an interview with the Chosun Daily. “Local newspaper reporters would sleep over at our house when they came for interviews. Foreign journalists would conduct interviews for days on end. I had to calculate, memorize, and show the same things over and over again countless times.” His family — largely his mother, it seems — spread the story that their son was overseas in America, attending college and working at NASA. In truth, he was being sheltered away inside their home, isolated while pursuing his studies, which he later regretted, saying that he wishes he had gone to elementary school instead and avoided the lie entirely. “I would enter elementary school,” he said. “If I hadn’t attended Hanyang University in 1966 and had just gone to elementary school at the appropriate age, none of this would have happened.” Ultimately, it was not the label of “failed genius” that troubled Kim throughout his life, but rather the label “genius.” People and media fixated on him because they believed him to be a genius. His parents invented the story that their genius son had gone abroad for a job at NASA. When he re-emerged to attend college in 1979, after being homeschooled, he had no papers to show for his education. And in the end, he was labeled a failure. But much of his story, it seems, was embellished. Even Kim thinks so. “I’ve spent my entire life fighting against the ‘child prodigy’ image imposed on me,” he remarked. “People say I’m a failed genius. But I’m not a genius. I don’t have that kind of heaven-sent talent. If I’m not a genius, how can I be a failed genius?” After reading about the life of Kim Ung-yong, discover the stories of some of the smartest people in the world, including William James Sidis, Marilyn vos Savant, and Christopher Langan. Or, look through these fascinating facts about Stephen Hawking The post The Curious Story Of Kim Ung-Yong, The South Korean Child Prodigy Who Became Known As A ‘Failed Genius’ appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 19 out of 105558
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund