Even before the federal government shutdown started almost a month ago, Republicans united around the label of a “Schumer shutdown,” and such blame is sticking. Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, joined the Americans for Prosperity Ohio chapter for a tele town hall this week, with a focus on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. Husted has referred to the “Schumer shutdown” early on, as he did during his interview with The Daily Signal last month, over a week before the shutdown began. The focus this time was no different. “Why is Sen. Schumer holding government hostage? Why aren’t we getting this done?” Donovan O’Neil, the chapter’s state director, asked Husted during the event. “It’s a clean continuing resolution, no deals, no carve outs, no special interest here. What is it that you’re hearing and seeing out there that’s causing this shutdown to linger as long as it has?” Husted brought up past comments from the minority leader. “As Chuck Schumer said in the past, what he wouldn’t do, he said, ‘I will not let my opponents hold me hostage in return for opening the government.’ Well, we want him to live up to the thing he asked us to do all those years as Republicans, and he needs to reopen the government so we can begin some of those conversations,” Husted shared. As a way to “play it straight,” Husted also addressed what Republicans have consistently brought up, which is Democrats’ focus on providing health care for illegal immigrants paid for by taxpayer dollars. “I will say that what they claim that they want is the resolution that they offered, which would have added $1.5 trillion in new spending that’s not paid for, and it would have allowed for legal immigrants to receive health care to be paid for through the Medicaid program, that would allow Medicaid to reimburse hospitals and healthcare providers for services that people who are not in this country illegally [sic], so that I something that I can’t be for,” Husted explained. This narrative has come up before, Husted reminded. “We ran an election, we wanted only people in this country who are American citizens to be receiving medical care paid for by the American taxpayer. And so that’s one of the things.” Another concern Husted brought up includes what Democrats want to cut. He mentioned how the Democrats’ plan “even though it increased spending that wasn’t paid for by $1.5 trillion, it cut 50 million from rural hospitals, something that the Republican team put in the budget reconciliation package.” These issues, Husted said, present “kind of a non-starter.” Husted also brought “the political tune” into the conversation. “Let’s be honest. I think that the radical left, led by [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] and others really put a lot of pressure on [Schumer] to stand up to President [Donald] Trump. More and more and more, he just is capitulating to that group,” Husted offered. “He wants the government shutdown to prove that he can stand up to President Trump, and that’s all fine and dandy, except for the fact that this hurts the American people. And Chuck Schumer has said every day that this shutdown goes on, it’s good for us. What he meant is good for Democrats politically, but I disagree with him, because it’s bad for the American people.” “This is indeed the Schumer Shutdown.” – U.S. Senator Jon Husted from OhioListen to what @SenJonHusted has to say about what’s REALLY going on in Washington. ? pic.twitter.com/DNW4DvvinG— AFPOhio (@AfpOhio) October 28, 2025 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., whom Husted mentioned in the exchange with O’Neil, has become a prolific influence in the Democratic Party. There’s also speculation that she may primary Schumer in 2028. In March, Schumer caved and voted to advance a continuing resolution, which ultimately passed. He had previously claimed that Democrats were united in denying Republicans enough votes for their CR. Not only had Schumer caved, but he also earned the ire from Ocasio-Cortez and other Democrats. A press release from the Ohio chapter also referenced support from Americans for Prosperity for the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act, described as “a bill that would require Congress to remain in session until it passes the bills necessary to fund the government, ensuring stability in the government and eliminating shutdowns as a political weapon.” That bill is sponsored by Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., whose office provided a statement for The Daily Signal. “The Senator is grateful for AFP’s support of the Prevent Government Shutdowns Act. We need to stop the cycle of government shutdowns, and that’s exactly what this bill would do,” said a Lankford spokesman. Leverage. That’s what Democrats call the pain caused by this shutdown. Four weeks in, and Chuck Schumer says “every day gets better for us.” Using Americans’ suffering for politics is unacceptable. It’s time to reopen the government and pass a clean CR.#GovernmentShutdown pic.twitter.com/iLZodsi0N0— Clayton Rasche ?? (@clayforfreedom) October 29, 2025 Americans for Prosperity Ohio’s chapter has been posting and reposting to X continuously about the shutdown, including how Democrats see it as leverage. Week four of the government shutdown and Democrats are still using it as political leverage. Twelve times they’ve voted against reopening our government against paying our troops, funding the Coast Guard, supporting low-income families, and keeping critical services running. This… pic.twitter.com/wHbUbfUZja— kentstrang (@kentstrang) October 28, 2025 Rep. Katherine Clark, D-Mass., who is the minority whip, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., have openly admitted that they see the shutdown as “a leverage” or “lever.” Democrats have blocked SNAP food assistance for 42 million Americans 13 times. On Saturday, funding runs out completely, and families nationwide will go hungry.In their words, they did it to increase their political “leverage.” pic.twitter.com/utXcrzE8sF— Senate Republicans (@SenateGOP) October 28, 2025 As November approaches, concerns pile up with regards to government assistance programs, which Husted has posted about. About 1.4 million Ohioans rely on SNAP to put food on the table. Five Senate Democrats could end this shutdown today by joining us to reopen the government and fund SNAP benefits. But for now, Ohio families shouldn't have to pay the price for Democrats’ political games.… pic.twitter.com/IdNDmqaSuG— Senator Jon Husted (@SenJonHusted) October 28, 2025 Democrats may no longer be so united in their strategy. “Democrats wobble as pressure to end shutdown ramps up,” The Hill reported on Wednesday morning. While Republicans have a majority in the House and Senate, they do not have 60 Senate members to overcome a filibuster. Democrats like Sens. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada have voted to fund the government, as has Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who caucuses with Democrats. Five more are needed, as Husted noted. I just voted for the 13th time to reopen the government. We need 5 more Senate Democrats to get the government open and serving Americans the way they deserve. pic.twitter.com/4rtAW2cSKL— Senator Jon Husted (@SenJonHusted) October 28, 2025 The post Husted Continues to Slam ‘Schumer Shutdown’ appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Australia is preparing to enforce a broad new restriction on online activity, ordering major social media platforms to block anyone under 16 from using their services starting December 10. The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 will apply to Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and possibly even apps such as WhatsApp and Roblox. The measure, touted by the government as a way to protect children from online harm, is being met with unease from the very companies expected to carry it out. Both Meta and TikTok say they will follow the law, but have questioned how such a ban can be realistically implemented. At a Senate hearing, TikTok’s Australia policy lead, Ella Woods-Joyce, stated, “Put simply, TikTok will comply with the law and meet our legislative obligations.” She also issued a warning about the unintended fallout, saying, “Experts believe a ban will push younger people into darker corners of the Internet where protections don’t exist.” Meta’s policy director Mia Garlick echoed those concerns, acknowledging that her company faces “numerous challenges” as it works to meet the December deadline. She said Meta would attempt to remove “hundreds of thousands” of users under 16, but admitted that doing so raises “significant new engineering and age assurance challenges.” The law is one of the most stringent of its kind anywhere in the world. Yet with its start date fast approaching, key details about enforcement remain unclear. Authorities have said companies will not be required to verify every user’s age, but must take “reasonable steps” to identify and deactivate underage accounts, meaning that they will have to verify ages to comply fully with the law. Failure to comply could lead to penalties of up to Aus$49.5 million (US$32 million). The law effectively incentivizes widespread identity checks and data collection, creating new systems of surveillance that erode online privacy for everyone, not just minors. Technology firms have expressed rare unity in their objections, calling the new mandate “vague”, “rushed,” and “problematic.” YouTube’s Australian representative, Rachel Lord, argued that while the government’s intentions might be positive, the policy itself is misguided. “The legislation will not only be extremely difficult to enforce, but it also does not fulfil its promise of making kids safer online,” she said. Regulators have hinted that the ban could extend beyond traditional social media to include streaming platforms and gaming networks. That potential expansion has deepened concerns that the law may push younger users off regulated sites and into less visible corners of the internet, where little oversight exists. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Tech Giants Pledge Compliance but Warn of Major Challenges as Australia Introduces Online Verification Law appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Google is preparing for a new era of digital age checks as state-level rules in Texas, Utah, and Louisiana begin to reshape how app stores operate. To get ahead of these requirements, the company has introduced the Play Signals API in beta, a system built to help developers adapt to laws that will soon mandate age-based controls. Starting in early 2026, each of the three states will enforce its own version of the App Store Accountability Act. Texas’s law takes effect first, followed by Utah and Louisiana a few months later. Each statute requires app marketplaces to confirm the age range of their users through “commercially reasonable” verification methods. Developers will be responsible for interpreting those signals and tailoring their apps accordingly. In some regions, they will also have to inform Google Play if a product update could require new parental consent. For testing purposes, the company is providing a FakeAgeSignalsManager so that developers can simulate data before the laws officially apply. Google’s rollout of its new Play Signals API is part of a broader shift toward a verified internet, one where digital access is increasingly tied to proof of identity. The company’s beta API is being framed as a neutral compliance tool, but its function sets the stage for a more monitored web. While the stated purpose is child safety and regulatory compliance, the architecture being built threatens to erode one of the internet’s core principles, pseudonymity. The data points that determine whether someone is over 13 or over 18 can easily evolve into a persistent set of identifiers, linking activity across apps, accounts, and even devices. Once these signals are standardized, nothing prevents them from being combined with advertising, analytics, or behavioral tracking systems. The result could be a world where age verification quietly becomes identity verification, and where “commercially reasonable” checks amount to permanent user profiling. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Google Adds Age Checks as Texas, Utah, and Louisiana Enforce Digital ID Laws appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Dog leash safety protects both you and your furry companion during every outdoor adventure. Poor leash choices and handling mistakes lead to injuries, escapes, and stressful walks. We at DogingtonPost know that the right equipment and techniques transform chaotic walks into enjoyable experiences. This guide covers everything from selecting the perfect leash to mastering safe walking practices. What Leash Should You Choose for Your Dog Your dog’s size determines your leash requirements more than any other factor. Dogs that weigh over 50 pounds need leashes with at least ½-inch width and heavy-duty hardware to prevent breakage when they pull suddenly. Small dogs under 20 pounds can use lightweight 1/2-inch leashes, but avoid thin cord-style options that snap under pressure. Medium-sized dogs between 20-50 pounds perform best with 3/4-inch width leashes that balance control with comfort. Material Matters for Daily Use Nylon leashes offer the best combination of durability and affordability, and they last 5-8 years with regular use. Leather leashes cost more but provide superior grip and can last 5+ years when you maintain them properly. Chain leashes work for heavy pullers but cause hand injuries and should only be used for training sessions (never for daily walks). Avoid cotton rope leashes entirely – they absorb moisture, harbor bacteria, and lose strength after you wash them. Reflective nylon leashes improve visibility during evening walks and cost only $3-5 more than standard options. Standard Six-Foot Length Works Best The American Kennel Club recommends 6-foot leashes as the optimal length for most walking situations. This length provides adequate control while it allows dogs reasonable exploration space. Retractable leashes cause more accidents than any other type, with emergency veterinarians reporting increased injuries from sudden stops and tangled lines. Four-foot leashes work well in crowded urban areas where you need close control (especially near busy intersections). Never use leashes longer than 8 feet in public spaces – they create safety hazards for pedestrians and other dogs while they make it impossible to maintain proper control when unexpected situations arise. Once you select the right leash, proper handling techniques become your next priority for safe walks. How Do You Walk Safely With Your Dog Proper leash control starts with the thumb lock technique, which gives you instant control when your dog changes direction unexpectedly. Wrap the leash around your thumb and grip it with your remaining fingers to create a secure hold that releases quickly under pressure. Keep your leash hand at hip level with your arm relaxed – tension in your arm transfers directly to your dog and increases their stress. Dog leash injuries have increased, especially in women over 65, with common causes including dog-pulling, tripping, and tangling. Maintain a U-shape in your leash throughout the walk, which indicates proper slack and prevents your dog from feeling trapped or restricted. Stay Alert to Your Environment Phone distraction causes accidents during dog walks, with injuries increasing sharply from 2001 to 2020 among people who walked dogs on leashes. Keep your phone in your pocket and scan continuously for approaching dogs, cyclists, and children who might startle your pet. Position yourself between your dog and potential threats like busy streets or aggressive animals. Watch for environmental hazards including broken glass, food scraps, and other dogs’ waste that could harm your pet. Weather conditions change your safety priorities – wet pavement reduces your grip strength while hot asphalt burns paw pads when temperatures exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit. If you walk in low-light conditions, invest in reflective gear for both you and your dog to significantly increase visibility and safety. Master Essential Commands for Control The wait command stops door dash attempts and prevents your dog from bolting into dangerous situations. Practice this command daily – drop treats in front of your dog before you open doors, which keeps their attention focused on you instead of the exciting world outside. Teach your dog to walk consistently on one side of your body (left side works best because it keeps them away from traffic). The heel command becomes essential when you encounter other dogs or need to navigate crowded sidewalks safely. Dogs that respond reliably to sit and stay commands avoid more conflicts with other pets during walks compared to untrained dogs. Even with perfect technique and commands, certain mistakes can still compromise your safety and create dangerous situations. What Leash Safety Mistakes Put Your Dog at Risk Damaged equipment causes more walk accidents than poor technique. Check your leash hardware every two weeks for stress fractures in clips, worn stitches at connection points, and frayed sections along the length. Metal clips fail suddenly when hairline cracks develop from repeated stress – replacement costs $15 but prevents emergency veterinary bills that average $800 per escape incident. Leather leashes crack when they dry out, while nylon develops weak spots where it rubs against rough surfaces. Replace any leash that shows visible wear immediately rather than wait for complete failure. Wrong Tension Creates Dangerous Situations Tight leashes trigger defensive behaviors in dogs according to animal behaviorists, while excessive slack eliminates your control when threats appear suddenly. Maintain exactly one inch of slack in your leash during normal walks – this prevents your dog from feeling trapped while it keeps them within your immediate control zone. Dogs with tight leashes show increased cortisol levels and aggressive responses to other animals. Loose leashes beyond six inches of slack allow dogs to build momentum before you react (which makes sudden direction changes impossible to manage safely). Stress Signals That Owners Miss Dogs telegraph their discomfort through specific body language that most owners ignore until problems escalate. Panting when temperatures stay below 70 degrees indicates anxiety rather than heat exhaustion. Tail position below the spine shows stress that precedes aggressive or flight responses. Dogs that freeze mid-walk, refuse forward movement, or repeatedly look backward signal environmental concerns you must address immediately. Excessive paw lifts, lip licks, and yawns during walks indicate stress levels that lead to unpredictable behavior. Stop walks when you notice these signs and redirect your dog’s attention with treats while you move away from the stressor. Owners who ignore these warnings face bite incidents, escape attempts, and traumatic experiences that require weeks of retraining to overcome (especially in reactive dogs). Final Thoughts Dog leash safety transforms every walk into a secure experience when you apply these proven techniques consistently. The six-foot nylon leash with proper thumb lock grip gives you optimal control while your dog enjoys reasonable freedom to explore safely. Weekly equipment inspections prevent 90% of leash failures that lead to emergency situations. Check metal clips for stress fractures and replace worn leashes before they snap during critical moments. Your investment in quality equipment pays dividends through years of reliable performance. Dogs that master basic commands like wait, heel, and stay avoid conflicts with other pets and navigate crowded areas without stress. Watch for stress signals that include excessive panting below 70 degrees, tail positions below the spine, and mid-walk freezing (these warning signs precede aggressive responses or escape attempts). These behaviors create dangerous situations for everyone involved. We at DogingtonPost provide comprehensive resources to help you become a more confident dog owner with expert advice on training, health, and responsible pet ownership.

Civil Trial Begins in Case of Teacher Shot by 6-Year-Old

The Anti-Communist Film Festival: Soviet Propaganda Cartoons

From Argentina to Japan, MAGA is going global. President Donald Trump’s slogan has long been “America First,” and his movement is all about making America great again — language the president’s foes misunderstand as meaning “isolationism.” In fact, strengthening America requires strengthening our friends as well — and Trump sets an example for those leaders in Latin America, Asia and Europe who want to make their nations great again, too. There’s no paradox here: A robust international order is impossible if America has to sacrifice its own industrial capacity, and our people’s economic security, to global free trade. That led to a weaker, more dependent America, even as our allies, in the era before Trump, expected us to shoulder most of the burden for their defense. The “liberal international order” was a suicide pact, building up China while wearing down America — and the system perversely incentivized our friends to prioritize welfare spending over national security needs. The alternative to that old, failed order isn’t anarchy or Chinese hegemony; it’s cooperation among stronger nations that take their responsibilities — to their own people and to Uncle Sam — more seriously. Japan is a critical case in point. Its new prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, represents a right turn for the dominant Liberal Democratic Party, which is Japan’s leading conservative party, despite what the name might suggest. More than 80 years after the end of World War II, Japan remains constitutionally forbidden to rearm: it has defense forces but not true military. Takaichi belongs to a wing of the Japanese right that would change that — and thereby make Japan no threat to anybody else but a better ally for America. The superpower danger in the Pacific today comes from Beijing, and the more constrained Japan is, the less constrained that China is. Rearmament is highly controversial within Japan, but just as Trump has taken controversial yet necessary steps to address America’s weaknesses — from imposing tariffs to cracking down on illegal immigration — a leader like Takaichi can bring great changes to her country. She’s already restricting immigration before it becomes the kind of problem it has long been in the West. Takaichi is a protege of Shinzo Abe, who was prime minister during Trump’s first term and had a uniquely strong bond with him. As the first woman to lead Japan, she’s also drawn comparison to Britain’s Iron Lady of the 1980s, Margaret Thatcher. Tariffs that serve America’s industrial policy put a strain upon trading partners like Japan, of course — although the land of the rising sun has long practiced its own forms of industrial and agricultural protection. Japanese rice production, for example, is heavily protected — which means Japan has enough domestic capacity to endure shortages in the event of war or other disruptions of international trade. Although Japan isn’t self-sufficient, it’s a boon to American security that the country can provide for itself better than some of our other friends in the region, such as Taiwan — which could be starved into submission by a Chinese blockade. Trump not only shows leaders like Takaichi that boldness can succeed in throwing out the political establishment’s playbook; his return to power prods allies like Japan to pick leaders simpatico with his right-leaning nationalist worldview — and those are the kind of leaders America needs among its allies in the 21st century. Right-of-center, anti-establishment politics also plays well for Trump-friendly leaders at home, both with voters and the stock market: Takaichi’s ascent sent the Nikkei stock index soaring to a new record. Half a world away, the success of President Javier Milei’s right-leaning party in Argentina’s midterm elections Sunday produced a similar result, with stock indexes booming by as much as 23%. It baffles Trump’s critics that America’s self-declared “Tariff Man” can have such good relations with Milei, a self-described “anarcho-capitalist.” But Trump thinks in terms of interests, not ideology, and it’s in America’s interests that Milei succeed in making Argentina freer, more prosperous and friendlier to us, in a region — our own neighborhood — where socialism, anti-Yanqui sentiment and Chinese influence continually threaten to align against us. There’s no contradiction in nationalists from different nations working in parallel to make their own countries stronger individually and more secure collectively. Likewise, there’s nothing strange about populist reformers from different places with different needs having sympathy for one another — Trump is fighting an establishment bent upon globalization; Milei faces an establishment in Argentina that wants an all-powerful state. Bringing different philosophies together to advance shared interests is simply the art of the deal. Trump’s the master of that, and other leaders around the world are quickly learning from him. They’re advancing a global realignment that will contribute to making America great again, even as it makes their own nations greater as well. Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review. To read more by Daniel McCarthy, visit www.creators.com.

A top Google executive made clear at a Wednesday hearing that the tech giant was proud of its censorship record. This admission may have dire implications for Big Tech’s ability to censor without consequences.  Markham Erickson, a government affairs executive at Google, repeatedly stated at a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation hearing that though the Biden administration had pressured Google to censor, the search giant had ultimately acted independently. Erickson also emphasized that Google had not admitted wrongdoing or made changes despite settling President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the company for censoring him in 2021.   [The story continues on MRCFreeSpeechAmerica.org]

The horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk in September should have united Americans. Instead, it split them even further. Conservatives watched too many of their countrymen on the left openly cheer the murder, and even weak denunciations often suggested Kirk got what he deserved.For a time, the right rallied — praising Kirk and demanding justice. That unity didn’t last. A furious fight over Kirk’s legacy followed, and that’s worse than politics: It’s destroying the movement he built.Charlie Kirk’s death was a monstrous crime. Let it not become the occasion for tearing the movement he led to pieces.George Washington spent much of his Farewell Address warning the young republic about foreign entanglements. He praised American separation from Europe’s great power intrigues and warned that making any foreign state a favored nation would corrupt domestic politics. Washington foresaw factions forming around foreign loyalties and predicted patriots who raised concerns about foreign influence would be branded traitors.His warning applies now, and the fracture cuts through conservatism itself. The United States has long allied with Israel — sharing intelligence, aid, and military cooperation. Many conservatives, especially evangelicals, treat support for Israel as near-religious obligation. Others point to practical security benefits in the Middle East. That religious devotion makes criticism of the relationship politically perilous. You can denounce Britain or Germany without being vilified. Question our alliance with Israel, and you risk immediate slurs — racist, anti-Semite, bigot.As Washington warned, centering policy on a foreign nation invites domestic discord and foreign meddling. Qatar and other Gulf states now pour money into U.S. institutions. Diasporas like India attempt to consolidate as a power bloc. None of this would surprise Washington. It was predictable. Still, both sides chatter past his counsel — and refuse the restraint he urged.Anger misdirectedCharlie Kirk excelled at coalition building and peacemaking. He united disparate conservatives behind Trump and MAGA. That’s why the civil war over his death is so corrosive. Conspiracy theories swirl. Former allies denounce one another in his name. Private texts between Kirk and fellow influencers have been leaked and used as weapons. The spectacle is inhuman.The impulse to treat Kirk’s private words as scripture echoes how people now treat the Constitution — stripping context until the document becomes a cudgel for whatever program you prefer. Left and right both reduce texts to proof texts; neither seeks the actual meaning.Kirk’s position on Israel was complicated. He loved and supported the state and saw biblical significance in its existence, yet he also held America First concerns about military commitments and complained about pressure from Zionist donors who pushed TPUSA to cancel conservatives. He sought to defuse right-wing animosity toward Israel through messaging at home and tempering excesses abroad. His views were nuanced — like most people tend to be when the shouting stops.Instead of using the outrage over his assassination to crush the left-wing terror network behind it, too many conservatives turned inward and drew long knives. One faction hates Israel so fiercely it would harm America; another treats any deviation from absolute support as treason.At the moment, conservatives should unify for survival, they trade blows over purity tests.Opponents or enemies?The reality is simple: Israel will remain. The conservative movement needs a coherent strategy. Religious devotion among evangelicals will persist, but it’s waning among younger Christians. Pro-Israel advocates must make a practical case to younger conservatives if they want broad support. Those who question the tie to Israel will keep growing in number.If pro-Israel conservatives want to avoid the radicalization they fear, they must tolerate dissent within the coalition without staging public witch hunts. Those who seek to re-evaluate the relationship should keep arguments factual and pragmatic. Washington’s cautions about favored nations and about letting hatred sabotage the country remain relevant.RELATED: Christians are refusing to compromise — and it’s terrifying all the right people rudall30 via iStock/Getty ImagesWe saw, after Kirk’s killing, how large segments of the left revealed a murderous contempt for conservatives. That truth cannot be unseen. But within conservatism, the critical question is whether your rival on the right is an opponent to debate or an enemy to be excised. Zionist or skeptic, neither camp is calling for your child to be shot. That low bar — refusing to wish literal violence on fellow citizens — must hold if conservatives hope to form a durable coalition.This is not an appeal to centrism. I have my views and have argued them plainly. But Kirk wanted a movement that could hold together. He worked to build a broad tent. The conservative civil war must end because the stakes are too high.If conservatives continue sniping through Kirk’s memory, they will squander their political capital and invite worse divisions. Washington warned us what happens when foreign loyalties and religious fervor distort public life; he warned that factional hatred breaks nations. Conservatives ought to remember that now — not to moderate principle for its own sake, but to preserve the only structure that allows principle to matter: a functioning political majority.Charlie Kirk’s death was a monstrous crime. Let it not become the occasion for tearing the movement he led to pieces. The left must be opposed forcefully and without mercy in politics, but infighting on the right hands them victory. Put down the knives. Honor Kirk by building the coalition he believed in — or watch the movement dissolve into impotence.

New revelations show the extent of the investigation known as Arctic Frost into the alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election.The Biden-era Federal Bureau of Investigation allegedly had a list of 160 Republican associates to investigate, according to the documents released by the Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee.‘This ought to be a chilling message to each and every American who loves this great country and believes in our constitutional system and equal justice under the law.'President Donald Trump and his allies have accused the previous administration of trying to imprison Trump officials under the guise of the Arctic Frost investigation out of political motivation."New Arctic Frost documents reveal even further wide ranging investigation by Biden's DOJ to take down President Trump and his supporters," reads a post from the committee on social media.The stated goal of the investigation was to find evidence that Trump allies "conspired to corruptly obstruct the United States Congress' certification of the 2020 Presidential election results by submitting allegedly fraudulent elector certificates."In a media briefing Wednesday, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said the new documents were obtained through a whistleblower and not from the FBI."This ought to be a chilling message to each and every American who loves this great country and believes in our constitutional system and equal justice under the law," Johnson said.Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) shared more than 1,700 pages of documents.RELATED: Exclusive: House Republican seeks criminal investigation into Jack Smith's alleged surveillance scheme Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas responded to the revelations on social media."Sen. Chuck Grassley just revealed that Jack Smith sent a subpoena to Verizon to tap my Senate office phone," he posted Wednesday afternoon. "This comes after learning that nearly 20% of Senate Republicans' cellphones, including mine, were also subpoenaed. Arctic Frost is the Biden DOJ's Watergate, and they need to be held accountable."The targets of the investigation included White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino and senior trade counselor Peter Navarro, as well as the chief operating officer at Turning Point USA, the organization founded by Charlie Kirk.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!