President Donald Trump threw down the gauntlet to left-wing rioters ravaging Los Angeles, alerting the feral mobs that he empowered the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Justice to restore law and order by any means necessary. In a Truth Social post Sunday, the...

Dallas Jenkins on the Legacy He Hopes 'The Chosen' Leaves

7 Family-Friendly Streaming Picks to Brighten Your June Nights

What happened to the Adam Silver who made great decisions

The UK government has announced that 500,000 additional children will receive a free school lunch following a major expansion in the program that provides it. Previously, the free meal was available only to students who come from the lowest of low-income households. Following the expansion, most low and middle-class citizens will be able to qualify, […] The post UK Announces Move to Universal Free School Lunches for All Low Income Homes–Expects 100,000 to Escape Poverty appeared first on Good News Network.

Danger Mouse (UK) Back in the 1980s, there was a problem: Drugs! There was an effort to shelter the kids from the threat. There was an effort to equip them against peer pressure. Here now CONTINUE READING... The post Drugs R Bad: The Saturday Morning Podcast appeared first on The Retro Network.

NATO plays a crucial role in our nation’s defense—and there’s a strong case to be made for increased defense spending by all NATO allies. Those are the points Nile Gardiner, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, made in his recent testimony before the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Europe Subcommittee. Gardiner is right: today, NATO matters more than ever and demands renewed commitment from our allies in Europe.  Gardiner noted that “the United States has a significant national interest in supporting and strengthening the NATO alliance, which has been the beneficiary of a huge investment by U.S. taxpayers for over three quarters of a century.” He further commented, “A secure Europe and a robust trans-Atlantic alliance, including the U.S./U.K. Special Relationship, advances the security of the American people.” As NATO looks toward the future, protecting U.S. interests in Europe—especially in emerging partners in the continent—remains vital. A stable, secure, and economically viable Europe isn’t just good for Europe—it’s in America’s economic best interest too. For more than seven decades since the signing of the treaty, U.S. military, diplomatic, and economic presence in Europe have contributed to European stability, economically benefiting both Europeans and Americans. But this vital partnership cannot be “a two-tier alliance” in which the United States carries the overwhelming military burden for the defense of the free world while some European allies build vast welfare states. Regrettably, many founding NATO members have prioritized welfare expansion over defense procurement, a shortsighted approach that has directly contributed to Europe’s current security crisis. Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea should have been a wake-up call; instead, it was met with half-measures and delayed commitments from key allies. Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine shattered any remaining illusions about European security. NATO’s collective security is only as strong as each member’s willingness to invest in it. The issue facing NATO is not whether and when allied spending should rise. Spending must rise now, not as a future aspiration, but as an urgent means of correcting years of strategic neglect. This renewed focus and commitment matters, given that NATO is the cornerstone of the transatlantic geoeconomic security alliance and practical partnership. Going forward, the best way to sustain a strong base is from the bottom up. The foundation of transatlantic relationship requires advancing practical bilateral partnerships with emerging partners and allies in Europe. Now more than ever, the U.S. should double down on its efforts to deepen and broaden its European engagement in the areas of military, economic, and energy cooperation. As Gardiner expressed in his testimony, “With bold US leadership at the helm, NATO still has the vision, capacity and energy to thrive and prosper for the next 75 years. But the long-term success of the alliance rests upon the willingness of all its member states to invest in their common defense and share the economic and military burdens that are necessary to keep the likes of Russia at bay. And the EU can never replace NATO.” The role NATO plays today is as vital as it has ever been. The depth and breadth of the NATO alliance is the most powerful deterrent in the world to those forces that threaten the United States and our partners. To improve cooperation and collaboration, NATO and the U.S. must work together to fine-tune their alliance via timely, forward-looking strategic clarity. The upcoming June 24- 25 NATO summit in Hague, Netherlands, provides the perfect opportunity to do just that. The post NATO Can Do More and Better appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The fastest flight by humans happened over 50 years ago.

A recent Wall Street Journal article, “The Pentagon Disinformation That Fueled America’s UFO Mythology” (June 6, 2025), claims to expose how the U.S. military used UFO stories to hide secret weapons programs. But a deeper analysis reveals something far more troubling—the article itself may be part of a new Pentagon disinformation campaign, manipulating public perception under the guise of transparency. The WSJ report confirms that since the 1950s, the Pentagon spread fake photos and false UFO stories—like altered “flying saucer” images at Area 51—to mislead the public and conceal advanced weapons projects, such as stealth aircraft. Rather than hiding alien technology, the military was protecting Cold War-era national security secrets. A congressionally-mandated Pentagon investigation, led by chief scientist Sean Kirkpatrick, found that misinformation was spread by military officials and possibly institutional programs, fueling decades of UFO myths. Some of these myths were deliberately allowed to flourish to misdirect foreign intelligence, particularly the Soviet Union. In 2023, investigators uncovered a bizarre “hazing” ritual in Air Force classified programs where new commanders were shown fake antigravity vehicle photos and told to keep them secret—further spreading false narratives. The Pentagon plans to release a follow-up report soon, but its 2024 UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) report already omitted critical details, raising suspicions. Absolute bomshell on the @WSJ front page today. The whole 78-year post-Roswell "US-gov-has-alien-tech" movement was a psyop—as I've always argued, & as WSJ just proved. Sadly, the ET/UFO Deception promoters will only double down. Refute them: https://t.co/TEdJBq44uv pic.twitter.com/unKa67gmgP — Daniel O'Connor (@DSDOConnor) June 7, 2025 Dismissing UFOs as Cold War Pranks While the WSJ article admits past deception, it also pushes a new narrative: that all major UFO incidents—including nuclear missile disruptions—were either mistaken sightings, military pranks, or misunderstandings. This dual tactic (admitting past lies while dismissing modern evidence) doesn’t clarify the truth—it muddies it further. One of the most glaring distortions involves the 1967 Malmstrom Air Force Base incident, where ten nuclear missiles suddenly shut down during a reported UFO encounter. Captain Robert Salas, an officer on duty that night, has repeatedly stated that a glowing object hovered above the facility before the missiles malfunctioned. Yet the WSJ now echoes the Pentagon’s new claim: that the incident was just an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) test. This explanation falls apart under scrutiny: EMPs cause permanent damage—they don’t just temporarily disable systems. A declassified Air Force study confirms that EMPs fry electronics irreversibly, yet Malmstrom’s missiles returned to normal operation shortly after. The U.S. already knew EMP effects from 1962’s Starfish Prime test, where a high-altitude nuke blacked out Hawaii’s streetlights (900 miles away) and destroyed satellites. If Malmstrom had been hit by an EMP, the damage would have been catastrophic and lasting. Why would the Pentagon test an EMP on live nuclear missiles during the Cold War? If they wanted EMP data, they had remote testing sites—not active missile silos. The Soviet UFO-Nuke Incident: Ignored Because It Doesn’t Fit Even more damning is the Pentagon’s silence on similar incidents abroad. In 1982, near Byelokoroviche, Soviet Ukraine, a UFO reportedly triggered a missile launch sequence, putting nuclear weapons in countdown for 15 terrifying seconds before they mysteriously reset. ABC News reported this in 1994, yet the WSJ and Pentagon completely ignore it—because it contradicts their narrative. The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) analyzed 590 documented UFO cases (1945-1975) and found statistically significant UFO activity near nuclear facilities—weapons labs, missile silos, and deployment bases. This wasn’t random; it showed targeted surveillance by unknown intelligences. Yet the WSJ omits this evidence entirely, reinforcing the idea that the article is not investigative journalism but narrative control. Is the Pentagon Using the WSJ Like Project Mockingbird? The timing of the WSJ piece is suspicious. Sources indicate that the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has already submitted Part II of its classified UFO report to Congress. The WSJ article may be prepping the public for a sanitized version, conditioning acceptance of the Pentagon’s preferred story. This mirrors Project Mockingbird, a CIA program that infiltrated major media outlets during the Cold War to plant government propaganda. The WSJ piece, with its selective facts and dismissive tone, fits this pattern perfectly. Discredit Whistleblowers – Frame witnesses like Salas as misguided or duped, using ridicule to silence them. Control the Narrative – Reduce UFO history to “Cold War pranks” to avoid scrutiny of current secret programs. Perpetuate Confusion – Admit some lies but offer no real answers, keeping the public in the dark. The Pentagon isn’t coming clean—it’s refining its deception. The WSJ article isn’t a breakthrough; it’s a psychological operation. If we want the truth, Congress must launch a formal investigation into the Pentagon’s ongoing UFO disinformation campaign. The American people deserve the full story—not another orchestrated cover-up. The post Pentagon’s UFO Gaslighting: How the WSJ Is Helping Cover Up the Truth appeared first on Anomalien.com.