YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #astronomy #police #humor #nightsky #moon #crime #treason #animalbiology #supermoon #perigee #commies #zenith #loonyleft #lawenforcement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
4 d

Tuesday’s Final Word
Favicon 
hotair.com

Tuesday’s Final Word

Tuesday’s Final Word
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
4 d

Vittert: Arguing Over International Law Pointless, Trump Always Wins
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Vittert: Arguing Over International Law Pointless, Trump Always Wins

NewsNation host Leland Vittert took Democrats and the liberal media to town Monday night over their newfound obsession with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s alleged “war crime” committed in early September. The On Balance host cut through the noise by arguing the reasonable and obvious: the strikes in the Caribbean were warranted and not unprecedented, and that Democrats have always lost when going after President Trump on common sense issues. After reporting the facts of the case, Vittert played a short compilation of clips from CNN’s The Situation Room, Chuck Todd on his podcast with Chris Cillizza, and Joe Scarborough on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, all of which were critical of the Trump administration’s actions: The Washington establishment is simply horrified that the Trump administration is killing drug runners, and they want you to be horrified as well. And they're happy. You can see that in their pensive smiles. Because to them this will be the issue that finally ends the Trump Presidency, or at least defangs Trump. Trump is doing what he does in every one of these situations: he stays defiant. Vittert then provided a brief history lesson to prove that the administration’s recent campaign against drug traffickers in fact had precedent, citing similar actions taken by former Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama in Colombia and Peru: “I don't remember anybody being charged with war crimes. […] Yet when Trump does it, we are to believe that it is completely unacceptable.” Other networks haven't wanted to acknowledge there were similar actions by other presidents.      The other major point of Vittert’s argument: “When Democrats attempt to bring down Trump and Hegseth on the process, on the rules, it's a losing argument.” Vittert didn’t even need to pull out a textbook to recall Democrat-darling Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador: … minor problem for Democrats, he had ties to MS-13, strong ties. Democrats back then were arguing the process, the rules, the due process of how exactly he was extradited and why this was terrible, and then Kristi Noem was gonna get fired, and it was gonna bring down the Trump administration. It didn't work for Democrats then, it's not going to work for them now. Not to mention the “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax, his two impeachments, and various lawsuits filed against him in-between his two terms. It’s been a futile witch hunt. In conclusion, based on Presidential precedent and the left’s TDS addiction, the inevitable endgame of the last few days’ controversy was clear: Arguing over the ins and outs of international law and whether or not Hegseth violated it is a pointless exercise […] To most reasonable Americans, blowing up boats bringing drugs into America makes sense. Call it common sense. When Democrats tried to defeat Trump on process issues, on common sense issues, they lose every time. They get excited, it's like Lucy and the football. They think this is going to be the time. Every time this happens, it actually makes Trump stronger. Only time would tell whether the latest attacks against Hegseth, Admiral Bradley, Joint Chief of Staff Chairman Caine or whoever else will actually stick. Needless to say, Trump will most likely come out unscathed and quite possibly, for the umpteenth time, vindicate The transcript is below. Click "expand" read: NewsNation’s On Balance with Leland Vittert December 1, 2025 9:01:33 p.m. EST LELAND VITTERT: If you watch TV this morning, much of the media and Democrats could not contain their glee, that a “double tap” strike on a boat that was running drugs might be the end of Pete Hegseth’s time as Secretary of War. The Washington Post reports Hegseth ordered the Navy to, quote, “Kill them all,” speaking of the alleged drug smugglers aboard a boat leaving Venezuela. The Navy admiral in charge of the strike then allegedly ordered a second missile strike on survivors of the first strike. [Cuts to clip] FMR. DEFENSE SEC. LEON PANETTA [on The Situation Room, 12/01/25]: I don't think there's any question that that's a war crime. ELIE HONIG [on The Situation Room, 12/01/25]: Well, Wolf, they were, in a word, illegal. CHUCK TODD [on Chris and Chuck Chat!, 12/01/25]: It's the kiss of death. It is — look, we know who the fall guy is going to be. JOE SCARBOROUGH [on Morning Joe, 12/01/25]: It’s a dangerous time legally for Pete Hegseth. It gets more dangerous if he is spending this time furiously going around trying to cover it up. [Cuts back to live] VITTERT: The Washington establishment is simply horrified that the Trump administration is killing drug runners, and they want you to be horrified as well. And they're happy. You can see that in their pensive smiles. Because to them this will be the issue that finally ends the Trump Presidency, or at least defangs Trump. Trump is doing what he does in every one of these situations: he stays defiant. [Cuts to clip] PRES. DONALD TRUMP [on 11/30/25]: And Pete said he said he did not want them — he didn't even know what people were talking about. So, we’ll look at — we’ll look into it. But no, I wouldn't have wanted that, not the second strike. [Cuts back to live] VITTERT: Okay, so Hegseth is distancing himself a little bit after a meeting in the Oval Office. He wrote on X, “Admiral Mitch Bradley is an American hero, [a] true professional, [and] has my 100% support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made — on the September 2 mission and all others since.” So, no matter what really happened there and both in the Pentagon and then what happened actually to the smugglers and the boat, these actions are nothing new. The Clinton administration shot down more than a dozen drug trafficking planes near Colombia and Peru from 1995 to 2001. I don't remember anybody being charged with war crimes. Bush's CIA started and Obama's continued a covert action in Colombia that killed dozens of revolutionaries from 2007 through 2013. Yet when Trump does it, we are to believe that it is completely unacceptable. You are all of a sudden hearing all of these words: the rules of war, the rules of engagement, laws of armed conflict, international law, the Geneva Convention. This would just be a political observation, but it’s also a human observation. Nobody liked the hall monitor in high school, or the RA, the person in college who told you couldn't drink after 10 p.m. in the dorms. Nobody likes those people. When Democrats attempt to bring down Trump and Hegseth on the process, on the rules, it's a losing argument. Remember just a couple of months ago, Democrats were losing their minds over the Maryland man deported to El Salvador. Kilmar Abrego Garcia turned into a household name and a household hero. And yes, minor problem for Democrats, he had ties to MS-13, strong ties. But Democrats back then were arguing the process, the rules, the due process of how exactly he was extradited and why this was terrible, and then Kristi Noem was gonna get fired, and it was gonna bring down the Trump administration. It didn't work for Democrats then, it's not going to work for them now. Arguing over the ins and outs of international law and whether or not Hegseth violated it is a pointless exercise, and here's why. To most reasonable Americans, blowing up boats bringing drugs into America makes sense. Call it common sense. When Democrats tried to defeat Trump on process issues, on common sense issues, they lose every time. They get excited, it's like Lucy and the football. They think this is going to be the time. Every time this happens, it actually makes Trump stronger.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
4 d

MAGA Republican defeats Nashville-hating Democrat in special election
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

MAGA Republican defeats Nashville-hating Democrat in special election

The Republican candidate has prevailed in the special election for the 7th congressional district of Tennessee.With 81% of the vote in, Matt Van Epps, a Trump-endorsed Republican, holds a lead of more than 11,000 votes over radical Democratic state Rep. Aftyn Behn. CNN and NBC News among other outlets have called the race for Van Epps.'I hate all of the things that make Nashville.'Though as of this writing he hasn't yet claimed victory on social media, Van Epps did tweet, "THANK YOU, TENNESSEE," shortly after media began calling the race.Behn has not commented on social media. However, she has lately had to answer for some previous comments and behaviors that indicate an erratic temperament and a deep-seated animus for Nashville, the city she was running to represent in Congress."I hate the city, I hate the bachelorettes, I hate the pedal taverns, I hate country music, I hate all of the things that make Nashville, apparently, an 'it' city to the rest of the country," she said.In 2019, Behn also stormed into the office of Republican Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, and security had to come in and forcibly remove her, video revealed. She then began kicking, screaming, and sobbing on the floor.By contrast, President Trump described Van Epps as a "phenomenal Candidate" and a "MAGA Warrior" in a Truth Social post on Tuesday morning.RELATED: Trump torches Nashville-hating Democrat for string of scandals: 'How the hell can you elect a person like that?' Photo by Jon Cherry/Getty ImagesThe special election was held on Tuesday to replace former Republican Rep. Mark Green, who abruptly retired in June after helping pass Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Green said he planned to pursue a private sector opportunity that was "too exciting to pass up." By holding the seat, Republicans will keep a 220-213 majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, though Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has already announced she plans to resign in January. Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill also stepped down from her seat after winning the New Jersey gubernatorial election last month.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
4 d

Who Really Killed Malcolm X? Inside The Lingering Mysteries Surrounding His Assassination
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

Who Really Killed Malcolm X? Inside The Lingering Mysteries Surrounding His Assassination

Bettmann/Getty ImagesMalcolm X being led away in a stretcher shortly after he was shot. On Feb. 21, 1965, one of America’s most powerful voices fell silent in a hail of bullets. Malcolm X, the fiery civil rights leader who offered a poignant expression of Black rage and Black pride, was murdered at age 39 while preparing to speak at New York City’s Audubon Ballroom. Three Nation of Islam members were later convicted of his murder: Thomas Hagan, Muhammad A. Aziz, and Khalil Islam. Hagan admitted to his role in the assassination, but Aziz and Islam always maintained their innocence. Now, six decades later, after Aziz and Islam were officially exonerated in 2021, many disturbing questions still remain. Who killed Malcolm X? Why were two men wrongly blamed for the crime? Was the murder carried out only by members of the Nation of Islam, or were law enforcement agencies possibly involved? And why has true justice remained so elusive? The Making Of Malcolm X Malcolm X was born Malcolm Little in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1925, into a world that would shape his revolutionary consciousness through violence and loss. His father, Earl Little, was a Baptist preacher and follower of the Jamaican-born Black nationalist Marcus Garvey, whose activism made the family especially vulnerable to white supremacist terror. The Ku Klux Klan shattered the family’s windows shortly before Malcolm was born, and after the family moved to Lansing, Michigan, a Klan offshoot burned their home. When Malcolm was six, his father died after being struck by a streetcar — an “accident” that his family and the local Black community believed was murder, suspecting that white racists had arranged for Earl to be killed. Years later, Malcolm’s mother Louise suffered a mental breakdown and was institutionalized, scattering the children into foster care. Wikimedia CommonsA teenage Malcolm Little’s mugshot in 1944. Despite this traumatic childhood, young Malcolm excelled academically and dreamed of becoming a lawyer someday — until a teacher told him that was “no realistic goal for a n*gger.” He then dropped out by the age of 15, and after years of hustling in Boston and Harlem, Malcolm was arrested in 1946 for grand larceny and sentenced to eight to 10 years. It was behind bars that Malcolm Little began his transformation. He devoured books in the prison library, hand-copying the dictionary and immersing himself in subjects like science, history, and philosophy. And when his brothers introduced him to the Nation of Islam, Malcolm found more than just a religion — he found a new purpose, eventually replacing his “slave name” with an X, representing his unknown African ancestry. Upon his release in 1952, his intelligence and charisma caught the attention of Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad, who made him a minister. Under Malcolm’s leadership, the organization exploded from roughly 400 members to an estimated 40,000 members in only eight years. Wikimedia CommonsBy the time of his death, Malcolm X’s rhetoric had taken on a more peaceful and inclusive tone — but he still counted many powerful enemies, leading to numerous potential suspects who may have killed him. Malcolm X became famous — and sometimes infamous — for his uncompromising rhetoric. While Martin Luther King Jr. preached racial integration and nonviolent civil rights activism, Malcolm X proclaimed that Black Americans should secure their rights and freedom “by any means necessary,” including armed self-defense. His refusal to condemn violence and his description of white people as the “white devil” for their oppression of Black people drew both fierce criticism and a passionate following. He gave voice to a different type of Black anger, one that rejected the dream of racial harmony and raised the possibility of Black nationalism and separatism. Though his rhetoric eventually took on a more peaceful and inclusive tone, he continued to have a massive target on his back. The Assassination At The Audubon Ballroom By early 1965, Malcolm X had long been a marked man. His relationship with the Nation of Islam had deteriorated dramatically after he discovered that Elijah Muhammad was having extramarital affairs with young secretaries — a clear violation of the movement’s teachings — and after Malcolm made controversial remarks following President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, calling it “chickens coming home to roost.” Wikimedia CommonsMalcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., pictured during the first and only time they met on March 26, 1964. In March 1964, Malcolm X publicly split from the organization. Soon afterward, he embarked on a pilgrimage to Mecca that would once again change his worldview. He marveled at the sight of Muslims of all races (including white Muslims), embraced Sunni Islam, began speaking about the possibility of racial unity, and even took on the new name El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz — earning him the lethal loathing of his former comrades. At the same time, Malcolm X had also long attracted the ire of the FBI. The FBI’s director J. Edgar Hoover was known to have hated Malcolm and ordered close surveillance on him for years. Ominously, it was eventually revealed that just a year before Malcolm’s murder, Hoover had ordered the FBI office in New York City to “do something about Malcolm X.” Malcolm X was well aware that death was coming. While visiting the University of Oxford, he told British activist Tariq Ali that “they’re going to kill me soon,” naming either the Nation of Islam or the FBI as likely culprits. Just one week before the assassination, Malcolm’s home in East Elmhurst, Queens was firebombed, effectively confirming his suspicions. On Feb. 21, 1965, Malcolm X arrived at the Audubon Ballroom in New York City’s Washington Heights neighborhood to speak in front of about 400 people at a rally for his Organization of Afro-American Unity. Despite the recent attempt on his life, he asked his security team not to carry guns or search attendees at the door, hoping to welcome potential new members and make them feel as comfortable as possible. Meanwhile, his wife Betty, who was pregnant with twins, sat in the audience with their other children. As Malcolm X began his speech with “As-salamu alaykum” — “Peace be upon you” — a commotion erupted in the crowd. Someone shouted about a “pickpocket.” And in the confusion, as Malcolm attempted to restore order, witnesses saw multiple men in the crowd firing multiple gunshots at him, with one of the gunmen “firing like he was in some Western.” Wikimedia CommonsCircled bullet holes from the stage of the Audubon Ballroom, where Malcolm X was shot to death. Malcolm X was shot 21 times. Betty Shabazz threw herself over her children as gunshots echoed through the ballroom. A UPI correspondent described a “terrifying volley of gunshots and screams” that seemed to last for an eternity. Meanwhile, Malcolm X tumbled backward, blood spreading across his face and chest. He was pronounced dead shortly after he was taken to the hospital. The enraged crowd quickly descended on the suspects. One assassin, Nation of Islam member Thomas Hagan, was caught at the scene after being shot in the leg by Malcolm’s security. He was then beaten by some members of the crowd before he was arrested by the police. Authorities later said that Hagan had a pistol containing four unused bullets. In the chaos and grief that followed, many questions emerged. Who killed Malcolm X? Was this simply the Nation of Islam’s revenge? Or was there something even more sinister at work here? Three Men Were Convicted Of Malcolm X’s Murder — But Did They Really Kill Him? Public DomainThomas Hagan being restrained by a police officer after the death of Malcolm X. Along with Thomas Hagan, police arrested two other Nation of Islam members for the death of Malcolm X: Muhammad A. Aziz and Khalil Islam. All three men were convicted of murder in 1966 and sentenced to life in prison. The prosecution’s case may have seemed straightforward enough on the surface — Nation of Islam members had killed their former comrade — but from the very beginning, the case was riddled with problems. Experts say law enforcement agencies left the crime scene improperly secured, arguably botching the investigation from the start, and shockingly, there was even a dance held at the same ballroom hours after Malcolm had been shot there. Though Hagan admitted to shooting Malcolm X, describing him as a “hypocrite” who had “gone against the leader of the Nation of Islam,” he adamantly insisted that Aziz and Islam had nothing to do with it. Aziz and Islam maintained their innocence, offering alibis that placed them at their homes in the Bronx when the murder occurred. What’s more, no physical evidence linked them to the crime. The prosecution relied entirely on eyewitness testimony — which was marked by troubling inconsistencies. In the 1970s, Hagan submitted two affidavits, reasserting that Aziz and Islam were innocent, naming other Nation of Islam members as his actual accomplices (while giving only partial names, not the full names). But for the time being, Aziz and Islam still remained behind bars. Later on, Aziz was paroled in 1985 and Islam was paroled in 1987, but their convictions still stood. Hagan stayed in prison until 2010 and eventually expressed “deep regrets” about his participation in killing Malcolm X. Bettmann/Getty ImagesMuhammad Abdul Aziz, one of the two men who were wrongly convicted for killing Malcolm X. Though Aziz and Islam were no longer in prison, they still had to live with the stigma of being convicted murderers of one of history’s most important civil rights leaders — a burden made all the heavier by their insistence they were innocent. Islam died in 2009, so he never saw his name cleared. As more people raised doubts about Aziz and Islam’s involvement, questions mounted about what really happened that day at the Audubon Ballroom. Then, in 2011, a former NYPD officer named Ray Wood claimed on his deathbed that he was part of a unit that worked to sabotage and discredit civil rights leaders — and one of his assignments was to help ensure the arrest of two of Malcolm X’s best bodyguards just days before his assassination, leaving the activist especially vulnerable. “It was my assignment to draw the two men into a felonious federal crime, so that they could be arrested by the FBI and kept away from managing Malcolm X’s door security on February 21, 1965,” Wood alleged. Wood also expressed regret and remorse for his actions decades earlier, saying that he “participated in actions that in hindsight were deplorable and detrimental to the advancement of my own Black people.” The letter’s reemergence in 2021 prompted Malcolm X’s daughter Ilyasah Shabazz to call for the evidence to be “thoroughly investigated.” By this point, a reinvestigation into Malcolm X’s death and who killed him was already underway, following the release of a documentary about the assassination and a new biography that renewed interest in the case. Exoneration And The Search For Truth In November 2021, after a 22-month investigation, Manhattan Judge Ellen Biben dismissed the convictions of Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam. One of the lawyers for Aziz and for Islam’s family said that the FBI and New York Police Department had withheld crucial evidence that pointed away from Aziz and Islam and could have even prevented their convictions. Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance said at the time: “We are moving today to vacate the convictions and dismiss the indictments. I apologize for what were serious, unacceptable violations of law and the public trust.” Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone/Getty ImagesMourners at Malcolm X’s funeral. The exoneration came about 57 years after the assassination, far too late for Islam, who had died still carrying the false mark of being Malcolm X’s killer. In October 2022, NPR reported that New York City had agreed to pay $26 million to settle lawsuits filed on behalf of both men, with the state of New York adding another $10 million — a total of $36 million that would be divided equally between Aziz and the estate of Islam. David Shanies, an attorney representing the two men, said the settlements sent a message that “police and prosecutorial misconduct cause tremendous damage, and we must remain vigilant to identify and correct injustices.” The New York City Law Department also acknowledged that the wrongful convictions represented a grave miscarriage of justice. Yet the exonerations, while vindicating two innocent men, only deepened the mystery of who actually killed Malcolm X. Thomas Hagan’s conviction still stands, but it’s clear that he didn’t work alone. Many scholars believe that other Nation of Islam members helped Hagan, likely including William Bradley, Leon Davis, Benjamin Thomas, and Wilbur McKinley. Unfortunately, it’s believed that most, if not all, of these potential accomplices have already died, making it impossible for them to be charged. Of course, the claims about the suppression of evidence by law enforcement agencies raise darker questions, and some believe that there may have been accomplices in various agencies like the FBI and the NYPD. Bettmann/Getty ImagesMalcolm X, pictured with his daughters Qubilah (left) and Attilah. Of course, J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI had been monitoring Malcolm X closely, viewing him as a threat to national security and clearly wanting any “threat” removed. Former NYPD officer Ray Wood’s deathbed confession letter has also been viewed by some as a sign of a larger conspiracy at work. And disturbingly, a witness who saw Malcolm X’s assassination later came forward to say that he heard one NYPD officer ask another officer “Is he one of us?” while they were restraining Thomas Hagan after the murder. The extent of possible FBI and NYPD involvement — whether through allowing the assassination to take place or even helping to plan it — remains unknown. Chillingly, it’s also unknown what other evidence is still buried. And so, the quest for the full truth still continues, as it remains shrouded in mystery. Malcolm X’s family has called for even further investigation into his death, closely examining resurfaced evidence like Ray Wood’s letter. As Ilyasah Shabazz had said, any new evidence deserves thorough inspection. The exoneration of Aziz and Islam seemed to show that the once-official story was built on shaky testimony at best and outright lies at worst. After reading about who killed Malcolm X and the lingering mysteries about his death, learn all about the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. Then, learn about Yuri Kochiyama, the woman who survived an internment camp, befriended Malcolm X, and became a prominent civil rights activist. The post Who Really Killed Malcolm X? Inside The Lingering Mysteries Surrounding His Assassination appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
4 d

British Medical Journal Concerned Far-Right Parties Are Gaining Ground
Favicon 
twitchy.com

British Medical Journal Concerned Far-Right Parties Are Gaining Ground

British Medical Journal Concerned Far-Right Parties Are Gaining Ground
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
4 d

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta Says Hegseth Is Guilty of a 'War Crime' in Narco-Terrorist Boat Blast
Favicon 
twitchy.com

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta Says Hegseth Is Guilty of a 'War Crime' in Narco-Terrorist Boat Blast

Former CIA Director Leon Panetta Says Hegseth Is Guilty of a 'War Crime' in Narco-Terrorist Boat Blast
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
4 d

Watch: Trump Has Everyone Laughing As He Humorously Nukes the Media and Their 'Fatigue' Narrative
Favicon 
redstate.com

Watch: Trump Has Everyone Laughing As He Humorously Nukes the Media and Their 'Fatigue' Narrative

Watch: Trump Has Everyone Laughing As He Humorously Nukes the Media and Their 'Fatigue' Narrative
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
4 d

Sen. Rand Paul: Hegseth Either Lying or Incompetent
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

Sen. Rand Paul: Hegseth Either Lying or Incompetent

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., charged Tuesday that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is either "lying" or "incompetent" in his continued defense of a second strike on a boat that was allegedly smuggling drugs reported late last week.
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
4 d

State Dept Finalizes Layoffs; No Returns Under Shutdown Deal
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

State Dept Finalizes Layoffs; No Returns Under Shutdown Deal

The Trump administration is pressing ahead with State Department workforce cuts, notifying hundreds of Foreign Service employees this week that their layoffs will proceed despite a shutdown-ending deal that forced other agencies to reverse similar actions.
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
4 d

Rep. Stefanik: Speaker Johnson Protecting Deep State
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

Rep. Stefanik: Speaker Johnson Protecting Deep State

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., has unloaded on House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., accusing him of protecting "the deep state."
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 532 out of 101622
  • 528
  • 529
  • 530
  • 531
  • 532
  • 533
  • 534
  • 535
  • 536
  • 537
  • 538
  • 539
  • 540
  • 541
  • 542
  • 543
  • 544
  • 545
  • 546
  • 547
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund