'Crowded primary race has no clear frontrunner'

The lie detector test results showed some level of deception

'A very challenging endeavor'

For years, fans have begged for MTV to go back to a music video format. Well, dust off your air guitars and crank up the volume, because for one glorious week this September, MTV is CONTINUE READING... The post MTV Is Bringing Back 24/7 Music Videos For a Limited Time appeared first on The Retro Network.

The Democratic Party establishment has been utterly discredited by four years under the Biden administration. While some of their party leaders and strategists have made a short-lived effort to rhetorically move to the “center,” the base of the party seems to be having nothing of it. They want “blood,” not abundance. At least, that’s what a recent Axios report suggested. “At town halls in their districts and in one-on-one meetings with constituents and activists, Democratic members of Congress are facing a growing thrum of demands to break the rules, fight dirty—and not be afraid to get hurt,” Axios reported. Axios noted that many House Democrats have said that “they see a growing anger among their base that has, in some cases, morphed into a disregard for American institutions, political traditions and even the rule of law.” Some of the quotes in the Axios piece, all anonymous of course, are downright disturbing. “Our own base is telling us that what we’re doing is not good enough … [that] there needs to be blood to grab the attention of the press and the public,” one House Democrat apparently said. “I actually said in a meeting, ‘When they light a fire, my thought is to grab an extinguisher,'” another House Democrat said, according to Axios. “And someone at the table said, ‘Have you tried gasoline?'” The story became even more ominous when just a short time later news broke that 10 people had been arrested and charged in connection with a terrorist attack at an ICE detention facility in Texas on the Fourth of July. There’s a lot to unpack here. The Axios report certainly could just be a planted story by House Democrats trying to justify their antics and impotence. But I do think it’s reflective of the state of the American Left and the direction Democrats are likely to take in the immediate future. Left Out of Power President Donald Trump’s return to the White House is undeniably an inflection point for the United States, more so than his first victory in 2016. When Democrats rode what remained of President Joe Biden into power in 2020 the country was still gripped by the Great Awokening, the George Floyd riots, and was under widespread COVID-19 lockdowns. Even though Biden won by the narrowest of margins and wasn’t even particularly popular with the Democrat base, he represented a return to the mid-2010s era of Obama, of institutions (wholly co-opted by the Left), of an end to populism in all forms. The Establishment had struck back. But then the reality of governing hit. It turns out an autopen president is wholly unprepared to handle the demands of the job in a time of crisis. The Left used its shallow political victory to foist what turned out to be a deeply popular agenda on America. Elite institutions followed suit—assuming this was the way of the future—and in some cases wholly discredited themselves. The country fell into a malaise deeper than even the late-1970s Jimmy Carter gloom. Then, after trying to literally imprison a former president, the dam broke. The entire country shifted to the right. Tech titans were lifting weights, abolishing DEI, and saying that mean Democrats made them censor Americans. Movies and entertainment produced during the Awokening became money-losing jokes. Corporations were scraping references to race-based hiring from their websites. Trump spent the first days of his presidency seriously striking at the nodes of entrenched left-wing power in the bureaucracy and reversing the Biden administration’s decision to flood the country with millions of illegal aliens. Now that Trump is riding a high of political success, both foreign and domestic, the Left is seething and looking for answers. They aren’t used to being this powerless. The institutions they’ve relied on for so long to enforce their dogmas have lost their old strength. Their demands are ignored and mocked. Their political leaders, desperate for relevance, have made appeals to moderates and conservatives instead of them. This has all been deeply and existentially dismaying to people used to getting their way. Democrat pride in America has sunk to new lows as they realize the country is no longer theirs to control. So where do they go from here? Mamdani, Lander, and Luigi As the Axios story noted, the Left’s base doesn’t want anything like the “triangulation” of Democrats in the 1990s who co-opted some of the Right’s Reaganite message and held onto power in a more conservative era. They want maximum confrontation. They want to revive the feeling of revolution, of being on the right side of history. So, they are embracing almost cartoonish post-colonial socialists like New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a young millennial who proudly embraces virtually every bad leftist idea since the French Revolution. They are rallying behind a peak member of the Howard Zinn generation. Take it down. pic.twitter.com/7Bmis8hnnh— Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) June 18, 2020 The college campus activist class sees the Democrat establishment weakening and they are taking their shot to fully topple it. Democrat base voters, many of them who imagine that in fighting Trump and Republicans they are stopping Adolf Hitler and Darth Vader, want spectacle from their political leaders. Hence, the cringeworthy stunts from politicians like New York Comptroller Brad Lander and California Sen. Alex Padilla. I’m guessing we are going to see a lot of embarrassing behavior like this in the coming years. Democrats know their base craves victimhood. ?PUBLICITY STUNTIn order to score what he thinks are political points, NYC Comptroller and Mayoral Candidate Brad Lander gets himself arrested at immigration courtHe’s actively interfering with ICE operationsHe went straight to the FO phase pic.twitter.com/Fcc8NAUhNF— Phil Holloway ?? (@PhilHollowayEsq) June 17, 2025 ? #BREAKING @SenAlexPadilla tries to interrupt a press conference by @DHSgov Sec @KristiNoem and he’s forcibly removed. California’s senior U.S. Senator was handcuffed and detained. Video from @AlexPadilla4CA’s staff ? pic.twitter.com/PXfszkBXxo— Elex Michaelson (@Elex_Michaelson) June 12, 2025 Democrat Rep. LaMonica McIver (red jacket) is literally throwing hands at ICE agents outside their detention facility for illegals in Newark.pic.twitter.com/LPsPsSdwas— Greg Price (@greg_price11) May 9, 2025 I suspect most of the “blood” being demanded by Democrat base voters is of this variety. Dumb stunts carried out by theater kid politicians to simulate danger and fighting the “man.” This is “doing something.” Yet, there is undeniably a fringe that’s willing to do more. There are the Luigi Mangione types who may decide that in an era in which their ideas have been rejected, they will take matters into their own hands and murder those who disagree with them. Some on the bloodthirsty Left haven shamefully glamorized these actions. These trends are unmistakable. Yet only a handful of Democrat leaders have been willing to take a stand against the current within their own party. Most seemed resigned to the party’s move leftward or are actively encouraging it. Many seem to think that is the way forward for the Democratic Party, and maybe it is in a certain way. But we shouldn’t be complacent to the reality that if a movement like that ever does fully take power, the reality will first be blood, then tyranny. All the repressive actions of the Biden administration will be doubled down on and magnified. On that, we should take the LARPing leftists seriously. The post Democrat Base Wants ‘Blood,’ Not Abundance appeared first on The Daily Signal.

At DogingtonPost, we understand the importance of finding loving homes for all dogs, including those who don’t complete their service training. If you’re wondering where to adopt failed service dogs, you’re in the right place. These incredible animals possess unique qualities and skills that make them excellent companions. In this post, we’ll guide you through the process of adopting a failed service dog and introduce you to organizations that can help you find your new furry friend. Here’s the modified chapter: What Are Failed Service Dogs? Understanding Service Dog Training Service dogs undergo intensive training programs to assist individuals with disabilities. These programs typically last 18 to 24 months and focus on teaching specific skills tailored to a future handler’s needs. The dogs learn to perform tasks that help their handlers navigate daily life with greater independence. Reasons for Training Failure Not all dogs complete their service training successfully. An estimated 70% of service dogs in training don’t graduate due to behavioral issues. Common reasons for failure include: High distractibility Inability to remain calm in public Physical health issues (e.g., hip dysplasia) Excessive energy levels Lack of confidence in new environments Unique Qualities of Failed Service Dogs Despite not completing their training, these dogs often possess exceptional qualities. They typically have: Good socialization skills Basic obedience training Comfort in various environments Many organizations, such as Freedom Service Dogs of America, note that their career change dogs make wonderful pets due to their gentle nature and prior training. Adopting a Failed Service Dog When you adopt a failed service dog, you should understand that these dogs may require continued training and patience. They’re often intelligent and eager to please but may need help transitioning to a pet lifestyle. Organizations like Guide Dogs for the Blind offer career change dogs for adoption. These dogs are generally between 1 and 2 years old and have received extensive socialization and basic training. This can be a significant advantage for adopters looking for a well-mannered companion. Transition to Pet Life Failed service dogs often thrive in family environments, bringing joy and companionship to their new owners while benefiting from the stability of a forever home. However, it’s important to remember that these dogs may need time to adjust to their new role as a pet (rather than a working dog). As we explore the topic further, let’s look at the organizations and programs that specialize in placing these exceptional dogs in loving homes. Where Can You Find Failed Service Dogs for Adoption? At DogingtonPost, we often receive questions about adopting failed service dogs. These exceptional animals make wonderful companions, and several organizations dedicate themselves to placing them in loving homes. Let’s explore some of the best options for finding your new furry friend. National Organizations Several national organizations specialize in placing failed service dogs. Guide Dogs for the Blind has a career change dog program. These dogs typically range from 1 to 2 years old and have received extensive socialization and basic training. Freedom Service Dogs of America places career change dogs with families looking for well-trained companions. These dogs often have a solid foundation in obedience and socialization, which makes them excellent pets. Service Dogs Inc., based in Texas, offers a career change dog adoption program. They rescue dogs from shelters and train them, placing those unsuitable for service work in loving homes. Local Options While national organizations provide great resources, don’t overlook local options. Many local shelters and rescue groups work with service dog organizations to place failed service dogs. These partnerships can provide opportunities to adopt these special dogs closer to home. Check with your local animal shelters and ask if they have relationships with service dog training programs. Some shelters may receive career change dogs directly from these programs. Veteran-Focused Programs For veterans looking to adopt, specialized programs exist. Pets for Patriots helps veterans adopt companion animals (including some failed service dogs). These programs often provide additional support and resources for veteran adopters. K9s For Warriors primarily trains service dogs for veterans, but they occasionally have career change dogs available for adoption. Application Process Regardless of which organization you choose, prepare for a thorough application process. These organizations want to ensure their dogs go to suitable homes. You may need to provide references, undergo a home check, and demonstrate your ability to care for a dog. The waiting period can vary significantly. Some organizations have long waiting lists due to high demand for these well-trained dogs. Patience plays a key role in this process. Adoption Fees Adoption fees for failed service dogs can range from $0 to over $1,000. These fees often reflect the extensive training and care these dogs have received. While it might seem high, these organizations invest significantly in each dog’s training and care. When you consider adopting a failed service dog, take time to research different organizations. Each has its own policies and procedures. Understanding the process and maintaining patience will set you on the path to providing a loving home for one of these special dogs. Now, let’s move on to the steps you’ll need to take once you’ve found an organization to adopt from. How to Adopt a Failed Service Dog Research Organizations Start your adoption journey by researching reputable organizations that offer failed service dog adoptions. Many national dog organizations adopt out canines who fail to make it through training. You’ll often see these dogs referred to as career change dogs. Local shelters and rescue groups may also have partnerships with service dog training centers. Contact multiple organizations to compare their adoption processes, waiting times, and fees. Adoption fees typically range from $35 to $150 per month, depending on the dog’s breed and the policy you choose. Be cautious of organizations charging significantly more without clear justification. Complete the Application After you choose an organization, prepare to fill out a detailed application. This usually includes questions about your lifestyle, living situation, and experience with dogs. Many organizations require: Proof of a fenced yard or suitable exercise area Veterinary references (if you’ve had pets before) Personal references Proof of income to ensure you can care for the dog Some organizations conduct virtual interviews as part of the screening process. Be honest in your responses to ensure the best match for both you and the dog. Prepare Your Home While you wait for approval, prepare your home for your new companion. Failed service dogs are often larger breeds like Labrador Retrievers or Golden Retrievers. Ensure you have: A comfortable bed Appropriate-sized food and water bowls A crate for safe transport Toys for mental stimulation Consider dog-proofing your home by securing trash cans and removing potentially harmful plants or chemicals. Meet Potential Adoptees Once approved, you’ll likely receive an invitation to meet potential adoptees. Organizations arrange meet-and-greets to ensure compatibility. During this interaction: Observe the dog’s behavior in different situations Ask about the dog’s specific training and any quirks Discuss the dog’s medical history and any ongoing needs Some organizations offer a trial period (typically one week) to ensure the dog fits well with your family and lifestyle. Use this time to establish routines and observe how the dog adjusts to your home environment. Finalize the Adoption If the trial period is successful, you’ll move forward with finalizing the adoption. This often involves signing adoption papers, paying the adoption fee, and receiving any relevant medical records or training information. The organization may also provide post-adoption support to help with the transition. Final Thoughts Adopting a failed service dog offers a unique opportunity to welcome a well-socialized and partially trained canine into your home. These exceptional animals possess qualities that make them wonderful companions, despite not completing their service training. You can find organizations that specialize in placing these dogs through our guide on where to adopt failed service dogs. The adoption process requires patience, understanding, and a commitment to ongoing care. However, the rewards of providing a loving home to one of these special animals are immeasurable. You’ll gain a loyal friend, a well-mannered companion, and the satisfaction of knowing you’ve made a significant difference in a dog’s life. We at DogingtonPost promote responsible dog ownership and support adoption initiatives. If you’re ready for a unique and fulfilling adoption experience, consider opening your heart and home to a failed service dog. Your new companion will bring joy, loyalty, and a special bond built on trust and mutual understanding.

The NY Times Does Its Best to Defend Mamdani's Bureaucratic Blackface (Again)

Michael Shear, a senior correspondent for the New York Times, made the front page of Sunday’s newspaper discussing how everyone dislikes Israel for good reason in his “news analysis,” “Today’s Israel: More Secure, More Isolated.” First, he declared victory on Israel’s behalf. It’s Israel’s Middle East now. After three-quarters of a century fighting hostile neighbors, the tiny Jewish country, about the size of New Jersey, has all but vanquished its enemies -- Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, Houthis in Yemen and now even Iran itself, the one backing them all. But why does Shear describe Israel fighting to win a war it didn’t start in such negative terms? The exercise of raw power has allowed Israel, for the first time since its creation in 1948, a future mostly free from immediate threats. The risk of a nuclear Iran is diminished, or perhaps gone. Israel has stable, if uneasy, relations with Persian Gulf Arab states. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has cemented his partnership with President Trump. The new reality in Israel, said Yaakov Amidror, a retired Israeli general and former top aide to Mr. Netanyahu, is that places once under constant threat from Lebanon, Syria or Gaza “will be more secure than Manhattan.” But at what cost? Mr. Netanyahu’s relentless and unapologetic military response to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack that killed 1,200 people and took 250 people hostage has cemented the view of Israel as a pariah, its leadership accused of genocide and war crimes, and disdained by some world leaders. In opinion polls globally, most people have a negative view of Israel. So what’s new? Israel’s very existence has always been loathed by Islamic states and lately, the international left. Notice how Shear and The Times don't use words like "genocide" and "war crimes" and "pariah" for actual terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. They get the bland treatment. The only description for their fanatical viewpoint is "pro-Palestine." "Militancy" is mentioned once, but the word "extremist" is saved for Israelis: There has been a surge in violence by extremist settlers against Palestinian civilians.the most intense crackdown on West Bank militancy in a generation, carrying out destructive raids, killing hundreds of people and arresting thousands. There was more of that:  In Gaza, the war against Hamas has taken a devastating toll, killing tens of thousands of people and leaving more than a million homeless and hungry. Much of the enclave has been reduced to rubble. Poverty and hopelessness are rampant. Israel is apparently to blame for violence against Jews worldwide: ….support for the country has become a fiercely contentious issue in Congress, the subject of angry debates and protests on college campuses and fuel for a surge in antisemitic incidents in the United States and around the world. The political climate has become deeply polarized. Many supporters of Israel denounce any criticism as antisemitic hate, while those opposed to Israeli policies vow not to be silenced by a label they call unfair. Shear does discuss and name anti-Semitic attacks but strained to contextualize them, noting that the Columbia protest group was a bit "extreme" -- without mentioning their celebrated leader Mahmoud Khalil. On Oct. 7, 2024, a year after the attacks by Hamas inside Israel, the pro-Palestine group that had organized student encampments at Columbia University issued a statement calling for “liberation by any means necessary, including armed resistance.” The statements were meant to shock and provoke. They were at the extreme end of the spectrum and did not represent the views of most students, experts say. Around the world, outrage at Israel’s actions in Gaza has been expressed largely as peaceful protests demanding an end to the war, but also by praise for the Hamas attacks, and even by some targeted attacks on Jews, killed in the name of opposition to Israel. Shear had a petulant response to the Trump administration having "seized on the campus divisions to accuse universities of failing to respond to antisemitism." Democratic lawmakers say Mr. Trump is exaggerating the situation for political gain. In April, five Jewish senators wrote in a letter to the president that his stated goal of fighting antisemitism was “simply a means to an end to attack our nation’s universities.” “Exaggerating the situation”? Jew-exclusion zones on campus, facilitated by the university itself? A “Zionists don’t deserve to live” video by a student leader of a pro-Hamas encampment?

On Monday night's episode of MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show, viewers were treated to a familiar ritual in left-wing media: the exploitation of tragedy to advance a partisan agenda. This time, the devastating floods in Texas served not as a moment of national unity, but as a launchpad for attacking political opponents with science as the supposed casualty. Maddow’s conversation with meteorologist Eric Holthaus was less an interview and more a political indictment dressed up as weather commentary. Holthaus, a frequent contributor to progressive publications like The Guardian, wasted no time blaming the Trump administration for climate-related disasters, claiming it had "systematically undercut science."     Missing from the conversation? Any acknowledgment that disaster preparedness and environmental policy were shared responsibilities across local, state, and federal levels, something that the large state of Texas had often struggled to meet. Maddow's leading question was a perfect example of that (click "expand" to read):  MADDOW: The rescue and recovery operations in Texas are still underway. It is heartbreaking. It's also, I think, increasingly infuriating that we're in this situation. Is it fair to say that we are taking action as a country to basically lessen our readiness, to lessen our ability to protect people and warn people in the face of this kind of disaster? HOLTHAUS: Yeah. I mean, unfortunately that's exactly right. I think that what the Trump administration has been doing is systematically undercutting science. I mean, let's take a step back. Here we are in the middle of the most severe problem our species has ever faced in climate change. And that problem is accelerating. Emissions are accelerating, and this administration has really decided to just say, “nope, we're not going to pay attention to that and we'll hope that everyone can, you know, fend for themselves.” And it's really, really infuriating as someone who's been covering this beat for 20 years now. I have little kids, you know, like I wake up at night and am just worried for, you know, when's– where's the next flood going to be? We haven't entered hurricane season yet and it's just it's going to be bad and it's heartbreaking. To pin this tragedy on federal budget cuts was lazy, politically motivated reporting. The National Weather Service in Texas has said themselves that the loss of life was a result of the amount of rainfall in addition to the nocturnal timing of the storm, a combination that proved to be the culprit in what made this flood so deadly.   But this wasn't the first time that Texas' emergency response to weather was lacking. In 2021, Texas suffered an intense winter storm that took out the state’s power grid, stripping millions of Texans of electricity and heating. The death toll for that storm rose past 200, and Texas’ emergency weather preparedness was also to blame then, not the White House. The exchange made one thing painfully clear: when progressives talk about disasters, they don’t just want action they want someone to blame. Even in the face of a natural disaster that demands cooperation and compassion, Maddow and her guest prioritized partisanship. Budget cuts to federal agencies became a stand-in for a broader narrative: that conservatives were anti-science, anti-fact, and anti-compassion. But that narrative conveniently ignored the complexity of government funding, the realities of bureaucratic obstacles, and the actual science around weather forecasting. Suggesting that fewer positions at NOAA directly led to a specific weather-related tragedy was both irresponsible and unprovable. But that didn’t stop MSNBC from implying it. Holthaus even asserted that the reason for the government budget cuts was because our officials think they can stop weather events from occurring. "I don't really understand any reason for that other than this idea that, you know, if you stop predicting something, that it won't happen– which obviously is a fairy tale,” he declared. What viewers witnessed was not journalism but a carefully scripted performance meant to stir outrage and assign moral blame. Holthaus spoke of losing sleep over his children’s future, a sentiment any parent can sympathize with. But the implication that his anxiety was caused by a particular political party was emblematic of the emotional manipulation that increasingly defines mainstream media. That kind of coverage hasn’t helped the public understand science; it has weaponized it. And when media institutions like MSNBC portray scientific funding as a zero-sum battle between good and evil, they not only distort the facts but sow fear among the public. When the public needed news that reported on natural disasters with facts and empathy, they got partisan talking points disguised as concern to meet an agenda. The entire transcript is below. Click "expand" to read. MSNBC’s The Rachel Maddow Show July 7, 2025 9:52:24 PM ET  RACHEL MADDOW: Joining us now is Eric Holthaus. He's a meteorologist and the founder of Currently Weather Service. He's been doing some frankly harrowing reporting on the collision of budget cuts and climate change and science for The Guardian newspaper. His latest article for The Guardian is titled “Texas Floods Reveal Limitations of Disaster Forecasting Under Climate Crisis.” Mr. Holthaus, thank you very much for joining us. I really appreciate it. ERIC HOLTHAUS: Yeah, thank you so much. It's a real honor to be here. MADDOW: The rescue and recovery operations in Texas are still underway. It is heartbreaking. It's also, I think, increasingly infuriating that we're in this situation. Is it fair to say that we are taking action as a country to basically lessen our readiness, to lessen our ability to protect people and warn people in the face of this kind of disaster? HOLTHAUS: Yeah. I mean, unfortunately that's exactly right. I think that what the Trump administration has been doing is systematically undercutting science. I mean, let's take a step back. Here we are in the middle of the most severe problem our species has ever faced in climate change. And that problem is accelerating. Emissions are accelerating, and this administration has really decided to just say, “Nope, we're not going to pay attention to that and we'll hope that everyone can, you know, fend for themselves.” And it's really, really infuriating as someone who's been covering this beat for 20 years now. I have little kids, you know, like I wake up at night and am just worried for, you know, when's– where's the next flood going to be? We haven't entered hurricane season yet and it's just it's going to be bad and it's heartbreaking. MADDOW: I feel like one of the things that we've all had to learn in these last few years is that climate change means climate chaos. It means weather chaos, and it means unpredictability when it comes to dealing with severe weather events of all kinds. One of the things that I think we're looking to science for right now, in terms of resilience, is to try to sort of increase predictability, to try to increase what we understand about how weather goes haywire in this type of climate crisis that we're in. Is that the kind of science that is being abandoned or turned off by this administration? HOLTHAUS: Right. I mean, there's one thing with the National Weather Service cuts. So, you know, the Austin-San Antonio office, which has responsibility for Kerr County in this case, was missing its Warning Coordination Meteorologist as you outlined. And that is the person who coordinates with emergency officials as a representative of meteorologists employed by the federal government to manage that disaster. And, yes, they had enough people on hand during the storm to cover that role. But as you said, you lost someone with decades of experience for no reason. And systematically now throughout the administration, you know, as we're going through this budget process the last couple of months, the parts of NOAA, parts of the parent of the National Weather Service that have been cut most are the researchers. So, the people that are working to make our science, moving it forward, those positions are being cut. You know, the Environmental Modeling Center, which is based in Maryland, their only job is to improve the weather models that every single person in the United States, every weather app, and anytime you get a weather forecast, these are the models that that forecast comes from. And those people have been fired. And it's just like, I don't really understand any reason for that other than this idea that, you know, if you stop predicting something, then it won't happen– which obviously is a fairy tale. MADDOW: Well, yeah, it doesn't even count as magic, bad magic to even try that. Eric Holthaus, founder and Chief Meteorologist at Currently Weather Service. Thank you for being with us, again, in the midst of this still ongoing disaster. We look forward to having you back to talk about talk about this more in the future. Eric, thanks.

Jeffrey Tucker, president of the Brownstone Institute, received an alleged leaked document detailing a plot to sabotage Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — and while he admits he doesn’t “know how you authenticate something like this” — he does believe the contents are cause for concern.The membership of the organization the memo is attributed to includes vaccine manufacturers, drug manufacturers, and hundreds of other biotech firms.Among those are Pfizer and Merck.“It’s time to go to the Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go,” reads a document that seems to contain notes from an April 3, 2025, meeting of the Biotechnology Innovation Organization’s Vaccine Policy Steering Committee.“This document is essentially a summary, or the minutes readout, of this April 3, 2025, meeting, allegedly, in which they are trying to figure out how to get Bobby Kennedy out of office,” BlazeTV host Liz Wheeler explains.“Now, that in and of itself is not terribly scandalous, except for the fact that they are not interested in the science that Bobby Kennedy is trying to reclaim in public health in our government,” she continues.While the document’s stated agenda is “to go to the Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr. to go,” that’s not the issue Tucker and Wheeler have with it — but rather how they plan to do it.“So there are conspiracy theories, and there are conspiracies. This is a conspiracy,” Tucker says, explaining that the group allegedly plans to remove RFK Jr. via creating a divide between MAHA and MAGA.“So you just assert that RFK is operating at odds with the MAGA agenda. So you want to drive a wedge between those two things and find ways to do that to turn the executive office of the White House against what RFK is doing,” he says, explaining the plan to Wheeler.Another alleged piece of their plan, Tucker says, is to “divide the MAHA alliance itself by making more diffuse and chaotic the coalition that supports RFK and is looking into the safety of these products.”“And one of the ways they’re planning to do that is what I think we could call triangulation,” he explains. “You reach out to conservative influencers, they may name several institutions here where they think are vaccine friendly, along with several administration employees that they think are probably weak and sort of corruptible in some way.”“This memo is very clever,” he continues, adding, “They’re trying to sort of drive a wedge between RFK and the agency’s appointees that he’s named based on their past positions.”While Tucker and his colleagues remain unsure of the veracity of the document, a spokesman from BIO claims the organization's vaccine task force had nothing to do with it. “The purported memo was not produced by BIO. We have never seen or heard of this document, and it certainly does not accurately represent the spirit, strategy, or mission of BIO’s work," he said. Though, in an interview with the Daily Signal, "He declined to confirm or deny the veracity of the quote about lobbying for Kennedy’s ouster."Want more from Liz Wheeler?To enjoy more of Liz’s based commentary, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.