A barbaric practice that maims and degrades women throughout the Islamic world. The post Nightmares of Female Genital Mutilation appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Was there some reason why Minnesota Somalis felt free to help themselves to government funds? The post Why All the Somali Fraud? appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

Not merely an invitee, but given pride of place. The post Tucker Carlson at the Doha Forum appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

And her threats are to be taken seriously. The post Ilhan Omar Has Ominous Words for Those Who Are ‘Collaborating with the Authoritarian Regime’ appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

How the Hegseth smear exposes a civilization that cries for killers and handcuffs its defenders. The post Tears for Injun Joe appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

According to The London Times, Sadiq Khan, the far-left mayor of London, mentored Zohran Mamdani. New York City can expect to replicate the new London, perhaps even worse. This week, Mayor Khan is under fire for the racist staff guidelines on his website. He said the white family photos don’t represent real Londoners. There was […] The post Staff for London’s Leftist Mayor X’d Out White Families on His Website appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The Golden Globes completely snubbed popular conservative and independent podcasts when nominations were announced on Monday for the newly-created category, Best Podcast. Instead of including some of the most listened-to podcasts in the nation, the organization nominated mostly actors and comedians for the category. Nominees included “Armchair Expert with Dax Shepard,” Alex Cooper’s “Call Her Daddy,” “Good Hang with Amy Poehler,” “The Mel Robbins Podcast,” NPR’s “Up First,” and “SmartLess” hosted by actors Jason Bateman, Will Arnett, and Sean Hayes. Notable snubs include “The Joe Rogan Experience,” widely known to be the most popular podcast in the nation and a chart topper across Apple, Spotify, and YouTube. Other huge conservative podcasts left out include “The Ben Shapiro Show” and “The Megyn Kelly Show.” Shapiro discussed being one of the 25 eligible podcasts for the nomination during an interview with Gold Derby last month. He said that in order for the country to unify, the other side needs to acknowledge the existence of conservatives. “I do think that it is necessary for people to sit at the same table and at least acknowledge that we’re all Americans together. Because if we can’t even do that, it’s going to be very difficult to have a country together,” he told the outlet. The Daily Wire host also noted how it was “really, really important” for podcasts to be recognized as a medium. Per the Golden Globes, the goal of the new award is to celebrate excellence in podcasting by recognizing their “quality, creativity, audience engagement, and impact.” Besides shutting out every conservative and independent podcast, the organization did not nominate any true crime shows, and kept the far-Left podcast “Pod Save America” off the list as well. The company said it would use “proprietary methodology designed to objectively evaluate podcasts,” based on metrics including audience reach/engagement, financial metrics, and platform visibility/market presence.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) declared her candidacy for the United States Senate seat currently held by Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) — but Mark Halperin is saying she doesn’t stand a snowball’s chance in the Lone Star State. Halperin, speaking with “AfterParty” host Emily Jashinsky, explained that Crockett was fighting an uphill battle in the reliably red state and would likely struggle to win a statewide election even if the Republican candidate was not ideal. WATCH: ?NEW: @MarkHalperin tells @emilyjashinsky Jasmine Crockett’s Senate hopes *DEAD IN WATER*? “Emily, a Democrat has not won a statewide office in Texas for over a quarter century. And if you’re asking me if Jasmine Crockett will be the Democrat who breaks that streak, the answer… pic.twitter.com/D6g3NqFwPX — Jason Cohen ?? (@JasonJournoDC) December 9, 2025 “Emily, a Democrat has not won a statewide office in Texas for over a quarter century. And if you’re asking me if Jasmine Crockett will be the Democrat who breaks that streak, the answer is no,” he began. He went on to say that it was certainly possible Crockett would make it through a Democratic primary, however unlikely an eventual win might be. “Maybe she’ll be the nominee, and if she is, the Republicans will rejoice because any of the three Republicans in the Republican primary can beat her, almost certainly,” Halperin continued. “Because again, there’s a profile that’s been bandied about for years of the kind of Democrat who could break this 35 — or whatever it is, I guess 31-year losing streak to win a statewide office in Texas, and that profile matches not at all with Jasmine Crockett.” Crockett’s campaign pitch thus far appears to be yet another lode from the same vein as much of her career so far in the U.S. House, largely built on direct and vocal opposition to anything President Donald Trump says or does.

The Justice Department will no longer pursue civil rights lawsuits based on “disparate impact theory,” the Trump administration announced Tuesday. The move comes after 50 years of government policy that encouraged lawsuits against “race neutral” policies without showing evidence of actual racial discrimination, the department said. Disparate impact theory is a framework that often assumes discrimination when there are different outcomes for different groups of people, even if there is no explicit discriminatory practice in place. “For decades, the Justice Department has used disparate-impact liability to undermine the constitutional principle that all Americans must be treated equally under the law,” said Attorney General Pam Bondi. “No longer. This Department of Justice is eliminating its regulations that for far too long required recipients of federal funding to make decisions based on race.” The Justice Department issued a rule removing disparate impact from consideration under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI prevents entities that discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion, and national origin from receiving federal money or support. “The prior ‘disparate impact’ regulations encouraged people to file lawsuits challenging racially neutral policies, without evidence of intentional discrimination,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Our rejection of this theory will restore true equality under the law by requiring proof of actual discrimination, rather than enforcing race- or sex-based quotas or assumptions.” The change comes after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in April that directed the federal government to stop using disparate impact theory in government policy and regulations. The order defined disparate impact theory as the “presumption” that “unlawful discrimination exists where there are any differences in outcomes in certain circumstances among different races, sexes, or similar groups, even if there is no facially discriminatory policy or practice or discriminatory intent involved, and even if everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed.” Trump said that this theory undermines America’s values of meritocracy and a colorblind society while also violating the Constitution. “It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals,” Trump wrote. Last year, President Joe Biden’s Justice Department was blocked from enforcing disparate impact claims against Louisiana.