Graduate workers union says campus is ‘safer’ without border patrol agency U.S. Customs and Border Protection will no longer appear at the University of Maine’s annual All Majors Career Fair on Wednesday after students and graduate employees demanded the agency’s removal, according to the student newspaper. The university Career Center website no longer lists the federal agency among the… Source

We are calling on technology companies like Meta and Google to stand up for their users by resisting the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) lawless administrative subpoenas for user data.  In the past year, DHS has consistently targeted people engaged in First Amendment activity. Among other things, the agency has issued subpoenas to technology companies to unmask or locate people who have documented ICE's activities in their community, criticized the government, or attended protests.    These subpoenas are unlawful, and the government knowns it. When a handful of users challenged a few of them in court with the help of ACLU affiliates in Northern California and Pennsylvania, DHS withdrew them rather than waiting for a decision.  These subpoenas are unlawful, and the government knowns it. But it is difficult for the average user to fight back on their own. Quashing a subpoena is a fast-moving process that requires lawyers and resources. Not everyone can afford a lawyer on a moment’s notice, and non-profits and pro-bono attorneys have already been stretched to near capacity during the Trump administration.    That is why we, joined by the ACLU of Northern California, have asked several large tech platforms to do more to protect their users, including:   Insist on court intervention and an order before complying with a DHS subpoena, because the agency has already proved that its legal process is often unlawful and unconstitutional;   Give users as much notice as possible when they are the target of a subpoena, so the user can seek help. While many companies have already made this promise, there are high-profile examples of it not happening—ultimately stripping users of their day in court;   Resist gag orders that would prevent companies from notifying their users that they are a target of a subpoena.   We sent the letter to Amazon, Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Reddit, SNAP, TikTok, and X.    Recipients are not legally compelled to comply with administrative subpoenas absent a court order   An administrative subpoena is an investigative tool available to federal agencies like DHS. Many times, these are sent to technology companies to obtain user data. A subpoena cannot be used to obtain the content of communications, but they have been used to try and obtain some basic subscriber information like name, address, IP address, length of service, and session times.   Unlike a search warrant, an administrative subpoena is not approved by a judge. If a technology company refuses to comply, an agency’s only recourse is to drop it or go to court and try to convince a judge that the request is lawful. That is what we are asking companies to do—simply require court intervention and not obey in advance.  It is unclear how many administrative subpoenas DHS has issued in the past year. Subpoenas can come from many places—including civil courts, grand juries, criminal trials, and administrative agencies like DHS. Altogether, Google received 28,622 and Meta received 14,520 subpoenas in the first half of 2025, according to their transparency reports. The numbers are not broken out by type.    DHS is abusing its authority to issue subpoenas  In the past year, DHS has used these subpoenas to target protected speech. The following are just a few of the known examples.  On April 1, 2025, DHS sent a subpoena to Google in an attempt to locate a Cornell PhD student in the United States on a student visa. The student was likely targeted because of his brief attendance at a protest the year before. Google complied with the subpoena without giving the student an opportunity to challenge it. While Google promises to give users prior notice, it sometimes breaks that promise to avoid delay. This must stop.    In September 2025, DHS sent a subpoena and summons to Meta to try to unmask anonymous users behind Instagram accounts that tracked ICE activity in communities in California and Pennsylvania. The users—with the help of the ACLU and its state affiliates— challenged the subpoenas in court, and DHS withdrew the subpoenas before a court could make a ruling. In the Pennsylvania case, DHS tried to use legal authority that its own inspector general had already criticized in a lengthy report.   In October 2025, DHS sent Google a subpoena demanding information about a retiree who criticized the agency’s policies. The retiree had sent an email asking the agency to use common sense and decency in a high-profile asylum case. In a shocking turn, federal agents later appeared on that person’s doorstep. The ACLU is currently challenging the subpoena.   Read the full letter here

The fake goods crisis cuts two ways. Luxury brands lose more than $30 billion a year to counterfeits, while buyers in the booming $210 billion second-hand market have no reliable way to verify that what they’re purchasing is genuine. Veritas wants to solve both problems with a solution that combines custom hardware and software. The […]

Donald Trump's seemingly haphazard tariff regime is understandably unsettling to the elites and the globalist class, but the economic results speak for themselves.

Ghislaine Maxwell invokes the Fifth, California swipes entire bonus from Super Bowl champs, Biden's parole program legally quashed, and more.

Way less pressure when you’re cranking out hits consistently. Regardless of your thoughts on his output as a whole, it’s becoming increasingly clear that HARDY has become one of the most interesting figures in all of Nashville over the years. As an artist, he’s experienced some great success, recently scoring a #1 on country radio with “Favorite Country Song.” Additionally, he’s scored #1 hits with the likes of 2020’s “ONE BEER” (feat. Lauren Alaina and Devin Dawson) and 2023’s “TRUCK BED.” Of course, that’s not even mentioning sleeper hits such as the Lainey Wilson collaboration, “wait in the truck,” and other Top 40 tracks, “Rednecker” and “GIVE HEAVEN SOME HELL.” Though his success as a solo artist shouldn’t be ignored, it’s fairly safe to say that HARDY has scored the most success in his career as a songwriter. At this point, the Mississippi native is best-known for being a frequent collaborator with Morgan Wallen, penning hits such as “Up Down,” “Sand in My Boots,” “More Than My Hometown,” “7 Summers” and “I’m A Little Crazy.” Beyond Wallen, however, he’s also written a plethora of other smash hits for other country artists, ranging from Florida Georgia Line’s “Simple,” Chris Lane’s infamous “I Don’t Know About You” and Cole Swindell’s “Single Saturday Night” to Blake Shelton’s “God’s Country,” Cody Johnson’s “How Do You Sleep At Night?” and Post Malone and Luke Combs’ “Missin’ You Like This.” With so many tracks and so many artists relying on him to keep churning out hits during co-writes, you’d think that there’d be some added pressure to maintain a balance between his career as a solo artist and songwriter. However, that doesn’t seem to be the case for HARDY. In a recent appearance on Chris Williamson’s podcast, Modern Wisdom, the “McArthur” singer opened up about about how he maintains the aforementioned balance. Surprisingly, for HARDY, the best way he deals with it is not really thinking about it at all. As he explained, songwriting comes so naturally to him that he can easily take six months off to tour extensively, then jump right back in like he never left. “I try not to think about it, really. I’m very thankful to have started out as a songwriter because I feel like I can jump right in and never skip a beat. I can tour for six months or whatever and barely write a song, and just jump right and write for somebody else. It’s not difficult at all. I’ve never really thought about the balance or the pressure between the two at all. To be completely candid, touring is a lot more lucrative than songwriting. A little bit of that takes the pressure off of having to make a career out of songwriting, but I just want to write hits for other people so bad. I’ll just never not want to do that. It’s why I moved to town; it’s my first love. I just love having great songs and giving that song to somebody and hoping that it helps their career.” He would admit, however, that every once in awhile, he will specifically request some time off the road in favor to write more, comparing his need to pen songs to a tank that keeps him going. Additionally, he’d note that the lack of pressure he puts on himself oftentimes leads to more creativity and better creative moments during a co-write. “I never really felt pressure. There’s definitely been times where I’ve [talked to my management and said], ‘Hey guys, we need to find balance. I need to write more songs.’ It’s a tank that I have. If it’s empty, I feel a little bit less sense of purpose if I haven’t been writing songs… There’s times where I become a little bit more aware that I need to sort of redistribute my time, but I’ve never really felt the pressure to do one more than the other… I try to take the pressure off myself, and I think it makes for more creativity and better creative moments when you don’t feel pressure to write hits or write so many songs.” As HARDY continues to rack up hits, both by himself and with superstars such as Wallen, it’s pretty safe to say that not thinking about the balance has worked out pretty well for him so far. Watch the full podcast here: HARDY Tour Dates February 11 – Winnipeg, Manitoba – Canada Life Center °* February 12 – Saskatoon, Saskatchewan – SaskTel Centre °* February 13 – Edmonton, Alberta – Rogers Place °* February 19 – Calgary, Alberta – Scotiabank Saddledome °* February 20 – Penticton, British Columbia- South Okanagan Events Centre °* February 21 – Abbotsford, British Columbia – Abbotsford Centre °* March 19 – Green Bay, Wisconsin – The Resch Center °* March 20 – Moline, Illinois – Vibrant Arena °* March 21 – Omaha, Nebraska – CHI Health Center Omaha °* March 26 – Allentown, Pennsylvania- PPL Center °* March 27 – Charleston, West Virginia – Charleston Coliseum °* March 28 – Evansville, Indiana – Ford Center °* April 9 – Knoxville, Tennessee – Thompson-Boling Arena x* April 10 – Tupelo, Mississippi – Cadence Bank Arena x* April 17-18 – Durant, Oklahoma – Choctaw Grand Theater * April 23 – Jacksonville. Florida – VyStar Veterans Memorial Arena x* April 24 – Charleston, South Carolina – Credit One Stadium x* April 25 – Orlando, Florida – Kia Center x* May 21 – Cincinnati, Ohio – Riverbend Music Center ~* May 22 – Huntsville, Alabama – The Orion Amphitheater ~* May 23 – Orange Beach, Alabama – The Wharf Amphitheater ~* May 28 – Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio – Blossom Music Center ~* May 29 – Darien Center, New York – Darien Lake Amphitheater ~* May 30 – Bethel, New York – Bethel Woods Center for the Arts ~* June 4 – Rogers, Arkansas – Walmart Arkansas Music Pavilion °* June 5 – St. Louis, Missouri – Hollywood Casino Amphitheater °* June 6 – Noblesville, Indiana – Ruoff Music Center °* June 11 – Columbia, Maryland – Merriweather Post Pavilion ~* June 12 – Virginia Beach, Virginia – Veterans United Home Loans ~* June 13 – Raleigh, North Carolina – Costal Credit Union Music Park ~* June 25 – Gilford, New Hampshire – BankNH Pavilion #* June 26 – Mansfield, Massachusetts – Xfinity Center #* June 27 – Camden, New Jersey – Freedom Mortgage Pavilion #* August 20 – Lubbock, Texas – Cooks Garage =* August 21 – New Braunfels, Texas – Whitewater Amphitheater * ° – Cameron Whitcomb * – McCoy Moore x – Mitchell Tenpenny ~ – Tucker Wetmore # – Muscadine Bloodline = – Jake WorthingtonThe post “It’s My First Love”: Hardy Says He’s Never Felt Pressure To Balance His Career As A Songwriter & An Artist first appeared on Whiskey Riff.

GOP lawmaker SHUTS DOWN opposition to SAVE ActFollow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos:https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

Federal agents attacked, DOZENS arrested during anti-ICE protests in MinneapolisFollow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos:https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

UK Special Coverage Starmer Survives a Palace Coup, But for How Long? Labour still has irresoluble internal faults. UK Special Coverage It is an old adage in war and politics that, if you’re going to take out your leader, you’d better not miss. You also need to be sure that the politicians who’ve said they’ll support you in a palace coup are serious people. Unfortunately, the Scottish Labour grandee, Anas Sarwar, failed on both counts. Yesterday he voiced what many Labour MPs have been saying privately for months and called openly for the beleaguered Prime Minister Keir Starmer to resign. “Too many mistakes,” he said. “The leadership needs to change.”  He was referring to the crisis that has engulfed Number 10 since the publication 10 days ago of the latest tranche of Epstein Files by the U.S. Department of Justice. These revealed the apparent duplicity and venality of the disgraced former British Ambassador to the U.S., Peter Mandelson, whom Starmer had appointed to this most senior of all diplomatic posts. But if Sarwar thought that he would be supported by a legion of disgruntled Labour ministers and MPs, he was sorely mistaken. Only his deputy, Jackie Baillie, MSP, and a couple of MPs echoed his “resign” call. The UK Cabinet rallied very publicly behind Starmer last night. Even the putative leadership contenders, the former Deputy Leader Angela Rayner and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, dutifully pledged their allegiance. It looked as if Sarwar had thrown the pin, not the hand grenade. Friends of Sarwar insist that, on the contrary, the Scottish leader has astutely distanced himself from the UK Labour leadership and that this will help him challenge the Scottish National Party in the Scottish Parliament elections in three months’ time. That remains to be seen. But for the time being, the UK Labour leader seems to be on rather safer ground than he was only 48 hours ago, when his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, resigned, followed quickly by his director of communications, Tim Allan. In reality, Starmer is still, as they say in Scotland, hanging on a shoogly peg. The Mandelson affair, Labour MPs agree, has cut through to the voters unlike most political scandals of recent years. This is because of the character of the man they call the Prince of Darkness. One of the architects of New Labour, Mandelson has been a malign influence for over 30 years, according to his many enemies. The Epstein files revealed that Mandelson had supplied his “best pal” with highly market-sensitive intelligence about the activities of the UK Government during the financial crisis of 2008–10. Documents suggest that he briefed his financier friend about an imminent €500 billion rescue operation and about the UK Government’s plan to sell state assets. This all happened prior to Keir Starmer becoming prime minister in 2020. However, the PM admitted last week that when he appointed Mandelson ambassador in 2024, he knew that he had maintained close relations with Epstein even after the latter was convicted in 2008 of procuring underage girls. Mandelson was forced to resign. Starmer’s critics pointed out that Mandelson had already had to resign twice in the past from Labour Cabinets over his relations with wealthy men. Did this not raise serious questions about Starmer’s judgment?  Even before the Epstein-Mandelson scandal, Starmer had been widely criticized over ill-thought-out measures like cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners, introducing compulsory ID cards, and abolishing jury trials for many lower-level offences. In some opinion polls, Starmer is currently the most unpopular PM in history. But much of the criticism of Starmer in the Labour Party is not over policy mistakes but ideology. The left have been urging him to start using the large majority he won in July 2024 to push through socialist measures. Now, it may seem as if Starmer has already been cleaving to the left. He has raised taxes on business to crippling levels; imposed onerous inheritance taxes on farmers and private individuals; pumped tens of billions into welfare; handed inflation-busting pay rises to public-sector unions; banned oil and gas exploration in the North Sea; and allowed small boats to ferry 50,000 illegal immigrants across the Channel, only to house many of them in costly hotels. Indeed, viewed from America, Britain already resembles a failed socialist state. But in the looking-glass world of progressive politics, Starmer is seen as positively right-wing. The socialist Campaign Group of MPs regard their leader as almost a Conservative. MPs like John McDonnell, a former chancellor, and Clive Lewis, a former minister, have been urging a more radical agenda. The left wants more wealth taxes, outright nationalization of public utilities, abolition of university tuition fees, a ban on trans conversion therapy, a boycott of Israeli goods and services, opposition to nuclear weapons and a return to the EU customs union along with free movement. Many of these are also the headline policies of Zack Polanski’s Green Party, which is expected to do well in the forthcoming Gorton and Denton by-election later this month. Labour is caught in a pincer movement by the Greens on the left and Nigel Farage’s Reform Party on the right. The former is draining support from Labour among the university-educated, progressive urban elites and the large immigrant communities in cities like Manchester and Birmingham. Reform is attracting many white working-class voters in the so-called “Red Wall” seats in the North of England who are concerned about living costs, immigration, and Asian grooming gangs. The tension between left and right in the Labour Party is, paradoxically, one reason for yesterday’s rejection of Anas Sarwar’s resignation call. Cabinet ministers realized that if the PM had resigned precipitately yesterday, then open war might have broken out in the party. That has been avoided for now. But the reckoning cannot be put off indefinitely. After this week’s clear-out of “Blairite” advisers like McSweeney, the left hope they can now capture Starmer and bend him to their will. But a reckless lurch to the left is the last thing the Labour Party needs. Public spending is out of control, growth is anemic, taxes are stifling growth, energy costs are crippling industry and uncontrolled immigration is creating caustic divisions in British communities.  British voters do not seek a return to the Venezuela-lite policies of the former Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, who now leads his own far-left party, confusingly called “Your Party.” Right now, Labour is not looking like anybody’s as it staggers from crisis to crisis. The post Starmer Survives a Palace Coup, But for How Long? appeared first on The American Conservative.