YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
14 hrs

The Evidence is Clear: Masks Don’t Do Anything.
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

The Evidence is Clear: Masks Don’t Do Anything.

by Kit Knightly, Off Guardian: We’re being hit with the “Super Flu” (allegedly), and that means everyone wants us to wear masks again. We went over this (a lot) in 2020. Then we went over it again in 2023. Masks don’t work, they never worked, and – prior to 2020 – the academic literature was very clear on this. […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
14 hrs

Netanyahu Demands FBI Arrest Critics of Israel or There Will Be “Bloodshed Across America”
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Netanyahu Demands FBI Arrest Critics of Israel or There Will Be “Bloodshed Across America”

from The People’s Voice: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
Like
Comment
Share
Pet Life
Pet Life
14 hrs

Stray Dog Who Could Barely Stand Now Holds His Head High | The Dodo
Favicon 
www.youtube.com

Stray Dog Who Could Barely Stand Now Holds His Head High | The Dodo

Stray Dog Who Could Barely Stand Now Holds His Head High | The Dodo
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
14 hrs

7 Facts About the First Continental Congress (1774)
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

7 Facts About the First Continental Congress (1774)

  In September 1774, representatives from twelve of the 13 British colonies in North America met in Philadelphia for what became known as the First Continental Congress. Sparked by Britain’s harsh rule, these representatives aimed to reimagine their rights as colonial subjects without breaking away from England. Important American figures like George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson debated approaches ranging from boycotting British goods to issuing a unified declaration of rights. The work done during this time further pushed the American colonies towards independence.   1. It Was Sparked by Anger Over the Intolerable Acts Prime Minister of England Lord North forces the “Intolerable Acts,” depicted as tea, down the throat of America, 1774. Source: Library of Congress   The First Continental Congress was a direct response to the “Intolerable Acts” passed by the British Parliament in 1774. These laws, which included the closing of Boston Harbor following the Boston Tea Party, pushed many colonies to their breaking point. The Quartering Act sparked the most outrage as it required American colonists to house, feed, and pay the salaries of British soldiers in North America.   Because of these acts, people in places like Massachusetts felt their rights were being trampled on, and they were not willing to take it anymore. In the eyes of many colonists, the British were going too far, and leaders in the colonies decided they needed a unified front if they had any hope of restoring their liberties.   Each colony would send delegates to a meeting in Philadelphia where they could discuss what to do next. That meeting became the First Continental Congress. While some people were still holding onto the idea of peace with Britain, others started to feel that outright rebellion might be the only way forward.   2. Not Every Colony Was Represented Map of the modern United States with the 13 original colonies highlighted. Source: Wikimedia Commons   In September 1774, delegates from all the colonies except Georgia made the trip to Philadelphia. Georgia’s leaders were dealing with issues of being a frontier colony, such as fighting with local native populations and they did not have the men to spare for such a venture. Still, the rest of the colonies showed up, determined to tackle their shared grievances as a unified people.   It was the first time such a diverse group of colonial representatives had sat down together to seriously plan their next steps. Prior years would have found each of these colonies attempting to find solutions individually. The American colonies did not, prior to this meeting, view themselves as one people but rather as citizens of their own individual colonies. This meant that while these delegates had similar issues, they all brought with them their own grievances unique to their colony.   Even though they had different local concerns, they realized they stood a better chance against Britain if they united. The delegates matched the diversity of the people they represented, some were loud and fiery, while others were more reserved and cautious. But all of them had grown frustrated with what they saw as heavy-handed British rule. By excluding Georgia, the Congress was technically missing part of its collective voice. Despite that small gap, the meeting symbolized a remarkable moment in history.   3. Major Figures From the Revolution Were Present John Adams portrait, by Gilbert Stuart, c. 1800. Source: National Gallery of Art, Washington   The First Continental Congress was not just a random gathering of minor colonial officials. Some of the most notable names in American history took part, including George Washington from Virginia and cousins John and Sam Adams from Massachusetts. While these men are well known today, they were considered the premier citizens of their time and their selection as delegates mirrored their importance.   Washington carried a quiet sense of authority, shaped by his background as a military leader and landowner. Meanwhile, John Adams was already known for his strong opinions and legal expertise, having defended the British soldiers involved in the “Boston Massacre.” His cousin Sam Adams was a founding member of “The Sons of Liberty,” a semi-secret political organization instrumental in orchestrating protests back in Boston and helped spark movements like the Boston Tea Party. There were also other key figures like John Jay of New York, who would later become the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.   4. They Wrote a Predecessor to the Declaration of Independence Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776. Source: Wikimedia Commons   One of the most significant outcomes of the First Continental Congress was a unified declaration of colonial rights. Leading up to 1774, individual colonies had complained about British policies, but never before had they come together to list them in a single document. This declaration spelled out specific problems, protesting the Intolerable Acts and other restrictive measures.   The delegates insisted that as English subjects, they were entitled to the same rights as citizens living in Britain—especially when it came to taxation and representation. They argued that these liberties were a right, not a privilege, and were not something colonial assemblies were willing to compromise on. This statement was not a full leap into independence; many delegates still held onto hope that the king and Parliament would back off on these policies. Nevertheless, the declaration signaled a shift. Colonists were no longer satisfied with being treated like second-class subjects. Although some members of the Congress remained cautious, their unified statement of rights helped set the stage for bigger and bolder actions in the years ahead.   5. They Wanted to End Trade With England The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor, by Nathaniel Currier, 1846, depicting the 1773 Boston Tea Party. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Along with voicing their rights, delegates at the First Continental Congress agreed that words alone were not enough. They needed a plan to pressure Britain into accepting their demands. The result was the Continental Association, a pact that essentially called for a widespread boycott of British goods. The idea was one of simplicity, if the colonies stopped buying items from Britain—everything from tea to textiles—Parliament might be forced to address their complaints.   The delegates recommended each colony form local committees to make sure everyone stuck to the boycott. Some towns went so far as to inspect shipments at ports or shame anyone caught purchasing British goods.   The delegates also agreed to cut off exports to Britain if their complaints were still ignored by a certain deadline. This tactic hit Britain where it hurt economically and united colonists in a shared cause. While not every colonist jumped on board immediately, the Association showed how a coordinated effort, carried out at local levels, could create real tension with the mother country.   6. Not Everyone Involved Saw Eye to Eye Carpenters’ Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where the First Continental Congress met in 1774, c. 2006. Source: Wikimedia Commons   It is important to remember that not everyone at the First Continental Congress was itching for independence right away. Some delegates felt that the colonies should still try to mend relations with Britain, believing war would be disastrous and unsuccessful. They favored a more conservative approach, pushing back on unfair laws, but keeping the overall relationship with the Crown intact.   Others, especially those from Massachusetts like John Adams, had grown fed up after events like the Boston Massacre and the closure of Boston Harbor.  They argued that united action was the only way to stop the continued diminishment of their rights.   Tensions flared during debates, with both sides presenting passionate arguments. Despite these differences, they managed to find enough common ground to release a declaration of rights and adopt the Continental Association. While independence wasn’t officially on the agenda yet, the fractures between colonists who still wanted reconciliation and those who believed in standing firm were already visible.   7. It Set the Stage for the Second Continental Congress A depiction of the Second Continental Congress voting on the United States Declaration of Independence, c. 1801. Source: Wikimedia Commons   By the time the First Continental Congress wrapped up in October 1774, delegates had a better sense of their collective strength, but they also realized the fight was not over. They agreed to meet again if Britain failed to respond to their demands in a reasonable way.   Unfortunately, tensions only got worse, especially after skirmishes broke out at Lexington and Concord in April 1775. That led to the calling of the Second Continental Congress, which would eventually appoint George Washington as commander of the Continental Army and steer the colonies toward the Declaration of Independence.   While the First Continental Congress itself did not declare independence or start a war, its significance lies in the unity it built among the colonies. It forced leaders from different regions to coordinate, share resources, and stand up for each other’s rights in a way they never had before. By drafting a joint response, the delegates laid the groundwork for what would become a full-scale revolution, making the First Continental Congress a milestone on the road to American independence.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
14 hrs ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Outrageous Actions After Brown U. Shooting, Reiner's Son Arrested For His Murder, w/ Emily Jashinsky
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
14 hrs

UPSIDE-DOWN WORLD: Biden Admin Sought Domestic Terrorism Guidance From Leftist Group Linked to Antifa
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

UPSIDE-DOWN WORLD: Biden Admin Sought Domestic Terrorism Guidance From Leftist Group Linked to Antifa

Even a year later, it’s hard to wrap your head around the upside-down world of the Biden administration: The White House celebrated transgender ideology on Easter Sunday, your tax dollars funded the settlement of immigrants who broke the law to come here, and authorities turned to an Antifa-linked group whose “hate map” inspired an act of terror for advice on combatting domestic terrorism. I want to dwell on that last point, because I am testifying in Congress about it Tuesday, and I think it highlights the threats conservatives still face from an organization too many Democrats continue to trust. Among the many left-wing NGOs that called the shots in the Biden administration, the Southern Poverty Law Center stands out. This organization claims to monitor “hate” yet fosters animus against conservative Christians. It claims to support “inclusive education,” but demonizes moms and dads who want a say in what their children learn. It claims to oppose “extremism” yet refuses to condemn Antifa, even though agitators loosely connected with that movement caused the most destructive riots in U.S. history in 2020, riots that led to the deaths of at least 26 Americans. The SPLC sued Ku Klux Klan groups into bankruptcy but today, it puts mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits on a “hate map” with Klan chapters, claiming to reveal the “infrastructure upholding white supremacy.” The SPLC uses the “hate map” for two goals: to scare donors into ponying up cash and to demonize its political opponents, narrowing the parameters of socially acceptable debate. If you oppose the SPLC’s agenda, you might just find yourself on the map. Do you support the enforcement of immigration law? You might be an “anti-immigrant hate group,” even if you have legal immigrants on your board. Do you oppose the grotesque medical interventions euphemistically described as “gender-affirming care?” You might be an “anti-LGBTQ hate group,” even if your organization consists of doctors. Do you oppose “drag queen story hour?” You might just be an “anti-LGBTQ hate group,” even if your membership is gay and lesbian. Inspiring… Well, Terrorism Of course, not everyone who sees the “hate map” knows it’s a fundraising ploy or a political weapon. In 2012, an LGBTQ activist saw the conservative Christian organization Family Research Council on the “hate map,” and decided he’d shoot everyone in the building. The building manager foiled his plan, and he’s now a convicted terrorist serving 25 years in prison. Earlier this year, the SPLC added Turning Point USA—the largest conservative youth grassroots organization in the country—to the “hate map.” The assassination of TPUSA Founder Charlie Kirk followed months later. The SPLC condemned both attacks—but has yet to remove either group from the “hate map.” Antifa While the SPLC’s former president condemned Antifa once in 2017, the group has repeatedly carried water for the violent movement. The “hate map,” for instance, includes the parental rights group Moms For Liberty as an “antigovernment extremist group,” but fails to include Antifa agitators, who have hurled Molotov cocktails at government buildings. The SPLC has minimized Antifa violence as “skirmishes and property crimes.” In 2023, authorities arrested an SPLC lawyer, charging him with domestic terrorism for his alleged role in an Antifa riot. The SPLC also hired a woman who had been described as “antifa’s secret weapon against far-right extremists.” According to researcher Jennica Pounds, better known as Data Republican, an internal Antifa document praises the SPLC as a “great resource” for tracking “fascists.” Domestic Terrorism Advice Yet when President Joe Biden took office, federal agencies reached out to the SPLC “to solicit” expertise “to help shape the policies” to “counter the domestic terrorism threat,” then-SPLC President Margaret Huang said in a 2021 donor meeting. The Biden White House hosted SPLC leaders and staff at least 18 times. The FBI cited the SPLC in its notorious memo on “radical-traditional Catholics.” Biden nominated SPLC attorney Nancy Abudu to a federal judgeship, and the White House touted the SPLC in its strategy to combat antisemitism. SPLC leaders also had close ties with the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, taking part in “quarterly meetings.” An SPLC staffer even spoke at a symposium for prosecutors, briefing them on the “anti-LGBTQ movement.” An Abiding Threat Conservatives often scoff at the SPLC, and a recent YouGov survey shows that the center has a negative 19% favorability rating among self-identified Republicans. Yet that same survey finds that 39% of Democrats view the group favorably, and the SPLC enjoys 8% favorability among U.S. adults. In other words, Biden is no longer president, and the Trump administration is excising the SPLC’s influence, but that doesn’t mean a future left-leaning administration won’t go right back to using the SPLC. The fact that our own government worked with a group that compares mainstream conservatives to the Klan just for the sin of disagreeing with the SPLC’s agenda, and that seems happy to look the other way on leftist street violence, should send a shiver down our spines. This group is contributing to the distrust and polarization of America, and it should be radioactive to both conservatives and liberals alike. The post UPSIDE-DOWN WORLD: Biden Admin Sought Domestic Terrorism Guidance From Leftist Group Linked to Antifa appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
14 hrs

Australian Prime Minister Sparks Uproar with 'Right-Wing Extremism' Comments in Wake of Islamic Terror Attack
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Australian Prime Minister Sparks Uproar with 'Right-Wing Extremism' Comments in Wake of Islamic Terror Attack

Globalist elites rely on a predictable lexicon. Evidently, the demons who possess their souls have limited vocabularies. In a clip posted to the social media platform X, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese inexplicably yet predictably mentioned "right-wing extremist groups" in connection with Sunday's massacre at Australia's Bondi Beach by a...
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
14 hrs

Chuck Schumer Accuses GOP Senator of 'Despicable Islamophobia' for Telling the Truth
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Chuck Schumer Accuses GOP Senator of 'Despicable Islamophobia' for Telling the Truth

Chuck Schumer apparently hopes to mend his fences on the left by attacking the right. The Senate minority leader -- a man who engineered a government closure just to pacify the radicals in his party's base -- turned his fire on a fellow member of the Senate on Monday, accusing...
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
14 hrs

President Trump Posts Very “Special” Message For Rob Reiner
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

President Trump Posts Very “Special” Message For Rob Reiner

President Trump posted perhaps his most scathing post of all time this morning with regards to Rob Reiner and his wife Michele being viciously killed in their home overnight, with the leading suspect being their son. Reiner was a vocal and very deep-seeded Trump hater, and President Trump did not hold back in his message for the Reiner family. Take a look: FULL TEXT in case you have any trouble reading that: A very sad thing happened last night in Hollywood. Rob Reiner, a tortured and struggling, but once very talented movie director and comedy star, has passed away, together with his wife, Michele, reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness, and with the Golden Age of America upon us, perhaps like never before. May Rob and Michele rest in peace! As you might imagine, the post is drawing fierce division, with many loving it and many others saying it is in poor taste. Drop your vote here before I give you my opinion: Many (which I agree with) are pointing out that after 10 years of class and trying to work with the Far-Left, the gloves are finally off and President Trump has finally learned there is no working with these people.  They never reciprocate back.  So take the gloves off and fight a fair fight: Nope. This tells me the gloves are off and this operation is nearing its end. https://t.co/fHNkBKx6ky — OGAn0n661 (@OgAn0n661) December 15, 2025 Many others are also pointing out that Reiner was a pretty vile in his hatred and attack on MAGA: I’m seeing alot of tweets of people lecturing on how nice of a guy he was. pic.twitter.com/sgSs53y3NX — The Nasty Italian (@sayitnspinit) December 15, 2025 I want to be very clear I am not calling Reiner a pedo or saying Reiner did anything untoward with his son, but Liz Crokin is: For those of you offended by President Trump’s post on Rob Reiner, would you still be offended if it turns out Reiner was a pedophile who also possibly may have raped and/or trafficked his own son? Trump knows everything. I’m offended by monsters who rape, torture and traffic… https://t.co/AQjZWhFP2e pic.twitter.com/2LOL16NjHu — LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) December 15, 2025 George Santos knows there is no negotiating with these people, no working with them. You either fight the way they fight, or you lose. There is never any reciprocity and Santos would know best: All of you saying @POTUS should delete this are tone deaf! Are these words nice and fuzzy? No. But this man has been almost killed because of the rhetoric that people like Rob Reiner has spewed. Rob Reiner would be celebrating alongside many Hollywood elites if it were potus… pic.twitter.com/Gzs7G0cfdY — George Santos (@Georgesantos) December 15, 2025 All of you saying @POTUS should delete this are tone deaf! Are these words nice and fuzzy? No. But this man has been almost killed because of the rhetoric that people like Rob Reiner has spewed. Rob Reiner would be celebrating alongside many Hollywood elites if it were potus who was killed…manny mocked POTUs when he was shot at in Butler with some saying “to find someone with better aim next time”. Here’s a little refresher if y’all already forgot it (https://tvinsider.com/1145167/sopranos-drea-de-matteo-trump-assassination-attempt/) I don’t make his sentiment mine but I understand his sentiment and will stand by his right to express it. Controversial or not this is America and we have a right to free speech even if you don’t like the speech! Sorry folks, while no one deserves to get their throat slashed for any reason, you also don’t get to call Trump a NAZI for 4+ years and nearly get him killed twice with dangerous rhetoric and then cry foul when he hits you back. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. Check out all of these VILE posts, that stirred up so much hatred for Donald Trump that he was nearly assassinated twice: Reiner and people like him are responsible for the TDS virus which almost got Trump killed, twice. pic.twitter.com/vMAzLufjbv — Deztro (@DeztroReal) December 15, 2025 President Trump is fully within his rights to post the statement he did. That’s my opinion but I want to hear yours below.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
14 hrs

SHOCKING Number Of People Have Now Lived Through TWO “Mass Shooting” Events — Statistically Impossible?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

SHOCKING Number Of People Have Now Lived Through TWO “Mass Shooting” Events — Statistically Impossible?

A new theme has emerged after the two mass-shooting events this past weekend at Brown University and in Bondi Beach, Australia…. And that theme is that there are now multiple people with such bad luck that they’ve now lived through TWO separate Mass Shooting events. What are the odds? As you might guess, I’m extremely skeptical about any narrative emerging from these tragic events that takes us towards more gun control, and that’s exactly what this does, so while I’m going to report on this factually, it doesn’t mean I am fully buying it either. That said, the flip side of that disclaimer is that a “False Flag” doesn’t mean the event didn’t happen and people didn’t die, it just means perhaps it didn’t happen in the way you were led to believe or as organically as you may have been led to believe. Ok, now let’s jump in. Starting with Zoe Weissman, who survived the Parkland School Shooting and now just survived the Brown University shooting: Zoe Weissman, Brown University Mass Shooter Survivor: Q: Zoey, how are you doing? Zoey: I have PTSD from the Parkland mass shooting I survived. I’m incredibly angry this country allowed this to happen to me again.. the only thing that’d make me feel safer is stricter gun… https://t.co/exhFNjbNyl pic.twitter.com/bmG9H6OLPa — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) December 15, 2025 FACT-CHECKED BY GROK: The shooting at Brown University on December 13, 2025, did occur, resulting in two students killed and nine injured in the Barus and Holley building, with the gunman escaping and a person of interest later released by authorities. Zoe Weissman, a sophomore at Brown, was present during the incident and has publicly discussed her experiences in interviews with outlets like CNN and NBC, expressing PTSD from the 2018 Parkland shooting (where she was a student at the adjacent Westglades Middle School), frustration with recurring gun violence, and calls for stricter gun control. She’s one of at least two Brown students (the other being Mia Tretta) who have survived multiple school shootings. The X post you linked shares a real clip from her CNN interview, but the replies’ claims of her being a “crisis actor” appear to be unsubstantiated speculation, as no evidence from searches supports that narrative. Next up is Mia Tretta, who survived the Saugus High School shooting and now the Brown University shooting: Yeah.. that’s a big coincidence… Brown University Students who survived previous well known Mass Shooting just survived another • Mia Tretta: Survived the 2019 Saugus High School shooting at Saugus High School in Santa Clarita, California — a staggering 3,000 miles from… pic.twitter.com/RBSvxU3gEQ — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) December 15, 2025 FACT-CHECKED BY GROK: Yes, the details about Mia Tretta being a survivor of the 2019 Saugus High School shooting—where she was shot in the abdomen—and escaping unharmed from the December 14, 2025, shooting at Brown University appear to be accurate, as confirmed by numerous news reports and interviews.Regarding the Saugus incident: Tretta, then a 15-year-old freshman, was wounded in the abdomen during the November 14, 2019, mass shooting at Saugus High School in Santa Clarita, California, where a 16-year-old gunman killed two students (including her best friend) and injured three others before taking his own life. For the Brown University shooting: As a 21-year-old junior studying international and public affairs and education, Tretta was in her dorm room when she received an active shooter alert. She sheltered in place and was not injured during the incident, which killed two people and wounded nine others. She has since spoken publicly about the trauma, noting that she chose Brown partly for its sense of safety and Rhode Island’s stricter gun laws, and she continues to advocate for gun control reforms. brown.edu Notice the first words out of their mouth are to call for more gun control: There it is… Zoe Weissman, Brown University Mass Shooter Survivor: I survived Two School Shootings, and this just shows the “inaction” of Congress to enact Stricter Gun Controlhttps://t.co/f86hlNTsF2 https://t.co/adEBzK7OsY pic.twitter.com/IS6C3hATFW — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) December 15, 2025 Then there is this guy who according to various accounts online which are a bit hard to sort out, but according to various claims online this man is reported to have survived the October 7th Hamas attack on Israel, a Russian attack on Ukraine, and now the Bondi Beach shooting in Australia: https://x.com/Villgecrazylady/status/2000244972336148984 Meanwhile, I asked Grok what the odds are that two Brown University students would also have survived two other school shootings, given that I saw one post claim the odds were 1 in 3 billion. Grok confirmed the odds are very low, but not that low: Bottom line: The odds are low (perhaps 1 in thousands or tens of thousands under randomness), but nowhere near 1 in 3 billion, and clustering makes it reasonably foreseeable.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58 out of 102781
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund