Could The Chief be gearing up for a big announcement? Continue reading…

Richard Kenneth Cox, 58, is a registered sex offender. According to a March 3 report from WJLA-TV, Cox faces 12 counts in Arlington County, Virginia, of being a sex offender in proximity to children, three counts of a sex offender entering a school or child day care center, four counts...

Since entering office, U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) has established a reputation for behaving more like a far-left social media influencer than a member of Congress. Jasmine Crockett and her comrades are ghetto AF! These are Democrats’ elected officials acting like damn fools. pic.twitter.com/7gEBHI9iW4 — Destiny (@Destiny15_FL) March 5, 2025 In recent days, a new controversy has plagued her tenure in the House, and her GOP rival, attorney Sholdon Daniels, recently looked into the matter. After following up on reports that an elderly couple donated more than $16,000 to Crockett’s campaign fund, Daniels reported that the alleged donors claimed they knew nothing about it. He released a video of the encounter: Jasmine Crockett received $16,000 in political contributions from an elderly retired couple.. Sholdon Daniels, who’s running against Jasmine Crockett, went to their house to confirm the contributions AND “THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT THESE CHARGES WERE” INSANE!!! @SholdonDaniels pic.twitter.com/DVkuZfCj9s — TONY (@TONYxTWO) March 12, 2025 This is just the latest question regarding Crockett’s finances: Where’d she get the money? On a $174K salary, newbie Rep Jasmine Crockett has a few secrets, so she’s desperately against the DOGE audit of gov waste, abuse. 2 years in Congress; Jasmine’s net worth $9M. A $2M property in Dallas. A$1.5M house in Austin, $1.5M Galveston cabin. pic.twitter.com/6koavxND6q — Tosca Austen (@ToscaAusten) February 27, 2025 Earlier this month, Fox News reported on Daniels’ campaign to unseat the controversial lawmaker: “She’s not really a leader. She’s not really a representative. Jasmine Crockett is more of a performer or an influencer,” Dallas area attorney Sholdon Daniels, who is running as a Republican to unseat Crockett in Texas’ 30th Congressional District, told Fox News Digital. “She’s wholly ineffective as a legislator. She wasn’t able to pass any laws when she was in the Texas State House, and we don’t anticipate that she’ll be able to have any effect while she’s on Capitol Hill.” Daniels added that it is “unfortunate” that the “hardworking people” of his district aren’t receiving leadership from Crockett, who he said is “spewing all this racist divisiveness” and is “hell-bent on tearing our country down.” Daniels is also challenging Crockett to a debate, as he teased in a recent X post: Jasmine Crockett loves talking on TV, but will she face me in a real debate? I challenge @RepJasmine to a LIVE DEBATE on X – April 15, 2025. No handlers, no distractions. Just two candidates, real issues, and the truth. Let’s see if she shows up. Who should moderate?… pic.twitter.com/6kTLgeWZmb — Sholdon Daniels For Congress (@SholdonDaniels) March 5, 2025 Of course, Crockett won re-election in November, so any opportunity for her constituents to vote her out of office is likely more than a year and a half away. She did not receive the reception her leftist supporters had hoped, though, as Axios reported shortly after Election Day: Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) decisively defeated Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) to win reelection to her Democratic leadership role spearheading the party’s political messaging. Why it matters: The battle for the chairmanship of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee was the only contested election for a slot in House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ (D-N.Y.) leadership team. Jeffries and other top Democratic leaders were all reelected by acclamation Tuesday morning. Driving the news: Dingell defeated Crockett 152 to 59, according to two House members who were at Democrats’ closed-door caucus meeting. Here’s a flashback to one of Crockett’s more memorable rants: And here’s a recent interview with her GOP challenger: RELATED REPORT: Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed? Is Jasmine Crockett Trying To Get President Trump Killed? Jasmine Crockett went on MSNBC today and many are saying she incited violence against President Trump.... INCITEMENT: Many of us on the right laugh when we hear Rep Jasmine Crockett declare Trump an enemy of the state, but the reality is that she is the de facto leader of the Democrat Party with millions of followers to respect and trust her. Her statements puts the lives of Trump… pic.twitter.com/7bag7BH7Bf — @amuse (@amuse) March 3, 2025 This post lays it out very clearly: pic.twitter.com/s5jYDSODMCJasmine Crockett is trying to get someone to assassinate President Trump Listen to her Language…• Donald Trump is “occupying the White House”• Donald Trump is an “enemy of the United States”• Donald Trump is a “Dictator” This is called Stochastic… — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) March 3, 2025 Jasmine Crockett is trying to get someone to assassinate President Trump Listen to her Language… • Donald Trump is “occupying the White House” • Donald Trump is an “enemy of the United States” • Donald Trump is a “Dictator” This is called Stochastic Terrorism Stochastic Terrorism refers to when public figures or media outlets use inflammatory rhetoric to demonize a person or group. They do so knowing it could unpredictably incite lone individuals to commit violence against the target (e.g., Trump), believing they’re acting heroically. Meanwhile, the instigator maintains plausible deniability for inspiring the act. What do you think? Is this acceptable behavior? Is she trying to get President Trump killed with this inflammatory rhetoric? I hope DA Ed Martin looks into this: This is completely unacceptable behavior! pic.twitter.com/jgqPvq8vLc — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) March 3, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: So unfortunately, we have someone occupying the White House, and as far as I'm concerned, he is an enemy to the United States. He swore an oath just like the rest of us. But right now, you are literally putting us at risk—all because of what? Because you want to convince your followers that you should be a dictator too. That you should never leave the White House. Because you don't believe that elections should take place. I don't really understand what is going on, and I don't know what it's going to take to get people to wake up. RELATED REPORTS: Does Far-Left Rep. Jasmine Crockett Not Even Know How To Spell Her Own Name? Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X — In For a Very Rough Future Meet Jasmine Crockett, Triggered On X -- In For a Very Rough Future Meet Jasmine Crockett, an American lawyer and politician currently serving as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 30th congressional district since January 2023. Her district includes parts of South Dallas County, Central Dallas, Dallas Love Field Airport, and portions of Tarrant County. She is a member of the Democratic Party and previously served in the Texas House of Representatives for the 100th district. In the 118th Congress, Crockett was selected as the Democratic freshman class representative, acting as a liaison between the House Democratic leadership and the newly-elected Democratic members. She was also named as a co-chair for the 2024 Harris-Walz campaign. And.....she got mega triggered on X today, or her staff did. Allow me to explain. Crockett posted this question to X:  "Which branch of Government does Elon belong to? Asking for a friend…." So I answered her (seemed like the nice thing to do right?  Help a confused woman out, so I did): "He belongs to WE THE PEOPLE. Hope that helps clear it up for you." He belongs to WE THE PEOPLE. Hope that helps clear it up for you. — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) December 19, 2024 Well, Ms. Crockett didn't like that very much and she blocked me moments later! Take a look: I have so many questions, perhaps you do too. First up, why does her profile look like some 1-900 sex phone number that you'd dial up in the 1990s and pay $4.99/minute for? Look Jazzy, you're in Congress (somehow) not running some illicit, late night, sex line. I'm embarrassed for you to have that logo! Second question: are you literally doing nothing other than reading your X notifications? Aren't you supposed to be working or something? Or is this one of those 100 days Congress has off each year? Third question: why does the concept of WE THE PEOPLE trigger you so much?  Why do all the far-left Communists in America hate WE THE PEOPLE so much? Fourth question: are you really so thin-skinned that you can't handle feedback from WE THE PEOPLE? In regard to that last question, I believe Ms. "Full-of-Crock"-ett is in for a VERY rough future. If these people get so triggered that they have to block people who simply answer a question they asked online, then the next four years of massive reform lead by Trump, Vance, Elon and Vivek is going to be extremely rough on them. Some may not make it. And no, that's not a threat.  I'm saying some will literally not be able to cope and will drop out of office.  They'll just leave.  That's my prediction. Because this is the generation that was raised on participation trophies....and DEI. Everything was handed to them because life must be made FAIR. Not fairness of opportunity, fairness of outcome. And when the adults are back in charge, and we return to a meritocracy and we start holding people accountable and asking "What did you get done this week?" -- my hunch is that people like Ms. Crockett will turtle and crater. Ummmm, what did I get done? I blocked some patriotic Americans on X!  Yay for me! "You're fired". Speaking of DEI, I would NEVER say that good old Jazzy Crocket is a DEI hire, but others have: Rep Jasmine Crockett is the result of DEI and affirmative action. She can’t even speak proper English. pic.twitter.com/6U3QkenUfd — Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) May 17, 2024 Look, I'm not here to take sides. I'm just a reporter. A blocked reporter, but a reporter nonetheless. So watch Ms. Crockett in this video and tell me if this is proper behavior or ghetto behavior? DEI “hire” Jasmine Crockett looks like a ghetto fool. How did these low IQ politicians got elected? You’ll find out on her voters.pic.twitter.com/g1fzoEIF5d — AJ Huber (@Huberton) May 17, 2024 And before anyone gets all spun up into a tizzy, let's get our definitions clear, shall we? Google Search, citing to Columbian University, defines ghetto as "behaving in a low-class manner": So that's the definition and I'm curious to know if you think what you watched in that clip above is proper decorum or ghetto behavior? And since ghetto behavior simply means "behaving in a low-class manner" I find it wildly rude and racist and offensive that some people would conflate this with a certain race. Don't bring that garbage around here! Quite frankly, I think it's very rude and racist for Racist Liberals to suggest that "behaving in a low-class manner" is some how associated with any certain race, so don't bother bringing that racist trope around here, thank you very much! But anyway, I think that about wraps things up. I believe Jasmine Crockett and her ilk (the Far-Left hating America constituency) are going to be in for a very rough four years and I think many will simply not make it to the finish line in office. RELATED REPORTS: ‘You Attacked Her’: Even CNN Host Took Issue With Rep. Crockett’s Insulting Outburst Toward MTG STAY TRASHY? New Orleans Mayor Proclaims “Back That Azz Up” Day In Honor of Juvenile

President Donald Trump’s ongoing effort to eliminate fraud and waste within the federal government hit a crescendo when his administration gutted the U.S. Agency for International Development. While the decision was widely popular across Trump’s base, the media seized on recent reports that suggested staffers at the agency were instructed to destroy classified documents. The Department of Justice was quick to dispel those claims, chalking it all up to a misinterpreted email. Per the New York Post: “Trained USAID staff sorted and removed classified documents in order to clear the space formerly occupied by USAID for its new tenant. The removed classified documents had nothing to do with this litigation,” wrote DOJ trial attorney Michael Clendenen in a Wednesday filing in DC federal court. “They were copies of documents from other agencies or derivatively classified documents, where the originally classified document is retained by another government agency and for which there is no need for USAID to retain a copy,” Clendenen went on. “Any documents pertaining to current classified programs were retained, as were all personnel records and any document that must be retained under the Federal Records Act (FRA),” he said. The attorney added that USAID would also inform associations for foreign services officers and contractors who are suing the agency before destroying any more documents. JUST IN: DOJ says the USAID email about burning classified docs has been “seriously misapprehended.” No docs are being permanently destroyed, just copies of docs retained elsehwere. It’s part of USAID’s exit from its office space.https://t.co/bHDtJXERw2 pic.twitter.com/TiIg2gMNRO — Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) March 12, 2025 After uncovering many of the controversial programs the agency has been funding with U.S. taxpayer dollars, Secretary of State Marco Rubio provided an update earlier this week: After a 6 week review we are officially cancelling 83% of the programs at USAID. The 5200 contracts that are now cancelled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve, (and in some cases even harmed), the core national interests of the United States. In… — Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) March 10, 2025 Here’s a full transcript of the statement posted above: After a 6 week review we are officially cancelling 83% of the programs at USAID. The 5200 contracts that are now cancelled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve, (and in some cases even harmed), the core national interests of the United States. In consultation with Congress, we intend for the remaining 18% of programs we are keeping (approximately 1000) to now be administered more effectively under the State Department. Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform. The Guardian provided additional coverage of the deep cuts, including a response from Department of Government Efficiency leader Elon Musk: “Tough, but necessary. Good working with you. The important parts of USAID should always have been with Dept of State,” Musk responded on X following Rubio’s announcement. The New York Times reported last week that there had been serious cut-ups between Musk and Rubio at a recent cabinet meeting over proposed cuts to the state department. During that meeting, Trump reportedly defended Rubio for doing a “great job” and said that Musk’s team would be merely advising cabinet secretaries about future cuts. But Rubio’s apparent embrace of Musk’s objectives reveal the extent to which the billionaire Trump supporter wields power in the administration. Here’s what White House Deputy Chief of Staff of Policy Stephen Miller had to say about USAID corruption in an interview last month:

If you need another reason to pull your children out of public school, here it is. At an elementary school in New York, parents showed up to a board meeting in order to express their outrage at their children being allowed to see some very disgusting, explicit images from a so-called ‘LGBTQ pride’ book. The book, titled The Rainbow Parade, contained several pornographic and disturbing images, including one of a naked person from the back — bare butt full on display — walking down the street and two men in full-on bondage fetish gear holding hands. It was reportedly sent home with a 5-year-old kindergartner, as well as a fifth grader, whose parents were rightfully shocked and angry. The book was also available in the school library, where any student could check it out. However, when parents confronted the school board about it, the meeting descended into chaos until the board members actually walked out on the parents. How despicable. Take a look for yourself here: BIG SCANDAL UNFOLDING in Penfield Central School District in New York: A kindergartner reportedly came home with a book about attending an LGBTQ pride parade which included pictures of naked people and men in bondage fetish gear. Parents showed up to demand an explanation and… pic.twitter.com/ogLmPd0yIW — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 12, 2025 What in the GROOMER is this crap?! “The Rainbow Parade” which is currently REQUIRED reading in a New York GRADE SCHOOL includes depictions of a FULLY NUDE woman, niche sexual fetish costumes known as FURRIES, and a gay couple outfitted in leather BDSM (BONDAGE/domination)… pic.twitter.com/r2ciwNXOfw — Stella X (@stellaaaaaax) February 13, 2025 Full text of that post: What in the GROOMER is this crap?! “The Rainbow Parade” which is currently REQUIRED reading in a New York GRADE SCHOOL includes depictions of a FULLY NUDE woman, niche sexual fetish costumes known as FURRIES, and a gay couple outfitted in leather BDSM (BONDAGE/domination) attire. Students who are ASSIGNED this book were in grades 1 through 5 – meaning they are roughly ages FIVE YEARS OLD to ELEVEN years old. Parents in the district were understandably ENRAGED and let Superintendent Tasha Potter know: “If you think that that’s appropriate for children to see, then there’s something wrong with you,” John Feathers, a father, said at the meeting, according to WHEC, adding, “You need to have a mental evaluation. There’s no reason that should be in the schools whatsoever at all…You can see the guy’s BUTT is clearly out,” Feathers said, referencing an illustration in the book. “And then if you go over on this side of the picture, there’s two guys standing in BONDAGE right there.” Here are some photos from the book that was reportedly given to an innocent 5-year-old child: The two pages read, “The sidewalk outside is filled with people waiting for the parade to state. Everyone is wearing whatever makes them feel most like themselves. Even if that means wearing hardly anything at all.” Sound appropriate for children? Honestly, does that sound appropriate for anyone? Watch this concerned mother call out the school board (before they walked out on her): MUST WATCH: A mom calls out Penfield Central School District in NY board after her daughter was allowed to take out a booked from the school library called “The Rainbow Parade” which includes graphic sexual messaging including an image of a naked man. We have a serious grooming… pic.twitter.com/kxKrKHHWcb — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 15, 2025 More from Daily Mail: A school board meeting descended into chaos during an argument over an LGBTQ pride book that was made available to children in kindergarten. The book, titled ‘The Rainbow Parade’, illustrates a young child and her two moms attending a pride parade together, where they see men in bondage holding hands and a near naked person walking the streets alone. Outraged parents from Penfield Central School in New York attended a board meeting on Tuesday night in an effort to voice their concerns, but were shut down by officials who refused to listen. ‘If you think that that’s appropriate for children to see, then there’s something wrong with you,’ parent John Feathers fumed. ‘You need to have a mental evaluation. There’s no reason that should be in the schools whatsoever at all.’ He noted that one page of the book shows a ‘butt is clearly out.’ ‘And then if you go over on this side of the picture, there’s two guys standing in bondage right there.’ Superintendent Tasha Potter was confronted by boos and shouting from parents gathered in the crowd as she conducted the meeting. ‘We have the policy in place. The procedures in place to object [to learning materials],’ she said. Parents began shouting their concerns from the crowd as she said: ‘That is not how you object.’ ‘We will ask people who cannot do that to be removed. We are here at our board meeting. We’re conducting our business.’ That comment sparked outrage from the crowd, who booed Potter and the rest of the board as they got to their feet and walked out of the room. ‘It’s our board meeting,’ one parent shouted over the chorus of boos. The board were called ‘chickens’ and ‘cowards’ as they left. ‘The school board is just leaving. They’re just leaving,’ one outraged parent said. ‘How do you just leave a school board meeting with a packed room?’ In case you’re curious, here’s the author responsible for writing this sick, pedophilic book: This is the author of the book in question “The Rainbow Parade.” She says as a kid, she loved going to pride parades with her moms and her queer family. pic.twitter.com/31klAxJzi6 — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 12, 2025 This is beyond derangement. To put it bluntly, this is child abuse. The school board and school district need to be held accountable for exposing children to such indecent, pornographic material. The school should definitely be prosecuted for this. That needs to start happening immediately. Children are being ab*sed by this. — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) January 15, 2025 We cannot allow for this kind of indoctrination and grooming of our children. Our education system needs a complete overhaul. These people cannot be trusted with our children. Withhold all funding from this school. This is why the Department of Education needs to be defunded and eradicated — sKorch (@sKorchDaddy) February 12, 2025 I truly hope things will change with our schools underneath President Trump’s new administration. In the meantime, it might be a good time to consider private or homeschooling, if you’re not already. pic.twitter.com/tZ02FQI3uh — Jeff Mack (@JeffMack55) February 12, 2025 RELATED REPORT: Democrats Release ANOTHER Sick Porno Ad [WARNING: Graphic and Gross] Democrats Release ANOTHER Sick Porno Ad [WARNING: Graphic and Gross] Democrats seem obsessed with bodily functions.... "Tampon Tim" and his wife are literally nicknamed "Tampon Tim" because he can't stop talking about.....tampons. Very strange. And the people making ads for Democrats in this Presidential Election keep making ads about....porno.  Or watching porno.  Or being in a porno. It's all quite disturbing. I guess this is all they know? How to be gross? I don't really want to give this any more attention than it deserves but take a look for yourself: THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK! This is a democrat ad… ??‍♂ . Be mindful if you have children around you. These ads, paid for by the Progress Action Fund, are reportedly being displayed on streaming services in swing states. pic.twitter.com/v85v8Fa6aZ — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) October 31, 2024 Full screen video player here: THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK! This is a democrat ad… . Be mindful if you have children around you. These ads, paid for by the Progress Action Fund, are reportedly being displayed on streaming services in swing states. pic.twitter.com/v85v8Fa6aZ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) October 31, 2024 Did we all really need to see that? Do my kids need to hear that when the TV is on? Class it up, Democrats....you're better than this, or at least you should be! And if that wasn't bad enough, I think their first one was worse. Maybe? I don't know, it's hard to tell. Democrats Release Most Vulgar Campaign Ad Yet RELATED REPORT -- these are the ads they show the adults in a Presidential Election, but this is what they're showing your kids in public schools: Heads Up Parents, These Are The Porno Vids They’re Showing Your Kids In School Heads Up Parents, These Are The Porno Vids They're Showing Your Kids In School Heads up parents! Do you know what your kids are being shown in school? In "Health Class"? I'll show you. Take a look right here and you tell me if you think this is age-appropriate for 5th graders: Ohio Parent is Horrified by the videos being played for 5th graders… I’ve been talking about the disgusting videos Amaze Videos makes for the public school system for a few years now. These sexualized Lesson Plans make its way into the public school system through a group… https://t.co/xU4ZLTNqB5 pic.twitter.com/6hZz1SUT4U — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 11, 2024 Ohio Parent is Horrified by the videos being played for 5th graders… I’ve been talking about the disgusting videos Amaze Videos makes for the public school system for a few years now. These sexualized Lesson Plans make its way into the public school system through a group called “Advocates for Youth”… I’m so glad this is getting attention now… keep sharing. Homeschool if you can.. but inform every parent you come in contact with. This is not ok. Backup here on Rumble if needed: Is this ok with you? How about the gender identity videos for older grades? I suppose it's better than this: BANNED VIDEO Shows How Schools Are Instructing Children Age 4-9 To Masturbate What is going on? This is the second story today I've covered about schools hyper-sexualizing students. In some cases VERY young students. According to StopWorldControl.com the video below was banned from Rumble: Although it was banned from Rumble, I have a copy. WARNING: this is disgusting stuff what these people are doing. Watch here at your own risk: BANNED VIDEO shows how schools are instructing children to masturbate... WARNING: this is UN Agenda 2030...and it's sick!#BannedVideo #UN #Sick #Children #SaveTheKids pic.twitter.com/X7sGRDLwcZ — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) June 1, 2023 Here's more from StopWorldControl: "Schools must equip children to have sexual partners" - say the UN and WHO This evidence report reveals how the World Health Organization and United Nations are sexualizing little children in primary education worldwide, for the purpose of normalizing pedophilia. This report consists of nothing but solid evidence, with many official documents, videos, books, archives, etc. All PDF documents may be downloaded from the references section at the end of this report. "Little children are sexual beings who must have sexual partners and begin with sex as soon as possible. For this reason, kindergartens and elementary schools must teach children to develop lust and sexual desire, learn masturbation, build same-sex relationships, use online pornography, and learn different sexual techniques such as oral sex." The above is a paraphrased summary of the official guidelines issued by the World Health Organization and the United Nations to educational authorities worldwide. Meanwhile, judicial organizations are issuing statements that sex between little children and adults should be legalized, while media outlets and political parties are calling for the acceptance of pedophilia as a "normal sexual orientation". Equipping children to have sexual partners The United Nations has issued the document "International Technical Guidance on Sexual Education".1 It is the official guideline for elementary schools around the world. The goal of this document is described on page 16.  In their own words:  "It aims to equip children... to develop sexual relationships". On page 17, the United Nations explains that this guide is intended to help children build relationships with romantic or sexual partners. In their own words: "These skills can help children form relationships with... sexual partners." On page 71, educators are instructed to teach little kids from the age of 5 about kissing, hugging, touching and sexual behaviors.  9-year-old children are to be taught about masturbation, sexual attraction and sexual stimulation. Teaching little kids to have sex The agenda to ensure that little children have sexual parters is being further developed by the World Health Organization. Their document, "Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe",2 contains the following instructions for kindergartens and elementary schools: ︎ Children between 0 and 4 years must learn about masturbation and develop an interest in their own and others' bodies. ︎ Children between 4 and 6 years must learn about masturbation and be encouraged to express their sexual needs and wishes. ︎ Children between 6 and 9 years must learn about sexual intercourse, online pornography, having a secret love and self-stimulation. ︎ Children between 9 and 12 years should have their first sexual experience and learn to use online pornography.   The WHO instructs teachers worldwide to educate 9-year-old children about having sexual intercourse for the first time, how to experience sex using the internet and mobile phones, and learning different sexual techniques. School video instructs kids to begin masturbating The following video is part of a European school program that works closely with the World Health Organization and United Nations to implement their agenda in schools nationwide. It is a real-world example of the execution of these guidelines, in this case, in The Netherlands. The video shows how children are encouraged by teachers to begin masturbating. This video was distributed to many thousands of schools as part of the WHO "comprehensive sexuality education" program, whose objective is that children should start having sex as early as possible. The publisher of this video, the Rutgers Foundation, operates in 27 nations, is a close partner of the WHO and UN, and is funded by Bill Gates and Planned Parenthood.6 The language spoken in the video is Dutch, but please be aware that this is a real-life example of the execution of an INTERNATIONAL agenda of the World Health Organization and the United Nations, therefore this will be coming to public schools in every nation of the world.  There's a lot more and if you want to read it all you can see the FULL article here: https://stopworldcontrol.com/children/?inf_contact_key=24325a1fdff113b6c32f395ed410c93fd18a532c4142cb79caf2b269de1401fa#watch-video Related: GRAPHIC: California Teacher Caught On Camera Teaching Students How To Enjoy Anal Sex Warning: this is a graphic post. You may have surmised that much from the headline, but I'm giving you a second warning. Ok, we good? Continue at your own risk. But that's kind of the point right? If I have to put a warning on this article for you adults to read it, then why are we ok with it in our schools? And yes I realize this is high school and no I'm not against Sex Education. But since when did Sex Education involve being taught how to enjoy anal sex and stimulate the prostate? That's Sex Ed now? I'll say this too...this teacher may just be doing her job. She may just be teaching the curriculum she was given. I don't know. So you tell me: you ok with this being taught in school?     View this post on Instagram   A post shared by dont get caught (@edhscaughtlacking) Backup here on Rumble: Oh and did you notice how quickly they start talking about how you can buy Sex Toys at Target? Because....of course you can. The PostMillenial had more details: An educator at El Dorado High School in Placentia, California was captured on video giving students explicit instructions during class on how to have pleasure during anal sex, and where to find sex toys that will stimulate the prostate gland. The video, posted to the Instagram account @edhscaughtlacking, shows the educator, sitting atop a desk in front of a classroom full of students, discussing why anal sex is pleasurable for gay men, with an enlarged image of a prostate gland behind her. "You don't have to go inside the booty hole you can actually just push on the seam and that stimulates the prostate gland," the educator told her students. "They apparently really like that." "So that's why, for male and male, anal sex is still very pleasurable because of the fact that it hits the prostate and there's a lot of nerve endings in your booty, as well," the educator explained, according to the video. She then told the class that the prostate gland is equivalent to the "g-spot" for women, and shared places where students can purchase sex toys that stimulate these areas. "If you go to Target, seriously, if you go to Target and go where the tampons and pads are, they have they just look like a little box but if you open it up, there's like a Velcro front to the box, you open it up and then 'BAM' sex toys," she explained. One student interrupted and said that sex toys can also be purchased as CVS pharmacies and the educator responded, "Yes! CVS has them too. A lot of them." "So that's why when you look at the toys, a lot of them look like this," she said, making a gesture that included a hooked finger insinuating that position stimulates both the "g-spot" and prostate gland, video shows. The California Board of Education approved new statewide comprehensive sex education laws in 2019 to include LGBTQ inclusivity for health education under the California Healthy Youth Act, which has been heavily criticized by parents. Following the updated sex education laws, hundreds of parents and residents of California communites expressed their opposition of the LGBTQ framework to the Instructional Quality Commission, which is an advisory to the state board, according to EdSource. From Twitter: Allegedly, a Southern-California high school teacher gave students explicit instructions on pleasure during anal sex. Sadly, this isn't surprising...this is expected and typical with Comprehensive Sexuality Education. Full video and video credit from: https://t.co/DHPtQ5bgeD pic.twitter.com/L0vLBnqX2o — Kelly S. (@kellyske) May 30, 2023 It's basically "kink ed" at this point: It’s kink ed at this point. When did reproductive education change into Sex Ed? — Renaissance Cowboy (@RennCowboy69) May 31, 2023 Exactly right: https://twitter.com/ttariahhealth/status/1663743335373189120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1663743335373189120%7Ctwgr%5E1be981111bcbd1f01b43521e086a8a04d71b16f8%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthepostmillennial.com%2Fviral-video-california-high-school-teacher-instructs-students-on-how-to-get-pleasure-from-anal-sex-to-buy-sex-toys-from-target Why is this necessary? I have no problem with sex education in HS environment. Use condoms to prevent disease. Birth control, how to find resources and talk about with adults. But, simply put, teaching them how to find the clit and prostate and how to "get people off?" and find sex toys? — My2Centrist - I #BCH (@toomuch72) May 31, 2023 What do YOU think? RELATED REPORT: VIEWER WARNING: Eighth Graders Shown Condom Video I've got a wild one for you... And you also might be surprised to get my take on it. But first let me lay it out. The Idaho Freedom Foundation (IFF) first covered this story and let the world know about an animated sex video being shown in the classroom to 8th Graders. The video was made by Trojan Condoms and was used as part of a Planned Parenthood sex education program. But you really need to see it, so here you go... The video is cheekily titled "Condom Sense": Here's the alert put out by the Idaho Freedom Foundation: Eighth-grade kids in Moscow Middle School were shown a disturbing video with animated sex scenes and a cartoon character apparently removing a condom from his erect penis. The video was part of a Planned Parenthood-endorsed sex education program which is implemented in public schools by the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and by individual health districts. Public records requests reveal that the video was shown for multiple years as part of the sex education program known as Reducing the Risk. Use of the video and other materials obtained by IFF indicates violation of Idaho law and standards, which require all sex education taught in public schools to reinforce traditional family arrangements and teach abstinence. The video definitely does not promote abstinence. “Keep the condom on until you ejaculate,” says a female narrator. The video switches to a bird exiting a cuckoo clock on the bedroom wall. Trojan’s video then shows a hand pushing a used condom up off a shaft. “Immediately after ejaculation, hold the condom in place and withdraw the penis while it is still erect,” the narrator says. “Dispose of the used condom by wrapping it in tissue,” the narrator adds alongside a depiction of just that. Titled “Condom Sense,” the video was created by Trojan Condoms and shows multiple scenes in which either a bed or car is rocking back and forth in an obvious attempt to depict sexual activity. Another scene shows the man and woman, whose breast size seems purposefully enhanced, at a table where the waiter offers a platter of various types of condoms. “Some have unique shapes, ribbing, nubs – all designed to enhance the experience,” the narrator says. NCHD has said that video was shown virtually and in-person at Moscow Middle School from 2019-2020. It was similarly shown in-person at Tammany Alternative School from 2018-2020. Another Trojan video was shown at Moscow Middle School from 2019-2022 and Tammany from 2018-2020. This one outlines, along with footage, how the company manufactures its condoms. A separate video discusses the history of condoms and includes clips of topless women. That content was revealed as part of a 2018 email in which NCHD Health Education Specialist Jennifer Andrews laid out multiple videos she intended to show students during a presentation for Reducing the Risk (RTR). NCHD says that particular video — dubbed “The History of Condoms” — was utilized at Tammany Alternative School but hasn’t been shown since 2018. Meanwhile, when asked for RTR content that was utilized, Moscow school district returned a presentation which included screenshots from both Trojan condoms videos. Idaho Freedom Foundation’s Center for American Education has reported extensively on this program, and Trojan’s video is the latest content linked to RTR, which can be approved by individual school districts. The curriculum can vary by jurisdiction. The Trojan video featured prominently at the beginning of a NCHD-recorded zoom lesson for RTR, which was recorded when some schools were teaching virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic. After showing the Trojan video during the recorded lesson an NCHD representative says, “Ok, great little video there.” The lesson also included a Trojan video touting the company’s manufacturing process. During the recording, the presenter later noted the ability for teens to obtain birth control pills from a doctor or family planning clinic without parental involvement. “You do not need a parent’s permission to get birth control at a clinic. No one needs to know that you’re going to the clinic anyways,” she said. “That’s between you and the doctor.” At another point, she says that a person-to-person visit with a health care provider is the best way to obtain information about contraception. “Your parents are a trusted source, but the most trusted one is a health care provider,” she adds. Part of the “contraception” presentations also included information about the abortifacient Plan B. The recorded lessons, 15 of which were obtained via records request, offered a glimpse into how NCHD intended to present the RTR curriculum to students. NCHD has said that only one of the recordings was utilized by Moscow Middle School, although it’s unclear which one. Regardless, NCHD and Moscow School District provided electronic copies of slides similar or identical to ones used in the Zoom recordings, and that contained problematic content. The RTR presentations discovered in NCHD primarily focused on promoting what we have previously called the “New Abstinence.” The objective definition of abstinence is abstaining from sex until marriage. The New Abstinence redefines the term to mean avoiding sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and pregnancy. Marriage is not in their vocabulary. Marital sex or marriage is never mentioned in the presentations. Meanwhile, vaginal, anal, or oral sex are discussed at least a dozen times in connection with using protection and avoiding STDs or pregnancy. The lessons promote vaginal and oral sex using a condom and sexual fantasy as positive, “no risk” behaviors for kids. Anal sex with a condom, oral sex without a condom, and having sex while high or drunk are considered to only carry “some risk.” Currently, RTR is being used by more than a dozen schools affecting around 700 students each year. Potlatch School District, which neighbors Moscow and is also part of NCHD, saw a contentious school board meeting in November as residents reeled from news that RTR was part of their small town’s curriculum. Ultimately, they voted to end the use of RTR, but the controversy raised questions about why the Department of Health and Welfare has pushed the Planned Parenthood-backed curriculum into K-12 classrooms. One board member stated that he “was afraid a teacher might teach the full curriculum to students.” School districts are not required to notify parents that they can opt their children out of sex education under Idaho code. If districts do choose to alert parents about the Reducing the Risk program, they claim children will be taught “abstinence.” Thus parents are left in the dark unless they realize Planned Parenthood has changed the meaning of the term to show kids how to have sex, transition genders, or get an abortion. The Trojan video is just one example of the graphic content being shown to our children by public schools and government health districts. Parents MUST find out what else is going on and hold their school districts accountable, because it only gets worse from here. More here: Ok....so now for my take. You may disagree with me, and that's ok! I give my take and I'd love to hear yours in the comments section. But I have to say this is lower on the list of things that offend me than some other stories we've covered recently (which I will copy below). These are not 2nd Graders, they're 8th Graders. If you think an 8th Grader has never heard of sex or condoms or seen far worse on the internet, you're fooling yourself. Not that any of that is ok, but it is reality for 99.9% of people. At some point, they grow up and they do need to be taught certain things. Abstinence only teaching would definitely be preferred, but I don't find this to be wildly out of line. I remember being in similar "sex ed" classes growing up. I'm pretty sure ours were in 6th grade, so to show this in 8th grade doesn't tend to offend me all that much. But I'm really interested to hear what you think... Now, I will tell you this... This next one is something to really get worked up about: Here Is That SICK Sex Ed Video Teaching First Graders To Masturbate Early warning on this article....this take is graphic. If you don't want to hear graphic content, turn away now. Ok, you've been warned. But that's actually kind of the point of this article. If this topic is too graphic for some of you to even want to read, then why are we allowing it to be taught to our CHILDREN? Not even just children, but how about FIRST Graders? Yes, really. Here is a short 3 minute clip where Ben Shapiro gives his thoughts and shows you the vile cartoon they are showing to your First Graders in school. This ok with you? Watch here: This too: 2nd Graders Shown Video of Man With Erect Wang Standing Over Child It's hard to imagine something less appropriate than showing a classroom full of Second Graders a cartoon with a man with a fully-erect Johnson standing over a child.... Yet that's what happened in Connecticut this week: In my hometown, in my daughters age group class of second grade, they showed an animated video today of a man with an ERECTION standing over a child!!!!! this is not OK!!!!https://t.co/B4vgSa7Qle — Carl Higbie (@CarlHigbie) March 29, 2021 Of course, the school district has tried to claim it was an "educational video" protecting against things like abuse. What do you think? Is that a good enough reason to show a giant erect Schlong to a classroom of 2nd Graders? Could the same goal have been accomplished in a different way? You be the judge and watch for yourself.... Is this video ok in your mind for 2nd Graders? Here's what my friends over at The Blaze reported: Second graders in Greenwich, Connecticut, were shown an animated video that displays the silhouette of a man with a graphic, full erection standing over what has been described as a "sad" girl during a "lesson on social and emotional learning." The New York Post reported that the kids were shown a cartoon titled, "Alfred Jr. & Shadow: A Short Story About Being Scared," during a virtual class that the Greenwich Free Press said was "a lesson on social and emotional learning." The Free Press reported: The description of the video says, "All children are normalscared, but what do children who are embarrassedscared or painfulscared need?" It explains that The Alfred Jr. & Shadow – A Short Story about Being Scared was an educational film for children aged 6-14 years. The children learn about different ways of being scared, what they need when they are scared, and suggestions for actions. Adults also get some tips on how to meet a child who is scared. At one point in the video, the narrator says, "Some children are afraid that their mom and dad will beat them, or that their parents will fight. Other children have experienced an adult touching or putting their penis in the child's private parts or mouth." As the voiceover speaks, the image displayed for several seconds on the screen is what The Washington Examiner called "a dejected-looking child" next to "a sexually aroused silhouetted man." The Post provided a montage to describe the video, which is provided below. What did one parent say? Greenwich parent and Newsmax host Carl Higbie tweeted, "In my hometown, in my daughters age group class of second grade, they showed an animated video today of a man with an ERECTION standing over a child!!!!! this is not OK!!!!" Higbie told the Free Press that he was "relieved" that his own second grader did not see the film, but that several other "disgusted" parents had reached out to him to express their outrage. "That somebody thought this video was acceptable for second graders was abhorrent," he told the outlet. And one more: New "Kids" TV Show Launches About Man With Abnormally Lengthy Dong This is a reprint of one of my favorite stories of last year.  ICYMI. Yes, you read that right. Call it whatever you want....a Dong, a Schlong, a Unit, a Johnson....call it whatever you want, it's the star of a new kids TV show in Denmark. Yes, I said kids show. Aimed at kids. Someone really thought this was a good idea. Take a look: Evolution of kids tv: -Kids before had Transformers and He-Man. -My generation had Yu Gi Oh and Pokemon. -New generation has Pup Patrol and John Dillermand (Penisman in Danish) Denmark launches children's TV show about man with giant penis https://t.co/qcfmTWGbAQ — Aldo (@aldo_alvarez93) January 7, 2021 Even after yesterday’s violence you just have to ask: Denmark: WTF?? John Dillermand: New Danish children's TV show features a man with a massive penis - CNN https://t.co/Vla27MjAbR — Bob Mana (@GeneralMana) January 8, 2021 And it's for kids: https://twitter.com/NarutoMobutu/status/1346870668936286215 You would think this has to be fake, but sadly it's not. From CNN: Denmark's flagship broadcaster has suffered blowback over its newest children's TV program, "John Dillermand" -- an animation starring a man with a penis so massive and flexible it can save children from danger, fetch objects from a river and operate as a pogo stick. The show, whose 13 episodes are available to watch on the DR network's website, follows its titular character as he navigates an array of unexpected scenarios caused by his inexplicably huge genitalia. In episode one, for instance, the mustached Dillermand uses his gigantic, stripey organ as a lead for his dog -- but quickly finds himself inundated with requests from his neighbors to take their pets out for a walk, too. At another point in the show, he is stuck floating in mid-air after balloons are tied to his groin. In another episode, he breaks a friend's vase with his penis and must raise money to pay them back, and in a third, he uses it to steal an ice cream at the zoo. The show's opening montage also shows him using his genitals to keep a lion away from a group of children. The show was generally met with hilarity in Denmark and across the internet, with many praising it as an appropriate and light-hearted way to teach children about the human anatomy. But some took issue with the main character's central trait. Danish politician Morten Messerschmidt, a member of the right-wing Danish People's Party, said children should not be forced to watch a cartoon depiction of an adult man's groin. close dialog And a handful of parents have taken to the Facebook page of DR's children's network, urging them to remove the program. A spokesperson for DR told CNN that most of those who criticized the program did so "without even (having) seen the show, because it wasn't released yet." "Now the great majority here in Denmark are ... making fun of the few critics instead," Sarah Cecilie added. "Hundreds of thousands is supporting 'John Dillermand' now." "In Denmark it is now a huge success, and the children are watching it in big numbers," she said, telling CNN that 200,000 people have viewed the first episode. You can watch a real preview of the show here if you dare: Stay classy Denmark.

Former Tangerine Dream keyboardist Peter Baumann will release new album Nightfall in May

On March 15, 2025, President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to address the invasion by Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang. The goal was to expedite their removal quickly. In stepped an Obama-appointed radical left judge to stop him and order the plane to turn around while in mid-air. This gang […] The post The Constitutional Crisis of An American Traitor, Judge Boasberg appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Blaney is a TikTok user who works in the oil and gas industry. She does not have one of those cushy, air-conditioned office jobs. She is an IE major from Texas Tech and works in cementing. Recently, Blaney pulled a master prank on a coworker that involved bedazzled coveralls. @bee_ah_naay Field pranks make the long days fun and easier #pranks #prankwars #prankvideo #prankster #oilfield #midlandtx #westtexas #westtexasoilfield #texas #oil #oilfield #oilfieldstrong #oilfieldlife #drill #drilling #joke #jokes #fy #fypシ #fyp #fypage #bluecollar #work #jobs #field #fieldwork ♬ original sound – Bianey Workers play pranks on one another to have a little fun. The levity also improves morale and gives everyone a good laugh. The job can be difficult and physically demanding, but humor makes the day go quicker. The bedazzled coveralls were a masterful prank that took planning and effort. First, Blaney had to “steal” the coveralls from her coworker’s truck. Then, she had to do the bedazzling. She used a special machine called the Bedazzler to attach individual rhinestones to the clothing. It was tedious work, and it probably took most of an entire evening to finish the bedazzled coveralls. Image from TikTok. After she bedazzled her coworker’s coveralls, Blaney had to sneak them back into his truck. When he arrived on the job site and got out of his truck, everyone was laughing. The shiny rhinestones glimmered in the bright sun. Blaney aligned the stones along the zipper, waistband, and each pocket. But the best part wasn’t visible until he walked away. The back of the coveralls had even more rhinestones on each pocket. Glittering multi-colored gemstones above the waistband in the small of his back spell out “JUICY.” Fortunately, her coworker was good-natured and answered the prank with smiles. Everyone on the job site that day had a good laugh as he walked by. Follow Blaney on TikTok for more fun. Smile, and please share this if Santa blessed you with a Bedazzler back in the day. You can find the source of this story’s featured image here. The post “I Stole My Buddy’s Coveralls” Oil Field Worker Plays “Juicy” Prank On Coworker appeared first on InspireMore.

For two decades, the public has been bombarded with dire warnings of an impending climate-induced agricultural apocalypse. The claim is that a climate warmed excessively by the carbon dioxide emissions of human activity will ravage the food supply and plunge humanity into famine and chaos. For many reasons, none of this ever made sense. Now, a new study published in Scientific Reports has turned this narrative of catastrophe on its head, revealing that a global temperature rise of even 5 degrees Celsius (9 degrees Fahrenheit) would not reduce crop yields—and might even increase harvests.  The paper, written by economist Ross McKitrick, dismantles a key pillar of the Biden administration’s always-suspect upward revision of the “social cost of carbon”—a metric used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to quantify the supposed economic damage of carbon dioxide emissions. The fivefold increase of the social cost of carbon—from $51 per ton of carbon dioxide to more than $250—was based partly on the assumption that warming would devastate agriculture.  The new findings aren’t just a minor correction to the scientific record; they are a reversal of dangerous conclusions drawn from sloppy—perhaps even fraudulent—analyses. Everything we’ve been told about climate change and food security is wrong.  How did the EPA arrive at a social cost of carbon that equates with mass starvation? In 2014, a widely cited meta-analysis of crop-model studies claimed that a warming climate would slash global crop yields, an assertion that fed into subsequent models that influenced the Biden EPA’s social cost of carbon hike.  That original dataset, however, was flawed—crippled by missing variables. Of its 1,722 records, nearly half lacked critical data, such as changes in CO2 concentrations, leaving only 862 usable entries. This incomplete picture painted a grim outlook of crop yields declining with only modest warming.  McKitrick, undeterred by what had become climate orthodoxy, dug deeper. By revisiting the source material, he recovered 360 additional records, bringing the total to 1,222—about a 40% increase in usable data. The additional information showed “positive average output gains for all crop types across the warming scenarios even up to 5 degrees Celsius”—a temperature jump far beyond warming predictions of the U.N.’s International Panel on Climate Change. This isn’t cherry-picking; it’s what happens when the full scope of evidence is examined. “If over the next 100-200 years, yields of all crop types increase, it does not stand to reason that a global trade model could generate global welfare reductions,” writes McKitrick in his concluding remarks.  McKitrick’s findings, grounded in a more comprehensive dataset, suggest the doomsday assumption was built on sand. Far from heralding a collapse, the data show crop yields at least holding steady and even improving with significant warming. Moreover, plants are not too frail for a warming world. They’re built to thrive in the contemporary temperatures of the 20thand 21st centuries. Most crops fall into two categories: C3 and C4 plants, so named to reflect their different photosynthetic processes. C3 crops, such as wheat, rice, and soybeans, flourish in elevated CO2 conditions characteristic of the 21st century. Carbon dioxide is food to plants, necessary for the process of photosynthesis—a process where oxygen is a byproduct. Higher levels of CO2act like a supercharger, boosting photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. Studies have long shown that CO2 enrichment in greenhouses can increase C3 yields by 20% to 40%. C4 crops—like corn and sorghum—are less responsive to CO2 but do well in hotter, drier conditions. In summary, if crop yields don’t crash—if they hold steady or grow—the rationale for a sky-high social cost of carbon disappears.  The McKitrick study is consistent with an extensive historical record that documents human flourishing during earlier eras warmer than today. The Minoan Warm Period 3,000 years ago and the Roman Warm Period and Medieval Warm Periods that followed are examples. Unfortunately, the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change—relied on by many as the standard-bearer for information on climate change—favors adherence to climate dogma over rigorous scientific inquiry. It often ignores cutting-edge findings like McKitrick’s.  So where do we go from here? First, the social cost of carbon calculation needs a reset. A realistic assessment would show that carbon dioxide is a benefit, not a pollutant, and that increasing CO2 adds to global productivity rather than imposes costs on society. The EPA must revisit its numbers, stripping out inflated agricultural damages and grounding its estimates in all the data available. It is time to look at the facts, trust the real science, and end the irrational governmental messaging that feeds climate hysteria. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Study Destroys Basis of EPA Climate Regulations appeared first on The Daily Signal.