YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #freedom #americanhistory #amercia250
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
7 w

Europeans are admitting these 16 everyday American conveniences would be 'luxuries' back home
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Europeans are admitting these 16 everyday American conveniences would be 'luxuries' back home

It's easy to criticize culture and lifestyle in the USA, but overall, it's still one of the best places in the world to live. Take it from the Europeans, who find plenty to admire within our borders; especially when it comes to regular, daily life.Even though European countries and the Unites States are roughly on the same level development-wise, there are still some stark differences in their ways of life. Americans may look to Europe and feel a bit jealous over their free healthcare systems and more laid-back approach to their professional lives. But Europeans who visit America are also in awe of some of the everyday things that Americans take for granted, which seem to be luxuries. A Reddit user asked Europeans to share the everyday American things that they believe are luxuries, and the question received nearly 13,000 responses.Even if there are things we may envy about Europe, Europeans clearly admire many things about the American way of life.Here are 16 of the best responses to the question: “Europeans of Reddit, what do Americans have every day that you see as a luxury?”1. Disability access"Disability access everywhere. I can go to any place -- theater, store, office, school, whatever -- with confidence that I'll be able to navigate fine in my wheelchair. They'll have ramps and/or elevators." "Of all the things in this thread, the disability access is it IMO. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 was an absolute game changer, and European countries and the EU as a whole should be embarrassed for not having something like it." America has strict mandates and requirements about accessibility in public spaces. Photo by Marek Lumi on Unsplash 2. Climate changes"You can pretty much choose to live in any climate you like when you live in the USA and still be in the same country. You like 4 seasons: Move to the Northeast. You like the humid ocean climate - move to Seattle. You like dry warm weather - move to Los Angeles. You like deserts, move to Arizona. You like warm and humid weather - move to the Southeast." "I work as an ecologist and the amount of biodiversity in California is insane. I'll do biological surveys a few hundred miles apart and see so many different plants and animals at each site. I've even done work at sites fairly close to each other (sub 50 miles apart) and will still find stark differences between sites. It's a magic state for wildlife biologists." Famously, Americans travel outside their home country far less than most of the rest of the world. The extreme diversity of habitats and cultures there are to visit within in America is one big reason.3. Big kitchens"Big kitchens and big refrigerators/ freezers. Even in my student apartment, we had a pretty good-sized kitchen. I was dating a Czech girl and her parents came to visit. When they went to my apartment for dinner, the mom was just amazed at the size of my fridge. They were amused when I dumped the scraps in the sink and turned on the garbage disposal. They’d heard about it but had never seen one." 4. Square footage"The massive houses, a special room just for your massive washer and dryer units, 2 car garage, basically you have tons of space." "The size of your homes in places like Utah and Texas. There's a dedicated room for everything. Kids playroom that isn't the living room or the kid's bedroom, walk-in pantry room, a laundry room." 5. Free refills"As an American, it's so easy to take this for granted. Similarly, getting free ice water in the US as well is something I often forget isn't exactly a thing in many other parts of the world." Many places in Europe don't expect you to tip, but they also don't provide free refills on drinks. Photo by Jarden Bellamkonda on Unsplash 6. National Parks"There’s just human development on virtually every inch of large parts of Europe. So even when there are parks, they’re not always as untouched as American parks. And the population density in large parts of Europe means you see a lot more people in the parks. America has national parks that are so untouched and massive that you can really be alone if you want to be." There are less wide open spaces in Europe than in America, just based on land size alone. Europeans who visit or move to America are simply stunned by the vast scale of the United States' largest parks.7. A/C"Americans pump it all summer long." About 90% of American households have some form of air conditioning compared to just 20% of European homes. This is, in part, due to summers in America getting quite a bit hotter.8. Two peaceful neighbors (Mexico and Canada)"Remember, the world's longest undefended border is between Canada and the United States. That says something about our relationship." "We Europeans both love and hate each other in ways that Americans will never understand. But basically, not being French should be enough." @stakuyi.fan Why do England and France hate eachother #Knowledge #stakuyi #shorts #history #education #story 10. Big schools"My high school just had a pool, 3 gyms, an agricultural barn with stalls for students to keep the animals they were raising to show at the rodeo, a few labs, a theater, a full-size kitchen that was used for the culinary classes to share (not the cafeteria), 3 tennis courts, 2 soccer fields that were also used for football practice, and a football stadium with a Jumbotron. At the end of the year, the culinary classes would cook breakfast for the graduating class." 11. Free public bathrooms"As an American who lived in Europe with little kids, this was frustrating. My wife found an app of free public restrooms in Europe." - YouTube www.youtube.com 12. Mexican food"Real Mexican food. We have Mexican restaurants in my home country, but the owners are usually not Mexican and it’s just not the same. Now, I’m living in Japan and it’s the same problem… Mexican food is so delicious." 13. Supermarkets"Enormous supermarkets with abundant choice. I always feel like I'm in Willy Wonka's chocolate factory when I enter one. There's so much stuff!" 14. Big showers"This stands out - I have two really great friends (an expat woman and her husband) that live in the UK, and when I went to stay at their first place together, their shower was like a 2-foot-wide plastic shield outside of the bathtub. I had to stay so close to the wall, so I didn't spray water all over the bathroom." 15. Money"There’s a huge gap between the volume of physical/material stuff Americans count as normal and what Europeans consider normal. An American home might have three TVs versus one, six or seven rooms full of furniture instead of two or three, extra small appliances added all the time like air fryers and espresso machines, new PCs and phones every couple of years because of constant upgrade marketing … the American perception that there’s not enough money is partly down to the giant volume of things Americans regard as minimum equipment." "In effect, when you account for wages and cost of living, luxuries (which usually have similar prices around the world) are proportionally cheaper for Americans. They make up less of their wage and, therefore, make less of a difference. Standard of living is completely different for a working-class American because they can afford luxuries people from working class in other countries can't." 16. 24-hour stores"Stores being open for 24 hours."Stores and restaurants that stay open all night do exist in Europe, but they're far more common in America.This article originally appeared two years ago. It has been updated.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
7 w

People are losing it at this Millennial trying to teach Boomer mom about gentle parenting
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

People are losing it at this Millennial trying to teach Boomer mom about gentle parenting

There are many modern ideas that make sense to those of us who came of age with them, but it's a really interesting exercise to view those same ideas from the perspective of older generations. It can make things seem pretty absurd. For example:Gentle parenting has been the anxious Millennial antidote to the trauma caused by their Boomer parents' not-so-gentle approach to raising kids. This new wave of parents has become determined to not let history repeat itself, to usher in a kinder, more emotionally secure, more confident generation of humans.What is gentle parenting?Gentle parenting is an evidence-based approach in which, instead of being punitive toward their kids, parents build an empathetic, respectful relationship with them. In this approach, although parents create firm boundaries, they also emotionally validate their children as much as possible. This often runs in opposition to the more authoritative parenting style used by Baby Boomers. A mom kissing her daughter's forehead. via Canva/PhotosA fun, tongue-in-cheek, and instantly viral video created by 37-year-old mom of two, Taylor Wolfe, shows how tough it can be for Millennials to bridge the generational parenting gap. The clip, which racked up 5.8 million views in less than 24 hours, shows Taylor trying to teach her Boomer mother, Sandy Wolfe, the ins and outs of gentle parenting so she can use these more compassionate tactics with her grandkids. @thedailytay GENTLE HANDS.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
7 w

19 super-specific memories that are giving people instant childhood nostalgia
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

19 super-specific memories that are giving people instant childhood nostalgia

Have you ever had a sight, sound, or smell trigger a strong memory? With the right prompts, waves of nostalgia can knock us off our feet, tapping into parts of our brain that take us right back to a specific time and place. Not only do we remember it, but for a fleeting moment, we can actually experience the feelings of being there. A Reddit user posed a simple question that dredged up countless memories and experiences that many had long forgotten, asking, “What’s something you can bring up right now to unlock some childhood nostalgia for the rest of us?” The question evoked specific sensory experiences as well as memories of past pop culture staples that are now long gone, and it was a serious trip down nostalgia lane. Here are 19 of the most popular responses: 1. Scented erasers"An eraser that looks and smells like a very fake strawberry." — zazzlekdazzle2. TV static"Remember the warm, fuzzy static left on your tv screen after it was on for a while. A lot of you crazy kids WEAPONIZED the static to shock your siblings!" — JK_NC3. Saturday morning cartoons"Waking up super early on Saturday morning before the rest of the family to watch cartoons." — helltothenoyo4. Freezy Pops"Eating one of those plastic-wrapped ice pop things after a long day of playing outside in your backyard with your friends." — onyourleft___ How many of us have visceral memories of VHS tapes?Photo credit: Canva5. VHS tapes"When you'd watch a vhs and it would say 'and now your feature presentation.'" — Mickthemmouse6. Everyone's favorite day at school"Scholastic book fairs." — zazzlekdazzle"The distinctive newspaper-y feel of those catalogues, the smell of them. Heaven. I would agonize over what books to get, lying on my living room floor, circling my options in different colored gel pens, narrowing it down to 2-4 from a dozen in an intense battle royale between slightly blurry one-line summaries. I know my mom's secret now. She would've bought me the whole damn catalogue. But she made me make my choices so that I really valued the books. I'd read them all immediately, reading all night if I had to, hiding in a tent under my covers with a flashlight I stole from the kitchen. I thought I was getting away with something. As an adult, I notice, now, that the flashlight never ran out of batteries." — IAlbatross7. Everyone's favorite weekday TV show"Watching 'The Price Is Right' when you were sick at home." — mayhemy11 Summer vacation was the best. Photo credit: Canva8. Summer vacation"That feeling of limitless freedom on the first day of summer vacation. That feeling of dreaded anticipation on the last day of summer vacation." —_my_poor_brain_9. The old video store"Blockbuster." — justabll7110. The worst best noise in the world"The noise when picking up the phone when someone was surfing the web." — OhAce11. The TV Guide channel"The TV Guide channel. You had to sit through and watch as the channels slowly went by so we could see what was on. It blew getting distracted by the infomercial in the corner and then realizing you barely just missed what you were waiting for so had to wait for it to start all over." — GroundbreakingOil Who didn't love a Lite Brite? Laurence "GreenReaper" Parry/Wikimedia Commons 12. The one and only Lite Brite!"Light Bright [sic]. I barely remember it myself but you’d take a charcoal-black board and poke different colored pegs through it. You plug it in to the electrical outlet and all the pegs light up creating whatever shape you made in lights." — 90sTrapperKeeper13. Parachute day in gym class"You knew it was gonna be a good day when you walk into PE class and see that huge colorful parachute." — brunettemountainlion14. A very specific part of school recess"Ripping handfuls of grass at recess and putting them on your friend." — boo_boo_technician15. Anything involving Mr. T"In 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum-security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem if no one else can help, and if you can find them....maybe you can hire The A-Team." — Azuras_Star8 Feeling Good About Who We Are | Mister Rogers' Neighborhood Full Episode www.youtube.com 16. Watching the best human being who's ever lived"Watching 'Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.' There was something so special about the intro where he would sing Won't You Be My Neighbor while he changed his jacket and shoes. I loved every second of it, and would watch in utter content and fascination each time as if I'd never before seen him zip his cardigan up and back down to the right spot and change his shoes with the little toss of a shoe from one hand to the other." — Avendashar17. The surefire way to fix any video game"Somewhere between blowing on some cartridges and pressing the cartridge down and up in the NES to get it to play." — autovices18. Reckless behavior on the swingset"That feeling when you are going as high as you can go on the swings. Power? Freedom? Hard to describe." — zazzlekadazzle19. When toy guns were a thing"Cap guns. But smashing the entire roll of caps at once with a hammer." — SoulKahn90The 80s and 90s were really a special time, right on the cusp of major technological breakthroughs, but before the internet and smartphones took over everyday life. Things were modern but simple. Of course, every generation can't help but crave "the way things used to be." Kids today will one day look back at the quaintness of TikTok, or they'll fondly remember a world before everything was AI-generated.There's nothing wrong with taking a brief look back every once in a while and soaking in the nostalgia. Just remember to keep looking forward as well.This article originally appeared four years ago. It has been updated.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
7 w

Which Elvis Presley song held the number one spot for the longest?
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Which Elvis Presley song held the number one spot for the longest?

The crown jewel. The post Which Elvis Presley song held the number one spot for the longest? first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Five Quick Things: The Wrath of the Savages

Welcome to this, your weekend edition of the 5QT, brought to you in part by excessive outrage and also by excessive wine. No, I will not explain. Anyhoo, on with the show… 1. Missives From Gov. Go-F**k-Yourself An interesting legal drama is brewing due to the state of Louisiana’s efforts to stamp out chemical abortions through the off-label use of mifepristone and other abortion drugs. The state has attempted to charge out-of-state doctors who are offering themselves as prescription-by-mail operators for those drugs in violation of a new Louisiana law making such prescriptions illegal (I’m oversimplifying it a bit because I’m racing toward the juicy stuff), and asking that those other states extradite the violators to stand trial in the Bayou State. (RELATED: ‘Dr. Maggie,’ Notorious Abortionist) That effort, made by Louisiana’s Attorney General Liz Murrill, didn’t get very far when she went after a doctor in New York. But that state’s reaction was a bit less performative than the one California Gov. Gavin Newsom threw back at Murrill this week when Louisiana demanded the extradition of a California doctor doling out abortion pills like a Pez dispenser. This was Newsom’s rather unfriendly reaction: Louisiana plans to sue me because I won’t extradite a doctor for providing an abortion.@AGLizMurrill: Go fuck yourself. California will never help you criminalize healthcare. pic.twitter.com/1CPMAWwCNU — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) February 6, 2026 The effort to prosecute out-of-state doctors for prescribing substances that are illegal neither in the state in which they reside nor in federal law is admittedly a bit of a reach. And the reality of a state claiming that the long arm of its law should extend even into hostile territory isn’t altogether a positive one — I can easily envision a scenario whereby a state like California might criminalize political satire of various kinds, for example, and then seek to prosecute non-Californians for perceived transgressions simply because their offerings might be consumed by Californians over the internet. In that scenario, I would want Louisiana’s governor, Jeff Landry, to take a similar stance against California’s efforts to extradite me and drag me in front of a kangaroo court full of Guatemalans or public employee union members or Women’s Studies faculty — or whoever is left in California. I’m not sure I’d require Landry to post “Go F[*]ck Yourself” on X on my behalf, though. There’s a certain element of fake masculinity — beta-male bravado, for certain — inherent in Newsom telling a female attorney general to do the anatomically impossible. Would he say that to Landry or to Greg Abbott or to Ron DeSantis? Perhaps. Murrill’s response was a bit more genteel… Bless your heart, @GavinNewsom. Killing Louisiana babies isn’t healthcare, nor is shielding California drug dealers. The sovereign State of Louisiana will defend life. See ya soon. ⚜️ https://t.co/RmovpXzU29 — Attorney General Liz Murrill (@AGLizMurrill) February 6, 2026 And she picked up a bit of a defense team among Louisiana’s politicos and others… Just to be clear: this doctor shipped high-risk drugs across state lines, at the request of a man who coerced his girlfriend into an unwanted abortion. I miss the days when governors knew drug trafficking isn’t “healthcare” & the F-bomb isn’t dialogue. Carry on, @AGLizMurrill. https://t.co/cXcV8iJ8Pj — Kristen Waggoner (@KristenWaggoner) February 6, 2026 You’re defending a so-called doctor who sent abortion pills to a MAN so he could coerce his girlfriend into aborting their baby that she wanted to keep. That is not health care, it’s drug dealing. You should be ashamed of yourself for facilitating this behavior. https://t.co/ULGunklKzY — U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. (@SenBillCassidy) February 6, 2026 Keep fighting! Louisiana AG Will Sue Gavin Newsom and Kathy Hochul for Allowing Illegal Mail-Order Abortions https://t.co/lfVrFpXBWS — LifeNews.com (@LifeNewsHQ) February 6, 2026 I know protecting criminals is your thing, @GavinNewsom, but at least try to be polite. Not a good look for your no chance presidential aspirations. https://t.co/iWoefqmzxJ — Governor Jeff Landry (@LAGovJeffLandry) February 6, 2026 We’ll see if this escalates. Newsom is looking for a fight because his camp has perceived that mean-girl spirit and its performative manifestations are the political currency of today’s Democrat Party, and so engaging in verbal pugilism with high-profile red-state conservatives is how he can burnish his street cred for 2028. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom’s New Low) Murrill has her own political ambitions. Some think she’s positioning herself for a run at governor of Louisiana in 2031 after Landry is termed out. So it’s in her interest to keep this fight moving as well. It remains to be seen whether she’d go beyond those lawsuits and into a true war footing against all things California. It should be recognized, of course, that two of Murrill’s political allies are Mike Johnson and Steve Scalise — the two most prominent members of Congress. One wonders if Newsom realizes how much trouble an all-out political war with the folks in Louisiana’s backwaters could make for him and his pals. Worth watching. 2. The Prophet Muhammad and Immigration, in the Words of New York’s New Prophet You probably saw this. Everybody has by now. NEW: NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani calls on America to look to Islam and the “Prophet Muhammad” to support migration “I consider my own faith, Islam, a religion built upon a narrative of migration.” “The story of the Hijrah reminds us that Prophet Muhammad, was a stranger too, who… pic.twitter.com/RHG5JfW5yA — Unlimited L’s (@unlimited_ls) February 6, 2026 I said it at X, and I also said it in the first segment of The Spectacle Podcast this week: Zohran Mamdani is a New Yorker but not an American, and this is a status it wasn’t possible to hold not long ago. (RELATED: The Spectacle Ep. 322: Commie Trouble: King Mamdani’s Kingdom Rubbled in Snow) Mamdani might hold American citizenship, though he shouldn’t, as he clearly lied on his naturalization forms about the ideologies he adheres to. But his cultural, economic, and political beliefs can only be described as anti-American in every way that matters. That said, he’s certainly a New Yorker. The New Yorkers obviously think so; they made him mayor of the place. And the Epstein files, which prove that Mamdani’s mother was very well connected not just to Jeffrey Epstein but the mob of Big Apple sophisticates Epstein ran with, make it obvious that Zohran Mamdani is no outsider to the in-crowd in that city. And it used to be that the things Mamdani is talking about in that clip — essentially that bringing in large numbers of people from diverse backgrounds added to a city’s dynamism — were understood to have a modicum of truth to them. New York offered a window into that truth, it’s true. Except this was when New York was still very much an American city. And that diversity and cultural dynamism fit within the box of an American culture and heritage that New York helped to shape, but was still governed by. It wasn’t long ago that, after the Twin Towers were brought down by people who believed a lot of the same things Mamdani believes, America rallied behind New York because New Yorkers still fundamentally adhered to the same worldview the rest of the country does. Nobody really thinks that’s true anymore. It started to not be true when Bill de Blasio served two terms as New York’s mayor, and now, under Mamdani, it’s unquestionably false. It’s mind-blowing that a generation after 9/11, this would be the man ruling New York, but that’s the reality. And in that sense, it is very possible to be a New Yorker and not an American. 3. The Chinese Cultural Revolution Comes to Corporate Yoga Who are the worst people in America? This is beginning to stand out as an important question. Certainly, the metropolitan elite being outed in the latest batch of dispatches from the Epstein files — the folks whose perversions and appetites the public have suspected but not quite known until now and have only accentuated their deliberate failure to preserve and advance the institutions they control — are one class of nominee. The criminal class of barbarians destroying the low-end areas of our cities, in concert with the crooked machine pols ruling from City Hall, is another group. But increasingly the leading villains in America are these people… Another private business targeted as activists aggressively confront employees for not taking a public stance against ICE
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Confederate Liberals

A core tenet of conservatism is captured by the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the last of the Bill of Rights crafted by James Madison. It’s simple and succinct: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” This is better known as federalism, which is a central principle of American conservatism. Conservatives believe in limited government. They oppose unnecessary centralization in Washington, D.C. They argue that decentralized, local government closer to the problem at hand is typically better, more efficient, and more helpful. The principle of subsidiarity represents this well. I’ll quote my friends from the Acton Institute: [T]he principle of subsidiarity … holds that nothing should be done by a larger and more complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization. In other words, any activity which can be performed by a more decentralized entity should be. This principle is a bulwark of limited government and personal freedom. It conflicts with the passion for centralization and bureaucracy characteristic of the Welfare State. When Ronald Reagan heard of subsidiarity, he considered it a mere statement of common sense. Connecting the principle of subsidiarity to the 10th Amendment, conservatives strive for a balance between excessive central governance in Washington and excessive governance by the states. James Madison so believed in such a balance that scholars refer to it as “Madison’s Middle Ground.” Among his fellow founders, Madison’s middle ground stood between Thomas Jefferson’s preference for state governance and Alexander Hamilton’s preference for a strong federal government. Reaching this middle ground has been a matter of fierce debate since the late 1700s. It reached its most vociferous point, of course, during the Civil War. In more recent times, liberal presidents such as Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson pushed more powers toward the federal leviathan in Washington. By the 1990s, Republicans like Newt Gingrich in the House and Democrat President Bill Clinton found common middle ground in areas such as decentralizing and block-granting welfare. The reality is that liberals invoke states’ rights all the time. Never a calming voice in these debates are liberals, especially left-wing race-baiters, which unfortunately describes most modern progressives. Anytime that a conservative properly invokes states’ rights, a liberal maniac jumps forward to hyperventilate and howl “Jim Crow! Racism!” at the top of his or her lungs. These voices of unreason insist that any invocation of states’ rights is “code language” or a “dog whistle” for racism. Max Boot did this with remarkable crassness in his awful biography of Ronald Reagan. (See: Paul Kengor, “Max Boot’s Reagan Is the Worst Book of the Year.”) When a conservative appeals to basic 10th Amendment federalism, the unhinged liberal accuses the conservative of being a closet Confederate racist. (RELATED: What’s Really Causing the Minnesota ‘Insurrection’?) And yet, here’s where such behavior from liberals gets even more maddening: The reality is that liberals invoke states’ rights all the time. Progressive Confederates To that end, I commend to readers three recent pieces we published at The American Spectator, which yet again affirm this point. Our Ellie Gardey Holmes published a disturbing piece on the latest crazed abortion actions of the heretical Catholic governor of New York, Kathy Hochul. Ellie notes that last week Hochul’s pals in the New York state Senate “passed a bevy of pro-abortion legislation that seeks to ensure abortion is funded and protected to the maximum extent possible. This included funding travel, meals, and lodging for women seeking abortions.” (RELATED: New York State Serves Up Insanity on Egg Freezing) I’ve followed this mess for quite a while. I had written about Hochul’s offer to provide such “services” back when Roe was reversed with the 2022 Dobbs decision. Hochul was so incensed that she dashed to the cameras to make a most generous offer to women outside of New York in pro-life states. Hochul urged them to come to New York, where they would be warmly treated to abortions. “Abortion access is safe in New York,” declared Hochul. With a grim grin, Hochul morbidly savored: “To the women of Texas, I want to say I am with you. Lady Liberty is here to welcome you with open arms.” She vowed: “We will help you find a way to New York.” As for any federal authorities who might want to halt this interstate commerce, Gov. Hochul effectively had a two-word rejoinder that would thrill any Jim Crow racist: “States’ rights!” (See: Paul Kengor, “The Democrat States’ Rights Supremacists.”) Yes, states’ rights. For Hochul, it was time to assert state supremacy uber alles. To hell with the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. It was Albany to the rescue—not only for women in the Big Apple, but from Austin, Dallas, Houston. Lady Liberty would cradle them (but not their babies) in her arms.  The states’ rights fanaticism of this liberal Democrat governor is echoed by liberals in the New York legislature. They, too, are states’ rights nuts. They urge women from every state to come to New York with every cost covered to kill their unborn babies. Are the nattering nabobs at the New York Times calling out this states’ rights hypocrisy by their progressive brethren? Hardly. From every left-wing outpost, there’s a new slogan to cheer. Do you hear them, dear reader? Listen: “States’ rights! States’ rights! States’ rights!” Except that their battle cry isn’t actually new at all. Liberals invoke states’ rights constantly. I noted last year how the left-wing governor of Maine, Janet Mills, and her progressive legislature went full-Jefferson Davis in defying federal law by rejecting President Trump’s new Title IX rules barring biological men from beating girls in women’s sports. “See you in court,” Mills told President Trump defiantly. And if the Supreme Court ever overturns Obergefell as it did Roe, you can expect liberals to become states’ rights fanatics for marriage laws. They’ll legalize same-sex “marriage” in all their states and tell the feds the issue is none of their damned business. Washington has no authority over them! Liberals are not thoughtful enough to discern their contradictions. Do they not see the hypocrisy in their invoking of states’ rights that they blast conservatives for invoking? No. Liberals are not thoughtful enough to discern their contradictions. Liberalism is based not on rational thinking but emotion — pure, unbridled, raging, child-like emotional outbursts. Our R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. had them pegged long ago when he dubbed it “infantile liberalism.” That brings us to another current example of their states’ rights extremism on full display: Gov. Tim Walz’s Minnesota. Like Golden Boy Gavin Newsom in California or any number of other liberal governors, Walz (as well as Minneapolis’ left-wing mayor) is fully defiant of federal law when it comes to illegal immigrants in his midst. As he fights the feds, left-wing activists from all over America dash to Minnesota to cheer him on and join the rebellion against Washington. (RELATED: Minnesota and the New Nullification Crisis) The hypocrisy of Walz was captured nicely in a piece last week by our Jeffrey Lord, aptly titled, “Tim Walz: The New Jefferson Davis.” Jeff writes: For those who read history, there is a recall of a long-ago politician, this one a U.S. senator who was so taken with the notion of rebelling against the federal government and a Republican president that he resigned his seat as a U.S. senator from Mississippi and was selected to be president of the new Confederate States of America. And in that capacity, he marshaled the forces of anti-federal government dissidents to formally fight the Union forces led by Republican President Abraham Lincoln. In today’s America, there is Minnesota’s Democrat Governor Tim Walz following the path of Jefferson Davis, marshaling the forces of violent anti-federal government ICE protestors to fight federal government ICE employees led by another Republican president, Donald Trump.  Also making this point for The American Spectator is Josh Hammer, who in his article, “The Rise of the New Confederacy,” writes: “In echoing the discredited theories of yesteryear, Ellison, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), and the rest of the state’s top Democratic brass have emerged as modern reincarnations of Jefferson Davis and George Wallace. They wouldn’t see it that way, naturally.” (RELATED: The Rise of the New Confederacy) No, they wouldn’t. They’re not smart enough to connect the dots. And don’t make the mistake of thinking they are smart enough. Liberals are not shrewd Machiavellians playing multi-dimensional political chess. Their ideological worldview is driven by emotion. Thus, on one hand, they’ll scream “racist!” at any conservative invoking the 10th Amendment while they themselves become the most strident states’ rights Confederates. Let’s accuse them of what they accuse conservatives of. Behold: Confederal liberals. READ MORE from Paul Kengor: A Haunt of Demons Shuts Its Doors … The Fall of Margaret Sanger’s ‘Clinic’ Mike Reagan, Twice Adopted, Rest in Peace TCM Remembers — And So Do I Image licensed under Attribution 2.0 Generic.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Newsom Practically Demands to Be the Democratic Candidate

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s PR team has been planning this week for months. This is the week that three publications, Vogue, the New Yorker, and the New York Times, were given the go-ahead to publish splashy profiles of Newsom that reveal details from his memoir, which is set to be published later this month. The three publications were offered personal interviews, staged photoshoots, early access to his memoir, and, in two cases, interviews with his family members. All of this makes Newsom’s rise to the top of the Democratic field look like the outcome of a meticulously managed effort to make his candidacy seem inevitable, rather than the result of organic momentum. Newsom is not — as his book would like to portray — a man who pulled himself up by his bootstraps, but rather a political product who has the whole establishment class working in lockstep to choreograph his presidential rise. It’s the same story today as it was when Willie Brown and John Burton and Gordon Getty and the whole San Francisco political class handed him his position as mayor of San Francisco and groomed him to rise even further in politics. In his PR team’s effort to tightly control the governor’s image and promote this narrative of inevitability, they selected writers who would fawn over Newsom in breathless fashion. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom’s Democrat Fangirls) Just look at how much of a joke the Vogue profile is. Titled “Gavin Newsom Is Setting His Own Rules,” the article begins by calling the governor “embarrassingly handsome.” Could there be a more embarrassing way to begin a piece?: Let’s get this out of the way: He is embarrassingly handsome, his hair seasoned with silver, at ease with his own eminence as he delivers his final State of the State address. That was a lot. But it truly gets worse the longer the piece goes on: It must drive Trump nuts. Newsom: lithe, ardent, energetic, a glimmer of optimism in his eye; Kennedy-esque. Argh! What is this? This must be satire, a joke to see how far the Democratic establishment class can go in demanding that Newsom be selected as the presidential candidate. This goes on in just as ridiculous a fashion. We learn Newsom has an “executive strut.” That he is a “self-made millionaire” (he really isn’t). That his tone is “temperate.” He is at one point described in a single sentence as “Immaculate.” Soon thereafter, he is described as — and I’m not entirely sure what this means — “Fantastic at gab, like a windup doll.” We are also treated to this lovely description: “As he spoke, late-summer sun slanted in through the windows, bathing Newsom in an oh so California magic-hour glow.” (RELATED: Gavin Newsom Plots Memoir to Recast Personal Scandals) There are more physical descriptions of the 58-year-old governor. He has a “lanky frame.” The writer, Maya Singer, thinks he looks perfect everywhere, too: “If Newsom has been spotted disheveled in public, show me the proof.” This is made all the worse by the fact that the piece is interspersed with model shots of Newsom taken by Annie Leibovitz, the photographer who’s supposed to be the best at capturing the softness of a person’s visage. The piece also includes long excerpts from Newsom’s interviews with the writer, but it’s clear she thinks that’s all way less interesting than describing him as “lithe” and “lanky.” I couldn’t help but notice that the New Yorker’s usually hard paywall is absent on the article, allowing its impact to be much wider. The New Yorker piece pretends to be more serious, but it’s just as in love with Newsom. It tries to argue that Newsom is an exceptionally talented politician and also seeks to provide a defense of his past bad behavior. I couldn’t help but notice that the New Yorker’s usually hard paywall is absent on the article, allowing its impact to be much wider. The article describes the governor as “one of the Democrats’ best hopes for pulling together a shattered country.” Its physical descriptions of the governor are only slightly more restrained than Vogue: “He was dressed in a white shirt, dusky-blue suit trousers, and a blue tie knotted, with two crisp dimples, into a four-in-hand.” He is “coiffed” and “has cultivated the air of an accidental politician.” The article quotes one of Newsom’s megadonors, LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, without noting the monetary relationship: “He understands that California is one of the leading places for the U.S. to try to compete with China.” There are several unique anecdotes featured in the New Yorker article, showing the extent of access the writer was provided in exchange for this fawning profile. In one episode, Newsom is described as dreamily wishing to have spent more time on self-study of the liberal arts than on reading policy all day. “How many books I could have read!” exclaims Newsom. “Literature! Philosophy! I think about my life, honestly. I could have gone through the Library of Congress. I could have been someone! I could have wisdom!” Further on in this window into Newsom’s daily life that the New Yorker writer has been afforded, the governor starts spouting allusions to the Walt Whitman poem “O Me! O Life!” The New Yorker writer then features Newsom quoting Walt Whitman later that night in his victory speech, celebrating the passage of his ballot proposition allowing California to gerrymander its districts. In this way, Newsom’s quoting of Whitman comes across as a supposedly organic and brilliant use of literature: “My call tonight, in the spirit of Whitman, who talked about ‘the powerful play goes on’ — we all must contribute a verse,” said Newsom. Newsom’s sister, Hilary, was evidently dispatched to the New Yorker writer to explain the governor’s marriage to Kimberly Guilfoyle. She simply says regarding the marriage, “Oh, God,” before going on to explain that Newsom’s heart was “locked” because of their mother’s illness during this time. In the New Yorker piece, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, Newsom’s wife, becomes the antidote to the problems that led Newsom to drink heavily and have an affair with a married mother. Siebel Newsom, it is stated, allowed Newsom to “express himself.” The New York Times piece serves to pump up Newsom’s narrative that his success is not due, as I contend in my own biography of Newsom, to his family’s connections and his role in San Francisco’s high society. “Mr. Newsom emphasizes in his memoir, through various anecdotes, that it was his work ethic that led to success in sports, business and politics,” says the Times piece. “But he does not deny that his father’s friends were helpful along the way.” The article, to its credit, notes that Newsom refused to discuss in his book his relationship with a 19-year-old when he was 38 and San Francisco’s mayor, which is something that I cover at length in my own book on Newsom. The governor’s defense of the relationship that he provides to the New York Times is: “That one was always colored in as something that it wasn’t.” This week, Newsom also made a showy announcement that his book tour — essentially his shadow presidential campaign — will kick off in red states. In doing so, Newsom is sending the message that he believes his presidential campaign can win the electoral votes of states that have been going to Republicans. His political adviser, Lindsey Cobia, told Politico: “It is very much on purpose to not start with the typical New York, DC, Philly stops…. We are being quite intentional in going into red states first.” Newsom’s first stop will be in Nashville, Tennessee, and will be followed by events in Atlanta, Georgia, and Rock Hill, South Carolina. By carefully orchestrating himself as the inevitable candidate nearly three full years before the presidential election, Newsom runs the risk of peaking too soon. It might be hard for organic momentum to grow around him when it feels like allegiance to him is being demanded. READ MORE from Ellie Gardey Holmes: Newsom Confesses His Disturbing Role in the Euthanization of His Mother Gavin Newsom’s ‘Self-Puffery’ Gets Him in Trouble With David Axelrod An AI Bubble Could Pop Newsom
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Crime and Chaos Pays — for the People at the Top

A pattern is emerging — and it’s no longer subtle. Money flows into the cities with the most chaos. Not despite the disorder, but because of it. These are the cities where politicians virtue-signal, undermine law enforcement, and sell decarceration as empathy. This isn’t random. It’s funded. And it’s been building since 2016. You can see it on the ground. In Minneapolis, anti-ICE protests didn’t look spontaneous. Marchers carried professionally printed signs and oversized, coordinated banners — the kind you’d expect at a national corporate conference, not a grassroots rally. (RELATED: Some Obvious Truths From Minnesota) They wore police-grade gas masks. They used encrypted apps and coordinated technology to track ICE agents in real time — sharing locations, vehicle descriptions, and alerts as operations unfolded. This has been widely reported as a tactic used by organized activist networks responding to federal enforcement. (RELATED: Anti-ICE Activists Block Minneapolis Roads) So ask the obvious questions. Who paid for the banners? Who paid for the gear? Los Angeles followed the same script this past summer. Pallets of bricks were neatly packaged and dropped off across the city — placed near overpasses where police were positioned below. Officers were suddenly attacked from above as bricks were hurled down at them. Police were forced to retreat to their vehicles to avoid serious injury or death. (RELATED: Skewed Reporting From Los Angeles) That does not happen by accident. Police cars were destroyed. Businesses were looted and windows shattered. Entire neighborhoods were surrendered to mob rule. We’ve seen this model before. Not models — one. That didn’t look like justice. It looked like money. Grant-funded chaos. During the 2020 Black Lives Matter “summer of love,” cities burned under the banner of racial justice while corporate donors and foundations poured in millions. In the years that followed, several BLM founders were federally indicted over alleged financial crimes tied to those donations. (RELATED: 5 Years On, What the Media Need to Know About George Floyd) That didn’t look like justice. It looked like money. Grant-funded chaos. Billions of dollars flow through foundations and political networks into city governments willing to play along. When they don’t, that same money is used to install district attorneys whose policies mirror those of radical public defenders — regardless of the consequences for public safety. (RELATED: Who’s Paying for the Minneapolis Protesters?) In New Jersey, Governor Mikie Sherrill demanded ICE agents be taken “off the streets immediately,” calling them “unaccountable” and “lawless” — not as a protester, but as a sitting governor attacking federal law enforcement on record. In Philadelphia, District Attorney Larry Krasner went further. On video, he claimed he would “hunt down” ICE agents — despite having no jurisdiction over them. (RELATED: Philadelphia DA Krasner’s Wreckless ‘Nazi’ Rhetoric) He outranks no one. He has no authority. This is first-year law school material. In New York City, Mayor Zohran Mamdani has aligned himself with figures who promoted defunding-the-police policies and used dehumanizing rhetoric toward law enforcement, while advancing taxpayer-funded ideological initiatives. During a recent winter blast, 17 homeless New Yorkers froze to death even as city leadership staged public photo-ops highlighting political priorities rather than emergency response. Families were left to grieve without answers. What do you say to those families? Or do deaths only matter when there’s a grant attached? At this point, the question isn’t whether this is happening. It’s why. The answer’s not complicated. It’s financial. Donald Trump didn’t enter politics to get rich. He already was. Members of Congress are different. They are public servants — and public service was never meant to be a pathway to personal enrichment. Yet questions persist about how some lawmakers amass fortunes far beyond what a congressional salary supports. That scrutiny has recently focused on Ilhan Omar, whose financial disclosures and reported rise in net worth have fueled public debate about how such wealth is accumulated while in office. (RELATED: The Spectacle Ep. 308: Ilhan Omar: Queen of Corruption) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez built a brand around “Tax the Rich,” then attended the Met Gala in a designer gown bearing the slogan. In 2025, the House Ethics Committee ordered her to repay more than $2,700 for improperly accepted gifts tied to the event — even while finding no intent to violate the rules. Public servants are not supposed to live like elites. I don’t say this as a pundit. I say it as someone who was one. When I worked at Allegheny County Pretrial Services in Pittsburgh, millions of dollars began flowing in under the banner of “bail reform.” Eventually, that funding approached $20 million. The condition was simple: downplay risk — meaning erase it entirely. We were expected to tell magistrates that violent offenders were not dangerous. That a man who nearly beat someone to death — even with dozens of prior arrests — posed no threat to the community. We recommended release. They walked out. Many returned — some just hours later — charged with attempted homicide or worse. Criminal history is the strongest predictor of future violence. We were instructed to argue the opposite. This was the cost of the funding. Meanwhile, the police were exhausted. Battered. Demoralized. Two years after the funding began pouring in, my director — a woman in her 50s with two college-aged children — built a home worth over one million dollars. Luxury vacations followed: Disney, Colorado, Hawaii — bragged about openly while innocent people were attacked by offenders who never should have been released. Every time the jail population dropped, another large check arrived. Now the fraud is coming into view: fake daycares in Minnesota. A winery that never existed. Taxpayer money funneled into ideological programs while basic public safety collapsed. Lawlessness was the distraction. Paid chaos. Bullhorns. Banners. Gas masks. Bricks. Ask yourself the only question that matters: Where do you think they came from? READ MORE from Kelly Rae Robertson: When Law Enforcement Becomes Political Image licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

I’m a Spanish Taxpayer. This Is Why the West Doesn’t Need to Reward Illegal Immigrants.

Spain has just announced the regularization of half a million undocumented immigrants. Pedro Sánchez published an article in the New York Times on Thursday (“I’m the Prime Minister of Spain. This Is Why the West Needs Migrants”), congratulating himself on the measure — but his piece included several inaccuracies and omissions, as well as a bunch of nonsense, as is usual from the author. In reality, the proposed regularization will affect closer to one million undocumented immigrants, a figure that could soon rise to two million thanks to family reunification policies. While this is theoretically a matter for each state, Giorgia Meloni has asked the EU to halt the regularization to prevent a surge of undocumented migrants in the Mediterranean. This is an irresponsible project that the social-communist government is pushing through by force, using the legal mechanism of a decree-law to bypass debate in Congress, where it lacks the support to pass. This is exactly the same as what dictators do. Sánchez leans on the argument that Spain was once a country of emigrants, but that’s a trap. Sánchez leans on the argument that Spain was once a country of emigrants, but that’s a trap: yes, Spaniards emigrated to the Americas and other parts of Europe in the 20th century seeking prosperity, but that migration was far more orderly and regulated. Most left Spain with state-managed contracts. By contrast, Spain was then a poor but European and stable country, whereas a significant portion of today’s immigration comes from failed states, extreme structural poverty, or war — and, unlike Spaniards who were heading to Switzerland or Argentina, many arrive with minimal willingness to adapt, unless you consider machete attacks in the streets a literal friendly invitation to mix with Spanish blood. Spain needs immigration with guarantees — people coming with work contracts, no criminal record, and willing to adapt. Otherwise, public services teeter on the brink of collapse, and sustaining the Welfare State will become increasingly difficult. For instance, since 2000, the population has grown by 20 percent, while per capita investment in infrastructure has dropped 38 percent. These figures are central to the debate in Spain following a recent train accident that killed 46 people and exposed the deterioration of the railway system under Sánchez’s administration. Crime is also a major concern. The government will not require criminal record certificates from undocumented immigrants benefiting from this measure — only a sworn statement denying any criminal activity. Police unions consider this a bad joke. Furthermore, Sánchez’s social policies encourage many immigrants not to work. Once regularized, an unemployed immigrant will have access to the minimum living income, regional aid, housing assistance, full public healthcare, and school meal grants for their children. Often, the difference between working or not is earning $330 more while dedicating 40 hours a week to a low-quality job. Immigrants know perfectly well that if they work, they lose the benefits. Sánchez claims Spain is enjoying a period of prosperity, but family economics tell a different story: the cost of groceries has risen 45.6 percent since 2019, Sánchez has imposed more than a hundred new taxes during his term — with 80 percent of the burden falling on the middle class and self-employed — and net wages have fallen by an average of 2.5 percent. He ends his article with an appeal to charity, which brings to mind one of Javier Milei’s most famous videos from before he became president. I’ll skip the 50 or so curse words delivered in barely 15 seconds and focus on the message: “If those in government want to do charity, let them do it with their damn money.” Not even the socialist supporters of regularization dare answer this question: What message are you sending to future immigrants after granting legal status to those who entered by breaking the law and violating our borders? Anyway, I, just like Sánchez, have found a fair and quick solution to this situation: let the New York Times, which willingly acts as the megaphone for Europe’s biggest liar, host that one million illegal immigrants in its offices. That’s a win-win. Everyone’s happy. READ MORE from Itxu Díaz: Nobody Is Worrying About Conservative Environmental Policies Confessions of a Hospital Hypochondriac Diary of a Very Dark Tuesday
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
7 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Crash by Illegal Immigrant in Indiana Draws National Outrage

Four people in Indiana are dead following a crash involving a semi truck on Feb. 3, 2026. The driver of the semi truck, Bekzhan Beishekeev, is a 30-year-old illegal immigrant from Kyrgyzstan who was paroled into the country under the Biden administration’s CBP One app, according to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS also stated that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had issued a detainer for Beishkeev and took custody of him on Feb. 5, 2026. “He will remain in ICE custody pending immigration proceedings,” they added. Indiana State Police and the Jay County Sheriff’s Office responded to reports of a crash at 4 p.m. on Tuesday, according to local media reports. The crash occurred when the semi truck, driven by Beishkeev, allegedly swerved into the opposite lane and collided with a van. Passengers Henry Eicher, Menno Eicher, Paul Eicher, and Simon Girod, 50, 25, 19, and 23, respectively, were declared dead at the scene. All of them were residents of Bryant, Indiana, and were members of the state’s Amish community. The driver of the van, Donald Stipp, 55, was seriously injured and is being treated at a hospital in Fort Wayne, Indiana. (RELATED: Privilege Lost Isn’t Oppression — It’s Justice) In addition to being paroled into the country under the Biden administration, DHS also stated that Beishkeev was given a commercial driver’s license by Pennsylvania. “These decisions have had deadly consequences and led to the death of four innocent people in Indiana on Tuesday… It is incredibly dangerous for illegal aliens, who often don’t know our traffic laws or even English, to be operating semi-trucks on America’s roads. These sanctuary governors must stop giving illegal aliens commercial driver’s licenses before another American gets killed,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. (RELATED: Keep On Truckin’ — If You Are Rightly Licensed) The incident has garnered national attention. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed the incident in a press conference at the White House on Feb. 5, 2026, saying that “[t]his is another tragedy that could have been prevented if not for the wide-open border” and chastised the media present in the room for not covering it more thoroughly. Indiana U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, a Republican, also weighed in, posting on X, “4 men from Indiana were killed this week because of an illegal Joe Biden allowed into the country. Husbands, fathers, sons all gone. We must deport every illegal and get them off our roads!” Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro responded to criticism of his state’s policies in a statement to Fox News, with spokesman Alex Peterson saying that [e]very person who applies for a non-domiciled commercial driver’s license issued by PennDOT must provide proof of identity and proof of their legal presence in the United States. That information is verified by the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, administered by Kristi Noem and the United States Department of Homeland Security. The individual in question had legal status in Kristi Noem’s database when the license was issued in July 2025 and still shows as eligible to receive a license as of today. Kristi Noem should focus on minding the shop in her own agency, as her incompetence and operational failures seem to be matching the scale of her moral failures as the Secretary of Homeland Security. Numerous bills in the current Congress have been proposed to prevent illegal immigrants from obtaining driver’s licenses. These include H.R. 5108, S. 2774, and H.R. 5330, which would threaten federal funding to states that choose to offer such licenses. Most applicable to this case is H.R. 5863 from New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew, appropriately titled the No CDLs for Illegals Act. This bill is specifically focused on prohibiting illegal immigrants from obtaining commercial driver’s licenses (CDLs), the type that Beishekeev had. None of these bills have become law. Several Republican-led states, including Florida, have passed legislation refusing to honor out-of-state driver’s licenses given to illegal aliens.  These legislative actions have been precipitated by a series of high-profile crashes by truck drivers illegally residing in the United States. For example, in December 2025, it was reported by Fox News that Indian national Rajinder Kumar, an illegal immigrant alleged by authorities to be guilty of criminally negligent homicide and reckless endangerment for his role in a fatal Oregon crash that killed two, was given a work authorization by the Biden administration and given a CDL by the state of California. He was hardly alone in that: according to a statement by DHS, during Operation Midway Blitz, 146 illegal immigrant truck drivers were arrested in northwest Indiana. The top states issuing CDLs to these individuals were Illinois, California, and New York, the agency added. READ MORE from Stephan Kapustka: Business as Usual on Pennsylvania Ave A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms Is as Conservative as Game of Thrones Gets One Year In: Trump’s Show of Force
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 6948 out of 115901
  • 6944
  • 6945
  • 6946
  • 6947
  • 6948
  • 6949
  • 6950
  • 6951
  • 6952
  • 6953
  • 6954
  • 6955
  • 6956
  • 6957
  • 6958
  • 6959
  • 6960
  • 6961
  • 6962
  • 6963
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund