YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Scientists Document Over 16,000 Footprints in the World’s Most Extensive Dinosaur Tracksite
Favicon 
www.goodnewsnetwork.org

Scientists Document Over 16,000 Footprints in the World’s Most Extensive Dinosaur Tracksite

In Bolivia, the largest number of dinosaur footprints ever recorded in a single spot is yielding fascinating insight on how these prehistoric animals moved in a way that bones just can’t. 16,600 footprints, forming dozens of “trackways,” have been so far documented on what would have been the muddy floor of a waterway along what […] The post Scientists Document Over 16,000 Footprints in the World’s Most Extensive Dinosaur Tracksite appeared first on Good News Network.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
1 w

Reading The Wheel of Time: Egwene Makes a Stand in The Gathering Storm (Part 11) 
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Reading The Wheel of Time: Egwene Makes a Stand in The Gathering Storm (Part 11) 

Books The Wheel of Time Reading The Wheel of Time: Egwene Makes a Stand in The Gathering Storm (Part 11)  Egwene breaks her silence around Elaida in dramatic fashion… By Sylas K Barrett | Published on December 9, 2025 Comment 0 Share New Share This week in Reading The Wheel of Time, we are finishing up Aviendha’s little portion of chapter 15 and then moving on to chapter 16, in which Egwene’s fight against Elaida finally comes to a very dramatic peak. It’s a very exciting chapter, and very well written, and I’m excited to get into it. Aviendha is carrying out her newest pointless punishment when she is startled by the approach of Amys. Amys comments on Aviendha’s dedication to her work, and Aviendha can’t figure out why Amys would shame her so. She replies that she only does as duty demands, and Amys answers that she does… and she also does not. “Sometimes, Aviendha, we are so concerned with the things we have done that we do not stop to consider the things we have not.” Aviendha has no idea what the proper response to this comment is, but she is saved from responding when she notices a light by the Traveling grounds. They move closer, and find that Flinn and Bashere have returned from their meeting with the Seanchan. A maiden, Corana, informs them that the Seanchan have agreed to another meeting with the Car’a’carn, but Corana doesn’t think he should sue for peace with such people. Amys and Aviendha are horrified to learn that the Seanchan have collared a number of Shaido Wise Ones, who were put on display when Rand’s delegation arrived. Amys asks for Aviendha’s assessment, and Aviendha admits that, however it pains her, the Last Battle must be faced first before anything else, even this grave insult, can be addressed. After Corana has left, Amys and Aviendha discuss the disturbance this news will cause among the rest of the Aiel, and how many will call for Rand to give up his attempts to make peace with the Seanchan. Amys declares that it is time to stop coddling Aviendha. In the White Tower, Egwene has been called to attend the white sisters Ferane (a Sitter), Miyasi, and Tesan. After an hour of shelling walnuts, she is finally asked how she would deal with the Dragon Reborn. Ferane tries to make it sound like she is giving Egwene a lesson in logic, but Egwene realizes that this is a test; Ferane has heard of Egwene criticisms of Elaida and is trying to feel her out. Egwene answers carefully, first explaining how she would handle it in a purely theoretical sense, and then, when called to, how she would handle it as herself, with the knowledge that she has of growing up with Rand. She points out that Rand should have been worked with, guided and supported, not pressured and fought and attacked, and that all of the “terrorizing” he has done fits with what prophecy says he will and must do. She compares Rand to a river, “calm and placid when not agitated, but a furious and deadly current when squeezed too tightly.” She outlines how she would approach Rand, the delegation she would send, and which Ajahs would send the right signals to him. She also points out that the Reds’ experience is in “dealing with” men who can channel, “which is different than ‘working with.’” She reminds the Aes Sedai of their history as master guiders and manipulators, subtle and clever, and asks why now, of all times, they abandoned that way for beating kings and locking them in boxes. She also points out that they cannot deal with Rand until they fix the White Tower, and lays out everything she has thought about the situation, both the split between rebels and Elaida’s followers and the decay inside the Tower that has happened since. She talks about the way the Ajahs have allowed themselves to be torn apart and lays out the conversations that she has had with members of other Ajahs, some of whom have been reasonable while others have been stubborn, and encourages the three Whites to make overtures to members of other Ajahs. By the time she has finished talking, the three all seem to be listening and taking her advice seriously, and she is even praised for her logic. Ferane remarks that Egwene would make an excellent White, a compliment Egwene accepts while also reminding her that the Amyrlin has no Ajah. As she leaves, she inclines her head to Ferane, and receives the same gesture in return. Egwene is elated, right up until Katerine comes to collect her and informs Egwene that she will have no more lessons. Elaida has decided that Egwene’s refusal to curtsy to sisters is the last mark of her defiance, and that Egwene will be given no more lessons, only work, until she lets go of her pride. Egwene is dismayed, not at the work but at the fact that not having lessons cuts her off from being able to do any work with the Aes Sedai. Set to clean out one of the fireplaces by Laras, Egwene considers giving in and starting to curtsy, in order to regain her access to the rest of the sisters, but she realizes that giving in won’t solve her problems. It will only show Elaida that an all-work detail is an effective way to get Egwene to submit. After hours of working, Egwene is surprised when Laras, quietly and secretly, shows her a hidden room in the kitchen floor, offering to hide Egwene there and smuggle her out of the city. She tells Egwene that she finds the beatings she is undergoing shameful. Laras has served loyally for many years but won’t be party to breaking someone’s spirit. “Well, I can see when a girl has moved away from being instructed and into being beaten down. I won’t have it, not in my kitchens. Light burn Elaida for thinking she could do such a thing! Execute you or make you a novice, I don’t care. But this breaking is unacceptable!” Egwene is tempted for a moment to return to her allies having rescued herself, especially now that she doesn’t know if she’ll have any more success in the Tower. But she can’t sit outside and watch the Tower fall, so she refuses. They are almost caught by Katerine, but Egwene’s quick thinking covers Laras’ deception. She is told to clean herself up so that she can serve Elaida for dinner. After an hour of scrubbing away soot, Egwene makes her way to Elaida’s rooms. She has decided that she will take the same tactic with Elaida as last time, remaining silent so as not to anger her, but not showing undue deference, either. However, when she goes in she finds that Elaida is entertaining a group of Sitters, including a representative from every Ajah except the Red and Blue, including Yukiri and Doesine, as well as Ferane. Egwene thinks for a moment that Elaida might be trying to mend some of the division in the Tower, but it quickly becomes clear that she is showing off her breaking of Egwene. Elaida makes derogatory comments about the different Ajahs and gives Egwene the job of refilling her wine every time it is slightly less than full. She even makes comments about the “stink of soot” on Egwene. When conversation turns to the Seanchan, Elaida tries to dismiss concerns about them as laughable, but Shevan, a Brown, has interviewed Egwene about them and thinks that the Aes Sedai should be concerning themselves with the danger to Sisters. Elaida accuses Egwene of being a liar and orders her to admit it. […] as Egwene glanced down the long mahogany table, set with bright white Sea Folk porcelain and flickering red candles, she saw five pairs of eyes studying her. She could see their questions. Egwene had spoken boldly to them when alone, but would she hold to her assertions now, faced by the most powerful woman in the world? A woman who held Egwene’s life in her hands? Egwene realizes that she cannot keep to her plan of silence and keeping her head down. She engages in a debate with Elaida, reminding Elaida of her Dream and stating that the assembled women know that Egwene doesn’t lie. Elaida must admit that the Seanchan are a threat. Elaida orders Egwene to kneel and beg forgiveness for her words and actions, but Egwene refuses. She points out that the Amyrlin should be able to convince people to obey her, and should not have to resort to force. She points out how Elaida has treated every sister who displeased her, and mentions her idea for a fourth Oath, an oath of obedience to the Amyrlin Seat. Egwene relies on the knowledge Siuan taught her, pulling a quote from the first Brown to be raised to the Amyrlin Seat and pointing out all the flaws in Elaida’s plans to capture and cage the Dragon Reborn, quoting The Karaethon Cycle and pointing out all the flaws in Elaida’s logic. She even calls Elaida a coward for refusing to attempt to mend the division in the Tower. Elaida’s eyes flared wide. “How dare you!”“I dare the truth, Elaida,” Egwene said quietly. “You are a coward and a tyrant. I’d name you Darkfriend as well, but I suspect that the Dark One would perhaps be embarrassed to associate with you.” Elaida loses herself completely and begins to beat Egwene with flows of Air, causing Egwene to fall and cut herself on the broken pitcher. She screams that Egwene and the rebels are the Darkfriends, continuing to beat her even as the other sisters tell her to stop, that she is violating Tower Law by using the One Power to discipline an initiate. “I am Tower law!” Elaida raved. She pointed at the sisters. “You mock me. I know you do it. Behind my back. You show me deference when you see me, but I know what you say, what you whisper. You ungrateful fools! After what I’ve done for you! Do you think I’ll suffer you forever? Take this one as an example!” But when Elaida turns, she sees Egwene standing, calmly, and watching her. She is shocked into silence, one hand pressed to her breast, as Egwene calmly tells her that she wishes she could give in, that the Tower could find a good leader in Elaida. That she would accept execution if it meant leaving the White Tower whole. Elaida only declares that death is too good for Egwene and shouts for guards to come and throw her in the deepest dungeon the Tower can provide. She orders that it will be announced in the streets that Egwene is a Darkfriend. As Egwene falls into unconsciousness, she feels a deep sorrow, knowing that, one way or another, her fight to save the White Tower has come to an end. You know who would really love Egwene? Cadsuane. I was fully cheering Egwene on out loud at the end of this chapter. I know she was (rightfully) worried that speaking her mind to Elaida would ruin any chance she had to keep working with the Aes Sedai in the Tower, but it must have felt so good to finally stop holding back all her opinions and righteous fury towards the woman who has done so much to destroy the Aes Sedai. Elaida is petty, vainglorious, power-hungry, and, while she may not actually be stupid, she is very dumb about people. This has always been true, even before Siuan was deposed, and before being touched by Mordeth-Fain messed with Elaida’s head. I honestly think she was doomed to be a poor Amyrlin no matter what. But of course, as Egwene pointed out, she is uniquely unsuited to be Amyrlin in this time, particularly. As a Red, Elaida represents the world’s distrust and fear of men who can channel. And to those men, she represents pain and a slow death. But even outside of Egwene’s very salient point about how Rand would never trust a Red, any Red living during the Dragon’s time has a particularly difficult struggle ahead of her in accepting that the traditional way of “dealing with” men who can channel cannot be applied to the Dragon Reborn. This is even more true now that Rand has cleansed saidin, but even if he hadn’t, even if there weren’t Asha’man to deal with, the simple fact is that the Dragon Reborn must not be gentled, and he must not be restrained, either, since the prophecies say he must do so many things before the Last Battle. Most people in this world are struggling with the fear of the Dragon and what he is prophesied to do, and many have struggled to recognize what Egwene knows: that the devastation the Dragon is prophesied to bring is inevitable, and perhaps even necessary to his success. This is as true of the Aes Sedai as of any other group. While it is understandable that everyone would struggle with such a difficult, frightening situation, for a Red Sister, whose entire Ajah is founded on the need to gentle such men to protect the world, it would be particularly difficult to adapt to this new reality. I agree with Egwene that any Red would make a poor Amyrlin for such times. Though to be fair, it isn’t just the Reds. Any sister might find the idea of allowing the Dragon Reborn to become a leader on the world stage difficult to swallow, because of the taint and because of the prophecies, even though the prophecies say he will and must do the very things everyone fears. We know that Moiraine and Siuan worried over the White Tower’s ability to engage with Rand’s existence, which is the other reason (aside from fear of death by Darkfriend) they kept his birth and identity a secret. From everyone, not just Reds. Of course, Elaida’s issues are deeper than that. As I said, I don’t think her personality is particularly well-suited to being Amyrlin in any era, but she probably would have gotten away with it if she’d been raised to the Amyrlin Seat normally, had not governed during Rand’s time, and hadn’t so many dark forces interfering with the White Tower during her tenure. Elaida is absolutely responsible for contributing to the distrust between the Ajahs and the general state of the White Tower, and if she was a stronger leader she might have done some work to combat the work of the Black Ajah—however, even outside of what she has or has not done, the Black has been very successful in creating an atmosphere of fear and danger in the halls of the White Tower. Alviarin forcing Elaida to pass certain regulations and decrees was a big part of that, but not the whole thing by any means. As we know, the Black have been at work undermining the White Tower for a very long time, since before Siuan and Moiraine were even students. Probably long before. This is why the search for the Black is so important, and will be particularly so when/if Egwene is put on the Amyrlin Seat and can actually work with the Black Ajah hunters directly. If she can unseat Elaida, unify the Aes Sedai, and get rid of the influence of the Black, we will have a very different White Tower on our hands, and hopefully just in time to help set a few things up before the Last Battle breaks. I have to applaud the way the end of the chapter was written. It was beautifully cinematic; I could see everything so clearly in my mind’s eye. Egwene, stoic and strong and regal despite her injuries and the flurry of blows falling upon her. Elaida, looking wild and crazed and paranoid, wide-eyed and rumpled, almost like she is the one being struck, rather than the other way around. The two facing off together, while the Sitters look on, horrified but also, perhaps, realizing a truth about Elaida, and about Egwene, they had been unwilling to recognize before. Everyone in that room saw who the true Amyrlin was, and nobody thought it was Elaida. Egwene recognized that this battle was the deciding one in her war, but I’m not sure she has a full sense of the impression she made on everyone. Now she’s going to a deep dark dungeon, but I don’t think she’ll be there very long. Something is coming to a head, and I can’t imagine at this point that the current Sitters—united by Egwene’s efforts and by Elaida’s display—won’t decide that something has to change. That Elaida is, as Egwene has tried to show them, destroying the Aes Sedai. Although they might not like the optics of making Egwene official on their end, it’s not like the Aes Sedai in the Tower have any other clear options to replace Elaida. Or enough time to spend on the political maneuverings and debates required to pick out a new candidate. Especially since few of them are able to talk to anyone from another Ajah. So I think this is going to be the pivotal moment in which the Hall decides they have to do something about Elaida, and that they may very well need to make Egwene their Amyrlin. She has made an impression on enough of them that I think, under the circumstances, the Sitters will make that choice. It might take them a minute, though, which will leave Egwene in the dungeons for a little while. You know, narratively, this would be the perfect moment for the Seanchan to attack the White Tower, while the Sitters are in the midst of conversations about Elaida’s actions and Elaida is going around issuing proclamations that Egwene is a darkfriend. Also, the absolutely pettiness of Elaida being so upset at being accused of being darkfriend material that she’s like, “no you are!” is really funny. Or it would be if it wasn’t so dangerous. It’s also funny that she missed Egwene’s actual insult, which was that even the Dark One wouldn’t want her in his ranks. What a perfect burn, oh my golly. Anyway, I also really appreciated Egwene’s assessments of Rand, both to the Whites and to Elaida, in particular the suggestion that he probably always had a temper, it’s just that it was rarely seen in the Two Rivers because there wasn’t anything there to spark it. I do remember we saw a strong drive for justice from Rand, and that his temper sparked whenever that drive was challenged. It also flared whenever he experienced mistrust or suspicion towards Moiraine. He also was very angry at Ba’alzamon (rightly so) by the end; that rage very much fueled him through the confrontation at The Eye of the World. Egwene also remembers everything that is good in Rand’s personality, and that is so very valuable in someone who will soon be having high-stakes encounters with him on the political stage. Anyone and everyone can fall prey to their own emotions around what Rand is and how he comes off; Egwene remembering his good nature, even if just as a temper to her own anger and fear, can only help as she tries to come to some kind of agreement and alliance with him before the arrival of Tarmon Gai’don. You know, I kind of see a parallel between Rand and Elaida here. Like Rand’s anger, Elaida’s more problematic personality traits have been enhanced both by the pressure of her position (which Elaida chose, of course, but I digress) and by the touch of darkness. In Rand’s case, his anger and suspicion has been enhanced by the taint on saidin and the madness it creates. In Elaida’s, her paranoia around the other Aes Sedai not respecting her as Amyrlin and her power-hungry, self-important nature have been enhanced by the touch of Mordeth-Fain. In both cases it’s hard to tell where the natural strain ends and the unnatural influence begins, but both are there. Moreover, Elaida and Rand both have a tendency to discount the humanity of other people. Each has their own reasons for this, but they share a common impulse to view others as tools to be wielded, and any dissent from said tools as a threat to their position and to their goals. Of course we also have many parallels between Egwene and Rand. I’ve remarked on these before, but I thought it was kind of perfect that Egwene herself identified them. Elaida tried to subdue Rand by force, to imprison and beat him until he accepted her authority and was bent to her will. Now she is doing the same with Egwene, up to including throwing her into the deepest cell of the Tower. Elaida seems to believe that authority and loyalty can be achieved with pain and fear, and in both cases that idea has backfired spectacularly. Indeed, I think that her attempts to break Egwene are the very thing that is going to result in her own fall, perhaps even more so than Egwene’s efforts to inspire and unite individual sisters. As Egwene said to the Black Ajah hunters: “Loyalty is better earned than forced.” Her words could not have been more prophetic had she Dreamed them. Looking at Egwene and Elaida, two Amyrlins who could not better exemplify how to lead and how not to, and seeing parallels with the leader of the male channelers in both of them, I feel like we have a really clear and sharp picture of two possible directions that Rand himself could tip. In one direction, Elaida’s direction, lies a further hardening, a further removal of his own humanity, which would no doubt come with an increased disdain for others and increased paranoia, including a further withdrawal from those few people he still allows himself connection to. In the other direction, Egwene’s direction, lies an improved connection with humanity and a greater empathy for others, (something that we, and Egwene, know he does possess, somewhere buried under the pain and trauma and taint madness) as well as an understanding of how to weather pain and grief in a way that both keeps him strong and keeps him human. Aviendha is also on a similar journey as Egwene and Rand and Elaida, though hers is on a slightly smaller scale and is somewhat less fraught. Not that it probably feels that way to her; she even considers that if things continue on as they are for too much longer, she is going to lose her sanity. Like Rand and Egwene, Aviendha is learning to be a leader, to understand difficult concepts like how to put aside her feelings about the collaring of Aiel by the Seanchan. She displays a great deal of wisdom when she explains the situation to Corana—how preparing for the Last Battle means putting aside everything else, no matter how important—including an ability to look past her own emotions and weigh the situation dispassionately. That doesn’t mean stifling those emotions or deciding that they are unimportant—it means not being ruled by them. As we know, this is a lesson Rand desperately needs to learn, and if Aviendha can ever pass her last test, she might be able to help teach it to him. Right now, Aviendha is in exactly the position that Egwene was when she was called to serve Elaida at the dinner, so much so that Amys’ advice could have been delivered to Egwene as she made her way up to Elaida’s rooms: “Sometimes […] we are so concerned with the things we have done that we do not stop to consider the things we have not.” Egwene had a plan for how to deal with encounters with Elaida, which was to accept punishment and to keep from angering Elaida as much as possible, so that she might retain her freedom to keep working with the rest of the Tower. She made this choice because she understood that her job was not to fight Elaida but to protect the Aes Sedai and restore the White Tower, and so she looked past her anger and hatred of Elaida, choosing to do what was tactically and morally most important, rather than what would feel the best. However, in this second confrontation, Egwene realized that, while her goals remained unchanged, the situation was different. She needed to show the other Aes Sedai her strength, be willing to stand up to Elaida as she has asked them to do, be willing to “put her money where her mouth is,” so to speak, when it comes to being an Aes Sedai and doing what must be done for the good of the Tower. Egwene realized that she needed to stop focusing on what she was doing (keeping her head down enough so that Elaida wouldn’t prevent her from having opportunities to speak to the other Aes Sedai) and recognize what she hasn’t done, which is showing everyone, including Elaida, that she is willing to stand up for what is right, for the Aes Sedai and for the White Tower, no matter the consequences to herself. She feels sadness at the end because she doesn’t know what the outcome of her choice will be, but she recognized that there was no other option. Sticking to what she was doing, however correct and useful that course of action was when she first settled on it, would have been a mistake. Probably a fatal one. The Wise Ones are waiting for Aviendha to come to a similar realization. She can see no reason for her punishments, is unaware of any transgression that might warrant so much shaming, even goes so far to think that the Wise Ones seem to be behaving erratically, but she continually focuses on how to bear the punishment correctly, how to discern the mistakes she assumes she must have made in order to receive such shaming, and never considers any more outside-the-box solutions, or reasons, for her current predicament. She never wonders if the Wise Ones are wrong, never decides to trust her own instincts, to believe that she knows what is right and wrong, has the wisdom to lead and therefore to stand up for herself. She hasn’t realized that the situation has changed, and she needs to make a different choice for how to handle it. I do feel like, once she does, she is going to be unstoppable. I also have to take a moment to praise the character of Laras. We haven’t seen much of her in a while, but her characterization remains distinctive and enjoyable. I really love her particular sense of morality. She doesn’t have any loyalty to any woman in particular, and she doesn’t really care who is in charge, but if someone does something that crosses the line, she will act every time. She helped Siuan, who she didn’t even like, for exactly this reason. I’ll be interested to see how she feels about Egwene when Egwene becomes Amyrlin. Will Egwene’s display of strength and dedication win Laras over to a more personal respect for the Amyrlin Seat? I’m also wondering if people will ever find out that Perrin is responsible for the Seanchan managing to collar so many Shaido. The rest of the Wise Ones might be temporarily willing to put aside their need for vengeance in order to focus on the most important problem, but it might hit a bit differently to know that someone Rand trusts, and someone who will be back in Rand’s inner circle soon, made the choice to allow the collaring. Rand and the Wise Ones will be hard pressed, I think, to keep the rest of the Aiel from wanting to exact some very serious toh from Perrin. We’re moving on to chapters 17 and 18 next week, in which Cadsuane finally comes up with a method of dealing with Semirhage and a revelation about Elaida throws the rebel Aes Sedai camp into chaos. Next week will also be the last post before the new year! [end-mark] The post Reading The Wheel of Time: Egwene Makes a Stand in <i>The Gathering Storm</i> (Part 11)  appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 w

Will Trump Lower Tariffs To Address Affordability?
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Will Trump Lower Tariffs To Address Affordability?

President Donald Trump didn’t rule out reducing tariffs on some goods in order to address affordability concerns. When asked by Politico if he would rule out reducing tariffs on any more goods, Trump said he would “on some” goods, adding on some, he will increase tariffs. “Because you know what happens is because of tariffs, all of the car companies are coming back,” he said. “You know, we lost 58% of the automobile business. We had a monopoly in the world.” Trump said he “inherited a total mess” from former President Joe Biden. “Prices were at an all-time high when I came in,” he said. “Prices are coming down substantially. Prices are all coming down. It’s been 10 months. It’s amazing what we’ve done. If you think of gasoline a gallon, they had it at $4.50, almost $5.00. You go to some of the states, you had it at $6.00. We hit three states two days ago, $1.99 a gallon. When that happens, everything comes down. Now everything is coming down.” Trump said beef prices will “start coming down pretty substantially.” On Monday, Trump announced he would make $12 billion in tariff revenues available to American farmers in response to temporary trade market disruptions and increased production costs. Trump has previously called the word affordability “a hoax” made by the Democrats. He repeated that the Democrats “love to say affordability, but then they never talk about it.” “They’re the ones that gave us the high prices,” he said. “I’m the one that’s bringing them down.” The post Will Trump Lower Tariffs To Address Affordability? appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 w

Australia’s Social Media Ban for Children Takes Effect
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Australia’s Social Media Ban for Children Takes Effect

REUTERS—Australia has become the first country to ban social media for children under 16, blocking access to platforms including TikTok, Alphabet’s GOOGL.O YouTube and Meta’s META.O Instagram and Facebook from midnight. Ten of the biggest platforms were ordered to block children from midnight on Wednesday (1300 GMT on Tuesday) or face fines of up to A$49.5 million ($33 million) under the new law, which drew criticism from major technology companies and free speech advocates, but was welcomed by parents and child advocates. The ban is being closely watched by other countries considering similar age-based measures amid growing concerns about the impact of social media on children’s health and safety. Former Chicago mayor and Barack Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel praised the move, writing “it’s time for America to step up its game and do the same” as Australia. “Parents have been battling big Tech all alone. They need a helping hand to protect their kids,” he added in a post on X Tuesday. Tomorrow, Australia is banning TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and other social media apps for kids under 16. Now it’s time for America to step up its game and do the same. Parents have been battling big Tech all alone. They need a helping hand to protect their kids. TikTok,…— Rahm Emanuel (@RahmEmanuel) December 9, 2025 In a video message that Sky News Australia said would be played in schools this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the ban aimed to support young Australians and ease the pressure that can come from endless feeds and algorithms. “Make the most of the school holidays coming up. Rather than spending it scrolling on your phone, start a new sport, learn a new instrument, or read that book that has been sitting there for some time on your shelf,” he said. “And importantly, spend quality time with your friends and your family, face to face.” Australia Could Set Precedent The rollout ends a year of speculation about whether a country can block children from using technology embedded in modern life. It also begins a live experiment that will be studied globally by lawmakers frustrated by what they say is a tech industry too slow to implement harm-reduction measures. “While Australia is the first to adopt such restrictions, it is unlikely to be the last,” Tama Leaver, a professor of internet studies at Curtin University, said. “Governments around the world are watching how the power of Big Tech was successfully taken on. The social media ban in Australia … is very much the canary in the coal mine.” Governments from Denmark to Malaysia—and even some states in the U.S., where platforms are rolling back trust and safety features—say they plan similar steps, four years after a leak of internal Meta documents showed the company knew its products contributed to body image problems among teenagers. Meta has said it has tools to protect children. Beginning of the End The ban initially covers 10 platforms, but the government said the list would change as new products emerge and young users switch to alternatives. Of the initial 10, all but Elon Musk’s X have said they will comply using age inference—guessing a person’s age from their online activity—or age estimation, which is usually based on a selfie. They might also check with uploaded identification documents or linked bank account details. Musk has said the ban “seems like a backdoor way to control access to the internet by all Australians” and most platforms have complained that it violates people’s right to free speech. An Australian High Court challenge overseen by a libertarian state lawmaker is pending. For social media businesses, the implementation marks a new era of structural stagnation as user numbers flatline and time spent on platforms shrinks, studies show. Platforms say they earn little from advertising to under-16s, but warn the ban disrupts a pipeline of future users. Just before the ban took effect, 86% of Australians aged eight to 15 used social media, the government said. ($1 = 1.5097 Australian dollars) (Reporting by Byron Kaye, Claire Beers. Writing by Alexandra Hudson. Editing by Andrew Heavens and Mark Potter. The Daily Signal’s Katrina Trinko also contributed.) The post Australia’s Social Media Ban for Children Takes Effect appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 w

Trump Threatens Mexico With Additional Tariffs Over Failure to Fulfill Water Agreement  
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Trump Threatens Mexico With Additional Tariffs Over Failure to Fulfill Water Agreement  

President Donald Trump has threatened to impose new 5% tariffs on Mexico if the country does not “immediately” comply with a decades-old water treaty.   “Mexico still owes the U.S over 800,000 acre-feet of water for failing to comply with our Treaty over the past five years,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to the 1944 U.S.-Mexico Water Treaty.   The treaty requires the U.S. to send Mexico 1.5 million acre-feet of water from the Colorado River every year, and for Mexico to supply the U.S. with 1.75 million acre-feet of water from the Rio Grande over a five-year cycle. Mexico has fallen significantly behind on its water deliveries to the U.S., creating challenges specifically for farmers and ranchers in Texas.   As of Nov. 25, the U.S. State Department reports Mexico is approximately 865,000 acre-feet short of meeting the required amount of water it is to supply to the U.S. in the five-year period ending on Dec. 31.   “The U.S needs Mexico to release 200,000 acre-feet of water before December 31st, and the rest must come soon after,” Trump wrote.   “As of now, Mexico is not responding, and it is very unfair to our U.S. Farmers who deserve this much needed water. That is why I have authorized documentation to impose a 5% Tariff on Mexico if this water isn’t released, IMMEDIATELY,” the president said. “The longer Mexico takes to release the water, the more our Farmers are hurt. Mexico has an obligation to FIX THIS NOW. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”   “Mexico continues to violate our comprehensive Water Treaty, and this violation is seriously hurting our BEAUTIFUL TEXAS CROPS AND LIVESTOCK… Mexico has an obligation to FIX THIS NOW.” – President Donald J. Trump pic.twitter.com/m4V1KEW0Lm— The White House (@WhiteHouse) December 8, 2025 Drought has significantly reduced the flow of the Rio Grande, a river that provides six million people with drinking water in Mexico and the U.S., according to Inside Climate News.   If the water agreed upon in the treaty is not delivered to the U.S., “Texas water users are forced to secure alternate sources of water, change crops, and reduce operations,” according to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.   The additional 5% tariff that Trump has threatened if Mexico does not deliver the water would be on top of an already existing 25% tariff rate. Many goods imported from Mexico to the U.S., however, are exempt from tariff under the United States—Mexico—Canada Agreement.   Since returning to office in January, Trump has relied heavily on tariffs as a tool to spur the U.S. economy and bring manufacturing back to the U.S. The president is expected to address questions about the water treaty and his tariff policies on Tuesday as he visits eastern Pennsylvania to discuss the economic successes of his administration.   The post Trump Threatens Mexico With Additional Tariffs Over Failure to Fulfill Water Agreement   appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 w

Impeach Ketanji Brown-Jackson
Favicon 
hotair.com

Impeach Ketanji Brown-Jackson

Impeach Ketanji Brown-Jackson
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 w

NEW: Federal Judge Unseals Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Material, But ...
Favicon 
hotair.com

NEW: Federal Judge Unseals Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Material, But ...

NEW: Federal Judge Unseals Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Material, But ...
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 w

Like Cheesy Vomit: Why Does American Chocolate Taste So Weird To Europeans?
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

Like Cheesy Vomit: Why Does American Chocolate Taste So Weird To Europeans?

Two words: Butyric acid.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 w

Klepper Joins Naked Bike Ride To Mock Idea Of Trump Winning a Peace Prize
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Klepper Joins Naked Bike Ride To Mock Idea Of Trump Winning a Peace Prize

Comedy Central’s Jordan Klepper aired his latest The Daily Show special on Monday that proved why conservatives should stop trying to win the approval of liberal comedy shows and Norwegian socialists as he tried to argue there is a logical disconnect between the idea that President Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize and what the administration has done in cities like Portland, Oregon. Worst of all, Klepper couldn’t even keep his clothes on for the entire episode as he joined Portland’s Naked Bike Ride to try to make his point. Before traveling to Portland, Klepper jetted off to Norway to interview former Nobel Committee Chairwoman Berit Reiss-Anderson, who claimed the criteria for the award include either having “contributed to fraternity between people or nations, to peace institutions, and/or contributing to reducing standing armies.” At no point did Klepper press Reiss-Anderson on the Nobel Committee giving an award to Barack Obama before he did anything. Nor did he press them on giving awards to people like Yasser Arafat, Aung San Suu Kyi, and Abiy Ahmed. Instead, a solemn but sarcastic Klepper asked, “Donald Trump has a new ‘no fatties in the army’ policy. Does that count?”     After Reiss-Anderson dodged the question, Klepper tried again, “If you lower the BMI of the army, does that count as lowering the standing army if they get thinner?” While Reiss-Anderson again avoided the question, she did declare that “all peace research really shows that democracy is a system that promotes peace because democracy includes freedom of speech, inclusion, social justice, and these kinds of values.” Klepper retorted, “Democracy is a big one. Trump loves democracy. In fact, he might run for a third term” before going to a voiceover, “Okay, I was starting to win her over. If the democratic experiment is on the ballot, it was time to go back home and see just how peaceful our own republic was looking.” After a brief clip of a liberal protestor yelling “[bleep] you” at law enforcement, Klepper went to commercial. When he returned, he was in Portland, and after interviewing some members of the Naked Bike Ride, he questioned Mayor Keith Wilson, “For a break from all the bouncing and jiggling, I asked the mayor of Portland why the president keeps describing it as the ninth circle of hell?” According to Wilson, “They want to create this idea that Portland is on fire so they can bring additional forces.” Klepper then wondered, “Are Portlanders taking the bait?” To which Wilson replied, “No, no, no, they've really done well. The protests have been really great. The absurdity that's being created on our streets, as if we're on fire, is then met with the absurdity of our city showing up saying, ‘Don't try and match Portland with crazy because we show up.’” Eventually, Klepper returned to the Naked Bike Ride and, after disrobing, joined the proceedings, “This is what the resistance looks like, apparently. Hi, there. Apparently, ANTIFA is staging a full frontal assault on the ICE headquarters.” In a voiceover, Klepper continued mocking the idea that anything in Portland was amiss, “Yes. The ice building was under siege from a rain-soaked army of deflated butts and inflated animals. Or as Trump called them—” Klepper’s sentence was punctuated with a clip of Trump saying “Antifa thugs,” but try as he might, Klepper cannot wish away the fact that Portland was not just naked people or dinosaur costumes. As for the larger point, nobody ever cared to explain why ICE’s Portland presence is a threat to democracy. Here is a transcript for the December 8 show: Comedy Central The Daily Show Presents: Jordan Klepper Fingers The Pulse: Give the Man a Prize 12/9/2025 12:06 AM ET JORDAN KLEPPER: She laid out the criteria by which every Nobel Peace Prize candidate is judged. BERIT REISS-ANDERSEN: Either contributed to fraternity between people or nations, to peace institutions, and/or contributing to reducing standing armies. KLEPPER: Donald Trump has a new “no fatties in the army” policy. Does that count? REISS-ANDERSEN: I couldn't tell you what single elements count. KLEPPER: If you lower the BMI of the army, does that count as lowering the standing army if they get thinner? REISS-ANDERSEN: Your questions are impossible to answer in that— KLEPPER: Come on. [Voiceover] There was one more important factor when it comes to recognizing peace. REISS-ANDERSEN: All peace research really shows that democracy is a system that promotes peace because democracy includes freedom of speech, inclusion, social justice, and these kinds of values. KLEPPER: Democracy is a big one. Trump loves democracy. In fact, he might run for a third term. [voiceover] Okay, I was starting to win her over. If the democratic experiment is on the ballot, it was time to go back home and see just how peaceful our own republic was looking. PROTESTOR: [bleep] you. … KLEPPER: For a break from all the bouncing and jiggling, I asked the mayor of Portland why the president keeps describing it as the ninth circle of hell? KEITH WILSON: They want to create this idea that Portland is on fire so they can bring additional forces. KLEPPER: Are Portlanders taking the bait? WILSON: No, no, no, they've really done well. The protests have been really great. The absurdity that's being created on our streets, as if we're on fire, is then met with the absurdity of our city showing up saying, “Don't try and match Portland with crazy because we show up.” KLEPPER: You're going to try to get into crazy-off with Donald Trump? WILSON: Yes. KLEPPER: He wanted to shoot a nuclear weapon at a hurricane. WILSON: Yeah. I don't know where his advisors are helping him at all. KLEPPER: Indeed. So to better understand this moment, I needed to embed in the naked bike protest. This is what the resistance looks like, apparently. Hi, there. Apparently, ANTIFA is staging a full frontal assault on the ICE headquarters. Yes. The ice building was under siege from a rain-soaked army of deflated butts and inflated animals. Or as Trump called them— DONALD TRUMP: Antifa thugs.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 w

New York Times Sunday A-1 Takedown of Lenient Biden Border Policy Applies to Them, Too!
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

New York Times Sunday A-1 Takedown of Lenient Biden Border Policy Applies to Them, Too!

Better (very) late than never? New York Times reporter Christopher Flavelle issued an exhaustive chronological rundown, sympathetic but still damning, of former President Joe Biden’s politically disastrous immigration policy, a dangerous mix of amnesty activism and passivity. The Sunday front-page headline introducing the whopping 4,000-word story: “Inside Biden’s Losing Bets on Immigration -- Not Heeding Warnings, and Giving Trump an Opening.” A shame then that the Times has spent years defending loose immigration policy while sliming Republican enforcement of immigration law in general, and accusing Trump’s more assertive enforcement of being rooted in violent nativism and racism. In the weeks after Joseph R. Biden Jr. was elected president, advisers delivered a warning: His approach to immigration could prove disastrous. Mr. Biden had pledged to treat unauthorized immigrants more humanely than President Donald J. Trump, who generated widespread backlash by separating migrant children from their parents. But Mr. Biden was now president-elect, and his positions threatened to drastically increase border crossings, experts advising his transition team warned in a Zoom briefing in the final weeks of 2020, according to people with direct knowledge of that briefing. That jump, they said, could provoke a political crisis. It eventually did, with no help from the Times. Flavelle provided the gory details. Soon after being sworn in, Mr. Biden issued a 100-day pause on deportations. He drastically narrowed the categories of unauthorized immigrants targeted for arrest. He directed his government to stop building the border wall, a centerpiece of Mr. Trump’s agenda. He suspended Remain in Mexico. He sent draft legislation to Congress to create a citizenship pathway for people in the country illegally. He kept Title 42 in place, but stopped using it to turn back children who crossed the border alone. The Times was supportive of Title 42 in 2022, dropping its omnipresent COVID paranoia and even making conservative-sounding arguments in favor of loosening protective measures – in the name of keeping the borders open. By the halfway mark of Mr. Biden’s term, the failure of his approach was impossible to ignore. The Border Patrol reported 2.2 million apprehensions along the Mexican border the previous year, up from 400,000 the year Mr. Biden was elected…. Flavelle raised a conservative point that surely made some Times readers spit out their matcha. Less than three weeks after the Senate deal collapsed, a 22-year-old nursing student, Laken Riley, was killed on the University of Georgia campus. When a Venezuelan man who had entered the country illegally was charged with the murder, her death became shorthand for Democrats’ failures. Mr. Trump met with Ms. Riley’s family and said that she would still be alive “if Joe Biden had not willfully and maliciously eviscerated the borders.” The conclusion was damning: Why Mr. Biden waited so long to effectively seal the border has become one of the defining questions of his presidency. Flavelle’s analysis topples several pillars of the paper’s pro-amnesty, porous-border philosophy. Pushing amnesty for illegal immigrants has been a long-term New York Times obsession, an issue where its liberal bias shows through the clearest. The paper has pushed initiatives like President Barack Obama’s plan to keep illegal young "Dreamers" in the country, including stories like this from 2017: “Program That Lifted 800,000 Immigrant ‘Dreamers’ Is at Risk.” Before Trump’s shocking win over Hillary Clinton in 2016, the Times pressed Trump to knuckle under on the issue that would eventually win him two terms: “Donald J. Trump faced a backlash on Thursday from some of his top conservative Hispanic supporters, who said their hopes that he was softening his immigration policy had been dashed by his fiery speech Wednesday night, which they said was anti-immigrant.” In June 2019, the paper ran an online op-ed that actually advocated doxxing -- revealing personal information on private citizens for the purpose of targeted harassment -- against migrant detention center employees in an online op-ed for the Times. The paper even had the nerve in January 2024 to blame Trump and the GOP for Biden’s border crisis, with Trump having “all but killed the prospects for a bipartisan border deal,” ignoring that then-President Biden had the executive powers to toughen the borders on his own. The Times hated Trump using the word “invasion” to describe the invasion of illegal immigrants across the southern border in April 2024, to the point of blaming deadly domestic terrorist attacks on the president’s rhetoric: “Historians and analysts who study political rhetoric have long warned that the term dehumanizes those to whom it refers and could stoke violence, noting that it appeared in writings by perpetrators of deadly mass shootings in Pittsburgh, Pa.; El Paso, Texas; and Buffalo, N.Y., in recent years.” Why the Times’ turnabout? Perhaps guilt for also giving in to left-wing pressure to not raise the issue during the 2024 campaign, resulting in lulling its favored party, the Democrats, into a false sense of political security?
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 1345 out of 103245
  • 1341
  • 1342
  • 1343
  • 1344
  • 1345
  • 1346
  • 1347
  • 1348
  • 1349
  • 1350
  • 1351
  • 1352
  • 1353
  • 1354
  • 1355
  • 1356
  • 1357
  • 1358
  • 1359
  • 1360
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund