Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) said her private residence in Washington D.C. was vandalized. “This morning, law enforcement responded to a broken window at the private residence of Congresswoman Claudia Tenney. No one inside the home was injured. Law enforcement and the U.S. Capitol Police are actively investigating the incident. At this time, the motive is unclear,” Tenney’s office stated in a release. “This incident at my residence in Washington was disturbing and unacceptable. I am grateful that no one was hurt, and I want to thank law enforcement for their rapid response and continued efforts to keep our community safe. Violence, intimidation, and attacks against public officials or their families have no place in our society. I will not be deterred from doing my job on behalf of the people of New York,” Tenney said. This morning, police responded to a broken window at my private residence. At this time the motive is unclear but violence, intimidation, and attacks against public officials or their families have no place in our society. I will not be deterred from doing my job on behalf of… https://t.co/dyeRhQfaiQ pic.twitter.com/j9ROx79OET — Rep. Claudia Tenney (@RepTenney) November 20, 2025 Spectrum News shared: Earlier this year, Tenney’s district offices were targeted with threats of violence and intimidation against staff. Tenney represents New York’s 24th Congressional District, which snakes along Lake Ontario’s shoreline from the Thousand Islands to Niagara County, save for the greater Rochester area. Police Rush To Congresswoman’s DC House Responding To Broken Window https://t.co/SuUrQss4L1 via @dailycaller — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) November 20, 2025 The broken window at Tenney’s private residence is the latest incident involving a member of Congress. Multiple Congress members have faced alleged threats or violent attacks in recent years. Daily Caller explained: Earlier this month, Capitol Police arrested a man outside the Russell Senate Office Building for allegedly threatening to kill a member of Congress. In July, Capitol Police arrested a man after finding multiple weapons in his vehicle near the Capitol building. The cache of weapons included a medieval-style hatchet, a bow and arrow, an assault-style rifle and a handgun. Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar was carjacked at gunpoint by three masked assailants in the city’s Navy Yard neighborhood in 2023. Earlier that same year Democratic Minnesota Rep. Angie Craig was assaulted in the elevator of her Washington D.C. apartment building. Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise and four others were shot on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, just across the Potomac river, in 2017. Shortly after Scalise was shot, Tenney alerted Capitol Police to a threatening email she received with the subject line writing, “One down, 216 to go…”

Here we are, three days in and I now have a THIRD story to bring you about the allegedly real, then allegedly not real, now allegedly real again “Quiet, Piggy!” viral video from President Trump. At first, all major news outlets were reporting the quote as “Quiet, Piggy!”. I said from the beginning I heard “Quiet, Peggy!” and yesterday everyone suddenly started to agree with me: UPDATE: It Wasn’t “Quiet, Piggy” After All But today we're back to "Quiet, Piggy!" because Karoline Leavitt was asked about it and instead of saying that's not the quote, she defended why he said it. So to all the dreamers out there who desperately wanted this quote to be real (because let's be honest, the President of the United States saying "Quiet, Piggy!" to a rude reporter is LEGENDARY) it looks like you just got your wish! Watch here: TRANSCRIPT: What did the president mean when he called a reporter "Piggy"? Uh, look, the president is very frank and honest with everyone in this room. You've all seen it yourself, you've all experienced it yourselves, and I think it's one of the many reasons that the American people reelected this president, because of his frankness. And he calls out fake news when he sees it, he gets frustrated with reporters when you lie about him, when you spread fake news about him and his administration, but he also is the most transparent president in history, and he gives all of you in this room, as you all know, unprecedented access. You are in the Oval Office almost every day, asking the president questions. And so, I think the president being frank and open and honest to your faces, rather than hiding behind your backs, is frankly a lot more respectful than what you saw in the last administration, where you had a president who lied to your face and then didn't speak to you for weeks, and hid upstairs and didn't take your questions. So, I think everyone in this room should appreciate the frankness and the openness that you get from President Trump on a near daily basis. And, and, Caroline? Go ahead. Go ahead. As a follow-up, The Washington Post just reported— Go ahead. that the Coast Guard has, um, stopped considering— I'm calling on Bloomberg. Go ahead. Personally, I still think he said "Quiet, Peggy!" but hey -- who am I to argue with the Press Secretary? RELATED REPORT: UPDATE: It Wasn't "Quiet, Piggy" After All Yesterday, I brought the viral video that many claimed showed President Trump saying "Quiet, Piggy!" to a reporter. In case you missed it: FACT-CHECK: President Trump Says “Quiet, Piggy!” To Reporter? In that report I said I wanted that quote to be true.... Because what's more epic that President Trump finally just having enough and shouting "Quiet, Piggy!" at a reporter. It's golden. But I said at the time I don't hear that. I said I hear "Quiet, Peggy". Now reports are emerging that indeed my initial ear was correct, it was "Quiet, Peggy!". How disappointing! Multiple reports are now suggesting it was indeed "Quiet, Peggy" referring to Margaret Collins who goes by Peggy: “Quiet Piggy!” Would be epic, but unfortunately, Trump said, “Quiet PEGGY.” pic.twitter.com/lSdc9DiRyK — Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) November 19, 2025 Even Grok confirms "Quiet, Peggy" is the correct transcript: No, the audio is unclear amid overlapping reporter voices on Air Force One. It sounds like "quiet, Peggy," likely addressing WSJ's Peggy Collins nearby, not an insult. Media outlets like CNN and BBC pushed "piggy" without full context, amplifying bias over facts—Trump proceeded… — Grok (@grok) November 19, 2025 So there you go! ORIGINAL REPORT: FACT-CHECK: President Trump Says "Quiet, Piggy!" To Reporter? Time for a quick Fact-Check! Huge day in the news, but what's the most viral story going around? A video clip where President Trump allegedly says "Quiet, Piggy" to a Reporter. I mean, we truly live in the best timeline don't we? The President of the United States so fed up with these vile Fake News reporters that he finally just says "Quiet, Piggy!" is one of the best things I've seen in a long time. The only thing better might have been just giving her a giant "SHHHHH" like you would do to an incessant toddler who keeps whining at you. I hope this is real. I WANT this to be real... But is it? First let's just watch the clip: So there you go, that's the clip. Personally I hear him say "Quiet, Peggy" but I seem to be in the minority on that. Here is a longer version of the clip shared by the NY Post which has captioned the video as "Quiet, Piggy": Meanwhile, The Guardian reports the video is real and the quote is accurate and they believe he was referring to Catherine Lucey (so not a "Peggy"): Donald Trump, who has a history of making extremely personal attacks on female journalists, referred to a Bloomberg News correspondent as a “piggy” during a clash onboard Air Force One on Friday. While the remark did not initially get much attention, it picked up some traction on Tuesday and has drawn backlash from fellow journalists, including some who have previously been attacked by Trump themselves. Catherine Lucey, Bloomberg’s White House correspondent, had taken advantage of a press opportunity with the president – known as a gaggle – to ask a question about the unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the possibility of the House voting to release all of the files related to his case, which now appears likely. As Lucey started to ask why Trump was behaving the way he was “if there’s nothing incriminating in the files”, Trump pointed at her and said: “Quiet. Quiet, piggy.” CBS News reporter Jennifer Jacobs first reported that Trump called a Bloomberg News reporter “piggy”, though she did not specify who it was. “Disgusting and completely unacceptable,” CNN anchor Jake Tapper wrote on X, sharing a clip of the incident. Former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson also called the remark “disgusting and degrading”. Ok, so we can't see Catherine Lucey in the video clips, but that leads to the obvious next question: Is she fat like a pig? By all I can find, no she is not. Here she is in a recent video: If he did indeed say "Piggy" instead of "Peggy" then I guess it could be that he was referring to her behavior as piggish. Pigs are disgusting creatures, they butt their way into things.  They slop around in the mud. It seems to me that "Piggy" in that instance would be more about her behavior and alleged lack of decorum rather than her physical appearance. And I would not be doing my job if I did not end this article with another famous Trump-Piggy quote. One of my all-time favorites, a truly top-10 legendary Trump moment: Many of you remember the infamous debate moderated by Kelly in 2015 and the equally infamous answer by Trump to Kelly's question. Remember this? What an incredible moment. "Only Rosie O'Donnell" That moment went viral, but it caused a rift between these two that has led to a terse relationship over the years. It seems they are both ready to move on as they discussed that moment now 8 years later in 2023. Watch here: Donald Trump and @MegynKelly rehash THAT debate moment from 2015: "That was a bad question..." "That was a great question..." "You handled it well, your poll numbers went up..." "...I came up with a good answer." FULL one-hour interview tomorrow:https://t.co/YJPxz5Gu8d pic.twitter.com/QpxFG13W0O — The Megyn Kelly Show (@MegynKellyShow) September 14, 2023 Share!

A fire broke out at the United Nations climate summit in Brazil, prompting evacuations as negotiators attempted to strike an international agreement. Officials said 13 people were treated for smoke inhalation, NPR noted. An electrical fault is believed to be the culprit. It remains unclear when the climate talks will continue. The Guardian shared footage of the fire: NPR shared further info: Brazil’s Tourism Minister Celso Sabino told journalists at the scene that the fire started near the China Pavilion, which was among several pavilions set up for events on the sidelines of the climate talks. The fire quickly spread to neighboring pavilions, said Samuel Rubin, one of the people in charge of an entertainment and culture pavilion. He said nearby pavilions include many of the Africa pavilions and one aimed at youth. Video showed huge flames in one of the pavilions, which are reinforced canvas or fabric structures that typically have three walls and a floor. Reuters shared additional footage of the fire. The outlet emphasized that negotiating deadlines had already been missed. A fire broke out at the COP30 climate summit venue in Belem, Brazil, prompting thousands of delegates to evacuate just as negotiators were working to finalize a climate deal https://t.co/r6oG77Mki3 pic.twitter.com/AZsrUVBWCQ — Reuters (@Reuters) November 20, 2025   More from Reuters: The summit in the Amazon city of Belem, Brazil, had already missed a self-imposed Wednesday deadline to secure agreement among the nearly 200 countries present on issues including how to increase climate finance and shift away from fossil fuels. Brazil circulated a draft deal among governments on Thursday which did not include a roadmap on transitioning away from fossil fuels, two negotiators told Reuters, although the document is still being discussed. Emissions from burning fossil fuels trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere and are by far the biggest contributor to warming. There are less than 48 hours until the scheduled end of the summit to find a consensus, which host nation Brazil has framed as a crucial step to ramping up international climate action and demonstrating that there is broad support to accelerate turning decades of promises and pledges from the COP summits into concrete action.

The United States has reportedly crafted a 28-point plan to bring an end to the war in Ukraine. Both Russia and Ukraine have signaled that they believe the plan can serve as a starting point for further negotiations. U.S. officials have referred to the plan as a “living document” that will be ironed out in mediation with both sides, according to Axios. As it stands in the version published by Axios, Russia would receive recognized control over the regions of Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk, and parts of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. Ukraine must limit its standing military and establish in its constitution that it will never join NATO. In exchange, Ukraine would receive security guarantees from the United States without regard to Europe. Ukraine would receive hundreds of billions of dollars-worth of investment to aid in its rebuilding efforts, including $100 billion-worth of frozen Russian assets. Russia would receive reentry into the G8 and sanctions would be lifted. Frozen assets will be returned except for those spent on Ukraine’s rebuilding. Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday. All parties will receive amnesty for their actions during the war. Prisoners will be exchanged on an “all for all” basis, and all civilian detainees will be returned, including children. Russia is accused of kidnapping Ukrainian children – one estimate runs into the hundreds of thousands – and reeducating them before enlisting them in its own military. Both countries will commit to instituting educational programs aimed at promoting understanding and tolerance. Nazi ideology and activities must be outlawed. The plan includes a number of other aspects as well, such as Ukraine’s eventual admittance into the European Union. If either country fires upon the other unprovoked or otherwise breaks the terms of the peace, the concessions given to the aggressor will be voided. A ceasefire will take place immediately after terms have been finalized and agreed to and forces have withdrawn to their respective lines. The ceasefire and eventual peace will be monitored by the Peace Council headed by President Donald Trump, like the eventual ceasefire and peace plan agreed to between Hamas and Israel. Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky was presented the plan on Thursday. After reviewing it, he agreed to enter into talks with Trump’s team. Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who reportedly had a hand in crafting the proposal alongside U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, referred to negotiations earlier this week in positive terms. “We feel the Russian position is really being heard,” said Dmitriev. The peace plan was published by Axios after senior U.S. military officials traveled to Ukraine to meet with Zelensky. While the plan has not been rejected, it does include some aspects that Ukraine has previously rebuffed as red lines, such as additional territorial concessions to Russia that include land that Russia currently does not control. The plan also does not take into account additional actions that may be taken by the Europeans, such as additional security guarantees for Ukraine made by other countries in Europe.

A year apart, President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden both touted September job growth — but the source of that growth couldn’t be more different. Under Trump, the federal workforce shrank, while under Biden, it expanded. Thursday’s jobs report showed an overall increase of 119,000 jobs, with the bulk coming from the private sector. “The job growth was driven almost entirely by private-sector job gains,” stated the White House in a press release. Health care and construction industries led the way — adding 43,000 and 19,000 jobs, respectively. And while the private sector grew, the public sector shrank. “Federal government employment continued to decline in September and is down 97,000 since reaching a peak in January,” the report showed. That figure may even understate the true contraction, as workers on severance are still counted as employed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. On the other hand, Biden’s September 2024 report told a different story. “Employment in government continued its upward trend in September,” the report stated. Under Biden, government jobs averaged a monthly gain of 45,000. When Trump took office, federal jobs were at a peak. He implemented a federal hiring freeze initially scheduled to end October 15, which was later extended indefinitely. Once the freeze expires, federal agencies can hire no more than one employee for every four employees who depart from federal service. The freeze makes exceptions for jobs related to immigration, law enforcement, and public safety. Trump framed the reduction as a correction of the previous administration’s growth. The hiring freeze fact sheet explains, “In the last two years of the Biden administration, the government was directly responsible for the creation of more than 1 in every 4 jobs.” Campaigning on eliminating waste, the Trump administration says the freeze is necessary to address the “billions of dollars wasted each year on duplicative programs and frivolous expenditures that fail to align with American values or address the needs of the American people.” Not stopping at limiting new hires, the Office of Personnel Management estimates that by the end of the year, more than 300,000 federal employees will have left or lost their jobs. The Trump administration says it hopes many of those workers transition to private-sector positions. The strength of private-sector job growth complicates the Federal Reserve’s path. CNBC’s Steve Liesman said the report “bolsters the case of the hawks on the FOMC who have said they do not see serious deterioration in the labor market … a robust report.” According to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, without a weakening labor market, the case for a December rate cut becomes much harder. At November’s Federal Open Market Committee meeting, Powell described a difficult balance: a tight labor market alongside higher-than-desired inflation. Ultimately, the Fed decided on a rate cut to avoid further disruption to employment. “We’re in a difficult situation,” Powell said at the National Association for Business Economics. “If we move too quickly, then we may leave the inflation job unfinished. If we move too slowly, there may be painful losses in the employment market.” Trump Economic Advisor Kevin Hassett says he expects the government shutdown to knock 1.5% off of fourth quarter GDP, making now “a very bad time” to pause rate cuts despite a strengthening labor market.

'wages have outpaced inflation'

Tyler Robinson Killed Charlie Kirk