When it comes to immigration enforcement by the Trump administration, especially for people living in the Midwest, there’s been one decision that’s stood out. And it’s clearly been a deliberate decision, for whatever reason. For the most part, the government has left illegal alien Muslim populations alone, in places like Dearborn, Michigan, and Minneapolis, Minnesota. Admittedly, there’s not much hard data on this. But intuitively, you can tell. You can go online and find hundreds of videos of ICE raids in Los Angeles or Texas. But you won’t find many videos coming from Little Mogadishu, which, by some conservative estimates, is home to tens of thousands of illegal aliens. And there’s another way to tell that immigration enforcement has been soft in these areas: They haven’t been rioting. They haven’t been surrounding ICE agents chanting, “Allahu Akbar,” like they’re re-enacting “Black Hawk Down.” Instead, Muslims in these communities have mostly been targeting white conservative activists and journalists, who dare to venture into the no-go zone that they’ve established. They’re not afraid of immigration enforcement. They’re emboldened, like conquerors. Whatever the administration’s strategy has been here, it does appear to be changing, at least to an extent. Last week, as you may remember, I called for hate crimes charges to be brought against a man who punched a white conservative activist in Dearborn. Within hours, Harmeet Dhillon, who runs the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, said she would begin an investigation. Then, shortly after that, the president announced a major change — one that we’ve been calling for, again and again, for several months. He ended “temporary protected status” for Somalis in the United States. This is a designation that’s been in place for more than three decades. It shields Somalis, in many cases, from being deported back to Somalia, on the theory that the country is so dysfunctional that it would be inhumane to send them back. To be clear, in most other cases, “temporary protected status” is awarded after some terrible natural disaster, like a devastating earthquake or mudslide. The idea is that we don’t want to send people back to an unstable environment like that, where everything is flooded or on fire. But in Somalia’s case, there was no devastating earthquake or mudslide or anything like that. There’s just a lot of Somalis attempting to govern themselves. And that’s been such a disaster that, for more than 30 years, it’s been the official policy of the U.S. government that we shouldn’t send Somalis back to their own country. Somali governance is equivalent to a 9.0 earthquake — it’s just as catastrophic. Essentially, we’ve said we can’t send Somalians back to Somalia because there are so many Somalians there. It would be cruel to force Somalians to live with Somalians. So instead, we should force Americans to live with them.  Of course, the appropriate response in this scenario is to keep Somalis as far away from the United States as possible. We don’t want them establishing an enclave in this country, because inevitably, it will be just as dysfunctional as the country they fled. But for many years now, it’s been the policy of the United States to pretend otherwise — and to give Somalis yet another host country to destroy. The fact that the Trump administration is changing this policy, after so many years, is a clear signal that they’re thinking about going into Muslim communities (particularly Somali communities) and enforcing immigration law, as well as civil rights law. This is a crackdown that’s long overdue. And it’s more urgent than ever, because at this point, law enforcement is now working on behalf of the foreign criminals in cities like Minneapolis. The leaders of major police departments are now far more worried about offending their Muslim overlords than actually enforcing the law. Earlier, I covered how conservatives can be physically attacked by Muslims in Dearborn, right in front of the police, and the police will do nothing. But the situation is even worse in Minneapolis, where the chief of police, Brian O’Hara, just apologized to the Somali community for pointing out that they’re committing a lot of crimes. This may be the first documented case of a police chief begging for forgiveness, simply for observing the fact that crime is taking place in his city. So here’s what Chief Brian O’Hara said, in an interview with a local radio station. This was the observation that outraged the Somali community, as reported by Alpha News. “Chief O’Hara said in the interview, ‘Groups of kids, groups of East African kids that are coming from surrounding communities and not just one community, kind of all over the place,” are coming to the area armed and ready for a fight. … “They aren’t the poor kids from Minneapolis that are our residents, these are kids coming down in mommy’s Mercedes-Benz to Dinkytown.” What he’s saying is obviously true. No one disputes that it’s accurate. Somalis, from East Africa, are invading communities in Minneapolis and committing serious crimes. But Somalis in Minneapolis decided that this statement simply could not stand. That’s because large Somali communities in the United States are effectively a criminal enterprise, like a mafia. There’s widespread awareness in these communities about the fraud and robberies they commit. And they understand that, in order to minimize any undesired attention, they need to band together and shut down any suggestion — from anywhere — that they’re engaging in criminal activity. There’s a code of silence that they obey themselves and enforce on everyone else. After all, the easiest way to conceal a criminal enterprise is to make sure no one is allowed to talk about it. It’s been known for a long time that Somalis operate like this. And it’s also been widely understood that politicians in Minneapolis are going along with it. The mayor, as we all know, isn’t ashamed to pander to Somalis and BLM, and so on. He’s certainly never critiqued Somalis, nor would he dream of doing so. That said, even with this background in mind, the police chief just took things to another level. He didn’t simply pander to Somalis or turn a blind eye to their crimes. He actually went on camera and apologized for making a factually accurate statement about criminal activity in Minneapolis. Accompanied by a translator, the police chief apologized for doing his job, for informing the public about criminal activity, and for enforcing the law against Somalis. If any video justifies a federal takeover of law enforcement in Minneapolis, it’s this one. Watch: BREAKING: MPD Police Chief O’Hara asks for forgiveness for exposing the reality of Somali criminal activity in Minneapolis pic.twitter.com/SFkWW2ZSXy — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) November 21, 2025 Credit: @EndWokeness/X.com He says we have to be honest about what’s happening. And then in the same breath, he apologizes for being honest about what’s happening. It looks like a hostage video, because that’s exactly what it is. After seeing this, is there anyone who seriously believes that any law enforcement official in Minnesota, from the attorney general on down, has any interest in arresting and prosecuting Somalis when they commit crimes? The guy looks absolutely petrified. And all he did was make a factually accurate statement. He didn’t even arrest anyone. But if somehow you think law and order still exist in Minneapolis, maybe this video will be the wake-up call you need. This is a sheriff in Minnesota. Watch: At the 24 second mark he says, “that’s why we are different from foreigners,” referring to native, Minnesotan officers. Read that again. He refers to the natives as the foreigners. It’s an invasion. https://t.co/BOy7SqsgfE — Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) November 23, 2025 Credit: @WallStreetMav/X.com According to the translation, the Minnesota sheriff refers to white police officers as “foreigners.” He says he’s working for Somalis and understands Somalis better than those foreign officers ever could. (Disclaimer: I have no idea how accurate the translation is. But that’s not my problem, because every single public official in the state should be speaking English.) What’s important to understand about clips like this is that, as unacceptable as they obviously are, the actual problem is much, much worse. What these clips signify is that the Somali takeover of Minnesota is now so pervasive that they’re not even pretending to hide it anymore. If sheriffs and the chief of police are willing to pledge their allegiance to Somalia on-camera, then there’s no chance whatsoever that Somalis are actually being prosecuted for committing serious crimes. Maybe the DOJ will catch some fraudsters here and there, but the vast majority of these crimes are going completely unpunished. And everyone knows it. But just in case there was any doubt, a few days ago, Ryan Thorpe and Chris Rufo published an article in City Journal highlighting the extent of the rampant fraud in Minneapolis. It’s so over-the-top and brazen that it almost sounds fake. “Autism claims to Medicaid in Minnesota have skyrocketed in recent years — from $3 million in 2018 to $54 million in 2019, $77 million in 2020, $183 million 2021, $279 million in 2022, and $399 million in 2023. Meantime, the number of autism providers in the state spiked from 41 to 328 over the same period, with many in the Somali community establishing their own autism treatment centers, citing the need for “culturally appropriate programming.” By the time the fraud scheme was exposed, one in 16 Somali four-year-olds in the state had reportedly been diagnosed with autism — a rate more than triple the state average.” Yes, claims for autism treatment in Minnesota — treatment that was mostly administered by Somalis, and which was then reimbursed by federal taxpayers — spiked from $3 million to $399 million, in the span of just five years. And this is just one of their scams. They’re scamming everything they can get their hands on, from COVID food programs to SNAP to the paycheck protection program. And we all know that, even when the DOJ catches a handful of Somalis who are involved, there’s no way to actually recover the money. The few Somalis who are eventually sentenced to prison, in all likelihood, won’t be there for very long. (By the way, there’s also a very good, comprehensive analysis of Somali fraud in Minnesota, written by Armin Rosen in the publication “County Highway.” It’s one of the better explanations of how Minnesota officials are concealing all of this fraud.) But the City Journal article highlights another important dimension of the story, which needs to be addressed — which is that Somalis in Minnesota are sending a lot of this stolen money back home. They’re taking the money you pay to the IRS, and they’re shipping it to Somalia. In some cases, they’re literally putting the cash in suitcases and flying it overseas. These are called “remittances.” And, as we discussed last week, millions of dollars in “remittances” are apparently going to Al-Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda. “The Somali fraud rings have sent huge sums in remittances, or money transfers, from Minnesota to Somalia. According to reports, an estimated 40 percent of households in Somalia get remittances from abroad. In 2023 alone, the Somali diaspora sent back $1.7 billion — more than the Somali government’s budget for that year. … Significant funds were being sent from America to Al-Shabaab networks in Somalia. Whether the money was intended for Al-Shabaab or not, they were taking a cut.” One obvious step to address this problem — which the Trump administration should take immediately — is to raise the tax on remittances to 10,000%, at least for remittances going to Somalia. Currently, the tax is something like 1%. It’s absurdly low. And especially since we’re clearly being robbed, to the tune of billions of dollars, that needs to change. We need an emergency tax on remittances, immediately. We also need to ramp up deportations and denaturalization proceedings. That’s going to trigger a legal battle, but it’s one we need to fight. The attorney general of Minnesota, Keith Ellison, is already vowing to take the Trump administration to court in order to keep as many Somalis in this country as possible. “Trump’s announcement of termination of Somali TPS holders in Minnesota is legally problematic — while a president does have a lot of authority to designate and revoke TPS, he cannot legally wield that power to discriminate against an ethnic group or to target a state, like MN. This ain’t over.” Yes, it’s “legally problematic” to end an extraordinary carve-out, which we’ve awarded to Somalis for no reason whatsoever, for more than 30 years. This is what always happens when you give any concessions or “favors” to anyone, including foreign nations. Instantaneously, it becomes an entitlement. They’ll sue you if you try to end it. Their lawyers will claim that you’ve violated the Constitution. But if you ask Somalis themselves, ironically enough, they’ll drop the pretense. At this point, Somalis are basically daring us to deport them. This was Ilhan Omar’s response after Trump terminated Somalia’s temporary protected status. “I am a citizen and so are the majority of Somalis in America. Good luck celebrating a policy change that really doesn’t have much impact on the Somalis you love to hate. We are here to stay.” Notice she doesn’t even refer to her own people as Americans. She admits that they’re “Somalis in America.” They’re foreign invaders in our country. They’ve taken over local law enforcement. They’ve taken over the state attorney general’s office. They’re attacking conservatives in the street. And now, the moment the Trump administration suggests that laws might actually be enforced in Little Mogadishu, they’re saying “come get us.” For once, we should give Ilhan Omar and her Somali countrymen exactly what they’re asking for.

On Monday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that President Donald Trump faces a high-stakes decision: Where to draw the line on exporting American AI technology to China.  “Is it more of a national security risk to give China some of these high-powered chips, or is it more of a national security risk to not have US tech in China?” Bloomberg anchor Lisa Abramowicz asked the commerce secretary in an interview on Monday. “Well, that is the question … in front of the president,” Lutnick replied.   As the commerce secretary, Lutnick oversees America’s export-control system. These rules regulate which sensitive technologies can be sold abroad. Nvidia’s AI chips have become a contentious part of that system. Lutnick explained that the President “decides whether to sell those chips or not, and then we will execute it however he decides to go forward.”  Abramowicz pressed Lutnick specifically on whether the administration will allow Nvidia to sell its H200 AI chips to China. The H200 is not as advanced as the new Blackwell chips, which President Trump said will not be allowed for export, but is more advanced than the H20 chips, which were approved for export earlier this year.  Some experts warn that allowing sales of H200 AI chips would go too far.  Samuel Hammond, chief economist at the Foundation for American Innovation, told The Daily Wire,  “Permitting H200 exports to China would be a world-historic mistake. America’s current lead in AI would be radically diminished with very little show for it.”  Hammond said the United States has an advantage, but it’s far from secure. “Our lead is incredibly fragile. China is massively outbuilding us on energy, leaving us vulnerable to being leapfrogged but for export controls,” he said. If export controls were lifted entirely, he warned, America’s computing advantage would “quickly drop from nearly 30x to just 4x.” President Trump’s AI Czar, David Sacks, emphasized this at the Salesforce Dreamforce conference last month, stressing that the decision is far from straightforward.  “What we ship to China is complicated,” Sacks said. Under the current policy, only less advanced chips are exported. But Sacks noted that the fight in Washington is over where that line should be drawn. He said, “Some people want to draw that line very, very restrictively.”  He argued that Washington’s mindset contrasts sharply with Silicon Valley’s, the place where Sacks built his career.  “What Washington wants is control … The bureaucracies want to control these decisions. They want you to apply for a license and get their permission to do business,” he said. “If we let the bureaucracy win, we are going to kill American competitiveness all over the world.”  Silicon Valley takes a different view. “Everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem … the most developers … the most apps in your app store,” he said. “You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack. And that’s what we want for the United States.”  Sacks believes Trump’s approach to China should be nuanced.  “I don’t think you want to sell China our latest and greatest chips because it would be too much of an advantage for them. But if you deprive them entirely, there are two issues with that.”  First, the economies of the United States and China are linked through trade, Sacks said. “We saw that recently with the rare earths, where they cut us off and imposed new requirements on that. So as long as we need some things from China, we are going to have to reciprocate in some way.”  Second, U.S. companies competing against China can weaken Chinese AI competitors such as Huawei, he continued.  “China wants Huawei to scale up and dominate the Chinese market and then use that to then dominate the world market,” Sacks said. “And what Huawei would want is for all American chips to be banned in China so they can dominate that huge market for themselves.” “I wouldn’t give them the latest and greatest,” he said, “but if we can take share away from Huawei with a less current chip, then that’s something I think we should consider doing.”  President Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday that he talked to China’s President Xi Jinping, but did not directly mention Nvidia’s H200 chips. “We discussed many topics including Ukraine/Russia, Fentanyl, Soybeans, and other Farm Products, etc.” 

“Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough laid into Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) on Monday, criticizing her defense of a video in which she and several others in her party had actively encouraged service members to refuse “unlawful” orders from President Donald Trump. Scarborough’s issue was not the fact that Slotkin, a former CIA analyst — and several others who had served in the military — had made the video insinuating that Trump either had already or would soon issue unlawful orders and telling military service members that they had a responsibility to refuse them. He did not take issue with the fact that she was defending the video, but rather, he was upset that she’d been unable to answer a specific question about it to his satisfaction during a recent interview. WATCH: Joe Scarborough is very mad at Senator Slotkin for saying Trump hasn’t issued any illegal orders. “Wrong answer!” Joe then goes on to cite a hypothetical scenario of what Trump might do as evidence of illegal orders. https://t.co/viCkHoAxMJ pic.twitter.com/NNyUdgizPw — Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 24, 2025 Scarborough was responding to Slotkin’s answer to host Martha Raddatz — on ABC’s “This Week” —  when she admitted that she didn’t actually know of any illegal orders that President Trump had given. “I’m sorry, with all due respect, wrong answer. President of the United States, the commander-in-chief does have wide latitude, just does. And the Senate can take that up. But he has wide latitude on strikes. Ask Barack Obama on drone strikes. Ask George W. Bush on drone strikes,” Scarborough said, referencing the Trump administration’s actions against narco-terrorists. Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday. “But where we know the president has said, I am going to give illegal orders to people in the military, is when he was on Air Force One coming back, I forget where he was coming back from, but he said, ‘I can send the Marines. I can send the Army. I can send the Air Force. I can send the Coast Guard into any city I want to control crime. And the courts can’t do anything about it.’ That’s illegal. It’s just illegal,” Scarborough continued, insisting that Trump had said he’d give illegal orders despite the fact that thus far, he had not done so. “And so Democrats kind of need to – if the president has already said, I’m going to commit this illegal act, then I’m kind of surprised they don’t have the answer when they go on a Sunday show for that,” he complained.

'encourage societal healing rather than furthering its demise'

'This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racism and Islamophobia'

'Ridiculous fabrication'

DOGE Succeeded, Just Not For The Reasons You Think

Did you know that before Call of Duty, EA Sports, Minecraft, GTA, and other 3D graphics came to the limelight, simple pixels ruled the gaming world? That was the golden era, and these games defined CONTINUE READING... The post The Most Addictive Retro Games That Defined a Generation appeared first on The Retro Network.