Florida has earned a reputation for pushing back against failed public health dogma and leading the way to a healthier America. Led by Gov. Ron DeSantis and Surgeon General, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the executive branch has taken steps praised by the MAHA community: challenging widespread vaccine mandates, increasing transparency, and advocating patient choice. Now, Florida is seemingly reversing course when it comes to championing freedom and transparency. The state legislature is looking to pass an obscure provision in the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services package bill that could have major consequences for free speech. This debate comes amid a broader trend of federal and state-level efforts to shield parts of the agricultural sector from liability and scrutiny. Florida is one of thirteen states with “food disparagement” laws that give legal recourse to producers who are affected by harmful public criticism. As Florida law currently stands, producers are allowed to sue if their perishable agricultural food products are disparaged as “not safe for human consumption.” Originally, this law was adopted to protect an industry that “constitutes an important and significant portion of the state economy.” Perishable products are uniquely vulnerable to market volatility and potential panic spread through misinformation, which may justify that narrow protection. However, the state legislature is considering major revisions to this law. These include broadening the legal shield to include non-perishable products and expanding the definition to include “agricultural practices used in the production of such products.” In addition, the bill authorizes damages including “reasonable attorney fees, and costs of the action” for producers, but provides no such cover to defendants who prevail. Punishment through process is the real danger. These changes are not minor technical edits. They mark a clear expansion that overlaps with much of the current MAHA debate over consumer warnings, pesticides, chemical inputs, and industrial processing. Criticism of how food is produced could now be misconstrued as an accusation that the product is unsafe and leads critics to court. Agricultural producers should be protected from baseless smear campaigns, especially when slander can destroy livelihoods and the American food supply. However, Florida can achieve that goal without obstructing good-faith debate and advocacy. If lawmakers insist on expanding this law, they should at least add guardrails to protect free speech and deter litigation abuse. This could include an anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) and an early-dismissal pathway for courts to screen out lawsuits aimed at suppressing free speech. It could also include rules about balanced attorney fees, so the legal system cannot be used as a financial weapon. The best course, however, would be to drop the proposed expansion altogether. If the agricultural industry truly has confidence in its practices and products, it should welcome scrutiny, not seek new legal pathways to silence it. This is bigger than MAHA: Florida has built its reputation on transparency and open debate. The legislature should preserve that tradition by rejecting the expansion of the food disparagement law. The post Florida Should Reject Expanded Food Disparagement Laws appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Turning Point USA has endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in his bid to defeat incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) in the GOP primary for U.S. Senate. Breaking News: Turning Point USA (@TPAction) has officially endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) in the 2026 Texas GOP Primary for U.S. Senate pic.twitter.com/CL82GJxYph — The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) February 9, 2026 Democrats are seeking to defy the odds and flip the seat blue in their effort to take the Senate in the midterm elections. “I’m honored to be endorsed by Turning Point Action as we fight to defend our conservative values and preserve the freedom of the next generation,” Paxton told Fox News Digital. “The movement and the organization that Charlie Kirk built has inspired millions of people across the world, and the work that Turning Point Action continues to do is critical for safeguarding our nation’s future,” he continued. Fox News has more: Paxton and Cornyn are locked in a bitter primary contest that also includes Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas. Whoever emerges victorious will face off against prominent Democrat Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, or rising star state Rep. James Talarico. The attorney general is a hard-line conservative and longtime vocal supporter of President Donald Trump. He has served as the attorney general of Texas since 2015. Since launching his Senate bid in April, he has touted himself as an “America First Warrior” and framed his candidacy as an anti-establishment effort to push back against “RINO [Republican-In-Name-Only] Republicans.” Though Trump has so far opted out of getting involved in the race, his presence looms large, with both candidates emphasizing their cooperation with the president. If elected, Paxton has promised to “champion President Trump’s legislative priorities.” According to The Texas Tribune, Paxton and Crockett lead polls in their respective primaries. New polling memo from the pro-Paxton @LoneStar_PAC, reported by @playbookdc today, puts the #TXSen primary at:@KenPaxtonTX-34%@JohnCornyn-26%@WesleyHuntTX-18% https://t.co/4m3QMggKvg pic.twitter.com/PxRsoaEhCX — Brad Johnson (@bradj_TX) February 8, 2026 Texas Senate Democratic Primary Poll Jasmine Crockett – 47% James Talarico – 39% University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs550 Likely Voters1/20-1/31 pic.twitter.com/2OuBzzmjV1 — The Political HQ (@ThePoliticalHQ) February 9, 2026 The Texas Tribune explained further: In a statewide sample of 550 likely Republican primary voters conducted between Jan. 20 and Jan. 31, Paxton led incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn by 7 percentage points. Across the aisle, a similar poll of 550 likely Democratic primary voters shows Crockett running ahead of state Rep. James Talarico by 8 percentage points. The survey findings are a change from recent polls that found both races to be neck-and-neck. In both primaries, 12% of respondents said that they were still undecided. And in hypothetical matchups for the general election, there is “little difference” between the expected performance of a Republican and a Democrat regardless of the candidates, according to the survey conducted by the University of Houston’s Hobby School of Public Affairs. While it indicates that Paxton and Cornyn could beat Crockett by 2 percentage points, Paxton could do slightly better than Cornyn if facing Talarico. Between 7% and 8% of likely voters said they were still unsure on how to vote in these cases. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.18 percentage points. For Republicans, the poll shows Paxton pulling ahead with 38% of the likely primary voters who were surveyed compared to Cornyn’s 31%, after recent polling showed them in a tight competition. U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Houston was in a distant third with 17%.

Last night during the Super Bowl, Ring Doorbell ran a commercial that I’m sure they thought was super cute and would get a ton of praise. But the opposite is happening. People are absolutely PISSED OFF (and rightfully so) that their Ring Cameras and Ring Doorbells are spying on them — now confirmed. I’ll explain in a minute, first watch the commercial: Y’all, this Ring Doorbell Camera commercial was creepy as can be. They are not even hiding it anymore. #SuperBowl pic.twitter.com/sYP0r65Xoh — Sol (@SollyinTexas) February 9, 2026 Ok so basically the pitch is this…. If you lose your dog, you can just upload a picture and then AI using all the footage from all local Ring cameras will constantly watch for your dog and alert you when and where there’s a match. Ok great. The only problem? I was under the impression that the Ring cameras were not constantly running, not storing the footage in some centralized database, and only ran when I wanted to view the camera and then only showed me. But in order for the “Dog Finder” to work, it has to be true that all Ring Doorbells are watching all the time. In other words, a huge spy net! “Yes so If you just upload a photo of your lost dog into the Ring doorbell app as seen in our SuperBowl ad” “Yes it will connect to other ring cameras and scan the neighbourhood to find your lost dog” “Do you see what I did there? I disguised mass human surveliance as a puppy… pic.twitter.com/hUaMCqAjHV — Luke Cope (@Copozade) February 9, 2026 So there you have it folks….your Ring Doorbell is spying on you! Actually, to be fair that’s not entirely true. Since they point outwards, it’s more like your NEIGHBOR’s Ring Doorbell from across the street is spying on you. Smile, you’re on Candid Camera!

For years, Elon Musk has told us we’re going to Mars. And for years I’ve said that’s really strange, why not master the Moon first? It’s far closer… Cheaper and easier to get there (allegedly)… Don’t have to wait for planetary alignment… And now today Elon Musk is acknowledging exactly everything I’ve said for the last 10 years and admitting that mastering the Moon first makes a lot more sense for all the reasons I’ve stated. Strange that it took him so long to come to this really obvious conclusion. See here: For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years. The mission of SpaceX remains the same: extend consciousness and life as we know it to… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 8, 2026 For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years. The mission of SpaceX remains the same: extend consciousness and life as we know it to the stars. It is only possible to travel to Mars when the planets align every 26 months (six month trip time), whereas we can launch to the Moon every 10 days (2 day trip time). This means we can iterate much faster to complete a Moon city than a Mars city. That said, SpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about 5 to 7 years, but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster. Tell you what folks, I still stand by my believe that we NEVER went to the Moon in 1969-1972. I am not convinced we CAN go to the Moon. Did you notice how NASA was supposed to launch their Artemis rocket this week and I told you it wouldn’t launch and sure enough that launch got “rescheduled”. Folks, I believe we can and do go to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) all the time. I believe we have hundreds of satellites up there and we are about to have millions more. But I am not convinced we’ve ever left LEO and I am almost certain we’ve never been to the Moon. I am also certain Nixon did not just dial up the Moon from a landline in the Oval Office: ”Nixon called the moon on a landline” pic.twitter.com/Yu5ufARtcW — Ted Logan (@TedLogan1010) January 7, 2026 What nonsense! RELATED REPORTS: Joe Rogan: Why Can’t Billionaires Replicate The Moon Landing? MOON MAN: Bart Sibrel EXPOSES The Moon Landings A couple days ago I had the pleasure of getting to sit down with someone who I’ve followed for a long time. One of the first people to speak out and say the Moon Landings don’t add up…. One of the ONLY people in the world to get punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin…. And one of the best filmmakers out there. I sat down with Mr. Bart Sibrel and we chatted for over an hour. The time totally flew by, and I had about 20 additional questions for him that we just didn’t have time to get to. After we had wrapped the interview, Bart commented to me that this interview flew by faster than any others he can remember doing recently, and I felt the same way. Whether you are a NASA fanboy or a Moon Landing skeptic, I think you’re going to enjoy this one. There’s a very real “cult of religion” surrounding the Moon Landings and so I know this is going to really ruffle some feathers. But it must be discussed because the truth will always rise to the top. In fact, Bart told me on air that he once came across a professor who said “even if I see Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong get on TV and confess to the world that the Moon Landings were fake, I will still believe they were true!” Hard to imagine anything more “cultish” and “brainwashed” than that statement, but I know we’ll get some of that in the comments below. Nevertheless, I am talking about this and I had Bart on my show because I believe this is one of the largest conspiracies ever to be covered up. And you do know that “conspiracy theories” are only “conspiracy” until they are admitted or proven as true, right? And you do know that MANY have moved from “conspiracy theory” to “proven fact” in the last century, right? In fact, I recently asked ChatGPT to give me a top 10 list and you might be surprised to see this list of 10 events that were once considered “tin foil hat” conspiracy theories are all now either proven or admitted to be 100% true: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972): The U.S. Public Health Service conducted an experiment on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, allowing syphilis to progress untreated to study its natural history, even after the discovery of penicillin as a cure. Operation Northwoods (1962): This was a proposed plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage false flag acts of terrorism and blame them on Cuba to justify military intervention. The operation was never approved or carried out. MKUltra (1953-1973): The CIA ran secret mind-control experiments using drugs like LSD, hypnosis, and more on unsuspecting subjects, including U.S. and Canadian citizens. Operation Paperclip (1945-1959): After WWII, the U.S. government secretly recruited former Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians, providing them with new identities to benefit from their expertise in various fields. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964): Originally presented as an unprovoked attack on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces, further analysis and declassified information showed that the event was misrepresented, leading to the escalation of the Vietnam War. COINTELPRO (1956-1971): The FBI’s program aimed to surveil, infiltrate, and discredit civil rights and political organizations and their leaders. Operation Gladio: Post-WWII, NATO-backed secret armies were allegedly involved in terror and provocation operations to discredit leftist groups and stabilize political situations in Europe. The Iran-Contra Affair (1980s): Senior U.S. officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was then under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua, violating U.S. law. The poisoning of alcohol during Prohibition (1920-1933): The U.S. government knowingly allowed the poisoning of industrial alcohols, which bootleggers used to produce drinkable spirits. This led to thousands of deaths. Operation CHAOS (1967-1974): A covert CIA program to monitor and infiltrate anti-Vietnam War and civil rights groups in the U.S., despite prohibitions against domestic spying. So now let’s talk Moon Landings…. Does that get moved to #1 on the list above at some point in the near future? I think it might. When it comes to the Moon Landings, I want to start with something Bart and I discussed….which is the fact that for everyone who thinks the Moon Landings were real, all the doubters used to be you! We used to be you…. We all grew up hearing about the Moon Landings, looking up at Space and thinking how cool it was that we’d been to the Moon…. A lot of us had the posters on our wall growing up…. We had the Globe in every elementary school classroom growing up and we were taught about the Moon Landings every year in school. We watched Star Trek and Star Wars and we loved it! We honored and revered the Astroanuts. We. Were. You! But then “A Funny Thing Happened”…. I’ll just speak to my situation, but I think this is how it goes for most people. I started hearing about how there was this group of people who said it never happened. “INSANE!” we all thought! But then eventually you decide, ok so what is going on here? It’s so strange, how could they think that? And then you go down the Rabbit Hole into Wonderland and once you start digging in you realize, hang on, some of this actually doesn’t make any sense! And once you hit that point you often never go back. It’s the famous quote: “There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principle is contempt prior to investigation.” The people who remain in contempt — holding all doubters in consternation — never investigate. And according to that quote, “contempt prior to investigation” is a bar against all information, leaving man in everlasting ignorance. So if that’s you, I challenge you to simply….investigate! And when you start investigating, you’re going to come across two different categories of information. The first category are what I call the micro-details. This is stuff like the shadows in the images are all wrong, the flag is not blowing right, there is a lack of stars, one rock has a “C” on it so it looks like it was a movie prop, the dirt is the wrong color, etc. There is a LOT of evidence in that camp, but that was never conclusive to me. Every piece of evidence has a counterargument and you can get mired in that back-and-forth all day long. It’s really the second category that seals the deal for me, which is what I call the logical proofs. And the logical proof is simply this — without any special training, any tests, any evidence of any kind — you just simply need your brain and logic, and in order to believe we landed on the Moon in 1969-72, you have to believe the following: In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim: That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today… 50 years ago… On the first attempt… With one-millionth the computing power of today’s cell phone! And then the kicker…..then we just never went back! Each one of those elements has never happened before in human history, let alone all of them at the same time. Let’s break those down… Currently, even by NASA’s own admissions, we cannot send human beings any farther than Low Earth Orbit (where the Space Station is) — yet, in 1969 we went to the Moon which is 1,000 times farther.  Really? That was 50 years ago, and so we could do it back then but can’t do it now. So technology went backwards? That would be like having the Internet in 2023 and then in 2073 the Internet is gone and we’re back to computers with no online connection and we’re back to using floppy disks. Technology has never gone backwards like that, ever. For all the visual learners, this: Watch this stunning clip here: Then you have to believe we did it perfectly on the first try! Amazing! Oh and we vertically landed the rocket on the Moon, meanwhile, it took Elon Musk 5 tries to vertically land a rocket in 2023.  They all kept blowing up! But we did it perfect, on the first try, thousands of miles away from Earth. With…..less computing power than we all currently walk around with on our cell phones. Think of that. NASA had ONE-MILLIONTH the computing power of our current cell phones. I can’t even get the WiFi to work in my house half the time, meanwhile, with 1/1,000,0000th the computing power, we remotely landed a rocket on the Moon?  And then packed it up and flew it back home again?  Really? And then the big one…. After all that, we went back a couple times in the 1969-72 range and then we just never went back again for over 50 years and counting. Really? That has also never happened in human history. That’s like discovering America in 1492 and then never going back again. Just decided to let it be! That ONLY happens if you CAN’T go back again, not because you choose not to. So to me, it’s this logical argument that catches my attention and says something is wrong here, something is very, very wrong here…. And with that, please enjoy my interview with Bart Sibrel, where we go much deeper on all of this. Watch safely here on Rumble: And on YouTube here: If you want more, you need to get Bart’s book, “Moon Man”. Bart’s book, plus a TON of free resources are all available at his website

An executive sous chef on Sir Richard Branson’s exclusive Necker Island was murdered after he threatened to expose a culture of cannibalism and ritualistic depravity connecting the billionaire’s private retreat to Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St. [...] The post Epstein Files Bombshell: Richard Branson’s Chef ‘Executed’ for Exposing ‘Cannibal Rituals’ Among Elite VIPs appeared first on The People's Voice.

A bombshell document from the latest DOJ Epstein file release (DataSet 9, EFTA00064309) describes how an FBI agent deliberately removed the hard drives from the Metropolitan Correctional Center’s (MCC) video recording system — fully aware [...] The post Bombshell New Epstein File Reveals FBI Secretly Disabled CCTV System Before His Death appeared first on The People's Voice.

Ross The Boss formed proto-punk band The Dictators in New York City in 1973, and metal icons Manowar in 1980