YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #astronomy #police #humor #nightsky #moon #crime #treason #animalbiology #supermoon #perigee #commies #zenith #loonyleft #lawenforcement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
1 h

Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy

[View Article at Source]To compete with China, boost the economy, and avoid woke chatbots, America needs a uniform approach. The post Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy appeared first on The American…
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

The Lonely Joys of Christmas Cards
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

The Lonely Joys of Christmas Cards

Culture The Lonely Joys of Christmas Cards Americans are losing the habit of putting pen to card and stamp to envelope. (Photo credit should read OLI SCARFF/AFP via Getty Images) In the spirit of the old philosophical quandary about whether a tree felled in a forest makes a sound if there is no one on hand to hear it, I present the following question for your consideration: If a Christmas card is sent but neither acknowledged nor replied to in kind, can it still be considered received? Over the years, I have had ample opportunities to consider this conundrum. Following the example of my parents, who were enthusiastic Christmas card senders, I first began sending my own Christmas cards when I was a teenager. While the sending of Christmas cards is surely its own reward, I readily acknowledge that few do so in absence of the hope of receiving Christmas cards back. So, ceding to the unhappy reality that few of my peers were likely practiced in the art of placing a stamp on an envelope, my Christmas card lists skewed older: I tended to send cards to relatives (grandparents, aunts, uncles) and friends of my parents.  For a long time, my calculated approach proved largely successful: Each season, I might send eight to ten cards, and I might receive five to seven cards back — something like that. This represented a reasonable return on my investment, which amounted to little more than a box of cards, a sheet of stamps, and a few hours of putting to use one of my few obvious skills (a gift for lettering acquired during my youthful days as an aspiring cartoonist). As the years went on, I broadened my Christmas card list to include professional colleagues, including fellow writers or editors, as well as the occasional celebrity with whom I might have come into contact. I have sent Christmas cards to the movie director Peter Bogdanovich (The Last Picture Show, Paper Moon), about whom I wrote and edited several books. For many years, the center held: Within a week or so of mailing my annual allotment of cards, my mailbox filled up with colorful square envelopes containing heavy card stock to go along with the electric bill and grocery-store coupon book. Alas, at some point over the last decade, I began noticing diminishing returns: Few of my Christmas cards went completely unacknowledged, but on more occasions than I might care to admit, a recipient sent an email thanking me for my card instead of sending a card back. Nonetheless, I persist. Each year, I carefully consider the best Christmas cards on the market (Crane usually wins out) and the postage that most accurately reflects my sensibility or views. Last year, I picked up a sheet of three-ounce stamps of author Saul Bellow, and this year, I will undoubtedly make use of the newly issued stamps of conservative godfather William F. Buckley Jr. Of course, I concede that I am holding onto a form of communication as antiquated as carrier pigeons and landline telephones. Why, then, do I persist with this increasingly frustrating practice? It goes back to my parents, who loved sending Christmas cards and — natch — were thrilled when they received some back. My mother, especially, was a sentimentalist in the matter: Each year, she set aside a single card, penciled in the year in which it was sent, and stowed it away in a box. Somehow, in the course of their long lives and many moves, my parents held onto that box and, eventually, a second box. Those boxes are now in my possession, and I can easily track my parents’ comings and goings — their ups and downs — by sifting through all those cards. The earliest Christmas card is from 1966, the year my parents were married. This card was custom-printed — my parents’ names were typed beneath the inside greeting — and they continued ordering custom-printed cards for several years thereafter. From 1969 through 1971, perhaps wanting to save money amid the holiday season, they seem to have relied on less expensive boxed Christmas cards, but their preference for custom-printed cards reemerged in 1972, when they sent a beautiful card featuring a holly tree and the following lovely accompanying text: “Of all the trees that are in the wood the holly bears the crown.”  The following year — 1973 — my parents ordered custom-printed Christmas cards from Neiman Marcus, the first of many such orders from that fabled department store. My working assumption is that each year they did so must have been a good year, job-wise. In 1983, the year of my birth, my parents sent an especially beautiful Christmas card whose front was embossed with illustrations of various emblems of the season: candy canes, a rocking horse, a pair of figure skates, and such. Inside, there was the following reassuring message: “Christmas is remembered joys.” For the first time, my name appeared with my parents at the bottom. You can appreciate why I cherish these boxes of old, forgotten cards. And so the Christmas cards continued to be sent year after year. My mother sent her first card solo in 2010, the year she became a widow, and she sent her last card in 2022. Because she died in September 2023, my mother did not send a card that Christmas. By then, I was the sole Christmas card sender in my family. Come what may, I am not about to give it up now. The post The Lonely Joys of Christmas Cards appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

Trump Takes Center Stage at World Cup Draw
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Trump Takes Center Stage at World Cup Draw

Culture Trump Takes Center Stage at World Cup Draw FIFA President Gianni Infantino awarded Trump with a ‘Peace Prize’ at the Kennedy Center on Friday. (Photo by Mandel NGAN – Pool/Getty Images) President Donald Trump was at his merry, free-wheeling best on Friday.  Amid a slew of bad headlines, poor polling numbers, and questions about his stamina, Trump got to have the kind of day he’s always been best at having: a fun one.  “You look at what has happened to football in the United States, soccer in the United States, we seem to never call it that…we should call it football,” Trump said with a laugh at Friday’s World Cup draw in Washington, DC. Flanked on stage by Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum and Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump reached his hand into a clear, waterless fish bowl on the stage at the Kennedy Center and fished out a white ping-pong ball.  “This is shocking,” Trump said with a smirk. Inside the prop was a scrap of black fabric with three letters printed in white: “USA.” It was a big day in DC for Trump. Amid a flurry of snow and freezing temperatures that greeted hundreds of employees and press members queued at 6am in the dead of winter, the 2026 FIFA World Cup draw got underway a little after noon in the significantly renovated Kennedy Center.   Forty-eight teams from around the globe will participate in the largest version of the World Cup in history and the games are scheduled to be played in joint sites across the United States, Mexico, and Canada. A message shared by the Department of State in anticipation of Friday’s event stated the tournament will be “the greatest in history” and suggested the U.S. will welcome 10 million international visitors, create 200,000 American jobs, and generate $30 billion for the U.S. economy. Speaking with reporters before the ceremony kicked off, Trump said he does not expect crime to be a problem in any of the American cities due to host matches. “If they do have a problem, by the time we get there we’ll take care of that problem,” Trump told the press. “I’ve proven that in DC and everywhere else we went so we’ll take care of that very easily. So, if they have a problem, hopefully they’ll let us know that and we’ll solve any problem.” Friday was the first meeting between Trump and Sheinbaum since she was elected the 66th president of Mexico on October 1, 2024. Carney also attended the ceremony, providing an opportunity for Trump and Canada’s leader possibly to restart trade talks. Previous attempts were abruptly scuttled following the release of an anti-tariff ad featuring the words of President Ronald Reagan that was released in October by Canada’s most populous province of Ontario. That video convinced Trump to terminate talks. But none of that mattered on Friday. The three leaders were spotted chatting amicably in Trump’s box during the second half of the two-hour ceremony. Friday’s celebrations were of a very different tone and tenor than the last time a World Cup draw was held in the U.S. That was in Las Vegas in 1993, and featured comedian Robin Williams poking fun at FIFA’s then-President Sepp Blatter, a notoriously tight-lipped figure. Friday’s gala was more muted, with Trump and friends receiving careful compliments from the current FIFA President Gianni Infantino, who won the gig after Blatter was impeached in 2015 over corruption scandals that temporarily stained the legacy of the tournament.  Infantino has become fast friends with Trump since the president was reelected; the pair arrived at Friday’s ceremony together. After Trump helped broker the tenuous ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, Infantino wrote on Instagram that Trump deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, an award Trump has eagerly sought. Despite Trump’s disputed claims that he has “ended eight wars,” the Nobel committee selected the Venezuelan activist María Corina Machado for this year’s top prize. In response to Trump’s statements, Infantino created a FIFA Peace Prize in October and awarded Trump with the honor on Friday. Infantino’s whirlwind decision reportedly surprised FIFA board members and vice presidents, many of whom have already expressed concern about Infantino’s close relationship with Trump. At the beginning of the month, officials with Human Rights Watch questioned FIFA’s criteria for its “Peace Prize” but did not receive a response.  On Friday, Trump beamed as Infantino awarded him with the inaugural medallion, which Trump proudly wrapped around his neck. “The FIFA Peace Prize is presented annually on behalf of the billions of football-loving people from around the world to a distinguished individual who exemplifies an unwavering commitment to advancing peace and unity throughout the world,” Infantino said. “We want to see unity. We want to see the future and I was lucky, Mr. President, to witness a few years ago the Abraham Accord signatures and a few months ago… the peace in the Middle East agreement regarding Gaza, I was in Malaysia and Kuala Lumpur for the peace between Cambodia and Thailand, and yesterday, here, in Washington the Washington peace agreement between Rwanda and the DRC. This is what we want from a leader.”  In conversation with reporters ahead of the draw, Trump downplayed the award, saying his main goal is to save lives. “I don’t need prizes,” Trump said. “I need to save lives. We’re saving a lot of lives. I’ve saved millions and millions of lives.” Friday’s draw sorted all 48 teams into 12 brackets of four, with the United States drawing Australia, Paraguay, and the winner of a yet-to-be-played European playoff.  Though the U.S. men’s soccer team remains a longshot to win the tournament, hosting the event is a great honor in and of itself.  “The United States of America has never been more respected or successful than it is now under President Trump’s historic leadership,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle. “America is the hottest country in the world right now, which makes us the perfect country to host one of the greatest sporting events in history—the FIFA World Cup 2026.” The post Trump Takes Center Stage at World Cup Draw appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy

Politics Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy To compete with China, boost the economy, and avoid woke chatbots, America needs a uniform approach. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) President Donald Trump wants America to follow one uniform policy on AI. That’s in contrast to states that want to impose their own regulations on the technology. Trump is drawing up an executive order and pushing for legislation to ensure the federal government handles the matter.  The president offered the best argument for this policy in a recent Truth Social post: Investment in AI is helping to make the U.S. Economy the “HOTTEST” in the World, but overregulation by the States is threatening to undermine this Major Growth “Engine.” Some States are even trying to embed DEI ideology into AI models, producing “Woke AI” (Remember Black George Washington?). We MUST have one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes. If we don’t, then China will easily catch us in the AI race. Put it in the NDAA, or pass a separate Bill, and nobody will ever be able to compete with America. Trump’s reasons are pretty solid. We need a national AI policy to support economic growth, prevent blue states from imposing DEI dictates on the technology, and compete with China. Allowing the states to dictate policy will curb growth, make AI woke, and allow China to outpace us on the world stage. Thus, it’s necessary to keep this issue in the hands of the federal government. Of course, there are some political issues which make sense to leave to the states. But there are others which would be idiotic to have 50 different policies on. For example, trade would be a disaster if Wyoming could establish its own dealings with foreign powers independent of the rest of the country. The same applies for immigration. California and other blue states would love to open their borders to the entire world. It’s necessary for the federal government to step in and establish sensible policies that work for the national interest. AI is in the same category. We no longer live in the 19th century. It makes no sense in the 21st century for all 50 states to have different policies concerning technology that’s interconnected with the entire globe. Arizona can’t shut out AI developments in China, much less in Colorado, by simply passing a law. A states’ rights approach would force companies to try accommodating 50 different policies, creating a byzantine framework in the process. AI advancement in America would stall as a result. Half of the country’s GDP growth in the first half of 2025 was tied to AI investment. Curtailing the tech would inflict a serious dent on the economy and overall technological development. There are legitimate concerns with AI, such as concerns over privacy, intellectual property theft, and child safety. But many of the state laws are primarily concerned with DEI matters. California’s AI laws demonstrate this idiotic focus. The state’s Civil Rights Department implemented new rules this year that would prevent employers from using AI tools to “discriminate” in the hiring process. The law considers resume-screening tools and cognitive-assessment games as possible ways for “algorithmic discrimination” to take place. Mind you, these are computers handling the screening process. Laws such as these insinuate that robots can be racist just by looking at objective data. It’s similar to how liberals deem fair and unbiased practices “disparate impact” if they result in outcomes unfavorable to minorities. “Unintentional bias” is still racist in the eyes of DEI-crats. The Trump administration has cracked down on “disparate impact” assessments within the federal government, but the thinking behind it persists in AI legislation. California’s regulations provide a way for DEI apparatchiks to impose their will on companies and mandate “bias audits” of businesses. A bias audit is an evaluation of an AI system to determine if its decisions result in unfavorable outcomes for protected classes. They aim to root out “unintentional bias” according to DEI ideology. While bias audits are technically not required even in the Golden State, the rules effectively force companies to conduct them to maintain their good standing with the California government. “It’s kind of a backdoor way of mandating a bias audit,” David J. Walton, a partner and AI practice chair at Fisher & Phillips LLP, told Bloomberg Law last September.  If California mandates DEI AI policies, the effects will be felt nationwide. Corporations will likely implement the same policy for the rest of their national workforce. California is a huge market, and companies will think it easier just to follow along rather than make an exception.  Rooting out unintentional bias in AI employee discrimination may be just the start. Blue states could also require ChatGPT, Grok, and other chatbots to only offer politically correct answers to users’ questions and image requests. We already experienced the absurdity of AI programs drawing the Founding Fathers and German soldiers as black. Liberals would love to impose their view of history and society on these programs as a matter of law.  And as California goes, so goes America. State and local AI restrictions would do nothing to stop China’s own advances with the technology. China would continue pushing artificial intelligence to the next level while America fell behind. All the concerns we have with AI would still exist and probably be worse in this situation. You’d still be able to access the latest developments in AI from your computer, regardless of what restrictions your state placed on the tech. China understood the importance of AI to its status as a global power and made it a national policy. Fortunately for them and unfortunately for us, the CCP doesn’t care about rooting out algorithmic discrimination or other DEI nonsense. Its policy centers on the national interest. All these reasons prove why it’s necessary to take this matter out of the states’ hands. A national law would exclude California’s ridiculous demands and safeguard companies from having to implement them. Legislation, as already proposed by Congress, would address the legitimate concerns with AI to protect users’ privacy and our children’s safety. This would make AI better for all and free of the woke demands made by the left. A national AI policy would help us take on the Chinese challenge and advance American technology. We would ensure that our values, not those of China or California, determine the trajectory of AI development. We live in a world our Founders couldn’t imagine, but they at least had the foresight to create a system where the national government would solely determine matters of urgent national significance. There are many matters best left to states and towns, but AI policy is not one of them. The post Trump Is Right to Nationalize AI Policy appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Worth it or Woke?
Worth it or Woke?
2 hrs

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2
Favicon 
worthitorwoke.com

Five Nights at Freddy’s 2

This content is for members only. Visit the site and log in/register to read.The post Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 first appeared on Worth it or Woke.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
2 hrs

John Entwistle’s strange reason for hating Woodstock: “14 hours behind”
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

John Entwistle’s strange reason for hating Woodstock: “14 hours behind”

A weekend to forget... The post John Entwistle’s strange reason for hating Woodstock: “14 hours behind” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz
Favicon 
townhall.com

President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz

President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Favicon 
townhall.com

America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism

America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD Versus BCE and CE
Favicon 
townhall.com

A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD Versus BCE and CE

A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD Versus BCE and CE
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 hrs

The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
Favicon 
townhall.com

The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season

The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 4 out of 101630
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund