It was 20 years ago on November 21, 2005, that Hugh Sidey died at age 78 while vacationing in Paris. As Washington Bureau Chief and White House correspondent, Sidey wrote about every American president…

If you missed this year’s amazing Black Friday sales at The Wellness Company, then don’t worry, they have been extended through Cyber Monday! That’s right, this year, you can do your part to help…

Regular readers have seen in the last in the last few days a push to declare that Trump’s policy of blowing narco-terrorists out of the water and allegedly ‘double tapping’ them was somehow illegal.…

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

It's not for everyone. The post The producer that walked out on Van Halen: “I left immediately” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

It should be obvious even to the most obtuse Republican in the Senate that the Democrats will eventually regain another governing trifecta in Washington and will shortly thereafter nuke the legislative filibuster. They have openly pledged to do so in order to pass several pieces of controversial legislation, and would have done it already had it not been for contrarian Senators Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema. Consequently, Senate Republicans should nuke the filibuster themselves if the Democrats try to shut down the government again on January 30, when the recently passed partial funding bill expires. Without the votes of non-citizens the Democrats can’t garner enough electoral support to recapture Congress or the White House. There are a number of reasons to do so while the GOP retains its thin congressional majority.Without the filibuster, for example, Senate Democrats would not be able to block passage of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which was passed by the House last April. The SAVE Act would amend the National Voter Registration Act — better known as the Motor Voter Law — by requiring states to obtain in-person documentary proof of citizenship before registering a person to vote in a federal election. The Democrats have used the filibuster to prevent Senate passage of this bill because they know requiring in-person proof of citizenship would deprive them of a core constituency. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) all but admits it in a statement released after the SAVE Act passed in the House. Congressional Republicans are pushing a proposal that would coerce states into instituting policies that would effectively prevent millions of American citizens from voting, stymie automatic voter registration and derail in-person voter registration drives. It is an outrage … We all support safe, transparent and secure elections. And countless studies have proved beyond a doubt that voter fraud is vanishingly rare. But Congressional Republicans want to disenfranchise millions of American citizens, seize control of our elections, and fan the flames of election skepticism and denialism. The “tell” in Schumer’s statement is the reference to automatic voter registration (AVR). As recently as ten years ago, AVR did not exist in the United States. If you wanted to vote in any election, it was necessary to visit a local agency in person, produce a valid form of identification and fill out registration paperwork. Then, in March of 2015, Oregon Gov. Kate Brown (D) signed the first law in the nation providing for the automatic registration of voters using information from the state’s Division of Motor Vehicles. Upon implementation a year later, everyone obtaining or renewing a driver’s license or a state identification card in Oregon became a registered voter unless they retroactively opted out within 21 days. A decade later the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) reports that every Democrat-dominated state plus the District of Columbia has passed and implemented AVR systems similar to the Oregon model. All of these states insist that their AVR systems are models of election integrity, but the objective data suggest otherwise. Oregon has been at this longer than any other state, yet its system was still registering non-citizens to vote as recently as the 2024 election cycle. Meanwhile, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to review a case involving Pennsylvania’s refusal to release data showing how noncitizens were added to the Commonwealth’s voter rolls. Pennsylvania publicly admitted that, for decades, its Department of Motor Vehicles had allowed non-U.S. citizens to register to vote through the state’s “motor voter” system. According to the state’s own analysis, “approximately 100,000 registered voters may potentially be non-citizens or may have been non-citizens at some point in time” … PILF requested the records under the National Voter Registration Act’s public disclosure provision, which requires states to make list maintenance documents available for public inspection. Pennsylvania denied the request. All of which brings us back to the need for the SAVE Act and why the Democrats will continue to use the filibuster to ensure that it doesn’t get a floor vote in the Senate. Without the votes of non-citizens the Democrats can’t garner enough electoral support to recapture Congress or the White House. This means the SAVE Act is quite literally an existential threat to their party. Consequently, the Republicans should heed President Trump’s call to terminate the filibuster and pass the bill. As Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) put it early in November, “We KNOW Democrats will nuke the filibuster as soon as they’re able to solidify their grip on power. We should act first in order to pass laws that benefit the AMERICAN people.” Yet Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-N.D.) insists that there aren’t enough Republican votes in the upper chamber to eliminate the 60-vote threshold to achieve cloture and bring the legislation to the floor for a vote. The voters came out a year ago and gave the GOP a governing trifecta in the expectation that they would govern more effectively than the Democrats. If the Republicans in the Senate squander this opportunity to keep an obsolete relic of the 18th century like the filibuster on life support, they deserve to be consigned to a lengthy sojourn in the political wilderness. The voters will likely reward them accordingly. READ MORE from David Catron: The Marjorie Taylor Greene New Deal SCOTUS Must Stop Mail-In Voting Madness Virginia Wild Card: Turnout Among Black Voters

Long after President Trump’s term in office ends, there will be lawfare about what he has done. When the dust settles on his war against the drug lords, there will still be a lot of litigation on things such as the announcement he made on Friday that all things that were done by former president Biden via the “autopen” were cancelled. Trump wrote on Truth Social that, Any document signed by Sleepy Joe Biden with the Autopen, which was approximately 92% of them, is hereby terminated, and of no further force or effect. The Autopen is not allowed to be used if approval is not specifically given by the President of the United States. The Radical Left Lunatics circling Biden around the beautiful Resolute Desk in the Oval Office took the Presidency away from him. I am hereby cancelling all Executive Orders, and anything else that was not directly signed by Crooked Joe Biden, because the people who operated the Autopen did so illegally. Joe Biden was not involved in the Autopen process and, if he says he was, he will be brought up on charges of perjury. How far back does that go? In 2024 alone, Biden signed 19 executive orders, granted 39 pardons and commuted about 1,500 sentences. In total, Biden “signed” 162 Executive Orders, 89 pardons and and 4,165 commutations. From what Trump wrote we have to conclude that he wants to wipe the slate clean of all Biden’s EOs, pardons, and commutations. That’s more pardons and commutations than any other president. Trump excels at throwing everything up in the air and seeing how it settles to earth. He’s done it again with his Friday declaration. Biden’s Executive Orders range from the first, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government” to the last, “Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay.” In all these cases, it will be up to the Justice Department to prove, in the resulting lawsuits, that Biden signed them with the autopen and didn’t specifically approve each one. How will they prove that? Well, first off they don’t have to. The burden of proof will be on the plaintiffs. They’ll have to prove that Old Joe either signed the document in question or specifically authorized the use of the autopen for that purpose. In defense, the Justice Department may be able to start with forensic evidence showing that Biden didn’t actually sign the documents in question. It may be that an autopen signature is different from an actual one. We don’t know if there is such evidence or how it can be derived. There may be videos showing which were — and were not — signed by Biden in person. But that doesn’t conclude the inquiry. Lawsuits will go back and forth, and to the higher courts, about whether Biden knew and specifically intended that the EOs, pardons, and commutations and such were going to be effective. Will Trump and the Justice Department try to re-imprison people who were pardoned or had their sentences commuted? If so, each of those people will be entitled to a trial on the circumstances surrounding the pardons and commutations. This is a huge mess for which lawyers will find employment for years to come. It’s much less clear that each person — or class of people — affected would have the right to a trial on the question of Trump’s action cancelling Biden’s Executive Orders. Trump could have saved himself the effort by — as this column recommended — cancelling all of Biden’s Executive Orders by his own EO on the first day he resumed office. A further problem is in that a future Democratic president who could (and probably would) cancel the defense of any or all of the lawsuits that are brought against Trump’s action, presuming that the litigation isn’t concluded by the time Trump leaves office (and presuming his successor, Heaven help us, is a Democrat.) There are problems, too, for those challenging Trump’s order. How can they counter evidence that Biden was overcome with senility at the time he supposedly signed the documents? How could that Biden have actually signed them and knew what he was doing when he did? These people cannot rely on Old Joe’s testimony. He’s reportedly too far gone into senility for that. Trump’s threat of a perjury indictment against Biden in the event of such testimony might be something to dissuade all involved to not try to obtain Biden’s testimony. So where does that leave us? If the Justice Department tries to re-imprison those pardoned or had their sentences commuted, that will definitely lead to lawsuits to sustain the pardons and commutations. Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department must have been consulted before Trump made his Friday declaration. How will they act to pursue it? And how will they sustain Trump’s erasure of all of Biden’s executive orders? There are any number of other documents Biden signed with the autopen including presidential directives that are still secret. How will they be treated under Trump’s new order? Trump excels at throwing everything up in the air and seeing how it settles to earth. He’s done it again with his Friday declaration. READ MORE from Jed Babbin: Striking the Unknown William F. Buckley, Jr. and Tucker Carlson Happy Birthday, Marines