YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #trafficsafety #assaultcar #carviolence #stopcars #notonemore #carextremism #endcarviolence #tennessee #bancarsnow #stopcrashing #pedestriansafety #tragedy #thinkofthechildren #memphis #chswarriors
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

YubNub News
YubNub News
9 m

Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy

[View Article at Source]The Texan senator is a canny politician, but it isn’t clear that embracing neoconservatism is a winning gambit. The post Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy appeared first…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
9 m

Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe

[View Article at Source]The new National Defense Authorization Act handcuffs the president to an antiquated European defense posture. The post Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe…
Like
Comment
Share
Salty Cracker Feed
Salty Cracker Feed
1 h

Candace Owens Alleges The Macrons Green Lit a Hit on Her
Favicon 
saltmustflow.com

Candace Owens Alleges The Macrons Green Lit a Hit on Her

The post Candace Owens Alleges The Macrons Green Lit a Hit on Her appeared first on SALTY.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 h

Border Patrol chief SOUNDS OFF on ‘blatant lies’ about federal agents
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Border Patrol chief SOUNDS OFF on ‘blatant lies’ about federal agents

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 h

Former Dem says the party is 'the CAUSE' of the affordability crisis
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Former Dem says the party is 'the CAUSE' of the affordability crisis

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 h

Absence Makes the Father Grow Fonder
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Absence Makes the Father Grow Fonder

Culture Absence Makes the Father Grow Fonder Is something missing after the end of the traveling father? Whenever he walked through our front door after being away for any meaningful length of time, my late father whistled. He did not whistle out of glee, delight, or even habit but to announce his presence. He whistled as a way to let his family know that he had come home.  His whistle did not carry a specific tune—it was nothing like the melodic “family whistle” used by Frances McDormand to beckon her rock journalist son in Cameron Crowe’s movie Almost Famous. To the contrary, his whistle was clear, quick, workmanlike. There was nothing elaborate or fussy about it.  When I think of my father’s whistle, I associate it with an accompanying noise: the rustle of his house key as he was unlocking the door. Those sounds—the racket of the key and the lock, and the whistle that invariably followed—signaled that my mother, my brother, and I had made it through the interregnum between my father’s departure and return. You might ask: Where had my father been that he felt obliged to broadcast his reappearance? He was at work—his job! Evidently, I am a member of one of the last generations in which fatherhood was, in part, associated with absence. Each day, my father drove to his job, which, for a not insignificant portion of my Louisiana childhood, was located in New Orleans, far across Lake Pontchartrain from our suburb on the Northshore. My mother, who got through life without the benefit of a driver’s license, was on her own with two small children. She managed brilliantly, but I know she felt relief when she heard his whistle each weekday afternoon around 5 o’clock. Sometimes my father was required to be even further afield than New Orleans. His was the age of business trips, and such trips usually meant air travel—an added stressor. My mother always left my father a note to stay safe; my father often left me a note, discovered as I was pouring my Cheerios on the morning of his departure, to help Mom while he was away. Such were the rituals of my early childhood: the anxiety of a father going away, the consolation of a father coming back. In between, of course, there was fun to be had in Dad’s absence.  All self-respecting sophisticated film fans will remember the scene in Terrence Malick’s masterpiece The Tree of Life in which the mother (Jessica Chastain) informs her brood of unruly boys that their father (Brad Pitt), a disciplinarian, has departed on a trip. The lads proceed to run wild through their house and torment their mother with a lizard. My brother and I were not inclined to such misbehavior, but it was certainly in the natural order of things that, growing up, our mother was present on an hourly basis while our father made appearances after work and on weekends.  Children raised in the era of remote work and Zoom calls might never know how much a father is treasured if he is home some of the time rather than all of the time. I thought again of this familial history because, with the arrival of the week of Thanksgiving, we have entered the season of Planes, Trains and Automobiles. This classic movie, written and directed by John Hughes, stars Steve Martin as Neal Page, a traveling advertising man whose earnest effort to spend the holiday in the company of his lovely wife and adoring children is torn asunder by winter weather, uncooperative rental car agencies, and the potentially lethal (though actually salutary) friendship of a sycophantic drifter, Del Griffith (John Candy).  In November 1987, when Planes, Trains and Automobiles was released to polite notices, I was all of 4 years old, which was, of course, much too young to see an R-rated movie, even one as well-meaning as this one. But, thanks to eventual viewings on cable and videocassette, I became intimately familiar with the film. Although my father, amazingly, shared the same first name as the John Candy character (Del), I associated him entirely and exclusively with Steve Martin’s urbane, sophisticated, slightly ill-tempered Neal Page. I could easily imagine my father navigating a city sidewalk to hail a cab to the airport, as Neal does in the breathless opening scene. I could picture him engaged in heated debate with the rental car agency representative, as Neal is in one famously salty scene. And I certainly remember him calling home to give my mother updates on his estimated time of arrival, as Neal does throughout the picture. If Neal had worked from home—if Neal’s advertising agency had not insisted that he meet certain clients in person, despite the inconvenience of travel during a holiday—his family would have been denied the ultimate joy of seeing him when he finally arrives, with the surprise special guest Del, on Thanksgiving Day. I know something of the jubilance Neal’s family experiences when they see him walk through the front door. My family had it each time we heard my father whistle. The post Absence Makes the Father Grow Fonder appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 h

Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy

Politics Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy The Texan senator is a canny politician, but it isn’t clear that embracing neoconservatism is a winning gambit. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) Axios clarified the obvious this week: Ted Cruz is preparing to run for president, again.  A lot has changed since Cruz conceded to Donald Trump in 2016. Trump completely remade the GOP and American politics over the last decade. Different issues and new rhetoric determine political discourse. Cruz ran as an anti-establishment insurgent in 2016, only to be outflanked by the genuine outsider Trump. This time, the Texas senator wants to restore the old order against the Trumpist takeover. But Cruz is smart enough to know he can’t outright attack the president or his legacy. To be a successful Republican candidate, one will need to present as pro-Trump: Over 90 percent of Republicans approve of Trump’s performance. The base’s attachment to the president remains as strong as ever.  That leaves Cruz in a difficult situation. He needs to distinguish himself from JD Vance, Trump’s assumed heir who will run on the administration’s legacy. But Cruz can’t attack Trump or his movement. Instead, he’s set on Tucker Carlson as a proxy target to deride Trumpism. With Tucker as his preferred nemesis, Cruz can claim he’s MAGA while he demands the GOP return to the old guard conservatism Trump buried in 2016. The senator will simply brand Carlson’s America Firstism as un-MAGA and his own conservatism as true MAGA. No matter how much Cruz claims otherwise, it won’t be America First. Cruz wants to drag the right back to the days before Trump came down the escalator. He’s just pragmatic enough to put a MAGA hat on it. Cruz and Carlson have been in a war of words for months. Ever since the commentator embarrassed the senator in an interview on Iran, Cruz has taken every opportunity to attack Carlson. It’s a rare week when he doesn’t whine about the popular podcast on his X account. In the wake of Tucker’s controversial interview with Nick Fuentes, the senator ramped up his attacks. Railing against Tucker served as a core part of his recent addresses to both the Republican Jewish Coalition and the Federalist Society.  A chief theme of Cruz’s anti-Tucker diatribes is foreign policy. “On foreign policy, Tucker has gone bat-crap crazy,” Cruz said after his contentious interview with Carlson. What does he think a non “bat-crap crazy” foreign policy looks like? Naturally, it would offer unquestionable support for Israel and allow zero tolerance for anyone on the Right who disagrees.  Cruz declared during the Tucker interview: “I came into Congress 13 years ago with the stated intention of being the leading defender of Israel in the United States.” He may earn that title now with his fervent advocacy of bombing Iran and demanding every American back Israel “100 percent.”  It’s not just Israel where he displays neocon instincts. He’s also a leading advocate for intervening in Nigeria and Venezuela. He also believes it’s imperative for America to deliver a “clear loss” to Vladimir Putin in Ukraine.  Cruz wasn’t always like this. He opposed intervention in Syria in 2013. In his previous presidential bid, he condemned the nation building of the Bush years and called the Iraq war a mistake. He insisted that toppling Bashar al-Assad would not be in the national interest and opposed sending more troops to the Middle East. Steve Bannon even praised Cruz’s “Jacksonianism” at the time, arguing it was far superior to Marco Rubio’s “Wilsonian internationalism.”  But, like many politicians, Cruz changed. His neocon pitch may not resonate with voters in the way Trump’s immigration message did with the base. But it will excite a very important demographic in GOP politics: donors. Axios reports Cruz is already finding an eager audience at top-dollar events. Many conservative donors view Carlson as a menace that must be destroyed. A number of them stopped giving money to Turning Point USA over its hosting of Carlson at its events. They want someone to call Tucker out by name and say he’s not welcome in the conservative movement. They see that man as Ted Cruz. Unsurprisingly, several of these donors also don’t like Trump. Cruz is courting many of the big-money names who backed Nikki Haley’s presidential bid against Trump. It’s obvious these people want Trumpism purged as well from the party. Cruz offers them the hope of moving the party back to the old days when no one questioned Israel, dissident Right views were consigned to the margins, and the only thing the party offered to voters was tax cuts. The Texas senator likes to portray himself as the only Republican brave enough to denounce Carlson by name. This was the theme of his recent Federalist Society speech. “My colleagues, almost to a person, think what is happening is horrible, but a great many of them are frightened because [Carlson] has one hell of a big megaphone,” he told the crowd of conservative lawyers. “Fuentes and Tucker and the rest of that ilk have a right to say what they are saying. Every one of us has an obligation to stand up and say it is wrong.” “It’s easy right now to denounce Fuentes,” the senator added. “Are you willing to say Tucker’s name?” This message may come across as music to the ears of many establishment donors. They want Tuckerism purged from the party. Nominating someone like Cruz may realize their dream. This is a major change for Cruz. In 2016, he wanted to be the Tea Party insurgent who would upend the stale GOP establishment. Now he’s pitching himself as the candidate for the same establishment.  Making Tucker his chief enemy also allows Cruz to undercut JD Vance. It’s well-known the vice president is good friends with Carlson. It’s already become the favorite way to criticize Vance within conservative media. Cruz can claim associating with Tucker is disqualifying or immoral, hitting Vance while not even naming him. His target audience will know who he’s talking about. It’s inevitable that Ted will make this anti-Vance attack explicit when primary season arrives. But he will likely keep it subtle before then. Vance is the vice president, not his presidential primary opponent at the moment. It’s bad form to directly attack the Republican president’s second-in-command. This attack may sway donors, but it could fall flat with actual voters. Rasmussen Reports finds that 62 percent of Trump voters have a positive opinion of Tucker. He’s also a political commentator, not a politician. It may strike voters as odd for presidential hopefuls to fight so fiercely over who’s friendly with a podcaster. They would prefer the candidates to real issues, not inquisitions over friendships. Cruz is a crafty politician. He knows how to further his ambitions in whatever moment he faces. In the Obama era, he made himself known as the chief bombthrower of the GOP and more Tea Party than the Tea Party. In the Trump era, he became one of the president’s most loyal supporters in the Senate. As he looks to a new era, Cruz reinvents himself as a diehard neoconservative who will restore Con Inc. to its former glory. This pitch will certainly get Cruz donations, but it’s much more uncertain whether it will earn him votes. I wouldn’t bet on the MAGA faithful turning to Neocon Ted as their next leader. The post Ted Cruz Wants Tucker As His 2028 Enemy appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 h

Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe

Foreign Affairs Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe The new National Defense Authorization Act handcuffs the president to an antiquated European defense posture. Credit: Alexandros Michailidis Congress has inserted a provision into the annual defense funding bill, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), that would prevent President Donald Trump from shifting the defense burdens in Europe. Both chambers passed similar but not identical provisions, leaving the possibility for dissenting members to advocate for stripping the provision from the final bill or to offer significant amendments if given the chance. What is most striking is the willingness of Republican national security leadership in both chambers to handcuff the president in exchange for keeping the United States as the main bill-payer for European security. The Senate’s language would restrict the President’s ability to draw down forces in Europe below 76,000 and prevent him from divesting legacy bases in the region or relinquishing the U.S. hold on the Supreme Allied Commander (SACEUR) post within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) unless the secretary of defense complies with an onerous and arguably impossible certification requirement. The House language largely sets the same restrictions, but requires both the secretary of defense and the commander of U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) to make independent certifications. The House bill, notably, does not extend the restrictions on presidential decision-making to the SACEUR position.   These provisions extend far beyond a reasonable standard for routine oversight. Congress is trying to make American foreign policy itself because its members don’t want to shift defense burdens in Europe. The requirements set forth in both provisions unnecessarily force division and strife between civilian and military leadership. For example, the Senate bill calls for the USEUCOM commander and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to provide separate and additional “independent” assessments of how a reduction in force posture would impact U.S. security and the capabilities of NATO allies. Additionally, a similar separate “independent” assessment is called for regarding the impact of a decision to relinquish the U.S. hold on the SACEUR position. The House bill goes a step further by requiring certifications from both the secretary of defense and the USEUCOM commander, breaking the chain of command by placing the USEUCOM commander’s perspective on equal footing with that of the secretary of defense.  Members of the Armed Services Committees on both sides of the aisle have been vocal advocates for civilian control of the military. Yet elevating assessments conducted and informed only by uniformed military leadership as a check on the decisions of the commander-in-chief is incompatible with that core principle. Furthermore, the combatant commands and the Joint Chiefs of Staff already provide input alongside civilian leadership on products going before the secretary as standard practice. A separate, “independent” product from senior military leadership is not only duplicative but also breaks down a civilian-led, cohesive coordination process.      Both chambers also required the Department of War to provide NATO allies and partners the ability to weigh in before the president moves forward with what should be national, sovereign decisions. As currently written, any move to reduce forces and basing in USEUCOM below prescribed levels, or relinquish the SACEUR position held by the U.S. in NATO, can be undertaken “only after appropriate consultations with all North Atlantic Treaty organization allies and relevant non-NATO partners” (emphasis added) have been completed as part of the certification.  The standard is designed as a poison pill to prevent burden-shifting in Europe. NATO allies and partners have no incentive to willingly bless a move that leaves room for the U.S. to step back as security guarantor for the continent. But truly abhorrent is the cynicism of American policymakers who put the interests of NATO allies and partners on equal footing in the president’s ability to allocate America’s scarce national defense resources. Allied status is not equal to, nor should it ever supersede, the authority of the U.S. commander-in-chief.  Despite these usurpations of authority designed to constrain the President’s vision for a burden shift in Europe, the provision has received little coverage in the press and no opportunity for thorough debate by the full membership of either the House or Senate. The Trump administration, to their credit, included vocal opposition to both provisions in official Statements of Administration Policy on the House and Senate NDAAs earlier this year. But as House and Senate leadership scramble to finalize the NDAA behind closed doors before year’s end, Congress owes the American people a debate. The Armed Services Committees’ effort to prevent a shift of the burden of European defense to European nations capable of resourcing their security needs should come under public scrutiny. With a debt-to-GDP ratio well over 100 percent and an annual deficit of $2 trillion per year, Congress needs to come to grips with scarcity. The post Congress Clings to Cold War Framework for U.S. in Europe appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 h

Math professor's hack can help cool your sweltering car in seconds
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Math professor's hack can help cool your sweltering car in seconds

Cars can become unbearably hot in the summer. Even at a seemingly mild 80°F outside, the temperature inside can soar to a scorching 109°F within 20 minutes. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in just 40 minutes it can escalate to a blistering 118°F. After an hour, it can peak at a searing 123°F. And that’s just the air temperature; a dark dashboard or seat can reach a staggering 200°F."These objects (e.g., dashboard, steering wheel, child seat) heat the adjacent air by conduction and convection and also give off longwave radiation (red) which is very efficient at warming the air trapped inside a vehicle," the National Weather Service said. It can take five to 10 minutes for your car to cool down on a hot day by turning on the air conditioning, which probably means you burn your buttocks and thighs on the hot seat. That’s why Hannah Fry shared an amazing hack on TikTok, demonstrating how to cool your car down in seconds using the laws of thermodynamics.Fry is Professor of the Public Understanding of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge. She is a mathematician, a best-selling author, and the host of numerous popular podcasts and television shows. @fryrsquared That age-old dilemma of choosing between having a non-sweltering car or baffling a passerby because you look like a fool who doesn't know how to use a door Fry suggests that instead of turning on the air conditioning—which she says is “not worth it” because of how long it takes to become effective—you should open a window on the opposite side of the car. Then rapidly open and close the driver’s side door so it moves back and forth like a fan.“The reason why it works is that when you open and close the door, especially if you do it quickly, the door, as it's moving outwards, it sweeps out all of the air that's in its way, creating this sort of area of low pressure that you get here,” Fry says. “And then that sets up something called bulk flow, which is where all of the hot, sweaty, horrible air inside the car is drawn outwards.”Fry’s practical approach to a problem everyone deals with blew people’s minds in the comments.“If I ever catch someone in real life doing this, I’m gonna know they’ve watched this exact video,” a commenter wrote. “I will give it a go, but while opening and closing the door, scream, ‘Be gone, heat demons! BE GONE!’” another added. “Going to remember this the next time my partner farts in the car,” someone joked.The fact that the air temperature inside a car and the temperature outside are often drastically different—especially in the summer—serves as a crucial reminder to dog owners never to leave their pets unattended in a parked car."Most dog owners know that you can’t leave a pet in a hot car," the American Kennel Club's Anna Burke writes. "Temperatures can rise to dangerous levels in just minutes, putting your dog at risk of heatstroke. But what if you open a window a little bit? Does that make it safe to leave your dog in the car? The answer is simple. You should never leave a dog alone in the car, even with the windows cracked. In some states, it’s even illegal."The following video by The Dodo explains why leaving a dog in a hot car can be deadly, even when it doesn’t feel that hot outside. - YouTube www.youtube.com This article originally appeared in June.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 h

Women share the 'girl codes' they'd never break, even for women they just met
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Women share the 'girl codes' they'd never break, even for women they just met

There is an informal, yet sacred social contract many women follow instinctively. You won’t find a manual on it, per se, but it lives in bathrooms, parking lots, parties, doctors' offices, group chats, and chance encounters with strangers, known to women as “girl code.”This solidarity takes on many forms. Sometimes it looks like it helps prevent embarrassing fashion malfunctions. Other times it looks like helping a stranger home after they’d had too much to drink. But at its core, girl code is all about protection, dignity, and kindness. Recently, women on Reddit shared their own example of “girls codes they’d never break,” and it paints a vividly clear picture about what makes female connection so uniquely special.Its Girl Code Bro Girl Thing GIFfrom Its Girl Code Bro GIFs 1. The bathroom sisterhoodAny bathroom is hallowed ground. Period. Many women described it as the place where strangers become instant allies.“If I'm next in line, I'll hold your door until another stall is available, then pass door holding duty to the lady behind me.”“If any women asks me to do a ‘check’ with their pants, I’ll always check. I’ve had strangers ask before and I’ve had to ask strangers.”“If they have something in their face or if their skirt is tucked into their underwear… TELL THEM!”“Bathroom hangouts in bars mean sisterhood, we are now best friends. Need someone to hype you up? On it. Need someone to leave with you and find your friends? Yes, queen. Need a good cry and vent about that stupid person in your life? F**k that person, I hate them now too.” Cause no one can trust that bathroom lighting. media0.giphy.com 2. The safety pactSafety sits at the heart of girl code. When another woman signals distress, the response is immediate and unquestioned.“If a woman comes up to me pretending I am her auntie, I am her goddamn auntie. Her mum and I were separated at birth.”“‘Don’t let that guy know i’m here or where i am’ YES MRS PRESIDENT.”“I’ve had quite a few women come up to me and my friends for safety to get away from someone. I will ALWAYS play along.”“Don't leave a girl/woman alone when she's inebriated at a party. You just never know.”3. The honesty and loyalty clauseHonesty that protects, rather than wounds, is a key part of these unwritten rules.“If someone can't fix the problem (cosmetic) in like 5-10 minutes, I don't bring it to their attention.”“If another woman asks me for the name of my perfume/where I bought my dress I will always tell her.”“I will never ever ask a woman when her baby is due, unless she tells me she is pregnant.” Leslie Knope from 'Parks & Rec' media1.giphy.com “Even if we aren't friends anymore, I'll never spread your secrets. They go to the grave with me one day as I promised.”And when relationships go wrong, accountability is aimed in the right direction.“If a guy cheats on me with a girl and she didn't know about me when it happened, then she and I are not enemies.”“If I know another woman's SO has cheated, I'm telling her.”4. The sharing economyGirl code comes with a simple rule: share what you have, especially when it matters most.“If someone asks for a pad/tampon and you have a spare? You. Give. It. To. Them.” Tampons for all. media3.giphy.com “Tampons and hair ties belong to whoever needs them.”“If I saw them stealing pads/tampons or baby products, I didn’t see sh*t.”5. The universal compliment policyWomen know how much a kind word can mean.“I always tell a woman if I think an item of clothing or hair style or hair colou or accessories look stunning on her.”Over on TikTok, you might have seen folks using the phrase “I love it when women” to share their admiration and respect. After reading all these answers, it rings even more true. Long live girl code.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 3 out of 99905
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund