As reported two days ago, Eric Ciaramella, the whistleblower in the Ukraine impeachment, admitted that he lied. He had no information. He anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country. That information was kept secret until recently, after the statute of limitations had passed. There is so much more to this story. For example, why didn’t John Ratcliffe reveal this in 2019? Why didn’t Schiff get charged along with the fake whistleblower? It was all in the Inspector General’s report. Conservative Treehouse has noted that ICIG Michael Atkinson, at the time of his testimony on September 19, 2019, and October 4, 2019, to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, was not in a classified session. It was a closed-door meeting, but not classified. The people present were representatives Schiff, Himes, Seawell, Carson, Speier, Quigley, Swalwell, Castro, Heck, Welch, Maloney, Demmings, Krishnamoorthi, Nunes, Conway, Turner, Wenstrup, Stewart, Stefanik, Hurd, and Ratcliffe. At the time of the 2019 hearing, any member could’ve immediately gone to the microphone and told Americans that Ciaramella lied, but no one did. Later, Adam Schiff classified the Inspector General Atkinson testimony to hide it. Notice the names of the Republicans who knew and could have said something: Turner, Nunes, Stefanik, etc., and RATCLIFFE, now the CIA director. This was exculpatory evidence that should have been presented at the Impeachment trial. It destroys the underpinnings of the claim against Trump. There was no justification for it but a lie. The reverse was true as we all suspected. Biden was guilty of trying to extort Ukraine. It wasn’t until later that Adam Schiff classified the Atkinson testimony to hide it. Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Mary McCord, Dan Goldman, Barry Burke, Steven Castor, and Norm Eisen drove the lawfare impeachment. None of those are a surprise since they continually set up other hoaxes to overturn the president and quash his agenda. These individuals are not facing consequences for this coup and other hoaxes. They continued to weaponize the ongoing investigation classification to keep the impeachment effort going, and continue the lawfare. Still, they retain their law licenses. Is the corruption too widespread? Why is Mary McCord always involved, and why is she never investigated? The Atkinson ICIG information used to impeach President Trump was never accessible to him. You can see from the list that some Republicans knew this. It’s especially disconcerting to know that John Ratcliffe was one of those present who kept silent. Why didn’t Ratcliffe release the information when he questioned Atkinson on December 9, 2019? President Trump fired ICIG Michael Atkinson on April 3, 2020, and then appointed John Ratcliffe as DNI. He was confirmed on May 26, 2020. This was after the impeachment acquittal. Why didn’t John Ratcliffe, then the DNI, release this information? He could’ve easily declassified it and released it. We should have known at that time. We didn’t find out until DNI Tulsi Gabbard recently asked for it. Could someone please clarify why John Ratcliffe did not release the report when he left in 2020? Could it have anything to do with the statute of limitations? Here is Ratcliffe in March of this year, stating that Adam Schiff covertly conspired with the impeachment whistleblower, CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella, in an attempt to overthrow the sitting president of the United States. Schiff met with Ciaramella before he lied. Ratcliffe could have told us much sooner. FLASHBACK: CIA Director John Ratcliffe says Adam Schiff secretly conspired with fake impeachment whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to overthrow the sitting President, and the Intelligence Community Inspector General confirms it. pic.twitter.com/mJsseWORdr — @amuse (@amuse) December 20, 2025 Here is more on the records from Catherine Herridge: NEW RECORDS VIA @DNIGabbard @RepRickCrawford ATKINSON TRANSCRIPTS – First Trump Impeachment + Whistleblower Motive Whistleblower met with Democrats on House Intelligence Committee (then led by Adam Schiff) BEFORE reporting his allegations to the Intelligence Community Inspector General. October 2019: then Congressman, now @CIADirector Ratcliffe nailed the timeline in a closed-door briefing with Intelligence Community Watchdog Michael Atkinson. – Trump/Zelensky call July 25th 2019 – Whistleblower complaint filed August 12th – Ratcliffe questioned what happened during those 18 days. Ratcliffe: The whistleblower did not disclose to you that he or she had contact with HPSCI (House Intelligence Committee)? Atkinson: The answer to that is yes. The answer to that is yes. Atkinson: On the urgent disclosure form, there’s a question that the complainant is asked about who they have reported the violation to…and one of the boxes is the congressional intelligence committees. The complainant did not check that box. NEW RECORDS VIA @DNIGabbard @RepRickCrawford ATKINSON TRANSCRIPTS – First Trump Impeachment + Whistleblower Motive Whistleblower met with Democrats on House Intelligence Committee (then led by Adam Schiff) BEFORE reporting his allegations to the Intelligence Community… pic.twitter.com/x7A1IxHLLO — Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) April 13, 2026 Here is Adam Schiff, the corrupt Senator from California. Trump’s dead of night decision to fire ICIG Michael Atkinson is another blatant attempt to gut the independence of the Intelligence Community and retaliate against those who dare to expose presidential wrongdoing. It puts our country and national security at even greater risk. pic.twitter.com/Pnm7chdIkl — Adam Schiff (@SenAdamSchiff) April 4, 2020 More details here. My 2019 reporting on the Trump Impeachment "whistleblower" shared by my then colleague at Fox @ChadPergram has aged well. Democrats alleged abuse of power over President Trump's call with Ukraine President Zelensky. Seven years later, the Atkinson transcripts are finally… https://t.co/AxPoXsh0Bi pic.twitter.com/aYYqPnI41N — Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) April 13, 2026 The post A Whistleblower, a Coup Attempt, & a Shocking Cover Up appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Researchers have developed a solar-powered reactor to break down hard-to-recycle forms of plastic waste – such as drinks bottles, nylon textiles and polyurethane foams – using acid recovered from old car batteries. The process then converts the waste into clean hydrogen fuel and valuable industrial chemicals. The reactor was developed by researchers from the University […] The post Researchers Turn Car Battery Acid and Plastic Waste into Clean Hydrogen and New Plastic appeared first on Good News Network.

Spain Just Opened Every Country in Europe to Islamist Migrants

When they arrive, a baby boom will kick off in the safety of sandy burrows, but then the real danger begins.

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg was handed a major defeat on Tuesday amid his ongoing jihad against the Trump administration.Early last year, the Obama appointee ordered a pause to the Trump administration's planned deportations of Tren de Aragua terrorists under the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg was not, however, sufficiently quick on the draw.Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed that two planes loaded with alleged gangsters were already airborne, one headed to El Salvador and the other to Honduras.'These proceedings are a clear abuse.'Boasberg, who previously helped the Biden FBI spy on Republican lawmakers' phone records and released a woman accused of repeatedly threatening President Donald Trump's life, lashed out in response.Days after the U.S. Supreme Court threw out his temporary restraining order blocking the administration from using the AEA to deport Tren de Aragua gangsters, Boasberg stated in a court motion a year ago that the federal government had demonstrated "a willful disregard" for his ruling, prompting him "to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt."RELATED: Liberals increase their stranglehold over Wisconsin Supreme Court — which now has ties to Planned Parenthood John Moore/Getty ImagesBoasberg attempted to pursue criminal proceedings against top administration officials, but the Justice Department intervened, asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to ground the activist judge's "endless fishing expedition."In its petition to the appellate court, the DOJ accused the district court of plunging forward "in a doubly unconstitutional manner: by conducting its own criminal investigation (contra the separation of powers) and doing so in a way that appears designed to punish Defendants for their successful mandamus petition (contra the Due Process Clause)."The DOJ argued further that Boasberg's order was "also incoherent on its own terms," noting "there was no willful violation as a matter of law because the TRO did not clearly forbid the conduct at issue."On Monday, a three-judge panel on the appellate court, comprising two Trump appointees and an Obama appointee, crushed Boasberg's dreams of raking Trump officials over the coals in criminal contempt proceedings in a 2-1 decision."The district court proposes to probe high-level Executive Branch deliberations about matters of national security and diplomacy," Judge Neomi Rao noted in the opinion for the court. "These proceedings are a clear abuse of discretion, as the district court’s order said nothing about transferring custody of the plaintiffs and therefore lacks the clarity to support criminal contempt based on the transfer of custody."Rao said that Boasberg repeatedly "moved the goalposts"; suffered from an incredible lack of clarity, at least in his construction of his restraining order; "assumed an improper jurisdiction antagonistic to the Executive Branch"; and had pursued an "intrusive" and "improper" investigation that would inevitably terminate in a "legal dead end." Boasberg did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A tough pressure campaign from high-profile Democrats has failed to persuade other members of their party in Maryland, where a new congressional map is now off the table.Democrats enjoy a super-majority in both the Maryland House of Delegates and the Senate, and Democrat Wes Moore has been governor since 2023. Nevertheless, a redistricting proposal that would have threatened the lone Republican congressional seat died in the Maryland Senate when the legislative session ended Monday night.'At some point, I am going to have to have a conversation with him if he continues to stand in the way of an up or down vote.'The Maryland House passed the map overwhelmingly in early February, 99-37.Gov. Moore pressed hard to pass the map through the state Senate and onto his desk as a way to combat Republican redistricting efforts in Texas and North Carolina, spearheaded by President Donald Trump."I think Donald Trump is actively trying to manipulate and change the rules around the November election and beyond because he knows he cannot win on his policies," Moore told the AP.Moore also told Rev. Al Sharpton last week: "If the rest of the country is going to have this conversation about mid-decade redistricting, then so should Maryland, and so should every other state. Because until it is done nationally, we have to make sure that this election is not stolen right before our face so this pain is made permanent."RELATED: Hakeem Jeffries pressures Maryland Democrat over one Republican-held congressional seat - YouTube Even U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) promised to pressure Democratic Maryland Senate President Bill Ferguson to bring the map up for a vote."All we are asking Senate President Ferguson to do is allow democracy to prevail. What that means is an up or down vote," Jeffries said in February. "At some point, I am going to have to have a conversation with him if he continues to stand in the way of an up or down vote. But, hopefully, over the next few days, he will change his mind."But Ferguson did not change his mind. Ferguson has consistently resisted efforts to vote on the map, claiming that passing a new map could jeopardize the current map by prompting judicial review."Any redrawing of the current map could reopen the ability for someone to challenge the current map and give the court the opportunity to strike it down, or even worse, redraw the map itself," Ferguson wrote in a letter back in October."That means that Maryland's potential gain of one seat is immediately eliminated, and, in fact, worsens the national outlook."A judge already tossed a Maryland congressional map that passed in 2021, calling it "a product of extreme partisan gerrymandering." The current map was passed in 2022.Jeffries' office did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tom Steyer's Radical Campaign Promise: Abolish ICE, Jail ICE Agents, and Turn CA Into a Sanctuary Warzone

If you're running into a constant warning that your storage is full on your Android device, an upcoming feature may help you with managing storage space.

NASA has released a 'Moon Base User's Guide' that reveals the major gaps the agency and its partners must fill in to land and live on the moon.