YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #nightsky #newyork #physics #moon #astrophysics #fullmoon #supermoon #planet #zenith #wolfmoon #moonafteryule #coldmoon #privacy #supermoon2026
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 m

Communication expert shares 2-step method for talking to people who never admit they're wrong
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Communication expert shares 2-step method for talking to people who never admit they're wrong

Some folks in this world just have to be right. All the time. Even when you present them with every fact imaginable that proves they are wrong, they will resort to any rhetorical tactic they can to make it seem as though they are right. If that doesn't work, they turn to personal attacks.People like this can be infuriating to deal with because talking to them is like screaming at a wall. Fortunately, communication expert Jefferson Fisher recently shared a two-step method on TikTok for dealing with these impossible people.Fisher, who has become massively popular online, offers tips "to help people argue less and talk more." @art_for_feeling How to handle someone who is always right. 3 steps from @ Jefferson Fisher #power #insporation Here is Fisher's two-step process for dealing with people who will never admit they are wrong:Step 1. Diffuse the situation"Know that the harder we work to prove that they're wrong, the more convinced they are that they're right," he says. "So what you're gonna do is diffuse that by just saying something simple as well, 'maybe you're right,' or 'maybe so.' That diffuses the whole situation."Step 2. Open the conversation up Fisher says you can encourage the other person to explore your ideas by saying: "'It's helpful for me to know that you're at least considering my thoughts, even if you don't agree with me.' Now you've made a safe space to have a discussion that's not threatening their identity. That's how you talk to somebody who thinks they're always right. So try that." Two woman having a heart-to-heart conversation. via Canva/PhotosWhy identity mattersIn his video, Fisher notes that people who won't admit when they are wrong have developed an identity based on always being correct. That's why, when they're confronted with the possibility that they may be incorrect, they will do anything to avoid admitting it. Research shows that when people feel their identity is being attacked, they perceive it as an affront to their authenticity and value as human beings. This can lead to a physical reaction known as the amygdala hijack, where people feel as if they are being physically threatened. That's a big reason some people get enraged when discussing politics or religion. If their views on these issues are closely tied to their identity and those views are challenged, it can invalidate their entire sense of self. A man who has dug in his heels. via Canva/PhotosThe 'backfire effect'Fisher explains that the harder we try to prove someone wrong, the more convinced they become they're right, due to a psychological phenomenon known as the "backfire effect." When people are shown facts that clearly contradict their views, they often cling to those beliefs even more strongly. That's because those beliefs are tied to emotion, not facts. When their views are challenged, it triggers defensiveness, and the brain works to protect their self-image rather than reconsider the belief.Getting through to stubborn people who always think they're right isn't easy, but Fisher's advice can help break through the wall they erect when their beliefs are challenged. It's good for you and the other person. When you're never wrong, you never learn from your mistakes, and that can quickly lead to problems far worse than admitting you were wrong.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 m

Cheese-loving toddler gains delightfully obsessed fan base after 'heartbreaking' viral video
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

Cheese-loving toddler gains delightfully obsessed fan base after 'heartbreaking' viral video

Judging by the number of people who say things like, "I could totally be vegan if I didn't have to give up cheese," it's safe to say that cheese is favorite staple among the general population. Apparently, Americans in particular are big cheese fans, with the U.S. alone producing a whopping 523 varieties of cheese and 96% of Americans saying they consume cheddar cheese regularly.But perhaps no one is as big a fan of cheese as a toddler named Asa, whose heartbroken reaction to having his cheese shreds taken away has people crowning the wee one King Cheesehead and begging for his mom to give the not-yet-2-year-old all the cheddar he wants. Though he only says the word "cheese," he manages to take viewers on an entire emotional journey in this video with over 18 million views: See on Instagram With some combination of "Yeah, same, kid," and "Give that boy all the cheese his heart desires," the consensus was loud in the comments:"That is not a tantrum cry, that is true pain. ?""Oddly enough, I have the same reaction.""Me too, bud. Me too.""That’s a normal human reaction when cheese is taken from anyone. If you don’t react like this, I’d be concerned.""Don’t you ever take the cheeeeee again from my little ginger baby!!!!""Internet Auntie here and I’m on the way Ginger.""Ready to send the U.S. military after mom.""DON'T MAKE THIS PAWPAW COME OVER THERE!!?? Quit messin' with that baby's cheese!?" Wallace And Gromit Cheese GIF Giphy "The cheese police are on their way ma’am, taking away a precious angels cheese is a felony.""I'm his lawyer and I can confirm you are indeed not allowed to confiscate his cheese again.""Give him an Oscar. He just expressed Love, fear, pain, forgiveness and gratefulness only using one word ?. 'Cheeeeesee.'""His only lines are four 'cheese's but he won Academy Awards for Best New Actor already. ?"This is not Asa's only viral cheese experience, by the way. Like the true cheese lover he is, he also represented his fellow cheddar heads by demonstrating a perfect example of "cheese rage," the dairy equivalent of "cute aggression." It just builds and builds until his little body can't contain it. See on Instagram And now Asa has a die-hard fan base of followers who relate to his cheese obsession. "I’ve never met someone who MAY, in fact, like cheese more than me. ?""Someone called him RON CHEESELY on the viral cheese reel and I can only think of that name every time I see him. He’s so adorable. I hope Santa brings him lots of cheese this Christmas.""Cheese Baby™️ brings me so much joy. And evidently the whole world. Please give him lots of hugs ?""Love it! My husband just heard it too and came running in - is it a new cheese baby video?!! Wishing you all the best for the festive season - and thanks for sharing the cheese love. It makes so many of us smile! ?" — (@) "I watch every video of my new cheese nephew at least 42,458 times. He looks SO much like my little brother when he was little! Please let us gather and pray to the cheese baby mother so we can continue to be gifted with more cheese baby videos! ❤️❤️❤️""The Cheese council should make this cute guy their spokesman. Every video of him I watch makes me want to eat some.""He needs to be paid for all the promoting of cheese. My whole family just keep saying cheeeeese. ??"What is it about cheese that makes it so delectable? It's hard to go wrong with fat and salt, of course, but some people have gone so far as to claim that cheese is addictive, largely due to a misreading of a 2015 study on food addiction and specific foods' impact on the brain. According to Houston Methodist, "There's no scientific evidence that cheese is addictive or that it significantly affects the brain similar to drugs or alcohol. That's not to say that eating cheese can't affect your brain's reward center, which may even cause you to crave it from time to time. But food cravings aren't the same as addictions. And they're also not specific to cheese."Like all of us, Asa does eat other things besides cheese, of course. Check out his "charCUTErie" board meal: See on Instagram Straight for the cheese first. Kiddo knows his priorities. For more Cheese Baby videos, you can follow Asa's mom on Instagram.
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 m

27 words and phrases that people agree are overused and need to be retired in 2026
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

27 words and phrases that people agree are overused and need to be retired in 2026

It’s pretty customary for humans to collectively latch on to certain words or phrases for a time, only to grow tired of them once the trendiness wears off. That’s by and large how we get generational slang in the first place. One man’s “rad” is another man’s “bussin.” The linguistic circle of life, as it were. `But the rapidity of social media has certainly seemed to make this turnover move at the speed of light, hasn’t it? It takes a fraction of the time for words to get overused, misused, change meaning, and lose meaning altogether. That’s probably why when someone on Reddit asked, “What overused word or phrase needs to be retired in 2026?” there was no shortage of passionate answers. From warped psychology terms to nonsensical Gen Alpha brainrot words, people delivered. Keep scrolling for our favorites.Sensational journalism wordsSlam Excited GIFfrom Slam GIFs 1. ’Slammed’ by the news.”2. “Also while we're at it, ‘bombshell,’ ‘destroyed,’ ‘meltdown,’ and ‘disaster.’"3. “Blasted. Clap back.”“Those are telltale signs that what you're about to read is heavily biased and was written to evoke emotions instead of giving just the facts so it's basically trash.Therapy speakTell Me Lies GIFfrom Tell Me Lies GIFs 4. “Gaslighting. People love to use this term wrong. It doesn't mean ‘lying,’ it means ‘manipulating somebody into believing they're crazy.’ That involves lying, but they're not the same thing. Also every term invented to get around TikTok censors. ‘Unaliving,’ ‘graped,’etc.”5. “Calling anyone who does anything slightly annoying a narcissist.”6. “Similarly, anytime someone feels just a little proud of themselves for something and/or compliments themselves, it's ‘ego.’ Not hating and constantly putting yourself down isn't ego. It's healthy.”7. “Trauma.You don’t have trauma from the Starbucks barista mispronouncing your name, Djoeffreigh. And if you do, I am not interested in hearing about it.”Aggressively passive-aggressive phrasesPassive Aggressive GIFfrom Passive GIFs 8. "People who use ‘the ick,’ ironically enough, give me the ick. Now I've given it to myself.”9. “Thank you for your attention to this matter.”10. “Louder for the people in the back.”11. “‘Let that sink in.’ ‘Read that again but slowly.’ ‘I don’t know who needs to hear this, but…’”12. "‘Just saying’ after being very aggressive.”Social media buzzwords and phrases that have been run into the groundIconic Rupaul GIFfrom Iconic GIFs 13. '''Let's normalize this.' please no.”14. “Tell me you’re Y without saying it.”15. “I’m begging people to stop saying’"its giving.’"16. “I’m literally obsessed”17. “X lives rent free.”18. “That’s iconic, she’s iconic, they’re iconic.”19. “Today years old”Weird, cutesy parenting termsNot Regular Cool Mom GIFfrom Wink GIFs 20. "Boy mom"21. “I also hate ‘littles."Words that do not mean what people think they meanMy Truth Michael Kupris GIFfrom My Truth GIFs 22. “'Underrated'. Sick of seeing ‘OMG! This band/singer/guitarist/drummer is so underrated’ when they're clearly millionaires from the musical success they've enjoyed for years.”23. “‘My truth.’ I like this one because it lets me know the next words out of their mouth are going to be bullshit.”24. “According to AI.”Phrases that kids today use that all us olds hateSouth Park 67 67 South Park GIFfrom South Park 67 GIFs 25. “The grandkids are slowing down on 6 7 (FINALLY), and I haven’t heard them say ‘sigma’ for a while, so HOPEFULLY those are both going away forever!!26. “‘Lowkey’ we’ve run it into the ground.”“The new ‘literally.”“Omg it's low key every second word my teen says.”And finally…Words that have lost their original meaning due to overuseIt'S A Game Changer Shea Whitney GIFfrom It'S A Game Changer GIFs 27. "‘Absolute game changer .’ I do product reviews, and I want to smack people for this one. Everything is a ‘game changer’ or a ‘holy grail.’ Bullshit, it is. That 5 star game changer is usually an overpriced piece of crap lol.”
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
42 m

'How entitled could you be?' UPS driver shares blunt message about stay-at-home moms.
Favicon 
www.upworthy.com

'How entitled could you be?' UPS driver shares blunt message about stay-at-home moms.

J.R. Minton, a 33-year-old UPS driver from the Dallas, Texas, area, recently ruffled some feathers with a viral TikTok video titled “SAHMs Listen up!” that begins with him asking, “I mean, how entitled could you be?” At first, Minton appears to fail to appreciate the enormous amount of emotional, mental, and physical labor that stay-at-home moms provide.“I truly cannot imagine the amount of arrogance you must have to sit there and complain when you are so privileged to have a person who is willing to provide such a carefree life for you,” Minton continues. “Let’s get real! What do you do all day? Your spouse is taking care of everything so you can take care of one thing. How complicated could it be: all you do is go to work?”At this point, legions of stay-at-home mothers and those who love them considered trucking themselves to Dallas to find this unappreciative UPS driver. However, it was soon apparent that Minton was referring to himself. @minton__jr Grow tf up—You should be doing more. #sahm #sahmlife #momlife #mom #momsoftiktok #sahmsoftiktok #sahmtok #momtok ♬ SAHMs Explained - J.R. Minton “For 10 hours a day, you get to live the life of a single, childless, carefree man because your wife was willing to take the financial risk of allowing you to be successful in your career while she takes care of everything else,” he continues. “She provides childcare services, home cleaning services, medical services, food services, scheduling services, and a list that goes on and on. And you provide... a paycheck? And you have the nerve to call yourself the provider! What is it going to take for you to realize that, bro, everything you have in your life is because of a stay-at-home mom.”The commenters on the video breathed sighs of relief and then praised Minton, a father of 4, for publicly appreciating his wife’s work."My sleeves were rolled up, earrings were off, hair tied up.... I was so ready...." one commenter joked. "I thought I landed in enemy territory for a min..." another added. "You have just made me realize after all these years that *I* am the freaking provider and that feels amazing,” a stay-at-home mother wrote.People appreciate Minton’s post because he praised stay-at-home mothers and placed his wife’s work above his, which he characterized as merely bringing home a paycheck. Minton has one job, delivering packages, but as he noted, his wife is an expert in over five different professions. In a world where stay-at-home moms are fighting to be seen as equals to their working spouses, Minton places them on a pedestal and owes his “carefree life” to them. A couple cooking in the kitchen with a cat sitting on the table beside chopped ingredients.Photo credit: Canva"Married life, with children, is bound to be chaotic," Minton told Upworthy. "It’s bound to have its ups and downs; It’s made me question myself a thousand times. However, the marriage my wife and I share has given me the space to find peace."Minton may be sharing an opinion we don't hear often enough, but he doesn't think he's the only one who thinks that way. "The last thing I am is rare or unique. There’s nothing special about the way that I feel or the things that I say. I have the same thoughts, feelings, frustrations and problems that any other husband or father might be struggling with," he told Upworthy. "The only difference that might be apparent is how I choose to react to the same situations any other man might encounter."This post isn’t the first time Minton has pulled the bait and switch on his followers. Last year, he made a video where he appeared to take pride in the fact that he never “helps” his wife with chores. @minton__jr ♬ original sound - J.R. Minton The twist in this video was that he doesn’t “help” his wife with chores because they are also his responsibility. "Because I do what I am supposed to do as a father and a husband. I cook. I clean. I do the laundry. I take care of the kids. I can't help my wife do those things because they are my job, too,” he reveals.He then urged men to change their perspectives on how they view stay-at-home moms. “Change the way you speak, change the way you think, and grow the f*** up and be a man," he added.Minton is an equal partner to his wife because he wants to treat his wife and family differently from how he was raised. “Pretty much everything about my parenting style is in spite of what I saw when I was growing up,” he told Today.com. @minton__jr I will not be explaining further. #dating #marriage ♬ original sound - J.R. Minton It's wonderful to see someone like Minton breaking the generational cycles. What makes it even better is that he wants to teach others to do the same.This article originally appeared in January 2025.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 m

Favicon 
spectator.org

Five Quick Things: Minnesota Goes to Hell (Again)

It really shouldn’t happen twice in six years. Then again, with the same cast of characters in charge, it’s hardly a surprise that it did. Or that it would keep happening. We speak here about the national crisis occasioned by the leadership and citizenry (slightly more than half of it, to be fair) of the state of Minnesota. So much has gone wrong there that an entire book can and perhaps should be written — perhaps in multiple volumes. But in the interest of brevity, we’ll limit this national filing of grievance to only five things. Which we will endeavor, as best we can, to be quick in declaring. 1. Piracy and Theft Since before Christmas, the nation has been transfixed by the scandal of Minneapolis’s Somali community and its “economic” activities, which mostly consist of running scams to steal money from the American taxpayer. (RELATED: Minnesota Welfare Scandal Is the Fraud Warning Americans Finally Noticed) There can be no real argument at this point that it was a grievous mistake to import hundreds of thousands of people from the world’s worst country. This was sussed out brilliantly in Congressional testimony by Texas Republican Rep. Brandon Gill, who walked a panel of Minnesota state legislators through the litany of failure the Somali community has inflicted on the people of these United States since their arrival… What do you get when you import a community where four in five of its members become dependent on the welfare system? This isn’t a hypothetical question, of course; we already know — and Minnesota has provided us with the answer. You get $9 billion in welfare fraud. Because while most Somalis aren’t on the ball enough to do much in the way of productive work, anyone immersed in a slack, openly incontinent system like SNAP or Medicaid will eventually find nooks and crannies in which to hide while draining its coffers. The masterminds of Somali fraud in day care centers, autism “crazy checks” and other things are almost certainly not just Somali — but there are clearly enough Somalis to fill up the fraud pipeline and make it so that any effort to clean these things up is going to be lambasted as “bigoted” or “racist.” So you get this… This is the type of wholesale racket that Democrats create. The Somalians here are the ones carrying it out, but we should not ignore the role played by their Democratic enablers who created the infrastructure for fraud to proliferate and go unchecked pic.twitter.com/prd3sjIPDS — Dinesh D’Souza (@DineshDSouza) December 24, 2025 And this… How does the Somali daycare fraud work? – Somalis bring in kids – Check them in – Leave with the kids – Bill the state for care that never happened – Parents receive kickbacks Oh, and this is surveillance from 2018. This has been happening for YEARS. pic.twitter.com/MhV9zpTQ5s — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) December 29, 2025 And these scams have gone on unabated, outside of the odd prosecution here and there, for more than 15 years, with nobody doing anything effective about it. Naturally, there is another level to this, which is that when you start asking the old Roman question cui bono — who benefits? — you realize why this unconscionable rape of the American taxpayer has carried on with Minnesota as its locus. Here’s a hint… And here’s more than a hint… ? HOLY CRAP. Nick Shirley and David just confirmed that 1 Somali collects mail-in ballots for entire COMPLEXES — up to 9 BALLOTS per apartment home — and send them in for Democrats The voter fraud is MASSIVE ? pic.twitter.com/AbyaQDigWG “They all vote together and there’s… — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 6, 2026 That’s pretty bad, you’d have to agree. Except it’s worse. Back in 2020, James O’Keefe exposed how bad it really is… Project Veritas was so far ahead of the Somali fraud in Minnesota. We exposed their illegal ballot harvesting schemes in 2020. No one was EVER arrested. pic.twitter.com/85irKXxYW4 — Eric Spracklen ?? (@EricSpracklen) December 30, 2025 @JamesOKeefeIII and @Project_Veritas uncovered Minnesota voter fraud among the Somali community in September 2020, two months before the election. And when I wrote about it, the backlash was ferocious. The story was “widely fact-checked” aka discredited by the “prestige” media… https://t.co/IuUVkBbfqm pic.twitter.com/JEzW0vM8Ub — Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) December 27, 2025 2. The Heave-Ho So as this scandal began to unravel and ferment, the poll numbers began to sour for Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz — a bizarre, unstable man who was exposed and rejected by voters across the country as Kamala Harris’s servile vice presidential nominee in 2024. Walz was called on the carpet by Minnesota’s senior senator, Amy Klobuchar, the story goes, and told that he’d gone politically septic and could therefore not be his party’s nominee for re-election this fall. (RELATED: Walz Can’t Escape the Somali Fraud Scandal) Walz seems to have a penchant for deferring to women not named Kristie Noem, so this was the result… It was surely an on-brand performance from Walz, who, along with Minnesota’s Attorney General Keith Ellison, actively inflicted the Somali piracy of the welfare state on the American taxpayer and then, when the political price had to be paid for it, went all in on partisan attacks on Donald Trump. The parallel that comes to mind is Harvey Weinstein, whose own denouement as a relevant figure on the national stage stemming from the failure of his character was seasoned with political attacks on Trump and a commitment to attack Americans’ gun rights in a failed leftist virtue signal. Walz’s downfall shouldn’t have been much of a blow to the national Democrat Party; after all, they’d given him his 15 minutes of fame, and he’d used them poorly. Flushing him was probably a net plus. Except that the Somali fraud mess is larger than something that can be cleaned up by the political demise of one lackluster governor. It spans several states and billions of dollars; there are political donations on the books to Democrats all around, and it touches something primal in the minds of ordinary Americans. Heidi Hill, posting at X, summarized this perfectly… There is something deeply insulting about watching a Somalian fraud ring siphon billions of dollars from the U.S. government through a scheme so sloppy it should have collapsed before it began. This wasn’t clever. It was incompetent. When confronted, the Somalian actors involved didn’t even deny the fraud outright. They claimed the records—and only the records needed to prosecute them— were stolen. All of them. Seemingly unaware they’d been caught in their own lies, one man bemoaned his innocence while wearing designer sunglasses priced around $2,500. It’s like watching every B movie where the embezzlers go buy a Ferrari and drive it to work the next day. Now activists are rushing in to block all conversation, which to any sane person makes them look even more guilty and increasingly ridiculous. As Frederic Bastiat warned, “When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” This mess was metastasizing, and it threatened to engulf an entire political party. Worse, it threatened to demoralize the Democrats’ base of affluent white female leftists — AWFLs — as some or perhaps many would reasonably conclude they’d been had by pirates and fraudsters bilking those beloved social programs. Something had to be done. And miraculously, an opportunity arose. 3. A Carpetbagging AWFL Earns Her Immortality The public wanted action against the pirates and thieves in Minnesota, and where some of them were not here legally, ICE and the Border Patrol could do at least a modicum of good by sending them home. Minneapolis is not a focus of ICE activity, but the agency is quite active there. In response, what has happened is that leftist NGO’s, funded partially by American tax dollars, have set up networks on Signal and WhatsApp in order to track the activity of ICE agents and mobilize to stop them from turning arrests into deportations. (RELATED: Please Deliver Us From the Poorly-Behaved Women) Bear in mind that more than 70 percent of everyone deported by ICE through the raids they’re carrying out across the country are not just illegal aliens but either criminals — meaning they’ve committed crimes while here illegally — or they’re under a judicial deportation order. So when ICE rolls in to make an arrest, and someone acts to interfere with their activity, that someone is, in more cases than not, acting to protect a criminal invader into our country. (RELATED: Are They Illegal? Because If They’re Illegal, That’s Why They’re Getting Arrested) For some reason — mostly, I imagine, because they’re the base of the Democrat Party and the Left as a whole — the brigades of “activists” mobilizing to stop ICE agents from doing their jobs are chiefly made up of AWFLs. And on Wednesday, a woman named Renee Nicole Good, described as a mother of three and a poet, married to another woman, drove her Honda Pilot into an ICE engagement and parked it in a way that blocked a street so ICE officers couldn’t get out with an arrestee. Good was asked to move her car. She didn’t. Her lesbian partner got out of the car to film what came next. Then the ICE officers moved to surround the car and arrest her, because obstruction of a law enforcement activity is a crime. Let’s remember, because you’ve been propagandized to believe that the recent campaign of left-wing “protests” are “nonviolent,” that there are well-established principles of nonviolent resistance which have come down from Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others, and among those principles are that if you’re going to be arrested by the police for having demonstrated against some unjust thing, you go with them calmly and passively. (RELATED: Abusing Border Patrol Agents: Echoes of Vietnam) That’s not what Renee Good did. As an ICE officer approached her open driver’s-side window and another got in front of her vehicle, she first threw the Pilot into reverse and then accelerated forward — perhaps in an attempt to escape, as her supporters have claimed, but the vehicle accelerated directly toward an ICE officer who shot her before being struck by the vehicle and then stepping aside as it careened into a parked car. That same ICE officer had been attacked by another leftist protester with a vehicle in June; in that incident, he’d been dragged some distance by the vehicle. Any opprobrium you might have for his having shot Renee Good should be tempered by that knowledge. And as Noem noted, attempting to run ICE officers over with cars is a well-established pattern. A woman behind the wheel of a car is not physically infirm, as she might be attempting to resist an ICE officer on foot, you see, and so if the recruits to your fairly violent “non-violent” resistance are women, you use what you have. Good was not from Minneapolis. She was born in Colorado and had lived in Kansas City. She showed up in Minneapolis to cause trouble with ICE and had been involved in trying to block streets to prevent ICE officers from doing their jobs several times in the preceding hours and days. With three children at home. 4. A Foul Mouth Full of Soy With Good’s death, Minnesota’s abjectly evil leftist politicians now had something other than Somali fraud to pivot to, and pivot they did. Jacob Frey, the noxious soyboy mayor of Minneapolis who was himself a carpetbagger — he’s from northern Virginia and has lived in Minneapolis only since 2009 — barely survived re-election against a Somali socialist named Omar Fateh, who might have turned that city into a full-on Mogadishu. Frey needed something to bolster his credibility as a leftist political figure after becoming a laughingstock for his pandering to the Somalis during the campaign, and now he could pander to the AWFLs. Boy, did he. Here was Frey last week… ‼️ Americans are calling for Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey to resign after he threatened violence against ICE just weeks ago. Now, today, a suspect attempted to run over ICE agents with her vehicle, prompting self-defense gunfire in response. pic.twitter.com/IqkzqE3gaa — Digital Gal (@DigitalGalX) January 7, 2026 That was not a warning to the Renee Goods of the world that they needed to be careful how far to take their “activism,” by the way. No, it was a demand that ICE not enforce the law. And after Good’s entirely avoidable death — had she exercised some judgment and personal discipline in making one single smart decision on Wednesday, none of this would have happened — this was Frey… There is absolutely no defense for the mayor of a city to speak this way — not just because of his foul, unprofessional language but because his message is utterly lawless. But it was utterly on brand for the Minneapolis mayor, who had done everything he could to set his city on fire following George Floyd’s death in police custody in May 2020. 5. Insurrection in the Wind Not to be outdone, and suddenly relevant again with a suitable helping of ghoulish attention-whoring, Walz returned to the political stage with his own announcement. And this was not just the usual demagoguery, but rather something more… “Peacefully, as you always do.” This from a governor who watched his largest city burn just five and a half years ago. And then Walz threatened to deploy the Minnesota National Guard against the federal government. There is almost no precedent for that. It gives off a distinct stench of civil war. Walz, Frey and the rest of Minnesota’s governing class have encouraged billions of dollars of theft from the American taxpayer, with much of the proceeds remitted to a hostile foreign nation engaged in terrorism and piracy on the high seas, and to deflect from public attention of the resultant scandal, ginned up useful idiots to interfere with federal law enforcement officers while making not-so-veiled threats that violence was coming. And when it did come, they then escalated the conflict with the federal government. Minnesota is now beyond the pale. It’s a benighted, lawless place. Were Trump to respond to Walz by invoking the Insurrection Act and deploying the military into the streets of Minnesota’s cities, and perhaps sending special forces operators to pinch Walz as they did Nicolas Maduro last weekend in order to hold him as an accused revolutionary, it would not be an outrageous act. It might even be a necessary act. Minnesota is now leading America into civil war. This would be the stupidest civil war in world history, and that would be beyond doubt on brand for the American Left, which allows itself to be led by people like Walz, Frey, Ellison, and Ilhan Omar. But this is where we are, and it must be dealt with. Walz and Frey must resign. Now. The full weight of the federal government must descend on Minnesota until they do. READ MORE from Scott McKay: You’ve Never Heard of the Citgo Six, and We’re Going to Change That Right Now The Toppling of Villains Has Begun in Earnest. It Must Continue. Trump Sends a Cajun to Press the Message to Greenland
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 m

Favicon 
spectator.org

Was the Minnesota ICE Shooting Justified?

Civics class taught us that elected members of Congress enact our laws. The president — through his appointees and their employees — then executes these policy choices. Law enforcement officers (as the name suggests) enforce these laws. Their job is to do so, whether or not they support the law. Passing laws is subject to debate, but enforcing laws isn’t optional. As a prosecutor myself, I took an oath to do this. (RELATED: Are They Illegal? Because If They’re Illegal, That’s Why They’re Getting Arrested) Polling indicates a loud minority of Americans oppose enforcement of the immigration laws that make it a crime to enter the United States illegally. These dissenters have two basic options. The first is to convince a majority of Congress (a supermajority if they expect a presidential veto) to change that law and allow anyone in the world to enter and enjoy our myriad free or low-cost welfare, education, housing, and health benefits. But it takes a lot of work to convince enough voters to encourage their lawmakers to make such a change. That’s why many of those who want more lax immigration laws take the second option — an easier, but less principled approach. It involves getting in the face of federal law enforcement agents, screaming obscenities at them, blowing deafening whistles, and — all too often — threatening their lives. These protestors, the violent and less so, mistakenly believe that policy change requires hateful stunts. It’s similar to, but more dangerous than, toddlers holding their breath to get the candy they demand for dinner. (RELATED: Abusing Border Patrol Agents: Echoes of Vietnam) Until recently, this wrongheaded approach has been largely low-life theater, with many of the C-list actors being yanked off stage and sent to jail. But this week, the pour-gasoline-on-a-fire performers finally caused a conflagration, and one of their own tragically died as a result. After Nicole Good recklessly tried to use her car to interfere with the lawful activities of ICE agents in Minneapolis, she sought to escape by pointing the car directly at an officer and accelerating. Video shows her tires positioned directly at him as she floored the accelerator, and the shot that the officer was forced to fire in those milliseconds went through her front windshield, killing her. If an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that someone’s actions put the officer or others at risk of death or any serious bodily injury, the law empowers that officer to use deadly force to stop that threat. I’ve worked on dozens of officer-involved shootings, and those of us who do this work know the standard comes straight from the U.S. Supreme Court: if an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that someone’s actions put the officer or others at risk of death or any serious bodily injury, the law empowers that officer to use deadly force to stop that threat. A police officer in Ohio was in a nearly identical situation when an escaping suspect accelerated into the officer, lifting his feet off the ground. He stopped the threat with one shot through the windshield, yet politically motivated prosecutors still charged him with murder. The jury quickly acquitted him. Why? It should be obvious: the law authorizes an officer to use deadly force when a deadly weapon — a 4,000-pound car — is aimed directly at him and moving. Many prominent Democrats immediately made things worse by claiming, despite manifest evidence to the contrary, that the ICE officer committed murder. The president weighed in, as well. Prudent leaders avoid bombast on criminal matters that are a few hours old, but such discretion now seems as antiquated as a daily newspaper on the front porch. As a politically tinged, symbolic stunt, prosecutors in Minneapolis will likely charge the officer in state court. Luckily, such cases can be removed to federal court, where a fairer process exists. Relentless agitation has turned destructive, even lethal, convincing one woman that those enforcing the law are responsible for the law itself. It’s sad and maddening all at once. It’s past time for those who seek change to respect the rule of law (and those who enforce it), express their dissent peacefully, and work through the democratic law-making process. That’s how responsible adults act. Changing a law is intentionally tedious: committees, hearings, and votes. It’s slow, but the deliberative process and consensus-building cement legitimacy. Those opposing a law ought to change it through elections and legislation — not through threats and chaos. Civic dissent should be loud but lawful; anything else is a spark in a dry forest. READ MORE from Mark R. Weaver: Hillary and Obama Out-McCarthied McCarthy Mark R. Weaver is an Ohio prosecutor and a former spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice. X:@MarkRWeaver
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
42 m

Favicon 
spectator.org

Why the Isolationist Wing Is Wrong: Trump’s Maduro Takedown Is Pure America First, Not Nation-Building

President Donald J. Trump’s lightning-fast operation to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro on January 3 has delivered a resounding victory for American interests. With Maduro now in a New York federal prison facing narco-terrorism charges, and U.S. oversight opening the door for American companies to revive Venezuela’s massive 303 billion barrels of proven oil reserves — the world’s largest — the advantages are undeniable: lower energy costs, new jobs, and a decisive setback for China’s influence in our hemisphere. Yet, even as Republicans rally behind the President — with 65 percent approving the operation according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll — some in the GOP’s isolationist faction, echoing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s pointed criticism, are questioning the move. Greene posted on X: “We elected Trump to end nation-building, not start it in our backyard. This smells like another Deep State trap.” Why are voices like Greene, Sen. Rand Paul, and Rep. Thomas Massie pushing back against what is clearly a win-win for America? (RELATED: Yes, Trump’s Action Against Maduro Was Legal) The benefits speak for themselves. Venezuela’s oil production has collapsed under Maduro’s regime to around 900,000-1.1 million barrels per day, down from peaks of over 3 million in the 1990s. Reviving it with American investment from companies like Chevron, ExxonMobil, and ConocoPhillips — whose assets were seized under Chávez — means cheaper heavy crude perfectly suited for U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, potentially dropping pump prices and creating thousands of jobs in red states. (RELATED: You’ve Never Heard of the Citgo Six, and We’re Going to Change That Right Now) Geopolitically, it’s a knockout blow. Maduro’s cartel flooded America with cocaine while China and Russia propped him up with billions in loans. Trump’s action severs that lifeline, curbs migration from Venezuela’s socialist collapse, and reasserts dominance in our backyard. Polls show Trump’s approval rising to 42-43 percent — his highest since the election — with strong GOP backing. Critics like Greene argue this betrays “America First” by risking nation-building. Paul calls it a potential slide into “war” without full congressional approval, and Massie questions the long-term commitment. They fear a “Deep State trap” leading to endless involvement, echoing Iraq or Libya. Oversight is temporary, focused on stabilizing oil flows and securing compensation for expropriated assets — not taxpayer-funded rebuilding. But they’re missing the point: This isn’t nation-building — it’s targeted law enforcement with massive upside. Trump executed a precise raid with no U.S. casualties, framing it as justice against an indicted criminal. Oversight is temporary, focused on stabilizing oil flows and securing compensation for expropriated assets — not taxpayer-funded rebuilding. As Trump emphasized in his Mar-a-Lago remarks, U.S. companies will lead the revival, turning a profit while advancing American interests. (RELATED: The Experts Were Wrong About Pete Hegseth) Venezuela isn’t a distant quagmire — it’s our hemisphere’s problem child, fueling drugs and chaos at our border. Ignoring it isn’t isolationism; it’s negligence. Trump’s first term showed he avoided endless wars while delivering results. This is “peace through strength” in action. Internal dissent risks handing ammunition to globalists and Democrats screaming “imperialism.” But MAGA thrives on unity behind bold wins. Influencers like Steve Bannon praise it as reclaiming America’s edge on his War Room podcast. With Latino voters cheering and Trump’s ratings up, this strengthens the coalition. Skeptics should trust Trump — he’s proven he delivers without the swamp’s traps. This is America First: decisive, profitable, and unapologetic. Let’s rally behind it for a stronger 2026. READ MORE: You’ve Never Heard of the Citgo Six, and We’re Going to Change That Right Now The Toppling of Villains Has Begun in Earnest. It Must Continue. Yes, Trump’s Action Against Maduro Was Legal
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
42 m

Favicon 
www.infowars.com

BREAKING: Border Patrol Shoots Suspected Tren de Aragua Gangbangers Trying to Run Them Over in Portland

Venezuelan husband, wife reportedly attempt to ram federal immigration agents during targeted enforcement operation
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
43 m

Behind the DOJ’s Politicized Indictment of Maduro: A CIA-Created ‘Network’ and Coerced Star Witness
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Behind the DOJ’s Politicized Indictment of Maduro: A CIA-Created ‘Network’ and Coerced Star Witness

by Max Blumenthal, The Unz Review: The January 3 US military raid on Venezuela to kidnap President Nicolas Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores was followed by the Department of Justice’s release of its superseding indictment of the two abductees as well as their son, Nicolasito Maduro, and two close political allies: former Minister of Justice Ramon […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
43 m

Leaked Emails Reveal How Industry Insiders Bent Federal Regulators
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Leaked Emails Reveal How Industry Insiders Bent Federal Regulators

from The National Pulse: For years, the kratom industry in America has presented itself as a loose coalition of small businesses, consumer advocates, and scientists working toward responsible regulation and harm reduction. The plant, chewed or smoked or turned into a tea, is said to have “opioid-like properties” and “stimulant-like effects.” Moreover, it has been used to […]
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 2 out of 105537
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund